scholarly journals RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INVESTMENT DECISIONS, ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Musfialdy Musfialdy ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Environmental Concerns ◽  
Corporate Social

scholarly journals The Effect of Environmental Performance, Foreign Ownership and Leverage to Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (Study on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange)

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 08-13
Author(s):  
Musfialdy Musfialdy ◽  
Enni Savitri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Linear Regression Method ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Ownership Type ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Corporate Social

Objective - The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of environmental performance, foreign ownership and leverage to disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Methodology/Technique - CSR of disclosure in this study using performance indicators based GRI (Global Reporting Initiatives). Data collection using purposive sampling method for manufacturing companies in Indonesia stock exchange in 2011 through 2013, there were 85 companies in the sample. Data were analyzed by multiple linear regression method. Findings - The result shows that the environmental performance and leverage effect on disclosure of corporate social responsibility, while foreign ownership doesn't affect on disclosure of corporate social responsibility. Novelty - this study adds to the variable debt and foreign ownership Type of Paper - Empirical Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Performance, Foreign Ownership and leverage

scholarly journals Pengaruh Dimensi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Future Institutional Ownership

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Rizky Eriandani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

<em>Corporate social responsibility practice becomes important subject in company`s activity, because it will affect the company's reputation. Besides, institutional investors likely prefer to invest in companies that have a social responsibility as it is considered to increase the legitimacy and future performance. This study aims to investigate the effect of CSR disclosure on institutional ownership. We use percentages ownership to measure institutional ownership. CSR measurement instrument used in this study adopted a previous research. The instrument comes from research Hackston and Milne, which was adjusted with Bapepam regulation in Indonesia. We also divided CSR disclosures in four sub-dimensions. The samples used in this research were 115 listed agriculture, mining, and manufacturing companies in indonesian Stock Exchange which studied during the years of 2010. Using SPSS 20, The analysis methods of this research used multiple regression analysis. Studies shows that not all dimensions of CSR disclosure effect on institutional ownership. Only product dimensions of CSR disclosures has a significant positive impact on institutional ownership. However, this paper fail to find any significant impact of another CSR dimensions. Thus, our study suggests that the dimensions of the product can affect investment decisions. In contrast, institutional investors have not focused on environment, employee relation, and community activities in investment decisions.</em>

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility, Investment Decisions, and Managerial Ownership on Value of The Company : Evidence from Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 268-285
Author(s):  
Kenny Ardillah ◽  
Thenia Thenia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to prove the influence of corporate social responsibility, investment decisions and managerial ownership on value of the company. Theories used in this research are agency theory and signal theory. This research was done on all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2016-2018. The sampling method used is purposive sampling technique and the data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study show that corporate social responsibility and managerial ownership have no influence on value of the company, while investment decisions have a positive influence on value of the company. Few suggestions for the further research are adjust research periods, use other criteria of sample, use other indicators such as funding decisions, company size, other corporate governance indicators, or use other methods to measure value of the company.

scholarly journals PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL, KEBIJAKAN DIVIDEN DAN INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY SET TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI) TAHUN 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
Ni Nyoman Yuningsih ◽  
Ni Luh Gde Novitasari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social

Financial performance can be used as a benchmark in assessing a company's financial success. Financial performance is a measure that describes the financial condition and ability of companies to make a profit. This study aims to reexamine the effect of environmental performance, corporate social responsibility, and good corporate governance on corporate financial performance. The sample in this study were 55 mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014 - 2018. Determination of the sample using a purposive sampling method. The analytical tool used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that environmental performance had no effect on financial performance and corporate social responsibility had a negative effect on financial performance. However, good corporate governance has a positive effect on financial performance.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH ENVIROMENTAL PERFORMANCE DAN SIZE TERHADAP NET PROFIT MARGIN DENGAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI TAHUN 2013 – 2015

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Trias Madanika Kusumaningrum
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Profit Margin ◽  
Significant Negative Effect ◽  
Net Profit ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aimed to analyze the influence of Environmental Performance, SIZE, and Corporate Social Responsibility to the net profit margin and the difference between the influence of the Environmental Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility SIZE as an intervening variable.The samples were registered manufactories on BEI, with total amount of samples (n) were 93 with pooling data method from 2013 to 2015. Sample was taken using purposive sampling method based on particular criteria which was appropriate with research purposes.The results showed that the Environmental Performance (EP) significant negative effect on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Size significant negative effect on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental Performance (EP) significant positive effect on net profit margin (NPM), Size does not effect on the net profit margin (NPM), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has no effect on net profit margin (NPM), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the first model did not prove to mediate Environmental Performance (EP) to Net Profit Margin (NPM), and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the second model is not proven to mediate Size to Net Profit Margin (NPM).         

Corporate Social Responsibility and Meaningful Work

2019 ◽  
pp. 69-95
Author(s):  
Akwasi Opoku-Dakwa ◽  
Deborah E. Rupp
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Personal Growth ◽  
Meaningful Work ◽  
Environmental Concerns ◽  
Sense Of Control ◽  
Personal Agency ◽  
Growth Opportunities ◽  
Corporate Social

This chapter distinguishes four facets of CSR and explains how they influence employees’ experience of meaningful work. Specifically, it is described how stakeholders’ CSR expectations help employees understand which aspects of their work are of value to others; how CSR assessments provide feedback to employees about whether they are meeting stakeholders’ expectations; how CSR attributions affect employees’ experience of kinship at work; and how organizations’ CSR responses provide opportunities for employees to experience personal agency in addressing socio-environmental concerns. Boundary conditions on these effects are discussed, including (1) employees’ agreement with stakeholder expectations, (2) their sense of control over socio-environmental outcomes; and the degree to which employees (3) identify with groups to which stakeholders attribute social (ir)responsibility and (4) perceive personal growth opportunities through CSR involvement. These insights contribute to understanding CSR as a context that influences employees’ experience of work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document