Analysis of Group Process for Adaptive Support in Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning: Applying Learning Analytics

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-612
Author(s):  
Jeongyun Han ◽  
Kwan Hoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Learning Analytics ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Adaptive Support

scholarly journals Learning analytics dashboards for adaptive support in face-to-face collaborative argumentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 104041
Author(s):  
Jeongyun Han ◽  
Kwan Hoon Kim ◽  
Wonjong Rhee ◽  
Young Hoan Cho
Keyword(s):  
Learning Analytics ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Collaborative Argumentation ◽  
Adaptive Support

Caring for Others: Internet Health Care Support Intervention for Family Caregivers of Persons with Alzheimer's, Stroke, or Parkinson's Disease

2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Marziali ◽  
Peter Donahue ◽  
Gillian Crossin
Keyword(s):  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Clinical Intervention ◽  
Group Interactions ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Ethical Implications ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Participant Response

The purpose of the project was to emulate face-to-face psychosocial support group process in an Internet videoconferencing environment and explore the benefits for 34 family caregivers of persons with neurodegenerative disease. Caregivers were provided with computer equipment and trained to access a password-protected Web site. Using videoconferencing software, each group of 6 members met with a facilitator online weekly for 10 weeks. Each caregiver was interviewed at 6-month follow-up. Participant response data were generated through qualitative analysis of group process and follow-up interviews. The analysis showed that the virtual group process closely paralleled face-to-face group interactions. At follow-up, 90% of the caregivers reported that the online group experience had been “very” or “overall” positive and that the group had helped them cope with the stresses of caregiving. The professional and ethical implications of providing a clinical intervention using the Internet are discussed.

A Case Study of Student Use of Asynchronous Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) to Support Reflection and Evaluation

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Land ◽  
Michele M. Dornisch
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Bulletin Board ◽  
Discussion Forums ◽  
Computer Supported Collaborative Learning ◽  
Communication Tools ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Recent Interest ◽  
Face To Face Instruction

Recent interest in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) has prompted educators to incorporate communication tools into their courses. This article reports findings of students' use of two Web-based discussion forums across two semesters to supplement face-to- face instruction. By tracking the discussions, we discovered that when students initiated reflection and integration of perspectives, they did so through concessions and oppositions to the postings of their peers. Findings point to the importance of explicit scaffolding of conversations to encourage student sharing and evaluation of perspectives.

Group Discussion in a Blended Environment in Engineering Education

TEM Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 508-516
Author(s):  
Deepti Mishra ◽  
Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren ◽  
Frode S. Volden ◽  
Carly Grace Allen
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Verbal Cues ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Seating Arrangement ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Group Members

Group work is a necessary element of engineering education and group members need information about one another, group process, shared attention and mutual understanding during group discussions. There are several important elements for establishing and maintaining a group discussion such as participant’s role, seating arrangement, verbal and non-verbal cues, eye gaze, gestures etc. The present study investigates these elements for identifying the behavior of group members in a blend of traditional face-to-face discussion along with computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) setting. The results of this study have shown that, speaking duration is the key factor for identifying the leadership in a group and participants mostly used eye gazes for turn taking. Although this study is a mix of face-to-face and CSCW discussion setting, participants mostly behave like faceto- face group discussion. However, unlike the previous studies involving face-to-face discussion, the relation between seating arrangement and amount of attention is not apparent from the data during this study.

scholarly journals Designing a Social Learning Analytics Tool for Open Annotation and Collaborative Learning

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah (Remi) Kalir
Keyword(s):  
Distance Learning ◽  
Social Learning ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Learning Analytics ◽  
Learning Sciences ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Collaborative Annotation ◽  
Social Learning Analytics

This book chapter recounts one approach to ethically co-designing a public dashboard that reports social learning analytics and encourages learners’ collaborative annotation across open texts and contexts. As a design narrative in the learning sciences, this chapter is a reflective, first-hand account organized around three related objectives: 1) Naming the theoretical stances toward open and social learning that informed design and research; 2) Describing key decisions and trade-offs pertinent to four iterations of a social learning analytics dashboard; and 3) Considering epistemological, technological, and infrastructural implications for the development and use of social learning analytics in open, flexible, and distance learning.

