scholarly journals Evaluation of a Public Child Eye Health Tertiary Facility for Pediatric Cataract in Southern Nigeria I: Visual Acuity Outcome

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-125
Author(s):  
Roseline E. Duke ◽  
Adedayo Adio ◽  
Sidney K. Oparah ◽  
Friday Odey ◽  
Okon A. Eyo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Pediatric Cataract ◽  
Eye Health ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Southern Nigeria

Purpose: A retrospective study of the outcome of congenital and developmental cataract surgery was conducted in a public child eye health tertiary facility in children <16 years of age in Southern Nigeria, as part of an evaluation. Materials and Method: Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery with or without anterior vitrectomy was performed. The outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) and change (gain) in visual acuity. The age of the child at onset, duration of delay in presentation, ocular co-morbidity, non ocular co-morbidity, gender, and pre operative visual acuity were matched with postoperative visual acuity. A total of 66 children were studied for a period of six weeks following surgery. Results: Forty eight (72.7%) children had bilateral congenital cataracts and 18 (27.3%) children had bilateral developmental cataracts. There were 38(57.6%) males and 28 (42.4%) females in the study. Thirty Five (53%) children had good visual outcome (normal vision range 6/6/ -6/18) post-operatively. The number of children with blindness (vision <3/60) decreased from 61 (92.4%) pre-operatively to 4 (6.1%) post-operatively. Post operative complication occurred in 6.8% of cases six week after surgery. Delayed presentation had an inverse relationship with change (gain) in visual acuity (r = - 0.342; p-value = 0.005). Pre-operative visual acuity had a positive relationship with post operative change (gain) in visual acuity (r = 0.618; p-value = 0.000). Conclusion: Predictors of change in visual acuity in our study were; delayed presentation and pre-operative VA. Cataract surgery in children showed clinical benefit.

scholarly journals A COMPARISION OF POSTERIOR CAPSULAR OPACITY FORMATION UPTO 1 YEAR IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY WITH FOLDABLE INTRAOCULAR LENS AND PHACOEMULSIFICATION WITH THE SAME INTRAOCULAR LENS

2020 ◽  
pp. 173-176
Author(s):  
Kinjal Rathod ◽  
Kinjal Trivedi ◽  
Snehal Nayi ◽  
Somesh Aggarwal
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Nd:Yag Laser ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Posterior Capsular Opacification ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Age Related

Introduction: Cataract is most common cause of curable blindness worldwide and cataract surgery is most common procedure performed in ophthalmology. Posterior capsular opacification (PCO) is most common complication after cataract surgery which is usually treated with Neodymium-doped: Yttrium Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy or occasionally with a surgical capsulotomy. The incidence and severity of PCO correlates to the type of surgical technique, IOL optic edge designs and IOL materials. Material and Methods: 70 eyes of 64 patients operated for age related cataract were studied in this prospective interventional study. Phacoemulsification was done in 35 eyes and SICS in 35 eyes with hydrophobic single piece biconvex foldable intraocular lens. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months for the development of PCO. Clinically significant PCO (loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen’s visual acuity chart) was treated with Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy. Results: The overall incidence of PCO was 22.85%. Amongst the patients who developed PCO, SICS and phacoemulsification was performed in 62.5% and 37.5% patients respectively. Result was statistically significant with p value <0.05 using z test. On first postoperative day, patients operated with phacoemulsification had better visual acuity than SICS. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification can provide early and better visual outcome than SICS and has lower incidence of PCO formation which may be due to difference in irrigation and aspiration and less disruption of blood aqueous barrier than SICS. PCO can be reduced by atraumatic surgery and thorough cortical clean up and capsular polishing.

scholarly journals Hospital-based community cataract surgery: comparison of visual outcomes between conventional extra-capsular cataract extraction and small incision cataract surgery

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Karki ◽  
JK Shrestha ◽  
JB Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Statistical Program

