scholarly journals Comparison of Pethidine and Tramadol for Control of Shivering in Patients undergoing Elective Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Mahesh Sharma ◽  
Kalpana Kharbuja ◽  
Bikash Khadka
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Sympathetic Blockade ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Introduction: Shivering is a common problem faced by an anesthesiologist during intraoperative as well as in postoperative period, specially after sub-arachnoid block (SAB). It is unpleasant and undesirable and is secondary to vasodilation following sympathetic blockade. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of pethidine on postoperative shivering following SAB and to compare its effects with those of tramadol.   Methods: This randomized, prospective study was conducted in American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II  patients undergoing surgery under SAB, to compare the efficacy of tramadol  and pethidine for control of shivering. Patients received tramadol or pethidine in a dose of 0.5mg/kg intra-venously after the appearance of shivering. Disappearance of shivering, side-effects as well as hemodynamics were observed at scheduled intervals.   Results: There were a total of 79 patients randomized into two groups. There were 44 patients receiving pethidine (Group P) and the rest 35 receiving tramadol (Group T). Shivering score was significantly lower in Group P at 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes compared to that in Group T. Sedation score was higher in pethidine group. Adverse effects in terms of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in Group T.   Conclusion: Pethidine provide better anti-shivering effect then tramadol with less side effects (nausea and vomiting)  but more sedation.

scholarly journals Comparison of Train of Four Measurements with Kinemyography NMT DATEX and Accelerography TOFscan

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Cyrus Motamed ◽  
Migena Demiri ◽  
Nora Colegrave
Keyword(s):  
Neuromuscular Blockade ◽  
Lower Limit ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Orotracheal Intubation ◽  
Neuromuscular Blocking ◽  
Physical Status Classification ◽  
Train Of Four ◽  
Surgery First ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Introduction: This study was designed to compare the Datex neuromuscular transmission (NMT) kinemyography (NMTK) device with the TOFscan (TS) accelerometer during the onset and recovery of neuromuscular blockade. Patients and methods: This prospective study included adult patients who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery with general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation. The TS accelerometer was randomly placed at the adductor pollicis on one hand, and the NMTK was placed on the opposite arm. Anesthesia was initiated with remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) and 2.0–3.0 mg/kg of propofol. Thereafter, 0.5 mg/kg of atracurium or 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium was injected. If needed, additional neuromuscular blocking agents were administered to facilitate surgery. First, we recorded the train of four (TOF) response at the onset of neuromuscular blockade to reach a TOF count of 0. Second, we recorded the TOF response at the recovery of neuromuscular blockade to obtain a T4/T1 90% by both TS and NMTK. Results: There were 32 patients, aged 38–83 years, with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I–III included and analyzed. Surgery was abdominal, gynecologic, or head and neck. The Bland and Altman analysis for obtaining zero responses during the onset showed a bias (mean) of 2.7 s (delay) of TS in comparison to NMTK, with an upper/lower limit of agreement of [104; −109 s] and a bias of 36 s of TS in comparison to NMTK, with an upper/lower limit of agreement of [−21.8, −23.1 min] during recovery (T4/T1 > 90%). Conclusions: Under the conditions of the present study, the two devices are not interchangeable. Clinical decisions for deep neuromuscular blockade should be made cautiously, as both devices appear less accurate with significant variability.

scholarly journals Randomized clinical study on the analgesic effect of local infiltration versus spinal block for hemorrhoidectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Antônio Borges ◽  
Plínio da Cunha Leal ◽  
Ed Carlos Rey Moura ◽  
Rioko Kimiko Sakata
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative analgesia and early recovery are important for hospital discharge. The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of perianal infiltration and subarachnoid anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. The secondary objective was to compare time to discharge, adverse effects and complications. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, prospective and comparative study at Dr. Mário Gatti Hospital. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18-60, in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category 1 or 2, were included. The local group (LG) received local infiltration (0.75% ropivacaine) under general anesthesia; the spinal group (SG) received subarachnoid block (2 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine). Analgesic supplementation consisted of fentanyl for LG and lidocaine for SG. Postoperative pain intensity, sphincter relaxation, lower-limb strength, time to discharge, analgesic dose over one week and adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: Eleven LG patients (52.4%) required supplementation, but no SG patients. Pain intensity was higher for LG up to 120 min, but there were no differences at 150 or 180 min. There were no differences in the need for paracetamol or tramadol. Times to first analgesic supplementation and hospital discharge were longer for SG. The adverse effects were nausea, dizziness and urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: Pain intensity was higher in LG than in SG over the first 2 h, but without differences after 150 and 180 min. Time to first supplementation was shorter in LG. There were no differences in doses of paracetamol and tramadol, or in adverse effects. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02839538.

