Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions

2018 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Duarte de Mello-Amoedo ◽  
Aparecido Nakano Martins ◽  
Adriano Tachibana ◽  
Daniella Ferraro Pinho ◽  
Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Abdominopelvic Ct

scholarly journals Radiation Dose Optimization in Pediatric Chest CT: Major Indicators of Dose Exposure in 1695 CT Scans over Seven Years

2018 ◽  
Vol 190 (12) ◽  
pp. 1131-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Esser ◽  
Sabine Hess ◽  
Matthias Teufel ◽  
Mareen Kraus ◽  
Sven Schneeweiß ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Dose Optimization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Pitch ◽  
Pediatric Chest ◽  
Radiation Dose Optimization

Purpose To analyze possible influencing factors on radiation exposure in pediatric chest CT using different approaches for radiation dose optimization and to determine major indicators for dose development. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study at a clinic with maximum care facilities including pediatric radiology, 1695 chest CT examinations in 768 patients (median age: 10 years; range: 2 days to 17.9 years) were analyzed. Volume CT dose indices, effective dose, size-specific dose estimate, automatic dose modulation (AEC), and high-pitch protocols (pitch ≥ 3.0) were evaluated by univariate analysis. The image quality of low-dose examinations was compared to higher dose protocols by non-inferiority testing. Results Median dose-specific values annually decreased by an average of 12 %. High-pitch mode (n = 414) resulted in lower dose parameters (p < 0.001). In unenhanced CT, AEC delivered higher dose values compared to scans with fixed parameters (p < 0.001). In contrast-enhanced CT, the use of AEC yielded a significantly lower radiation dose only in patients older than 16 years (p = 0.04). In the age group 6 to 15 years, the values were higher (p < 0.001). The diagnostic image quality of low-dose scans was non-inferior to high-dose scans (2.18 vs. 2.14). Conclusion Radiation dose of chest CT was reduced without loss of image quality in the last decade. High-pitch scanning was an independent factor in this context. Dose reduction by AEC was limited and only relevant for patients over 16 years. Key Points Citation Format

Radiation dose and image quality of double-loaded cassettes

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Kelsey ◽  
Fred A. Mettler ◽  
Lisa M. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose

scholarly journals Radiation dose and image quality of high-pitch emergency abdominal CT in obese patients using third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Forbrig ◽  
Michael Ingrisch ◽  
Robert Stahl ◽  
Katharina Stella Winter ◽  
Maximilian Reiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Dual Source Ct ◽  
High Pitch ◽  
Subjective Image Quality ◽  
Dual Source ◽  
Group A

Abstract In this third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) study, we retrospectively investigated radiation dose and image quality of portal-venous high-pitch emergency CT in 60 patients (28 female, mean age 56 years) with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2. Patients were dichotomized in groups A (median BMI 31.5 kg/m2; n = 33) and B (36.8 kg/m2; n = 27). Volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were assessed. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and dose-independent figure-of-merit (FOM) CNR were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed using a five-point scale. Mean values of CTDIvol, SSDE as well as normalized DLP and ED were 7.6 ± 1.8 mGy, 8.0 ± 1.8 mGy, 304 ± 74 mGy * cm and 5.2 ± 1.3 mSv for group A, and 12.6 ± 3.7 mGy, 11.0 ± 2.6 mGy, 521 ± 157 mGy * cm and 8.9 ± 2.7 mSv for group B (p < 0.001). CNR of the liver and spleen as well as each calculated FOM CNR were significantly higher in group A (p < 0.001). Subjective image quality was good in both groups. In conclusion, third-generation abdominal high-pitch emergency DSCT yields good image quality in obese patients. Radiation dose increases in patients with a BMI > 36.8 kg/m2.

Acquisition time, radiation dose, subjective and objective image quality of dual-source CT scanners in acute pulmonary embolism: a comparative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 2712-2721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Abdellatif ◽  
Eric Esslinger ◽  
Kevin Kobes ◽  
Amanda Wong ◽  
Jennifer Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Dual Source Ct ◽  
Dual Source ◽  
Ct Scanners

Effects of automatic tube potential selection on radiation dose index, image quality, and lesion detectability in pediatric abdominopelvic CT and CTA: a phantom study

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Brinkley ◽  
Juan C. Ramirez-Giraldo ◽  
Ehsan Samei ◽  
Daniel J. Frush ◽  
Kingshuk Roy Choudhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Phantom Study ◽  
Lesion Detectability ◽  
Tube Potential ◽  
Abdominopelvic Ct ◽  
Automatic Tube Potential Selection ◽  
Dose Index

scholarly journals Analisis Perubahan kV dan mAs terhadap Kualitas Gambar dan Dosis Radiasi pada Pemeriksaan Multislice Computed Tomography Abdomen dalam Kasus Tumor Abdomen di Instalasi Radiologi RSUD dr. Saiful Anwar Malang

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Ardi Soesilo Wibowo ◽  
Gatot Murti Wibowo ◽  
Anang Prabowo
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Scoring Method ◽  
Tube Voltage ◽  
Abdominal Tumor ◽  
Abdomen Ct ◽  
Voltage Variation

Backgroud: Examination of the abdomen CT scan is often done by using standard protocol, meanwhile the actual parameter can be modified according to local needs considering image quality and radiation dose based on Karabulut and Ariyuek (2016). Abdomen CT Scan by GE 16 slices unit in Radiology Instaallation of Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang Hospital, using exposure factor of 120 kV, 234 mAs and the value of the CTDI dose was 53.04 mGy. While the BAPETEN’s reference of CTDI value, a CT scan of abdomen was 25 mGy.  This study aims to determine the changes of the value of kV and mAs to the image quality and the radiaton dose in the abdomen MSCT examination on abdominal tumor case in Radiology Installation of Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang Hospital.Methods: This research was a quantitative research with an experimental approach. The data were collected from three variations of tube voltage (kV) ie 100 kV, 120 kV and 140 kV and three variations of tube current value and time (mAs) ie, 180 mAs, 195 mAs, and 210 mAs. Radiographs was evaluated by three radiology physicians. Data were analyzed by scoring method of respondent’s assessment to assess MSCT image quality of abdominal tumor, while the radiation dose was obtained by CTDI recording.Results: The results showed that there was influence of tube voltage variation to image quality of abdominal tumor using MSCT unit. The higher kV used, the higher image quality resulted. From the calculation of the percentage from the assessment, the highest score of variation was at 140 kV, while the lowest score of variation was at 100 kV. Based on the recording CTDI radiation dose on the monitor, found that the higher value of kV, the higher radiation resulted. The mAs variations influenced the image quality of abdominal tumor using MSCT unit. Acoording to the percentage of the assessment, the highest score of variation found in 210 mAs, and the lowest score of variation found in 180 mAs. Based on the recording of radiation dose on the monitor, the higher mAs value, the higher radiation dose using MSCT unit. It was recommended to use 195 kV and 120 mAs for MSCT examination of abdominal tumor in Radiology Installation of Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang Hospital.Conclusion: There was influence of kV and mAs variation to anatomical image clarity and radiation dose of abdomen MSCT examination

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document