The Circadian PER2 Enhancer Nobiletin Reverses the Deleterious Effects of Midazolam in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury

Background: Recently, we identified the circadian rhythm protein Period 2 (PER2) in robust cardioprotection from myocardial ischemia (MI). Based on findings that perioperative MI is the most common major cardiovascular complication and that anesthetics can alter the expression of PER2, we hypothesized that an anesthesia mediated downregulation of PER2 could be detrimental if myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) would occur. Methods: and Results: We exposed mice to pentobarbital, fentanyl, ketamine, propofol, midazolam or isoflurane and determined cardiac Per2 mRNA levels. Unexpectedly, only midazolam treatment resulted in an immediate and significant downregulation of Per2 transcript levels. Subsequent studies in mice pretreated with midazolam using an in-situ mouse model for myocardial (IR)-injury revealed a significant and dramatic increase in infarct sizes or Troponin-I serum levels in the midazolam treated group when compared to controls. Using the recently identified flavonoid, nobiletin, as a PER2 enhancer completely abolished the deleterious effects of midazolam during myocardial IR-injury. Moreover, nobiletin treatment alone significantly reduced infarct sizes or Troponin I levels in wildtype but not in Per2-/- mice. Pharmacological studies on nobiletin like flavonoids revealed that only nobiletin and tangeritin, both found to enhance PER2, were cardioprotective in our murine model for myocardial IR-injury. Conclusion: We identified midazolam mediated downregulation of cardiac PER2 as an underlying mechanism for a deleterious effect of midazolam pretreatment in myocardial IR-injury. These findings highlight PER2 as a cardioprotective mechanism and suggest the PER2 enhancers nobiletin or tangeritin as a preventative therapy for myocardial IR-injury in the perioperative setting where midazolam pretreatment occurs frequently.

Download Full-text

Dose-dependent Effects of Esmolol-epinephrine Combination Therapy in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury

Current Pharmaceutical Design ◽

10.2174/1381612825666190618124829 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 25 (19) ◽

pp. 2199-2206 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yoshimasa Oyama ◽

Justin Blaskowsky ◽

Tobias Eckle

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Ischemia ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Infarct Size ◽

Troponin I ◽

Myocardial Dysfunction ◽

Ischemia And Reperfusion ◽

Ischemia And Reperfusion Injury ◽

Area At Risk ◽

Myocardial Ischemia And Reperfusion ◽

Arterial Blood

Background: Animal studies on cardiac arrest found that a combination of epinephrine with esmolol attenuates post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that esmololepinephrine combination therapy would be superior to a reported cardioprotective esmolol therapy alone in a mouse model of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury. Methods: C57BL/6J mice were subjected to 60 min of myocardial ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Mice received either saline, esmolol (0.4 mg/kg/h), epinephrine (0.05 mg/kg/h), or esmolol combined with epinephrine (esmolol: 0.4 mg/kg/h or 0.8 mg/kg/h and epinephrine: 0.05 mg/kg/h) during reperfusion. After reperfusion, infarct sizes in the area-at-risk and serum cardiac troponin-I levels were determined. Hemodynamic effects of drugs infused were determined by measurements of heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) via a carotid artery catheter. Results: Esmolol during reperfusion resulted in robust cardioprotection (esmolol vs. saline: 24.3±8% vs. 40.6±3% infarct size), which was abolished by epinephrine co-administration (38.1±15% infarct size). Increasing the esmolol dose, however, was able to restore esmolol-cardioprotection in the epinephrine-esmolol (18.6±8% infarct size) co-treatment group with improved hemodynamics compared to the esmolol group (epinephrine-esmolol vs. esmolol: MAP 80 vs. 75 mmHg, HR 452 vs. 402 beats/min). Conclusion: These results confirm earlier studies on esmolol-cardioprotection from myocardial IR-injury and demonstrate that a dose optimized epinephrine-esmolol co-treatment maintains esmolol-cardioprotection with improved hemodynamics compared to esmolol treatment alone. These findings might have implications for current clinical practice in hemodynamically unstable patients suffering from myocardial ischemia.

Download Full-text