Conversational Agents in Health Education: A Scoping Review Protocol (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Zayan Nizam ◽  
Leigh Powell ◽  
Nabil Zary
Keyword(s):  
Health Education ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Specific Area ◽  
Conversational Agents ◽  
The Public ◽  
Daunting Task ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Review Protocol

BACKGROUND Conversational agents can reach people where they are at, existing online, on mobile phones, or even through hardware like Alexa and Siri, making information easier to access and providing an engaging method of interaction. It makes sense that chatbots would also start to emerge to improve public health through health education. While building a chatbot is getting easier, there is still required time and effort. There is also a lack of clarity and consistent terminology about what kinds of chatbots are out there, how they are developed, and the kind of resources needed to develop and sustain them. This lack of clarity makes a daunting task for those seeking to build health education initiatives. Our scoping review seeks to categorize conversational agents in healthcare education in alignment with current classifications and terminology emerging from the marketplace. We will define the terminology of levels of conversational agents, categorize current agents along with these levels and describe the uses, resources, and evaluations common to these levels. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to identify literature that reports on the design and implementation of conversational agents to promote and educate the public on matters related to health. METHODS This scoping review will be conducted by employing the Arksey and O’Malley framework. We will also be adhering to the enhancements and updates proposed by Levac et al. and Peters et al. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews will guide the reporting of this scoping review. A systematic search for published and grey literature will be undertaken from the following databases (1) PubMed, (2) PsychINFO, (2) Embase, (4) Web of Science, (5) SCOPUS, (6) CINAHL, (7) ERIC, (8) MEDLINE, (9) Google Scholar. Data charting will be done using a structured format. RESULTS Initial searches of the databases retrieved 1,480 results. The results will be presented in the final scoping review in both a narrative and illustrative manner. CONCLUSIONS Reviewers have previously explored conversational agents in health. However, to the authors' knowledge, there has been no review conducted in the specific area of our interest –Health Education. Therefore, this review will provide a map of the literature in this area and clarify and define the heterogeneous terms found in the literature. This information will help healthcare professionals and administrators to understand what kinds of chatbots would be appropriate in their setting. And through our charted data could also help them understand what kind of resources or expertise is required for the different chatbots in use.

scholarly journals Incorporating and Evaluating Citizen Engagement in Health Research: a Scoping Review Protocol

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anmol Shahid ◽  
Brianna K Rosgen ◽  
Karla K Krewulak ◽  
Diane L Lorenzetti ◽  
Nadine Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Citizen Engagement ◽  
The Public ◽  
Implementation Evaluation ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Meaningful Engagement ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Planning Decision

Abstract Background: Citizen engagement in research is an emerging practice that involves members of the general public in research processes such as priority-setting, planning, decision-making, research conduct, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination. Engaging citizens in research, particularly health research, increases the relevance of study findings, minimizes waste by facilitating stewardship over resources, and builds public trust in the research. While several existing frameworks guide the application of citizen engagement principles to health research, it is unclear how citizen engagement can be utilized to maximize benefits and minimize risks and challenges in health research. To address the gaps in knowledge around citizen engagement in health research, we propose a scoping review to synthesize the state of knowledge on methods to incorporate and evaluate citizen engagement in research. A protocol is presented in this manuscript. Methods: The methodology for our scoping review is guided by Arksey and O’ Malley’s framework for scoping reviews, and additional recommendations by Levac and colleagues. We will include peer-reviewed and grey literature that report on citizen engagement in health research (including biomedical, clinical, health systems and services, and social, cultural, environmental and population health) and report method(s) to conduct, measure, or evaluate citizen engagement. We will systematically search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, JSTOR, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Science Direct) and relevant organizations’ websites for additional studies, frameworks, and reports on citizen engagement. Title and abstract and full-text citations will be screened independently and in duplicate. Data will be extracted independently and in duplicate, including: document characteristics, citizen engagement definitions and goals, and outcomes of citizen engagement (e.g., impact, barriers, facilitators). Discussion: This review will synthesize the definitions, goals, methods, outcomes, and significance of citizen engagement in health research, as well as any potential barriers, facilitators, and challenges outlined in existing literature. The findings will provide an evidence-based foundation for developing new or improved guidance for citizen engagement in health research. Overall, we anticipate that our scoping review will be a preliminary step to meaningful engagement of citizens in research and strengthen the relationship between the scientific community and the public through transparency and collaboration.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

scholarly journals Development of a national stroke audit in Ireland: scoping review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Carlos Bruen ◽  
Niamh A. Merriman ◽  
Paul J. Murphy ◽  
Joan McCormack ◽  
Eithne Sexton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Minimum Dataset

