HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD S. RUBIN
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
The Public

The funding status of retiree health plans in the public sector

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT L. CLARK ◽  
MELINDA SANDLER MORRILL
Keyword(s):  
Labor Market ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Health Plans ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Accounting ◽  
Retirement Benefit ◽  
Unfunded Liabilities

AbstractWhile no longer common in the private sector, most public sector employers offer retiree health insurance (RHI) as a retirement benefit to their employees. While these plans are thought to be an important tool for employers to attract, retain, motivate, and ultimately retire workers, they represent a large and growing cost. This paper reviews what is currently known about RHI in the public sector, while highlighting many important unanswered questions. The analysis is informed by data produced in accordance with the 2004 Government Accounting Standards Board Rule 45 (GASB 45). We consider the extent of the unfunded liabilities states face and explore what factors may explain the variation in liabilities across states. The importance and sustainability of RHI plans in the public sector ultimately depend on how workers view and value this post-retirement benefit, yet little is known about how RHI directly impacts the public sector labor market. We conclude with a discussion of the future of RHI plans in the public sector.

scholarly journals Has the increase in private health insurance uptake affected the Victorian public hospital surgical waiting list?

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Hanning
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Uptake Rate ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting List ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
The Public

It was anticipated that increased uptake of Private Health Insurance (PHI) would reduce demand on public sector surgical waiting lists. The best measure of changed demand is the comparison of the actual cases added to that projected given previous trends in PHI uptake. Detailed Victorian data is available up to 2000-1.The total waiting list has varied little, reflecting significant decreases in both in patients added to and removed. There was a marked increase in private sector elective surgery cases coinciding with the fall in additions to the public sector waiting list and in public sector elective surgical cases. The June 2001 Victorian surgical waiting list would have been 69,599 not 41,838 if the PHI uptake rate had continued to fall in line with pre-1999 trends, and that of June 2002 about 100,000 compared to 40,458 in March 2002.Limited data from other states suggests the Victorian trends are representative of all Australia.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICES: VARIABILITY OF THE METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-48
Author(s):  
Oksana Yurievna Dyagel
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
The Public ◽  
Medical Institutions ◽  
Compulsory Health Insurance ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Analytical Tools

The purpose of the article was to reveal the analytical tools for evaluating the effectiveness of the allocated financing funds for the provision of the services provided in the public sector of the economy, the application of which does not have a uniform methodology today. The possibility to solve this issue is shown with regard to the compulsory health insurance system. To achieve the goal, the study reveals the definition of such categories as “effect” and “efficiency” of the medical institutions activities, “efficiency of spending” of the Territorial Fund for Compulsory Health Insurance. There is revealed the analytical significance of the existing methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of health care costs; their comparative analysis is carried out. Based on the results, the alternative is proposed, based on the system of the cost-effectiveness indices to achieve the health, social and economic effects of medical institutions; the analytical advantages of the alternative proposed are justified.

scholarly journals Psychiatry in Australia: economic and service delivery aspects

1991 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 446-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Public Practice ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purse ◽  
Simple Basis ◽  
The Cost

In 1987 there were 1,428 psychiatrists in Australia, 8.8 per 100,000 population (Burvill, 1988), 55% identified as in private practice and 45% in public sector practice. Let us be clear about terms. Public sector practice means that each week you receive a salary from the public purse whether you have seen one or a hundred patients. Private practice means that you are paid on a piece-work basis, also largely from the public purse (national health insurance or Medicare), but the income (at about $100 per hour) depends exactly on the number of hours spent with patients. On average, private psychiatrists in Australia gross about $150,000 per year, out of which they must pay practice expenses. The pay for public sector psychiatrists probably averages $70,000 to which, for the purposes of our calculation, we will add the cost of rooms, telephone and secretary provided by the hospital which at $30,000 brings the cost of a public sector psychiatrist to about $100,000 per year. If 45% of psychiatrists are in public practice then the averaged cost of a psychiatrist in Australia can be calculated as $127,500 per annum, and as there are 8.8 psychiatrists per 100,000 the cost, calculated on this simple basis, is $1.12 million per 100,000 population (Andrews, 1989).

scholarly journals Availability, prices, and affordability of selected essential cancer medicines in a middle-income country – the case of Mexico

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Moye-Holz ◽  
Margaret Ewen ◽  
Anahi Dreser ◽  
Sergio Bautista-Arredondo ◽  
Rene Soria-Saucedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
World Health ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
The Public ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Public And Private Sector

Abstract Background: More alternatives have become available for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer in low- and middle-income countries. Because of increasing demands, governments are now facing a problem of limited affordability and availability of essential cancer medicines. Yet, precise information about the access to these medicines is limited, and the methodology is not very well developed. Objective: To assess the availability and affordability of essential cancer medicines in Mexico, and compare their prices against those in other countries of the region. Methods: We surveyed 21 public hospitals and 19 private pharmacies in 8 states of Mexico. Data were collected on the availability and prices of 49 essential cancer medicines. Prices were compared against those in Chile, Peru, Brazil, Colombia and PAHO’s Strategic Fund. Results: Of the various medicines, mean availability in public and private sector outlets was 61.2% and 67.5%, respectively. In the public sector, medicines covered by the public health insurance “People’s Health Insurance” were more available. Only seven (public sector) and five (private sector) out of the 49 medicines were considered affordable. Public sector procurement prices were 41% lower than in other countries of the region. Conclusions: The availability of essential cancer medicines, in the public and private sector, falls below World Health Organization’s 80% target. The affordability remains suboptimal as well. A national health insurance scheme could serve as a mechanism to improve access to cancer medicines in the public sector. Comprehensive pricing policies are warranted to improve the affordability of cancer medicines in the private sector.

scholarly journals Impact on public hospitals if private health insurance rates in Victoria declined

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian W T Hanning
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Operating Cost ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Income Loss ◽  
The Public ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Recurrent Cost ◽  
Insurance Rates

The additional cost of treating acute care type Victorian private patients as public patients in Victorian public hospitals based on the current public sector payment model and rates was calculated, as was the loss of health fund income to public hospitals. If all private cases became public the net recurrent cost would be $1.05 billion assuming all patients were still treated. If private health insurance (PHI) uptake had declined to 23.3% as was projected without Lifetime Health Cover and the 30% rebate, the additional operating cost and income loss would be $385 million. This compares to the Victorian cost of the 30% rebate for acute hospital cases of $383 million. This takes no account of capital costs and possible public sector access problems. The analysis suggests that 31 extra operating theatres would be needed in the public sector (had the transfer of surgical patients from the public sector to the private sector not occurred). This analysis suggests that without the PHI rebate the current stresses on Victorian public hospitals would be increased, not decreased.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document