Introduction: The small-incision cataract surgery is gaining popularity among the ophthalmic surgeons. Objective: To compare the visual outcome of conventional extra-capsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) in a hospital based community cataract program. Materials and methods: A prospective interventional study without randomization was carried out including the patients undergoing cataract surgery by either conventional ECCE or manual SICS. They were followed up for 6 weeks postoperatively. The visual outcomes were compared between the two groups. Statistics: The statistical program Epi-Info version 2000 was used to analyze the data. Mean values with standard deviations, 95% CI and p value were calculated. The p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 85 patients, 44 (M: F=10:34) underwent ECCE and 41 (M: F=15:26) SICS (RR= 0.71, 95% CI=0.42-1.2, p value=0.16). Unaided visual acuity on the 1st postoperative day in the ECCE group was e"6/ 18 in 22.7%,<6/18-6/60 in 63.6 %,< 6/60 in 13.7%, whereas in the SICS group, the same was e"6/18 in 70.7%,<6/18-6/60 in 22 %,< 6/60 in 7.3% (95% CI = 0.23 - 0.48, p=0.001). Best corrected visual acuity on the 6th week follow-up in the ECCE group was e"6/18 in 79.5%,<6/18-6/60 in 18.2 %,< 6/60 in 2.3% and in the SICS group the same was 6/18 in 90.5% and <6/18-6/60 in 4.9% (95% CI=0.44 - 0.73; p=0.0012). Conclusion: Both ECCE and SICS are good procedures for hospital based community cataract surgery but within the 6 weeks postoperative period SICS gives better visual outcome. Remarkably higher number of female patients can be provided service in a hospital based community cataract programme as compared to males. Keywords: cataract; small incision; extra-capsular DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3686 Nep J Oph 2009;1(2):118-122

scholarly journals Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery (SICS): which one is a better surgical option for immature cataract in developing countries?

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Singh ◽  
I Winter ◽  
L Surin
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Several studies have shown comparable visual outcomes of SICS and phacoemulsification (Gogate et al 2007, Ruit et al 2007). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of different types of surgical procedures (phacoemulsification versus SICS) for cataract surgery in immature cataract. Material and methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was carried out involving 93 and 89 patients with immature senile cataract selected for phacoemulsification and SICS respectively. Statistics: Mean values with standard deviations were calculated. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of gender, age and pre-operative visual acuity (p = 0.09). In phacoemulsification group (n=93) more than two thirds and in SICS group (n=89) more than three quarters of the patients had good visual outcome (6/6-6/18) on first postoperative day (p=0.065). Poor outcome (<6/60) was recorded in 6% (phacoemulsification group) and 1% (small incision cataract surgery group). Mean visual acuity was 0.43 ± 0.27 in phacoemulsification group and 0.47 ± 0.24 in SICS group. Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in SICS group (p=0.0003). Statistics: Data were computed and analyzed using the SPSS software program vs 10. The p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in visual outcome on first post operative day in between phacoemulsification and SICS technique. However, performing SICS was significantly faster. Small incision cataract surgery with implantation of rigid PMMA lens is a suitable surgical technique to treat immature cataract in developing countries. Keywords: phacoemulsification; small incision cataract surgery (SICS) DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3682 Nep J Oph 2009;1(2):95-100

Pediatric Cataract Surgery: Comparison between Ages at Surgery and Contrast Sensitivity Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Aquirina Caesari Putri ◽  
Rozalina Loebis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Natural World ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pediatric Cataract ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pediatric cataracts are major causes of children’s blindness. Surgery has proven to be beneficial in terms of visual function prognosis. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after surgery is as important as visual acuity considering that natural world consists of various objects in low-to-medium contrasts. The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference of contrast sensitivity outcomes based on ages at surgery. Method: Retrospective data of children with pediatric developmental cataract from July 2013 to November 2015 were collected. All children who underwent cataract surgery at 60-months-old or less were randomized into two groups, ≤24 months and >24-to-60 months. Contrast sensitivity was then examined with preferential-looking method using Hiding Heidi low-contrast test face chart. The main outcome measures were contrast sensitivity of both groups. Age-at-evaluation, cataract onset, duration of follow-up, duration of deprivation and visual acuity were also noted. Result: Of 14 children (23 eyes), 11 eyes (47,8%) were in ≤24 months group, 12eyes (52,2%) were in >24-to-60 months group. All eyes underwent cataract extraction and similar type of intraocular lens implantation. Mean age-at-surgery was 28,2 months±16,8 (SD). Mean contrast sensitivity for each group was 47,50 %±42,29 and 18,33%±27,38, respectively, with p-value 0,031. Further analysis of Spearman’s correlation test demonstrated significant negative correlation (rs = -0,559; p = 0,006) between the two groups. Conclusion: There was statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity between those who underwent surgery at ≤24 months and >24-to-60 months. Children who underwent surgery at older ages tend to have better contrast sensitivity afterwards.