Introduction Recent advances in stroke management and care have resulted in improved survival and outcomes. However, providing equitable access to acute care, rehabilitation and longer-term stroke care is challenging. Recent Irish evidence indicates variation in stroke outcomes across hospitals, and a need for continuous audit of stroke care to support quality improvement. The aim of this project is to develop a core minimum dataset for use in the new Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS), which aims to improve the standard of stroke care in Ireland. This paper outlines the protocol for conducting a scoping review of international practice and guidelines in auditing acute and non-acute stroke care. Objective Identify data items that are currently collected by stroke audits internationally, and identify audit guidelines that exist for recommending inclusion of content in stroke audit datasets. Methods and analysis This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Grey literature will also be searched for relevant materials, as will relevant websites. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two researchers, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Data charting and synthesis will involve sub-dividing relevant sources of evidence, and synthesising data into three categories: i) acute stroke care; ii) non-acute stroke care; and iii) audit data collection procedures and resourcing. Data will be charted using a standardised form specific to each category. Consultation with knowledge users will be conducted at all stages of the scoping review. Discussion This scoping review will contribute to a larger project aimed at developing an internationally benchmarked stroke audit tool that will be used prospectively to collect data on all stroke admissions in Ireland, encompassing both acute and non-acute data items.

scholarly journals Factors other than medical acuity that influence hospitalisation: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e028949
Author(s):  
Mellena Giday ◽  
Meghaan Hawes ◽  
Ann Madhavan ◽  
Maralyssa Bann
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Common Language ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Medical Issues ◽  
Review Protocol

IntroductionThere is evidence that patients are admitted to the hospital with low-acuity medical issues, though delineation of the underlying factors has not been comprehensively explored. This scoping review will provide an overview of the existing literature regarding factors outside of acute medical illness that influence hospitalisation of adults. The review will also seek to provide a review of common language and definitions used in the research on this phenomenon.Methods and analysisThe scoping review framework, outlined by Arksey and O’Malley and expanded on by Levacet al, will be used as the basis for this study. A systematic search of seven databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Sociological Abstracts and Social Science Abstracts) will be conducted to identify existing literature followed by a standardised two-phase, two-reviewer process to select relevant papers for inclusion. Relevant studies will investigate adult non-psychiatric hospital admission plus at least one additional factor unrelated to medical acuity. Details of the work will be extracted, including the terminology used and perspectives included. An assessment of methodological quality will be performed using a tool designed for mixed-methods systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThe scoping review protocol delineates a transparent and rigorous review process, the results of which will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentation at relevant local or national meetings. The study does not require ethics approval as the data will be accumulated through the review of published, peer-reviewed literature and grey literature.

scholarly journals What is known about the LGBTQ perspective in child welfare services? A scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e030675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannike Kaasbøll ◽  
Veronika Paulsen
Keyword(s):  
Child Welfare ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Child Welfare Services ◽  
Welfare Services ◽  
Policy Practice ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Review Protocol

IntroductionIn previous studies, it is estimated that sexual minorities (eg, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) individuals) are overrepresented in the child welfare system. However, the numbers are unclear, and there are limited studies in this field. No systematic review of LGBTQ issues across a broader context (ie, youth, foster parents and service providers) of child welfare services exists. The overall objective of this scoping review is to systematically scope the existing research on LGBTQ issues in the context of child welfare services, including policy, practice, service providers and users’ perspectives.Methods and analysisThe scoping review framework outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) based on previous work by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac and colleagues will guide this review. In addition, the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation will be used throughout the process. We will search electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Idunn) and grey literature sources to identify studies that are appropriate for inclusion in this review. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the ‘Population–Concept–Context’ framework, two researchers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles considered for inclusion. Any qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method study of LGBTQ issues in the child welfare context will be described and synthesised using a thematic synthesis approach.Ethics and disseminationA scoping review is a secondary analysis of published literature and does not require ethics approval. This scoping review is meant to provide an overview of the existing literature, aiming to expand policy-makers’ and practitioners’ knowledge of LGBTQ issues in a child welfare context and identify research gaps that can be used as a basis for further research. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, a conference presentation and a presentation to the key stakeholders.

