scholarly journals Assessment of Relationship Between Nutritional Status and Handgrip Strength in Hemodialysis Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. E202034
Author(s):  
Sevil Karahan Yılmaz ◽  
Neslişah Rakıcıoğlu
Keyword(s):  
Body Composition ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Moderate Positive Correlation

In hemodialysis patients, the prevalence of malnutrition is high; a decrease in muscle strength is observed.  The objective of the research was to evaluate the nutritional status of hemodialysis patients and the relationship between the nutritional status and muscle strength. Materials and Methods. Sixty hemodialysis patients (38 males, 22 females) were chosen from among volunteers. Food consumption, biochemical values, anthropometric measurements, body composition, physical activity status, subjective global assessment, and handgrip strength in individuals were examined. Results. According to subjective global assessment, 73.3% of patients were well-nourished, 26.7% of patients were moderately malnourished. In male patients, a moderate positive correlation was determined between handgrip strength and lean body mass (r=0.359, p<0.05), albumin level (r=0.408, p<0.05), energy intake (r=0.437, p<0.05), protein intake (r=0.345, p<0.05). In female patients, a moderate positive correlation was determined between handgrip strength and body weight (r=0.470, p<0.05), body mass index (r=0.472, p<0.05), triceps skinfold thickness (r=0.530, p<0.05), mid-upper arm circumference (r=0.515, p<0.05), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (r=0.557, p<0.05), lean body mass (r=0.470, p<0.05), body fat content (%) (r=0.588, p<0.05), albumin level (r=0.565, p<0.05). Conclusions. Handgrip strength alongside with more than one method of food consumption, biochemical parameters, subjective global assessment, anthropometric measurements, and body composition should be used for assessing the nutritional status in hemodialysis patients.

Is Subjective Global Assessment a Good Index of Nutrition in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms?

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjun Li ◽  
Jie Dong ◽  
Li Zuo
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Lean Body Mass ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective We investigated whether patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were prone to be diagnosed as malnourished by subjective global assessment (SGA) by simultaneously evaluating SGA and other indices of nutrition in a cross-sectional survey of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Patients and Method From June 2006 to June 2007, 214 PD patients were involved in the study. We recorded results of a GI symptoms questionnaire (GSQ) and SGA. Other indices of nutrition included dietary intake, chemistry examination, anthropometry, handgrip strength, and lean body mass measured by creatinine kinetics. Results Mean age of the 214 PD patients enrolled in the study was 60.22 ± 14.02 years, and mean dialysis duration was 60.22 ± 14.02 months. Of the 214 patients, 56 (27.16%) were diagnosed as malnourished by SGA. The mean GSQ scores were 9.37 ± 1.71 (range: 8 – 17). There were 90 patients with GSQ scores of 8 (group 1), 80 patients with scores of 9 or 10 (group 2), 44 patients with scores of 11 or more (group 3). The prevalence of malnutrition diagnosed by SGA was significantly different in the three groups: 15.56% in group 1, 27.5% in group 2, and 45.45% in group 3 ( p = 0.02). However, we observed no difference between the three groups in mid-arm circumference, skinfold thickness (biceps, triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac), daily protein and energy intake, handgrip strength, lean body mass, and serum albumin and prealbumin levels ( p > 0.05). Conclusions Our results showed that the reliability of SGA in PD patients with GI symptoms remains worth exploring. These patients are possibly diagnosed as malnourished by SGA, although many other indices of nutrition are not necessarily bad.

Assessment of nutritional status of hemodialysis patients by subjective global assessment score: a single centre study from Karachi, Pakistan

2022 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2761-2765
Author(s):  
Lubna Ghazi ◽  
Murtaza Dhrolia ◽  
Aamna Hamid ◽  
Ruqaya Qureshi ◽  
Kiran Nasir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Practical Method ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional

Objective: Despite being an important predictor of morbidity and mortality, routine screening for malnutrition in dialysis patients is not a common practice in Pakistan. Modified Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a convenient, inexpensive and practical method to assess nutritional status particularly in resource limited setup. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in The Kidney Center Post Graduate Training institute (TKC-PGTI). Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) were included through non-probability consecutive sampling. A one-time SGA score was calculated based on the history and physical examinations using modified SGA or Dialysis Malnutrition Score (DMS). Chi square test was applied to find association between variables, while to observe the amount of effect of factors on SGA score; binary logistic regression analysis was run. P value of ? 0.05 considered significant. Results: Mild-Moderately malnourished patients were the most frequent in our study 96(64%).None of patient had severe malnourishment. Females were 2.6 times more prone for malnourishment (p value=0.009). More than 5- years on hemodialysis also increased the risk of malnourishment by 12.5 times (p value <0.001). Overweight patients had 85 % less chance of being malnourished as compare to patients with normal weight (p value=0.004). Conclusion: Malnutrition is quite common in hemodialysis patients, which necessitates its regular assessment and monitoring. There is a need to assess the reasons of more malnourishment in female as compared to male. Similarly, the longer duration (> 5 years) on hemodialysis also need attention for prevention and cure of malnourishment.  Continuous...

