scholarly journals Real-World Integration of a Sepsis Deep Learning Technology Into Routine Clinical Care: Implementation Study

10.2196/15182 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e15182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P Sendak ◽  
William Ratliff ◽  
Dina Sarro ◽  
Elizabeth Alderton ◽  
Joseph Futoma ◽  
...  

Background Successful integrations of machine learning into routine clinical care are exceedingly rare, and barriers to its adoption are poorly characterized in the literature. Objective This study aims to report a quality improvement effort to integrate a deep learning sepsis detection and management platform, Sepsis Watch, into routine clinical care. Methods In 2016, a multidisciplinary team consisting of statisticians, data scientists, data engineers, and clinicians was assembled by the leadership of an academic health system to radically improve the detection and treatment of sepsis. This report of the quality improvement effort follows the learning health system framework to describe the problem assessment, design, development, implementation, and evaluation plan of Sepsis Watch. Results Sepsis Watch was successfully integrated into routine clinical care and reshaped how local machine learning projects are executed. Frontline clinical staff were highly engaged in the design and development of the workflow, machine learning model, and application. Novel machine learning methods were developed to detect sepsis early, and implementation of the model required robust infrastructure. Significant investment was required to align stakeholders, develop trusting relationships, define roles and responsibilities, and to train frontline staff, leading to the establishment of 3 partnerships with internal and external research groups to evaluate Sepsis Watch. Conclusions Machine learning models are commonly developed to enhance clinical decision making, but successful integrations of machine learning into routine clinical care are rare. Although there is no playbook for integrating deep learning into clinical care, learnings from the Sepsis Watch integration can inform efforts to develop machine learning technologies at other health care delivery systems.

Author(s):  
Mark P Sendak ◽  
William Ratliff ◽  
Dina Sarro ◽  
Elizabeth Alderton ◽  
Joseph Futoma ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Successful integrations of machine learning into routine clinical care are exceedingly rare, and barriers to its adoption are poorly characterized in the literature. OBJECTIVE This study aims to report a quality improvement effort to integrate a deep learning sepsis detection and management platform, Sepsis Watch, into routine clinical care. METHODS In 2016, a multidisciplinary team consisting of statisticians, data scientists, data engineers, and clinicians was assembled by the leadership of an academic health system to radically improve the detection and treatment of sepsis. This report of the quality improvement effort follows the learning health system framework to describe the problem assessment, design, development, implementation, and evaluation plan of Sepsis Watch. RESULTS Sepsis Watch was successfully integrated into routine clinical care and reshaped how local machine learning projects are executed. Frontline clinical staff were highly engaged in the design and development of the workflow, machine learning model, and application. Novel machine learning methods were developed to detect sepsis early, and implementation of the model required robust infrastructure. Significant investment was required to align stakeholders, develop trusting relationships, define roles and responsibilities, and to train frontline staff, leading to the establishment of 3 partnerships with internal and external research groups to evaluate Sepsis Watch. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning models are commonly developed to enhance clinical decision making, but successful integrations of machine learning into routine clinical care are rare. Although there is no playbook for integrating deep learning into clinical care, learnings from the Sepsis Watch integration can inform efforts to develop machine learning technologies at other health care delivery systems.


1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Kamell ◽  
Suzanna S. Hoyler ◽  
Jennifer E. Seiffert ◽  
John L. Young ◽  
Donald E. Henson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Saem Choi ◽  
Soon Min Lee ◽  
Hoseon Eun ◽  
Minsoo Park ◽  
Kook-In Park ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 656-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret B. Hargreaves ◽  
Cara Orfield ◽  
Todd Honeycutt ◽  
Michaela Vine ◽  
Charlotte Cabili ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arni S.R. Srinivasa Rao ◽  
Michael P. Diamond

AbstractIn this technical article, we are proposing ideas those we have been developing of how machine learning and deep learning techniques can potentially assist obstetricians / gynecologists in better clinical decision making using infertile women in their treatment options in combination with mathematical modeling in pregnant women as examples.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Hespe ◽  
Edwina Brown ◽  
Lucie Rychetnik

Abstract BackgroundQuality-improvement collaborative (QIC) initiatives aim to reduce gaps in clinical care provided in the healthcare system. This study provides a qualitative evaluation of a QIC project (QPulse) in Australian general practice focused on improving cardiovascular disease (CVD) assessment and management. MethodsThis qualitative-methods study explored implementing a QIC project by a Primary Health Network (PHN) in 34 general practices. Qualitative analyses examined in-depth interviews with participants and stakeholders focusing on barriers and enablers to implementation in our health system. They were analysed thematically using the Complex Systems Improvement framework (CSI), focusing on strategy, culture, structure, workforce, and technology.ResultsDespite strategic engagement with QPulse objectives across the health system, implementation barriers associated with this program were considerable for both PHN and the general practices. Adoption of the QIC process was reliant on engaged leadership, practice culture, systems for clear communication, tailored education and regular clinical audit and review. Practice ownership, culture and governance, rather than practice size and location, were related to successful implementation. Financial incentives for both the PHN and general practice were identified as prerequisites for systematised quality improvement (QI) projects in the future, along with individualised support and education provided to each practice. Technology was both an enabler and a barrier, and the PHN was seen as key to assisting the successful adoption of the available tools. ConclusionsImplementation of QI programs remains a potential tool for achieving better health outcomes in General Practice. However, enablers such as individualised education and support provided via a meso-level organisation, financial incentives, and IT tools and support are crucial if the full potential of QI programs are to be realised in the Australian healthcare setting. Trial registrationACTRN12615000108516, UTN U1111-1163-7995.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document