scholarly journals Evaluating Healthcare Governance Policies: A Scoping Review Protocol

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Finnegan ◽  
Gayle Halas ◽  
Caroline Monnin ◽  
Allie Peckham ◽  
Malcolm Doupe
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Keyword Search ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Healthcare Interventions ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background: Governance policies provide structures and processes through which healthcare systems are managed. Existing literature defines strategies to evaluate operational (e.g. program) and clinical (e.g., patient-provider) healthcare interventions; the equivalent strategies to evaluate governance policies are less well developed. The aim of the proposed scoping review is to examine the extent, nature and range of approaches used to evaluate healthcare governance policies.Methods: Informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the Arksey and O’Malley framework, the proposed study will conduct a keyword search of both health and social sciences databases, including Ageline (EBSCOhost 1978-2020), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost 1981-2020), EconLIT (EBSCOhost 1886-2020), Medline (Ovid 1946-2020), Global Health (Ovid 1973-2020) and Scopus (1970-2020). The grey literature – Public Documents (desLibris), Theses & Dissertations (ProQuest) and Google Advanced – will also be searched to ensure comprehensive identification of studies. Any evaluation of healthcare governance policies published in English will be included. Findings will be presented using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRIMSA-ScR). Our cross-disciplinary team will critically assess the identified literature. Discussion: Findings from the proposed scoping review will provide insight into the ways in which healthcare governance policies have been evaluated and offer future research directions. Based on initial literature scans and consultations with policy workers, we expect to demonstrate the need for more robust (i.e., deliberate, methodical) approaches to evaluate healthcare governance policies, which in turn requires meaningful partnerships to enrich the transactional space between research and policy.

scholarly journals Indigenous Cultural Safety Training in Health, Education, and Social Service Work

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Andrea Bowra ◽  
Lisa Howard ◽  
Angela Mashford-Pringle ◽  
Erica Di Ruggiero
Keyword(s):  
Health Education ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Safety Training ◽  
Cultural Safety ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Social Service Work ◽  
Health Social Services

Background: Indigenous Cultural Safety (ICS) training is a growing field of study; however, little consensus exists about how ICS is conceptualized and operationalized. This lack of consistency can lead to misinterpretation and misappropriation of Indigenous knowledges and histories that can further perpetuate colonial harms. Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to explore and characterize the academic literature related to the conceptualization and operationalization of ICS training within the fields of health, social services, and education. Methods: This scoping review protocol employs the Joanna Briggs Institute’s three-step search strategy to identify articles in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, and ASSIA. This protocol follows the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2015; Tricco et al., 2018). Discussion: This review will add new knowledge by offering insights into the historic and contemporary approaches to defining and operationalizing ICS training in the health, education and social services fields. The results produced will be of interest to scholars and health, social services, and education providers looking to apply the most current and appropriate concepts and practices of ICS.

scholarly journals Protocol for a scoping review of multi-omic analysis for rare diseases

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e026278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Kerr ◽  
Helen McAneney ◽  
Amy Jayne McKnight
Keyword(s):  
Rare Disease ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Biomarker Discovery ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Technology ◽  
Disease Research ◽  
Scoping Reviews

IntroductionThe development of next generation sequencing technology has enabled cost-efficient, large scale, multiple ‘omic’ analysis, including epigenomic, genomic, metabolomic, phenomic, proteomic and transcriptomic research. These integrated approaches hold significant promise for rare disease research, with the potential to aid biomarker discovery, improve our understanding of disease pathogenesis and identify novel therapeutic targets. In this paper we outline a systematic approach for a scoping review designed to evaluate what primary research has been performed to date on multi-omics and rare disease.Methods and analysisThis protocol was designed using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for primary studies relevant to the key terms ‘multi-omics’ and ‘rare disease’, published prior to 30thDecember 2018. Grey literature databases GreyLit and OpenGrey will also be searched, as well as reverse citation screening of relevant articles and forward citation searching using Web of Science Cited Reference Search Tool. Data extraction will be performed using customised forms and a narrative synthesis of the results will be presented.Ethics and disseminationAs a secondary analysis study with no primary data generated, this scoping review does not require ethical approval. We anticipate this review will highlight a gap in rare disease research and provide direction for novel research. The completed review will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences discussing rare disease research and/or molecular strategies.

