scholarly journals Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 Monotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Korean Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-260
Author(s):  
Jeong Ho Kim ◽  
Ki Soo Lee ◽  
Choung-Soo Kim ◽  
Young Deuk Choi ◽  
Tae Hyo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Subcutaneous Injection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Korean Patients ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

Purpose: This study was a prospective single-arm clinical trial aimed at assessing the efficacy and toxicity of subcutaneous interleukin (IL)-2 monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and Methods: We enrolled 26 patients with metastatic RCC in this multicenter controlled trial. The patients received subcutaneous injections of recombinant IL-2 (BMI-rh-IL2, an aldesleukin biosimilar, BMIKOREA Co., Ltd.) in 5-week cycles. In the first week, the patients received a subcutaneous IL-2 loading dose of 18×106 IU once on treatment days 1–5, followed by 2 days of rest. In the following 3 weeks, they received a dose of 18×106 IU via subcutaneous injection once on treatment days 1 and 2. Then, the patients received a dose of 9×106 IU via subcutaneous injection once on treatment days 3, 4, and 5, followed by 2 days of rest. The primary end point was the objective response rate; the secondary end points were progressionfree survival (PFS) and safety.Results: Overall, 22 patients were included in the final per-protocol analysis. The objective response and the disease control rates were 13.64% (3 of 22), and 90.9% (20 of 22), respectively. The mean PFS was 5.55 months (95% confidence interval, 2.71–8.4). The proportion of patients who experienced a treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse event was 3.85% (1 of 26). There were no treatment-related deaths.Conclusions: In this study, the subcutaneous IL-2 monotherapy regimen demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to those reported in previous studies of subcutaneous IL-2 monotherapy and was effective in Korean patients with metastatic RCC.

Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 688-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Fyfe ◽  
R I Fisher ◽  
S A Rosenberg ◽  
M Sznol ◽  
D R Parkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Median Response

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimen in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred fifty-five assessable patients were entered onto seven phase II clinical trials. Proleukin (aldesleukin; Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA) 600,000 or 720,000 IU/kg was administered by 15-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 8 hours for up to 14 consecutive doses over 5 days as clinically tolerated with maximum support, including pressors. A second identical cycle of treatment was scheduled following 5 to 9 days of rest, and courses could be repeated every 6 to 12 weeks in stable or responding patients. RESULTS The overall objective response rate was 14% (90% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 19%), with 12 (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 24 (9%) partial responses (PRs). Responses occurred in all sites of disease, including bone, intact primary tumors, and visceral metastases, and in patients with large tumor burdens or bulky individual lesions. The median response duration for patients who achieved a CR has not been reached, but was 19.0 months for those who achieved a PR. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was the only predictive prognostic factor for response to IL-2. While treatment was associated with severe acute toxicities, these generally reversed rapidly after therapy was completed. However, 4% of patients died of adverse events judged to be possibly or probably treatment-related. CONCLUSION High-dose IL-2 appears to benefit some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma by producing durable CRs or PRs. Despite severe acute treatment-associated toxicities, IL-2 should be considered for initial therapy of patients with appropriately selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Activity of retreatment with sorafenib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 404-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nozawa ◽  
N. Matsumura ◽  
M. Yasuda ◽  
Y. Okuda ◽  
H. Uemura
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

