Influence of Water Hyacinth-Based Organic Manures on Yield and Phytochemical Composition of Cultivated Cassia angustifolia

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1318-1325
Author(s):  
Jignasha Chauhan
2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
S.Suba vasugi ◽  
◽  
K. Rajamani ◽  
K. Sundharaiya ◽  
M. Palanikumar ◽  
...  

1954 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. De ◽  
S. Digar

The investigation shows that when water-logged soils were treated with nitrogenous manures and fertilizers like oil cake, water hyacinth, ammonium sulphate and sodium nitrate, a large volume of nitrogen evolved as gas. This loss began 7–12 days after application of different treatments and was quicker from inorganic fertilizers than from organic manures. Besides loss as gas, a large amount of nitrogen was also lost in the drainage. The results suggest that if fertilizers like ammonium sulphate and sodium nitrate are applied to rice-fields by top dressing during the active vegetative growth of the crop, the loss nitrogen as gas will probably be greatly minimized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1993-1997
Author(s):  
D Mastan Vali ◽  
KM Yuvaraj ◽  
V Vijaya Bhaskar ◽  
Lalitha K ◽  
VV Padmaja

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M. Villamagna ◽  
Brian R. Murphy ◽  
Sarah M. Karpanty

Water hyacinth is among the most widespread invasive plants worldwide; however, its effects on waterbirds are largely undocumented. We monitored site use by waterbirds at Lake Chapala, the largest lake in Mexico and recently designated Ramsar site, to evaluate the potential influence of water hyacinth cover on species composition and aggregate measures of the waterbird community, including waterbird density, species richness, and Simpson's index of diversity. We examined the response of waterbirds to changes in percent water hyacinth cover at 22 independent sites around the lake during six study seasons from May 2006 to February 2008. We found little evidence to suggest that percent water hyacinth cover affected aggregate community measures; however, multivariate analysis of relative species composition suggested that water hyacinth cover corresponded with seasonal species composition (Canonical Correspondence r = 0.66, P = 0.007) when seasonal site cover averaged 17.7 ± 4.67% (winter 2007). Several migratory species were not observed during this season, which could suggest that some small-bodied migratory species avoided Lake Chapala during the winter of high water hyacinth cover. We suspect that observed changes in the waterbird community are in response to species-specific tolerances for water hyacinth and indirect abiotic and biotic effects of its presence (e.g., invertebrate and fish composition).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document