scholarly journals Telemedicine in primary healthcare for the quality of care in times of COVID-19: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e046227
Author(s):  
Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva ◽  
Rayssa Horácio Lopes ◽  
Osvaldo de Goes Bay Júnior ◽  
Miguel Fuentealba-Torres ◽  
Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Stakeholder Consultation ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Review Protocol

IntroductionTelemedicine gained strength in primary healthcare (PHC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, there is a need to know its scope, technologies used and impacts on people’s health. This study will map telemedicine use in PHC around the world and its impacts on quality of care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThis is a scoping review protocol developed according to Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al, based on the Joanna Briggs Institute manual, and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The records will be mapped in the following multidisciplinary health sciences databases: Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase. Searches will also be conducted on Google Scholar, preprint repositories and specific COVID-19 databases (grey literature). Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics, while thematic analysis will be performed for qualitative data. Preliminary findings will be presented to stakeholders to identify missing studies and develop effective dissemination strategies.Ethics and disseminationResults will be disseminated through publication in an open access scientific journal, scientific events, and academic and community newspapers. Ethical approval was obtained due to stakeholder consultation, but will not involve the direct participation of patients. Link to the protocol record in the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/q94en).

scholarly journals Optimising electronic prescribing in hospitals: a scoping review protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. e100117
Author(s):  
Jac Williams ◽  
David W Bates ◽  
Aziz Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health Informatics ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Electronic Prescribing ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
The Public ◽  
Quality Of Prescribing ◽  
Review Protocol

IntroductionElectronic prescribing (ePrescribing) systems can improve the quality of prescribing decisions and substantially reduce the risk of serious medication errors in hospitals. However, realising these benefits depends on ensuring that relevant sociotechnical considerations are addressed. Optimising ePrescribing systems is essential to maximise the associated benefits and minimise the accompanying risks of these large-scale and expensive health informatics infrastructures.MethodsWe will undertake a systematic scoping review of the literature to identify strategies to achieve optimisation of ePrescribing systems. We will search Medline, Embase and CINAHL for the period 1 January 2010 to 1 June 2019 and the grey literature by using Google Scholar. Independent reviewers will screen the results using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and will extract data for narrative and thematic synthesis.DiscussionThis work will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and we will ensure that the findings are both accessible and interpretable to the public, academics, policymakers and National Health Service leaders.

Intracranial compliance concepts and assessment: A scoping review protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Russo ◽  
Gabriela Ocamoto ◽  
Rafaella Zambetta ◽  
Gustavo Vilela ◽  
Cintya Hayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Intracranial Compliance ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background: Monitoring patients with acute brain injury is crucial in neurocritical care. Intracranial compliance (ICC) has been studied to complement the interpretation of intracranial pressure (ICP) and help the neurocritical care team to anticipate brain function deterioration. ICC has been found to be related to compensatory mechanisms that maintain the stability of ICP (e.g., the higher the compensation, the higher the compliance of intracranial content to adapt to changes in volume and pressure). However, ICC has not been properly translated to clinical practice and has remained a critical technology gap in clinical neuroscience. The objective of this study is to establish a protocol for a scoping review to map the key concepts of ICC in the literature. In addition, this study is designed to characterize the relationship between ICC and ICP, as well as systematically describe the outcomes that are used to assess ICC, considering both the invasive and noninvasive methods.Methods: The scoping review protocol will be conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute’s recommendation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews will be followed. Animals and humans are considered as the population to be investigated. No age criteria or health condition will be considered. ICC, as well as the relationship between ICC and ICP, will be considered as a core concept in this review. Information will be screened based on the context of neurocritical care. Several databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, Grey Literature Report, clinical trial registries, and Cochrane Clinical Trials) will be searched to identify literature using a combination of keywords and descriptors, and there will be no restriction on the time frame. Data will be extracted systematically by the research team and the results will be summarized.Discussion: No systematic review has mapped the concepts of ICC and its relationship with ICP. Providing the key concepts of ICC and the methods of assessment might show its possible applications in clinical practice and the gaps in research.Systematic review registration: Currently, scoping review protocols are not eligible for registration in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review database.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document