scholarly journals Topical Isotretinoin in Acne Vulgaris

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
M Moksedur Rahman ◽  
M Abdullah ◽  
M Moazzem Hossain ◽  
MA Siddique ◽  
M Nessa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Outpatient Department ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Cutaneous Reactions

This study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of topical isotretinoin 0.05% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. This prospective study was undertaken in Skin & VD outpatient department of Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi. One hundred patients with mild tomoderate acne vulgaris were enrolled and were instructed to apply isotretinoin 0.05% gel once daily at night for 12 weeks. Patients were followed up at 2,4,8 and 12 weeks for efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy was measured by counting facial inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions and by grading acne severity. Cutaneous tolerance was assessed by determining erythema, scaling and burning with pruritus.Response was excellent in 80%of cases.None of the cutaneous reactions was severe, all were mild and well tolerated.Nobody had to discontinue the therapy for side effects. This study confirms that isotretinoin 0.05% gel is safe and effective topical therapy for mild to moderate acnevulgaris.TAJ 2016; 29(2): 1-5

scholarly journals Dexmedetomidine use during epiduroscopy reduces fentanyl use and postoperative nausea and vomiting: A single-center retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211875680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
Ryota Inokuchi ◽  
Kazuo Hanaoka ◽  
Machi Suka ◽  
Hiroyuki Yanagisawa
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Anesthesia Care ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Monitored Anesthesia Care ◽  
History Of ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Objectives: Minimally invasive epiduroscopy has recently been reported as an effective treatment procedure for chronic and intractable low back pain. However, no study has determined safe anesthetics for monitored anesthesia care during epiduroscopy. We aimed to compare and evaluate conventional monitored anesthesia care drugs with dexmedetomidine. Methods: A retrospective study including all patients who underwent epiduroscopy at the JR Tokyo General Hospital from April 2011 to March 2016 was designed. The epiduroscopy procedures were performed under anesthesia with dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl (dexmedetomidine group) or droperidol plus fentanyl (neuroleptanalgesia group). Patients who received analgesics other than fentanyl, another analgesic combined with fentanyl, any sedative other than dexmedetomidine or droperidol, or who had incomplete data were excluded. We compared (1) the type and dose of medication during the epiduroscopy and (2) the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: We identified 45 patients (31 and 14 in the dexmedetomidine and neuroleptanalgesia groups, respectively) with a mean age of 69.0 years. The two groups had comparable characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, analgesics used in the clinic, comorbidities, history of smoking, and the duration of anesthesia. The dexmedetomidine group received a significantly lower fentanyl dose during surgery (126 ± 14 vs 193 ± 21 µg, mean ± standard deviation, p = 0.014) and exhibited a significantly lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (1 vs 3, p = 0.047) than the neuroleptanalgesia group. Conclusion: This study involved elderly patients, and the use of dexmedetomidine in monitored anesthesia care during epiduroscopy procedures in these patients may reduce the required fentanyl dose during surgery and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This strategy may help prevent respiratory depression and aspiration.

scholarly journals Obtenção de Consentimento Informado para Anestesia em Cirurgia Eletiva num Hospital Terciário: Práticas e Contexto Ético-Legal

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Luís Guilherme Casimiro ◽  
Sara Marisa Pereira ◽  
Sofia Cardoso Pires ◽  
Joana Mourão
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Active Process ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Written Informed Consent

