Successful Response to Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Therapy in a Hemodialysis Patient With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background/Aim: There are few reports about the administration of nivolumab plus ipilimumab to hemodialysis patients and their efficacy and safety have not been established yet. Case Report: A 74-year-old male, who was receiving hemodialysis, was presented with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Two years later, more metastases were found, hence, immunotherapy involving nivolumab plus ipilimumab was initiated. After two doses of immunotherapy, interstitial pneumonia was observed. Thus, steroid pulse therapy was administered immediately. Subsequently, computed tomography (CT) findings and symptoms improved markedly. One month later, a CT scan showed a nodular shadow and an air cavity. A fungal infection was strongly suspected, so an antifungal drug was administered. Conclusion: Combination immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was demonstrated to be effective in a hemodialysis patient with mRCC.

Download Full-text

A Fatal Case of Life-Threatening Interstitial Pneumonitis Induced by Everolimus for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comment about the Increased Risk of Interstitial Lung Disease in Japanese

Case Reports in Urology ◽

10.1155/2019/2703871 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-4 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yasukiyo Murakami ◽

Tetsuo Fujita ◽

Yoji Wakatabe ◽

Masatsugu Iwamura

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Interstitial Pneumonitis ◽

Fatal Case ◽

Pulse Therapy ◽

Steroid Pulse ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Life Threatening

We describe an 81-year-old woman with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who did not recover from life-threatening interstitial pneumonitis induced by everolimus therapy. She received everolimus due to disease progression after sunitinib, but 2 months after starting everolimus treatment, she visited the emergency department after developing a sudden fever and dyspnea. Chest CT revealed diffuse ground-glass opacities, thickening of the interlobular septa, and consolidation throughout both lung fields. The diagnosis was surmised to be everolimus-induced interstitial pneumonitis. Everolimus administration was stopped and 3 courses of steroid pulse therapy were administered, along with intensive care, but the patient died due to rapid respiratory failure.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Current Oncology ◽

10.3390/curroncol28020133 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (2) ◽

pp. 1402-1411

Author(s):

Koji Iinuma ◽

Koji Kameyama ◽

Kei Kawada ◽

Shota Fujimoto ◽

Kimiaki Takagi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Objective Response ◽

Predictive Biomarkers ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Predictive Marker ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Lymphocyte Ratio

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) in 35 patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, we focused on patients who received NIVO+IPI and were stratified into intermediate- or poor-risk disease according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model at five institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, we evaluated the role of inflammatory cell ratios, namely neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as predictive biomarkers in patients with mRCC. The median follow-up period was 1 year, and the 1-year OS rate was 95.8%. The ORR and DCR were 34.3% and 80.0%, respectively. According to BOR, four patients (11.4%) achieved complete response. According to NLR stratification, the 1-year PFS rates were 82.6% and 23.7% when the NLR was ≤4.6 and >4.6, respectively (p = 0.04). Based on PLR stratification, the 1-year PFS rates were 81.7% and 34.3% when the PLR was ≤188.1 and >188.1, respectively (p = 0.033). Although 71.4% of the patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with NIVO+IPI, only four patients discontinued NIVO+IPI due to grade 3/4 TRAEs. Patients treated with NIVO+IPI as a first-line therapy for advanced or mRCC achieved relatively better oncological outcomes. Therefore, NIVO+IPI may have potential advantages and may lead to a treatment effect compared to those receiving targeted therapies. In addition, PLR >188.1 may be a useful predictive marker for mRCC patients who received NIVO+IPI.

Download Full-text