scholarly journals Interaction Rating Scale (IRS) as an Evidence-Based Practical Index of Children's Social Skills and Parenting

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (Supplement_II) ◽  
pp. S419-S426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tokie Anme ◽  
Ryoji Shinohara ◽  
Yuka Sugisawa ◽  
Lian Tong ◽  
Emiko Tanaka ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Anme ◽  
T. Watanabe ◽  
K. Tokutake ◽  
E. Tomisaki ◽  
Y. Mochizuki ◽  
...  

Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the validity of the Interaction Rating Scale Advanced (IRSA) as an evidence-based practical index of social skills. Methods. The participants in our study were 17 high school students. The participants completed the five-minute interaction session and were observed using the IRSA. Their teacher evaluated their social competence based on regular observation in school. Results. The results indicated the high correlation between IRSA scores and teacher's practical evaluation. IRSA can measure social competence with high validity. Conclusion. The IRSA provides further evidence of the fact that in order to study social competence development, it is important to evaluate various features of the interaction like IRSA subscales.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Anme ◽  
R. Shinohara ◽  
Y. Sugisawa ◽  
L. Tong ◽  
E. Tanaka ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Saykaly ◽  
Victoria Talwar ◽  
Shobhita Soor

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-210
Author(s):  
Ae Hwa Kim ◽  
◽  
Ui Jung Kim ◽  
Hyun Skil Yoo ◽  
Eun Young Kang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 019874292110123
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Lambert ◽  
Douglas Cullinan ◽  
Michael H. Epstein ◽  
Jodie Martin

This study examined the internal structure of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance-3 Rating Scale (RS), a teacher-completed RS developed to measure emotional disturbance (ED). As defined in U.S. law and regulations, ED involves five characteristics or patterns of behavioral and emotional maladaptation. RS data obtained on a sample of students with ED were used to examine validity evidence based on the internal structure of the assessment. Of particular interest was the extent to which multivariate factors derived from the RS data conform to the five characteristics of ED stated in the definition. Results indicate that the RS data fit a 5-factor model reasonably well. A subsequent bifactor analysis identified a considerable proportion of common variance across factors, suggesting the presence of a strong general ED factor, two distinct group factors (Inability to Learn and Inappropriate Behavior), and three weak group factors. The findings provided evidence of the validity of the SAED-3 RS based on internal structure and pointed to support for use of the RS in contributing to the process of determining whether a student qualifies for the ED education disability. Implications for improved research on the nature of ED and how students with ED can be better served are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document