Introduction: Informed consent is an active process of the doctor-patient relationship, based on ethical and legal principles. The anesthetic act has inherent risks, which should be subject of specific consent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of implementation of written specific informed consent for anesthesia in the context of elective surgery.Material and Methods: An observational prospective study, at a tertiary university hospital, in 230 patients aged 60 years or older, undergoing elective surgery between May and July 2017. Eligible patients who consented to participate were interviewed clinically on the day before surgery. In the postoperative period, the anesthetic technique and the existence of the written informed consent for the anesthetic and surgical procedures were assessed. Patients who were unable to give informed consent or those admitted in the Intensive Care Unit after surgery were excluded. Results: Written informed consent for the surgical procedure was obtained for 225 (97.8%), while it was obtained in just 96 (41.7%) patients for the anesthetic act. There was a higher prevalence of stroke, anemia, and higher Charlson and physical American Society of Anesthesiologists scores in patients without written informed consent for the anesthetic act.Discussion: We identified a low implementation of written informed consent for anesthesia. This situation may have important implications in the context of disciplinary, civil or criminal liability.Conclusion: Despite its importance, the practice of written informed consent for anesthesia in this institution is not yet implemented on a regular basis.

The Combitube in Elective Surgery

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis A. Gaitini ◽  
Sonia J. Vaida ◽  
Somri Mostafa ◽  
Boris Yanovski ◽  
Milian Croitoru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Spontaneous Ventilation ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Entire Duration ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
American Society ◽  
End Tidal ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Spontaneously Breathing

Background The Combitube has proved to be a valuable device for securing the airway in cases of difficult intubation. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Combitube in elective surgery during both mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Methods Two hundred patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, with normal airways, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: nonparalyzed, spontaneously breathing (n = 100); or paralyzed, mechanically ventilated (n = 100). After induction of general anesthesia and insertion of the Combitube, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and isoflurane concentration, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as breath-by-breath spirometry data were obtained every 5 min. Results In 97% of patients, it was possible to maintain oxygenation, ventilation, and respiratory mechanics, as well as hemodynamic stability during either mechanical or spontaneous ventilation for the entire duration of surgery. The duration of surgery was between 15 and 155 min. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that the Combitube is an effective and safe airway device for continued management of the airway in 97% of elective surgery cases.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Ondansetron and Lidocaine in Reducing Injection Pain of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wirat Wasinwong ◽  
Sarocha Termthong ◽  
Prae Plansangkate ◽  
Jutarat Tanasansuttiporn ◽  
Riam Kosem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
Syringe Pump ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Median Pain

Abstract Background Propofol injection pain is common. Previous studies found that ondansetron can also block sodium channels. Objective The primary outcome was the efficacy of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for the reduction of propofol injection pain. Method This trial was conducted in 240 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-III and aged between 18-65 years old, undergoing elective surgery, and having a 20-gauge intravenous catheter at the hand dorsum. Each group of 80 patients received 8 mg of ondansetron in the O Group, 40 mg of lidocaine in the L Group and normal saline in the C Group. The study medications were blindly given then 1 minute later, the propofol was administered via the syringe pump at the rate of 600 ml/hr. for 30 seconds. Thereafter, the syringe pump of propofol was temporarily paused, and the patients were asked to rate his/her pain. Result The incidence of pain was lowest in the L group (66.2%) compared with the O (82.5%) and the C groups (85.0%) (P<0.01). The median pain score in the L, O, and C groups were 2 (0-4), 4 (2-5), and 4.5 (2-6), respectively (P<0.01). The incidences of no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain were also significantly different in the L group (33.8%, 37.5%, 21.2%, and 7.5%, respectively) compared with those in the O group (17.5%, 31.2%, 31.2%, and 20.0%, respectively) and the C groups (15.0%, 22.5%, 40.0%, and 22.5%, respectively) (P<0.01).. Conclusion Pretreatment with intravenous lidocaine, rather than ondansetron, can reduce the incidence and intensity of propofol-induced pain.

scholarly journals Topical Clindamycin in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Shahnaj Sultana ◽  
Md. Nure Alom Siddiqul ◽  
Md. Moksedur Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Afsar Siddiqul ◽  
Abdullah Al Amin
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Clindamycin Phosphate ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Patient Response ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Continued Use