scholarly journals Visual outcome of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation versus manual small-incision cataract surgery

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Gurung ◽  
DB Karki ◽  
S Shrestha ◽  
AP Rijal
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
P Value ◽  
Extracapsular Cataract Extraction ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

Background: An effective method for cataract surgery should be identified to combat cataract blindness. Aim: To study the surgical outcome of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual small-incision cataract surgery. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out including one hundred eyes (88 patients) which were divided into two groups using systematic randomization: groups of conventional extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (ECCE with PCIOL) implantation and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). The postoperative parameters/variables studied were the unaided and best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism. Statistics: Epi info 2000 version statistical software was used for data analysis and calculation of relative risk, 95% CI and p value. The p value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: In the immediate postoperative period, unaided visual acuity of =/> 6/18 was achieved in 24 subjects in MSICS group versus 7 in ECCE with PCIOL group (RR=2.05, 95% CI=1.44 - 2.94, p = 0.0002), whereas the same at 6 - 8 weeks postoperatively was found in 28 and 22 subjects in those groups respectively (RR=1.27, 95% CI=0.86-1.89, p=0.23). The astigmatism of =/> 2 at 6 - 8 weeks was found in 35 and 17 subjects from the conventional and MSICS groups respectively ( R=2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.73, p=0.0002). Conclusion: Both MSICS and conventional ECCE with PCIOL are safe and effective techniques for treatment of cataract patients. A more rapid recovery of good vision can be achieved with MSICS than with conventional ECCE with PCIOL in the immediate postoperative period. Key words: ECCE; MSICS; visual acuity; astigmatism DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i1.3668 Nep J Oph 2009;1(1):13-19

scholarly journals Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) with Clear Corneal Incision and SICS with Scleral Incision – A Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Md Shafiqul Alam ◽  
Khaleda Nazneen Bari
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Corneal Incision ◽  
Clear Corneal Incision ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Postoperative Astigmatism ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Age related cataract is the leading cause of blindness and visual impairment throughout the world. With the advent of microsurgical facilities simple cataract extraction surgery has been replaced by small incision cataract surgery (SICS) with posterior chamber intra ocular lens implant, which can be done either with clear corneal incision or scleral incision. Objective: To compare the post operative visual outcome in these two procedures of cataract surgery. Materials and method: This comparative study was carried out in the department of Ophthalmology, Delta Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period of January 2010 to December 2012. Total 60 subjects indicated for age related cataract surgery irrespective of sex with the age range of 40-80 years with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly and equally distributed in 2 groups; Group A for SICS with clear corneal incision and group B for SICS with scleral incision. Post operative visual out come was evaluated by determining visual acuity and astigmatism in different occasions and was compared between groups. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS for windows version12. Results: The highest age incidence (43.3%) was found between 61 to 70 years of age group. Among study subjects 40 were male and 20 were female. Preoperative visual acuity and astigmatism were evenly distributed between groups. Regarding postoperative unaided visual outcome, 6/12 or better visual acuity was found in 19.98% cases in group A and 39.6% cases in group B at 1st week. At 6th week 6/6 vision was found in 36.3% in Group A and 56.1% in Group B and 46.2% in group A and 66% in group B without and with correction respectively. With refractive correction, 6/6 vision was attained in 60% subjects of group A and 86.67% of group B at 8th week. Post operative visual acuity was statistically significant in all occasions. Postoperative astigmatism of >0.50D was in 82.5% subjects of group A and 52.8% subjects of group B at 1st week. At 6th week postoperative astigmatism of less than 1D was in 79.95% subjects of Group A and 83.34% subjects of Group B. About 20% subjects in Group A and only 3.3% in Group B showed astigmatism of more than 1D and these differences on both the occasions were statistically significant. Conclusion: The post operative visual outcome was better in SICS with scleral incision (group B) than in SICS with clear corneal incision (Group-A). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v2i1.17793 Delta Med Col J. Jan 2014; 2(1): 22-27

