scholarly journals STUDI KASUS PENYUSUTAN ARSIP DI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94
Author(s):  
Ahmad Saeroji ◽  
Agung Kuswantoro ◽  
Ratu Bunga Maremitha Ungu ◽  
Ade Rustiana
Keyword(s):  
American Psychological Association ◽  
Processing Unit ◽  
Use Value ◽  
American Psychological ◽  
A Value ◽  
Archival Institution ◽  
Work Units ◽  
Abstract Case

Abstrak: Studi Kasus Penyusutan Arsip di Universitas Negeri Semarang. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (1) Untuk mengetahui penyusutan arsip secara peraturan perundang-undangan, (2) Untuk mengetahui cara penyusutan arsip di Universitas Negeri Semarang, (3) Untuk mengetahui prosedur penyusutan arsip di Universitas Negeri Semarang. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kasus, dimana peneliti menyelidiki secara cermat suatu program, peristiwa, aktivitas, proses atau sekelompok individu. Penyusutan arsip di lingkungan Universitas Negeri Semarang menggunakan prosedur penyusutan arsip menurut UU No. 43 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kearsipan,  diantaranya (a) Pemindahan Arsip Inaktif dari unit pengolah ke unit kearsipan. (b) Pemusnahan arsip yang telah habis masa retensinya dan tidak memiliki nilai guna dilaksanakan sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. (c) Penyerahan arsip statis oleh pencipta arsip kepada lembaga kearsipan. Cara penyerahan arsip dari unit kerja ke lembaga kearsipan Universitas Negeri Semarang meliputi (a) Melalukan pemeriksaan dan penilaian arsip yang akan diserahkan, (b) Pembuatan Daftar Arsip yang akan diserahkan ke UPT Kearsipan, (c) Pembuatan berita acara serah terima arsip, (d) Pelaksanaan penyerahan arsip. Prosedur penyusutan arsip di Universitas Negeri Semarang adalah Pembuatan Daftar Pertelaan Arsip, Pemindahan Arsip, Pemusnahan Arsip yang sudah tidak bernilai guna, dan Penyerahan arsip ke UPT Kearsipan yang bernilai guna permanen/ sejarah. Abstract: Case Study of Archive Depreciation at Universitas Negeri Semarang. The purpose of this study is (1) To find out the depreciation of the archive by statutory regulations, (2) To find out how to shrink the archive at Universitas Negeri Semarang, (3) To find out the procedure of shrinkage of records at Universitas Negeri Semarang. The method used in this research is a case study, where researchers investigate carefully a program, event, activity, process or group of individuals. Depreciation of records in the Universitas Negeri Semarang environment uses the procedure of depreciation of records according to Law No. 43 of 2009 concerning Archives, including (a) Transfer of Inactive Records from the processing unit to the filing unit. (b) Destruction of archives that have retired and which do not have a value for use are carried out in accordance with statutory provisions. (c) Submission of a static archive by the creator of the archive to the archival institution. How to submit archives from work units to the archives institute of Universitas Negeri Semarang include (a) Conducting examination and evaluation of archives to be submitted, (b) Making Archive List to be submitted to the UPT Kearsipan, (c) Preparation of minutes of archive handover, (d) ) Implementation of submission of archives. The procedure of depreciation of records at Universitas Negeri Semarang is the Making of Archive Information Archives list, Transfer of Archives, Destruction of Archives that have no use value, and Submission of archives to UPT Kearsipan that are of permanent / historical value. Jika Anda menyusun daftar pustaka menggunakan standar American Psychological Association (APA), Anda bisa copy paste teks dibawah ini untuk Anda masukkan pada bagian daftar pustaka Anda!Saeroji, A., Kuswantoro, A., Ungu, R. B. M., & Rustiana, A. (2020). Studi Kasus Penyusutan Arsip di Universitas Negeri Semarang. Efisiensi-Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 17(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v17i1.30442

scholarly journals Intellectual Corruption in Modern Science: A Case Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-07
Author(s):  
James F. Welles
Keyword(s):  
American Association ◽  
American Psychological Association ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
American Psychological ◽  
Intellectual Community ◽  
The University ◽  
University Of Connecticut ◽  
Cover Up ◽  
Do So

A reviewer of a book I wrote claimed an idea presented therein could be found elsewhere. Nine years later, no one could say where, but no one would correct the erroneous claim, so what be-gan as an effort to obtain a redress of a legitimate grievance slowly degenerated into a tour d’farce of a surreal ethics warp in our intellectual community. The citations submitted to docu-ment the claim failed to do so, and the file on the dispute maintained by the American Psychological Association (APA) really is not about my case at all. The University of Connecticut (UConn) and the American Association for the Advancement of Sci-ence (AAAS) failed to hold anyone accountable. There was a basic conflict between the conduct of officials of all these organiza-tions and their ethical codes. In a culture of intellectual cor-ruption, behavior consisted of a pervasive and extended cover-up characterized by sophistry, secrecy, fantasy, irrelevance, ra-tionalization, misattribution, misrepresentation, fabrication, falsification, failure to communicate and an adamant refusal to deal logically and fairly with the facts of the case. This demon-strated a complete lack of cognitive integrity and constituted a total betrayal of the academic/scientific commitment to truth.

Fool’s Gold: Psychologists Using Disingenuous Reasoning to Mislead Legislatures into Granting Psychologists Prescriptive Authority

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-524
Author(s):  
Brent Pollitt
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
American Psychological Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Psychotropic Medications ◽  
American Psychological ◽  
Training Requirements ◽  
Prescriptive Authority

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document