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of topical clindamycin phosphate 1% lotion in treating acne vulgaris in a group of Bangladeshi people. This prospective study was undertaken in skin & VD out patient department of Rajshahi Medical college Hospital, Rajshahi. A total of 30 patients, 15 (50%) males and 15 (50%) females between ages 15 and 35 years (mean 18 years) with acne of grades I, II and III of duration <3 years to 10 years (mean 3.33 years) were studied. Clindamycin phosphate 1% lotion was administered twice daily for 12 weeks to each patient. Response was excellent in 73.33%, good in 20%, fair in 3.33% and poor in 3.33% of cases. Clinical adverse effects were noted in 20% of cases where oiliness was in 6.67%, irritation and burning in 3.33%, puritans in 3.33%, erythema i3.33% and peeling in 3.33% of cases. None of the reactions was severe, all were mild and well tolerated and most occurred within the first month of initiation of treatment and resolved with continued use of drug and completely cured after the treatment completed. No body had to discontinue the therapy for side effects. 80% of the total patients had no side effects. This study confirms that clindamycin is safe and effective topical therapy for mild to moderate acne vulgaris.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/kyamcj.v1i2.13316KYAMC Journal Vol.1(2) January 2011, 59-64

scholarly journals Analysis of factors affecting reversal of Hartmann’s procedure and post-reversal complications

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hyun Kang ◽  
Byung Mo Kang ◽  
Sang Nam Yoon ◽  
Jeong Yeon Kim ◽  
Jun Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Records ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Colorectal Disease ◽  
Hartmann’S Procedure ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Hartmann's Procedure ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Abstract Although Hartmann’s procedure (HP) is commonly used as emergency treatment for colorectal disease, the reversal of HP (HR) is infrequently performed. The aims were to evaluate the rate of HR and determine the factors predictive of achieving HR. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent HP between January 2007 and June 2019 at six Hallym University-affiliated hospitals. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify which factors were independently associated with HR. In the study period, 437 patients underwent HP, and 127 (29.0%) subsequently underwent HR. Of these, 46 (35.9%) patients experienced post-HR complications. In multivariable analysis, an interval between HP and HR of > 6 months was associated with the only lower rate of post-HR complications. Multivariate analysis showed that HR was less likely in patients aged > 70 years, those with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV, elective surgery, those experiencing more than two HP-related complications, and those with a malignancy (an indication for HP). One-third of the patients underwent HR. Age > 70 years, ASA class III or IV, elective surgery, more than two HP-related complications, and malignancy were associated with a non-HR rate.

Effects of Clonidine on Propofol-Based Anesthesia

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward B. Lack ◽  
John D. Rachel ◽  
Oana Patrascu
Keyword(s):  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intravenous Sedation ◽  
Hemodynamic Stability ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Dosage Rate ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Higher Doses

Introduction: Propofol-based anesthesia is a safe and effective method to provide intravenous sedation in office-based elective surgery. Clonidine is a drug that can provide anxiolytic sedation and hemodynamic stability, thus reducing the propofol consumption rate. This study reports the effect of 0.1 mg of clonidine administered orally and preoperatively on the dosage rate of propofol. The authors also describe the hemodynamic effects on patients undergoing elective liposculpture surgery. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective review, 20 American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I and grade II patients undergoing elective liposculpture surgery under monitored anesthesia care were studied. Ten patients received premedication (0.1 mg clonidine) 30–45 minutes before the induction of anesthesia. A control group receiving no premedication underwent the same procedures conducted by the same surgeon. Propofol dosage rate, heart rate, and blood pressure of both groups were monitored preoperatively, intraoperatively, and in the recovery room. Results: The average propofol dosage rate was 3.21 mg/ kg/h for the treatment group and 2.78 mg/kg/h for the control group. Hemodynamic stability was obtained for both groups during and after the treatment periods. Neither group had episodes of hypotension or changes in expectable recovery time. Discussion: Clonidine premedication of 0.1 mg orally did not reduce the requirements for propofol dosage rates. In contrast to previous studies using higher doses, this clonidine dose did not provide the beneficial effects of lowering the anesthetic requirement for propofol. However, hemodynamic stability was achieved, and no adverse effects were observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document