404 Background: Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have increased. Complete remission is, however, rarely seen and patients are treated with multiple sequential therapies. We assessed clinical activity of sorafenib rechallenge after progressing on other therapies. Methods: Patients with mRCC who received a second course of sorafenib therapy after failure of prior sorafenib and other agents were retrospectively identified. RECIST-defined objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Fourteen patients with mRCC who were retreated with sorafenib were identified and twelve patients were assessable for this study. 92% were male. Median age at first systemic therapy was 63 years. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 92% of patients. 42% of patients had favorable or intermediate risk, 17% poor, and the rest not available per MSKCC criteria. Eighty-three percent of patients were treated with other agents before initial sorafenib therapy, including 75% interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), 50% interleukin-2 (IL-2), and 17% sunitinib. First sorafenib therapy began a median of 9.0 months after the diagnosis of mRCC and produced a clinical benefit (PR + SD) rate of 75% and a median PFS of 5.0 months. 67% of patients discontinued initial sorafenib for disease progression and 33% for adverse events. Interval between discontinuation of initial sorafenib and rechallenge was a median of 7.6 months. During the intervening period, 50% of patients were treated with sunitinib, 33% with everolimus, 25% with VEGFR1 vaccine, and others. Clinical benefit rate of 67% and a median PFS of 4.3 months were obtained on sorafenib rechallenge. There was no significant difference in outcome to sorafenib rechallenge based on duration between sorafenib treatments or number or type of intervening treatments. No new severe toxicity was observed during rechallenge. Conclusions: Sorafenib rechallenge has potential to achieve clinical benefits, is well-tolerated, and may be considered after multiple sequential therapies in select mRCC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized comparison of high-dose and low-dose intravenous interleukin-2 for the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an interim report.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1572-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Yang ◽  
S L Topalian ◽  
D Parkinson ◽  
D J Schwartzentruber ◽  
J S Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

PURPOSE A randomized prospective study was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose intravenous bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) and a lower-dose intravenous bolus regimen for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between March 1991 and April 1993, 125 patients with metastatic RCC were randomized to receive IL-2 by intravenous bolus every 8 hours at either 720,000 IU/kg (high-dose) or 72,000 IU/kg (low-dose) to the maximum-tolerated number of doses (or a maximum of 15 doses). After approximately 7 to 10 days, both treatment groups were re-treated with a second identical cycle of therapy. Those patients who were stable or responding to treatment 5 to 6 weeks later went on to receive re-treatment with another course (two cycles) of therapy. Response rates and toxicity were determined for the two treatment arms. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five patients received a total of 208 courses of therapy. Sixty patients were randomized to receive low-dose, and 65 to receive high-dose IL-2. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. There was a greater incidence of grade III or IV thrombocytopenia, malaise, and hypotension in patients who received high-dose IL-2, while patients who received low-dose IL-2 had significantly more infections. Three percent of treatment courses with low-dose IL-2 required vasopressor support, compared with 52% of courses with high-dose IL-2. Patients who received low-dose IL-2 had a 7% complete response (CR) and an 8% partial response (PR) rate, and patients who received high-dose IL-2 had a 3% CR and a 17% PR rate. CONCLUSION Low-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 represents an effective regimen for the treatment of metastatic RCC, with preliminary results comparable to those observed with high-dose IL-2. Low-dose IL-2 can be administered with significantly fewer complications, reduced use of vasopressor support, and fewer admissions to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Interleukin-2, interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil immunochemotherapy with and without 13-cis-retinoic acid in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results of a prospective randomized trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14571-14571
Author(s):  
S. Bierer ◽  
M. E. Bode ◽  
O. A. Brinkmann ◽  
L. Hertle
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