scholarly journals Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Learning Experiences with Laurillard’s Conversational Framework

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-167
Author(s):  
Yong Fen Yu ◽  
Neo Mai ◽  
Hew Soon Hin
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Pedagogical Practice ◽  
Face To Face

Collaborative learning (CL) is becoming increasingly recognised as a popular pedagogical practice in higher education that promotes socialization and learning among students. However, the use of collaborative learning does risk placing too much responsibility on the learner and reducing face-to-face interaction with the educator. Therefore, there is a need for educators to find a balance in the interaction and engagement with students to help improve their perceived collaborative learning experiences.

Collaborative Learning in Dynamic Group Environments

2011 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamen Kanev ◽  
Shigeo Kimura
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Computer Supported Collaborative Learning ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Educational Materials ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Group Management ◽  
Dynamic Group ◽  
Surface Code ◽  
Printed Materials ◽  
Printed Educational Materials

This chapter is dedicated to Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) employing dynamic groups, where at different stages students work independently, interact with each other in pairs, and conduct joint work in larger groups with varying numbers of participants. A novel Dynamic Group Environment for Collaborative Learning (DGE/CL) that supports students in making informed and intelligent choices about how, when, and with whom to collaborate is introduced. A face-to-face collaborative scenario, where all students are in the same room and can move freely around and interact with each other while using digitally enhanced printed materials with direct point-and-click functionality is considered. Flexible and efficient support for dynamic group management is ensured through the adopted Cluster Pattern Interface (CLUSPI) technology, which, while preserving the original touch-and-feel of printed educational materials, supports additional affordances and allows employment of new, non-traditional paper-based interactions. Possibilities for DGE/CL enhancements with specialized surface code readers and laser-based digital surface encoding being developed by the authors are outlined and references to recent projects are given.

Collaborative Learning by Developing (LbD) Using Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams

2010 ◽  
pp. 215-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Päivi Immonen-Orpana ◽  
Mauri Åhlberg
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Concept Mapping ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Successful Aging ◽  
Concept Maps ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Design Experiment ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Group Concept ◽  
University Course

Collaborative Learning by Developing (LbD) was researched in a University course. The focus was reflective metacognitive competence development (Appendix 1.) of Physiotherapy students. The authors used both individual and collaborative concept mapping and improved Vee heuristics in learning process evaluation. The content of the design experiment was ‘Coping at Home’. As educational research it was a design experiment, a multi-case, multi-method study. The core concept of the study unit and development project was ‘successful aging’. Both Cmap Recorder and videotaping of discussions during group concept mapping were used. The main result was that plenty of face-to-face dialogue was needed before the shared understanding and group concept maps were created. First the main concepts were fixed and then other concepts and their relationships were elaborated. Differences between individuals and two groups are analysed. In the collaborative learning process, the feeling in both groups was as if they had a unified and shared thinking process. Students continued each others talking and thinking very fluently like they had had “common brains”.

Technology Support for Collaborative Learning

2011 ◽  
pp. 888-893
Author(s):  
David A. Banks
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Audience Response ◽  
Technology Support ◽  
Electronic Meeting Systems ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
The Face ◽  
Response Systems ◽  
Computer Based

Collaborative learning is an activity that takes place between a teacher and a learner, between learner and learner, and sometimes, one would hope, between learner and teacher. The free flow of ideas between the various parties can be inhibited by a variety of factors, including perceived or actual power barriers, language skills, previous learning experience, and personal factors such as shyness or dominance. Technology can be used as a way of overcoming, or reducing, some of these inhibitory factors, and this chapter outlines some of the computer-based technologies that can be used. The use of technology to support distant learners is well documented, and this chapter concentrates instead on the less well-reported use of technology in the face-to-face classroom. The chapter opens with a brief consideration of collaborative learning and then focuses on the technologies that can be used to support collaborative learning process in a variety of time and place settings. These technologies include audience response systems, electronic meeting systems, and more recently, and rapidly developing, blended versions of these technologies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document