scholarly journals Visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract Surgery (MSICS) in a peripheral CMH

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Md Abdullah Al Masum ◽  
Md Kamrul Hasan Khan ◽  
M Anwar Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
World Health ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Cataract Patients

Introduction: Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is a cost-effective alternative to phacoemulsification cataract surgery for developing countries. This prospective study was carried out in Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Chittagong from October 2009 to March 2011 on 75 cataract patients who were operated by MSICS technique. Objectives: Aim of this study was to assess the visual outcome and complications of MSICS in a peripheral CMH. Methods: Seventy five cataract patients were operated by MSICS technique. All surgical procedures were performed by the principal author. Major per-operative and postoperative complications were documented. Visual outcome was assessed by Snellen’s visual acuity test 06 weeks after operation. Results: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/6 – 6/18 in 57 (76.0%) patients, < 6/18 – 6/60 in 15 (20%) and < 6/60 in 03 (4.0%) patients. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6-6/18 in 65 (86.7%) patients, < 6/18-6/60 in 07 (9.3%) and < 6/60 in 03(4.0%) patients. Visual outcome was good in 86.7% of patients according to World Health Orgnization (WHO) criteria and was not far away from the WHO expected outcome. Posterior capsule rupture was the most significant per-operative complication which was found in 7(9.3%) cases and surgically induced astigmatism was main postoperative complication that affected visual outcome. Mean postoperative astigmatism (against-the rule) was - 1.25DC. 14 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 10, No 1 (June) 2014 Conclusion: MSICS is a safe and cost-effective technique of extra-capsular cataract extraction where surgical skill and experience of the surgeon plays a significant role in the result. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v10i1.22895 Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.10(1) 2014

scholarly journals A study to assess the macular thickness and visual outcome before and after cataract surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Salwan ◽  
Shakeen Singh
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Cystoid macular edema (CME) is the formation of fluid-filled cystoid spaces between the outer plexiform and inner nuclear layers of the retina. It may present as a complication of routine cataract surgery including phacoemulsification (PHACO) and small incision cataract surgery (SICS).Methods: An observational study of uncomplicated cataract surgery with assessment by ophthalmoscopy, slit Lamp, Snellen chart and OCT during pre- and post-operative period. 100 patients were selected by inclusion criteria and using convenient sampling technique and were divided into two groups of 50 each in PHACO and SICS groups.Results: During preoperative observation in SICS/group-1, mean value and SD of macular thickness was 223.38±12.61 and in PHACO/group-2 it was 224.14±12.69. Mean value, mean difference and p value of visual acuity in group 1 was 0.258, during 12 weeks 0.788 with mean difference -0.53 and p=0.000 and in group 2 it was 0.269, during 12 weeks 0.844 with mean difference -0.58 and p=0.000. Mean value, SD, mean difference and p value of macular thickness in SICS during 1 week was 238.28±12.29, during 12 weeks 227.04±12.58 with mean difference 11.24000 and p=0.000 and in PHACO mean value, SD, mean difference with p value during 1 week was 231.90±12.42, during 12 weeks was 225.02±11.74 with mean difference 6.88000 and p=0.000.Conclusions: A subclinical increase in post-operative macular thickness was recorded which returned nearly to baseline values during the 12 weeks follow up and did not affect visual outcome.