Association of subjective global assessment of nutritional status with gut microbiota in hemodialysis patients: a case–control study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-Yun Lin ◽  
Szu-Chun Hung
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Protein Energy Wasting ◽  
Β Diversity ◽  
Protein Energy ◽  
Α Diversity

Abstract Background Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the pathogenesis of PEW in CKD patients has not been fully identified. The gut microbiota has been implicated in the regulation of host metabolism and energy balance. Therefore, we aimed to explore the association between nutritional status and the composition of the gut microbiota in hemodialysis patients. Methods Gut microbial diversity and taxonomy were examined in 88 hemodialysis patients with PEW (n = 22) and normal nutritional status (n = 66) who were matched 1:3 for age and sex. Nutritional status was assessed by using the 7-point subjective global assessment (SGA) score (1–3 = severe PEW; 4–5 = moderate PEW and 6–7 = normal nutrition). The gut microbiota was assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Results Patients with normal nutritional status had a significantly higher body mass index and physical activity and serum albumin levels, but significantly lower levels of inflammatory cytokines than patients with PEW. The most striking finding was that the α-diversity of the gut microbiota was significantly lower in patients with PEW. In a multivariate analysis, the SGA score was independently and positively associated with α-diversity (P = 0.049). Patients with or without PEW were different with respect to the principal coordinate analysis of β-diversity. Notably, the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a butyrate-producing bacteria, was markedly reduced in patients with PEW. Conclusion In hemodialysis patients, PEW assessed with the SGA was associated with gut dysbiosis.

Assessment of nutritional status in hemodialysis patients using patient-generated subjective global assessment

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Desbrow ◽  
Judith Bauer ◽  
Claudia Blum ◽  
Amutha Kandasamy ◽  
Alison McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment

scholarly journals The Nutritional Status Sensitivity of the Assessment of Nutritional Status Based on Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) Was Compared with Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy in RSUP Dr Wahidin Sudirohusoda Makassar

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Khoirul Anam ◽  
Takdir Tahir ◽  
Ilkafah Ilkafah
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background: Chemotherapy is highly recommended for cancer treatment, however can cause some side effects such as nausea and vomiting. This will affect food intake and nutritional status in cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy. Aim: To describe nutritional status based on anthropometry Body Mass Index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in RSUP. Dr. Wahidin sudirohusodo Makassar. Methode: This experiment uses a quantitative non-experimental research method with cross sectional approach on 1010 patients, nonprobability sampling with purposive sampling technique on 70 respondents, data collection with interview and observation techniques. Results: Nutritional status based on Body Mass Index (BMI) shows that 39 people (55.7%) had normal BMI values. About 37 people (52.9%) had good / normal nutritional status based on Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA)  while Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) reveals 100% of respondents experienced nutritional status problems. Conclusion: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is the best tool to identify nutritional status of cancer patients that undergo chemotherapy since this instrument is very sensitive and practical. Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is good to assess nutritional status in subject who have lost weight drastically and shows signs of subcutaneous fat loss and muscle mass loss. Keyword: Cancer, chemotherapy, body mass index (BMI), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).

Selection of an Acceptable Method of Evaluating Nutritional Status in Hemodialysis Patients Compared to Subjective Global Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atefe Kohansal ◽  
Zahra Sohrabi ◽  
Hanieh Mirzahosseini ◽  
Moein Naghibi ◽  
Morteza Zare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
International Society ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Subjective Global Assessment ◽  
Protein Energy Wasting ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Abstract Background: Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is prevalent among hemodialysis (HD) patients and is associated with poor outcomes. There are various methods for evaluating nutritional status in HD patients that each has its own advantages and disadvantages. We aimed at comparing the methods of normalized protein catabolic ratio (nPCR) and malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) with subjective global assessment (SGA) in HD patients. Method: We examined 88 HD patients using SGA and MUST questionnaires, and also nPCR were calculated using predialysis and post-dialysis BUN, and Kt/v. Also, patients were assessed for PEW based on the Criteria of the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism. Methods’ specificity, sensitivity, and precision rates were assessed. Correlations between methods were analyzed using Pearson-correlation. Results: Based on the SGA, MUST, and nPCR methods, almost 41, 30, and 60 percent of patients had malnutrition, respectively. According to the criteria by International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism, more than 90 percent of patients had PEW. SGA was positively and significantly associated with MUST (P≤0.001). Sensitivity for SGA, MUST, and nPCR methods were 100,100, 1.8 %, and their specificity were 98, 98, and 4 %, respectively and their precision rates were 99.7, 98.7, and 3%, respectively. Conclusion: From various methods of nutritional assessment (SGA, MUST, and nPCR), compared to SGA as the common method of nutrition assessment in hemodialysis patients, MUST had the nearest specificity, sensitivity, and precision rate compared to SGA and nPCR method had the lowest ones. nPCR seems to be a flawed marker of malnutrition and it should be more investigated whether MUST can be used instead of SGA or not.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document