14571 Background: Combined immunochemotherapy with interleukin 2, interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has shown objective response rates up to 30% and more. The therapeutic effect of adding 13-cis-retinoic acid still remains controversial. Methods: Between 05/2001 and 11/2003 we randomly assigned patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma either to receive a combined immunochemotherapy of interleukin 2 (s.c.), interferon alpha (s.c.) and 5-fluorouracil (i.v.) = group A or the same regimen plus 3 × 20 mg 13-cis-retinoic acid daily (p.o.) = group B. 83 patients were eligible (41 in group A and 43 in group B). All patients had ECOG 0 or 1 and no prior systemic therapy. Objective response (OR = Complete response, CR + Partial response, PR + Stable disease, SD), time to progression (TTP) and median survival were determined. Results: Patient characteristics were well balanced between both groups. There was no significant difference in objective response between both groups (A/B: CR 2%/2%, PR 22%/5%, SD 46%/69%, p = 0.8). The responders in both groups showed no significant difference in TTP (A/B: 11.5/9.5 months, p = 0.4). Median survival was 23 months for all patients with no significant difference between the two groups (A/B: 26/22 months, p = 0.42). Slightly more therapeutic side effects (e.g. mucositis) were seen in group B. Conclusions: The addition of 13-cis-retinoic acid to a combined immunochemotherapy of interleukin 2, interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma does not seem to have a therapeutic benefit. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A Randomized Study of Low-Dose Interleukin-2 Subcutaneous Immunotherapy versus Interleukin-2 plus Interferon-Alpha as First Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 397-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Lissoni ◽  
Sandro Barni ◽  
Antonio Ardizzoia ◽  
Marco Andres ◽  
Epifanio Scardino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

Aims and Background IL-2 given subcutaneously in combination with interferon-alpha 2b (IFN) appears to induce a response rate comparable to that obtained with IL-2 intravenous injection in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but with lower toxicity. The role of IFN when combined with IL-2 has however still to be defined. The present study was performed to draw some preliminary conclusions about the effect of IFN in combination with IL-2 in metastatic RCC. Methods The study included 30 consecutive patients with metastatic RCC who were randomized to treatment with IL-2 subcutaneous therapy (3 million IU twice/daily for 5 days/week for 6 weeks) or with IL-2 plus IFN (5 million U/m2 subcutaneously thrice weekly). In patients without progressive disease, a second cycle was repeated after a 28-day rest period. Results No significant difference in partial response rate was found between patients treated with IL-2 alone and those given IL-2 plus IFN (5/15 vs 4/15). Similarly, no difference was seen in the percentage of stable disease (7/15 vs 7/15). Toxicity was higher in patients who received IL-2 plus IFN. Lymphocyte and eosinophil mean increase was higher in patients treated with IL-2 alone than in those treated with IL-2 plus IFN, without however any significant difference. Conclusions The present results, which require confirmation in a larger series, indicate that combination with IFN does not increase the efficacy of IL-2 subcutaneous immunotherapy in metastatic RCC but only the toxicity of treatment.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1402-1411
Author(s):  
Koji Iinuma ◽  
Koji Kameyama ◽  
Kei Kawada ◽  
Shota Fujimoto ◽  
Kimiaki Takagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) in 35 patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In this study, we focused on patients who received NIVO+IPI and were stratified into intermediate- or poor-risk disease according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model at five institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, we evaluated the role of inflammatory cell ratios, namely neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as predictive biomarkers in patients with mRCC. The median follow-up period was 1 year, and the 1-year OS rate was 95.8%. The ORR and DCR were 34.3% and 80.0%, respectively. According to BOR, four patients (11.4%) achieved complete response. According to NLR stratification, the 1-year PFS rates were 82.6% and 23.7% when the NLR was ≤4.6 and >4.6, respectively (p = 0.04). Based on PLR stratification, the 1-year PFS rates were 81.7% and 34.3% when the PLR was ≤188.1 and >188.1, respectively (p = 0.033). Although 71.4% of the patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with NIVO+IPI, only four patients discontinued NIVO+IPI due to grade 3/4 TRAEs. Patients treated with NIVO+IPI as a first-line therapy for advanced or mRCC achieved relatively better oncological outcomes. Therefore, NIVO+IPI may have potential advantages and may lead to a treatment effect compared to those receiving targeted therapies. In addition, PLR >188.1 may be a useful predictive marker for mRCC patients who received NIVO+IPI.

scholarly journals Fas Ligand Expression in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma During Interleukin-2 Based Immunotherapy

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 7911-7916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frede Donskov ◽  
Hans von der Maase ◽  
Niels Marcussen ◽  
Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit ◽  
Hans Henrik Torp Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Fas Ligand ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Ligand Expression
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document