scholarly journals An experience of management of cluster endophthalmitis in western hilly rural region of Nepal: A descriptive, interventional study

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 10-19
Author(s):  
P Bastola
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
High Volume ◽  
World Health Organisation ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
World Health ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery

Infectious endophthalmitis is among the most serious complications of cataract surgery. Cluster endophthalmitis is defined as five or more cases of endophthalmitis occurring on a particular day in a single operating room in one centre. The study aimed to find out causative organisms, ocular status and visual outcome after an outbreak of cluster endophthalmitis in a high volume cataract surgery in a camp. A descriptive, interventional study was carried out in 18 suspected cases of acute endophthalmitis after manual small incision cataract surgery in a single day. All clinically suspected cases underwent vitreous tap and received intravitreal injections. Vitreous samples were sent for staining and KOH mount, culture, sub-culture and sensitivity test was carried out in all vitreous specimens. Standard treatment protocol was followed. Patients were followed up till six weeks. Of the 89 eyes operated, 18 (20.2%) eyes underwent vitreous tap and intravitreal injections. Mean duration of presentation was 36 hours (24 – 48 hours). Commonest presenting symptom was redness 18 (100%), pain 83.3% (15) followed by decreased vision 77.8% (14). 10 (55.6%) eyes were culture negatives while, 8 (44.4%) were culture positive for pseudomonas aeruginosa. Six (33.3%) eyes needed core vitrectomy and repeat intravitreal injections, whereas 2 (11.1%) eyes needed repeat intravitreal injections only. Eight eyes (44.4%) got a normal visual acuity; two eyes (11.1%) fair and 8 eyes (44.4%) had poor visual acuity according to World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. Four eyes (22.2%) needed evisceration, while three (16.7%) eyes progressed to phthisis bulbi. Acute post operative endophthalmitis is a serious complication following cataract surgery. Prognosis of cluster endophthalmitis with proven culture positivity to pseudomonas infection is poor even with prompt standard management.

scholarly journals OUTCOME OF CATARACT SURGERY IN CHILDREN

1969 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
Haroon Rashid ◽  
Faizur Rahman ◽  
Sayed Ashfaq Ali Shah ◽  
Muhammad Ali Jan
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Extracapsular Cataract Extraction ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Age Range

Objectives: To evaluate the management and visual outcome of cataract surgery in children. Study design: Descriptive. Material and Methods: This study included one hundred pediatric patients having cataracts over a periodof two year, from Is' January 2005 to 31 st December 2006, at the Department of Ophthalmology, SaiduTeaching Hospital, Saidu Sharif, Swat. Results: Age range was fourteen years and below. Sixty five (65%) patients were males and thirty five (35%) females. Sixty three (63%) patients had congenital or developmental cataracts and thirty seven (37%) had traumatic cataracts. Extracapsular cataract extraction (aspiration) was performed on 150 eyes. Postoperative visual acuity was recordable in 112 eyes. Acorrected visual acuity of 6/18 or better was obtained in50 (44.64%) eyes. Forty one (36.6%) eyes obtained visual acuity of 6/24 to 6/60, while in 21 (18.75%) eyesthe visual acuity remained below 6/60. The most common postoperative complication was development ofthick posterior capsule, which occurred in 51 (34%) eyes and vitreous loss in 10 (6.6%) eyes. Pupil blockglaucoma developed in 4 (2.66%) eyes. No case developed endophthalmitis. Posterior chamber IOL wasimplanted in 9 (6%) eyes. Conclusions: Management of cataracts in children is still a problem and delayed presentation leads to poorvisual outcome. The public should be educated to seek early treatment for childhood cataracts. Paramedicsand doctors should be made aware of the problem and its management. Management of unilateral cataractsis still a difficult problem. Therefore search should continue for better surgical approach and better methodsof correction of aphakia so as to achieve better visual outcome. Key words: Childhood Cataracts, Congenital Cataracts and Traumatic Cataracts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document