scholarly journals Does Dry Needling Treatment Make an Extra Contribution to Conventional Treatment in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain? A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Bağcıer ◽  
Ozan Volkan Yurdakul ◽  
Gamze Deniz ◽  
Ahmet Akbulut ◽  
Yusuf Çelik
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Scale Range ◽  
Motion Measurements ◽  
Joint Range

Aim: To evaluate the effect of adding dry needling treatment to conventional rehabilitation on pain, range of motion, and functionality on hemiplegic shoulder pain. Methods: A total of 38 patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain were divided into two groups. A multimodal rehabilitation protocol including physical therapy methods and exercise treatments was applied to both groups (5 sessions per week for a total of 15 sessions). In addition to the rehabilitation, three sessions of dry needling treatment were applied for dry needling group. Pain with visual analog scale, range of motion with a goniometer, functionality was evaluated by quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand and fugl meyer assessment upper extremity. Evaluations were made before treatment, after treatment, and at the third month of treatment. Results: Patients aged from 30-60 years (mean±SD=53.1± 5.3). The average duration of HSP was 6.7±1 months. While a significant improvement was observed in both groups in all parameters after the treatment, a statistical superiority was found in the dry needling group (p<0.05). At the 3rd month follow-up, there was no difference in pain and functionality parameters between the groups, while flexion and abduction measurements were higher in the dry needling group (p <0.05). Conclusion: Adding dry needling treatment to conventional rehabilitation did not show any difference except for some joint range of motion measurements in the subacute period.

scholarly journals Limited Knee-Joint Range of Motion in Patients With Tophaceous Gout Improved With Medical Treatment: A 18-Months Follow Up

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan-Chin Lu ◽  
James Cheng-Chung Wei ◽  
Cheng-Ang Chang ◽  
Chih-Ming Chen ◽  
Sen-Wei Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Tophaceous Gout ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Range

scholarly journals Adolescent elite skiers with and without cam morphology did change their hip joint range of motion with 2 years follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3149-3157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefin Abrahamson ◽  
Anna Swärd Aminoff ◽  
Carl Todd ◽  
Cecilia Agnvall ◽  
Olof Thoreson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Range ◽  
Cam Morphology ◽  
Elite Skiers

Effect of Posterior Capsule Tightness and Humeral Retroversion on 5 Glenohumeral Joint Range of Motion Measurements: A Cadaveric Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1434-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayana P. Rosa ◽  
Paula R. Camargo ◽  
John D. Borstad
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Posterior Capsule ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Measurements ◽  
Humeral Retroversion ◽  
Clinical Measurements ◽  
Joint Range

Background: Altered glenohumeral joint range of motion can be caused by increased humeral retroversion (HR) and/or posterior capsule tightness (PCT). To make informed clinical decisions, it is vital to understand how HR and PCT alterations, individually and in combination, affect joint range of motion measurements. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of experimental tissue alterations on clinical range of motion measures. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Five clinical measurements were quantified in 8 fresh-frozen cadavers under 4 experimentally created conditions: baseline (no alterations), HR condition (20° increase in HR by transecting the bone), PCT condition (20% decrease in length via thermal energy), and PCT + HR combined. Clinical measurements included bicipital forearm angle, low flexion, glenohumeral internal and external rotation, and horizontal adduction. All measurements were taken by the same blinded tester. Separate 1-factor repeated measures analyses of variance were used to evaluate the effect of the alterations on each clinical measurement. Results: There was a significant main effect of condition for bicipital forearm angle ( P = .02, F = 4.03), low flexion ( P = .02, F = 3.86), internal rotation ( P = .03, F = 3.65), and external rotation ( P < .001, F = 15.15) but not for horizontal adduction ( P = .29, F = 1.33). The HR condition resulted in a decreased bicipital forearm angle of 16.1° and 15.8° as compared with the PCT and PCT + HR conditions, respectively. When compared with baseline, the PCT + HR condition decreased the low flexion test by 13.5°, and the HR condition decreased internal rotation range of motion by 14.2°. All conditions increased external rotation when compared with baseline. Conclusion: Greater measurement changes were noted in both HR conditions, suggesting that bony alterations influence motion to a greater extent than posterior capsule alterations. Clinical Relevance: Clinicians should be aware that humeral retroversion will influence the measurement of posterior shoulder tightness.

scholarly journals Determining the Reliability of a New Method for Measuring Joint Range of Motion Through a Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 707-719
Author(s):  
So Young Ahn ◽  
Hanbit Ko ◽  
Jeong Oh Yoon ◽  
Sun Ung Cho ◽  
Jong Hyun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
New Method ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Range

Reliability of Ankle Goniometric Measurements

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 564-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
RobRoy L. Martin ◽  
Thomas G. McPoil
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Motion Measurements ◽  
Goniometric Measurements ◽  
Joint Range

This article reviews the existing range-of-motion measurement literature related to ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion to determine whether the reliability of ankle range-of-motion measurements can be defined, how the characteristics of the study population or clinician affect reliability, and the level of responsiveness for these measures. A MEDLINE search was performed through February 2004, and 11 articles met the inclusion criteria established for this review. Ample evidence was found for intrarater reliability for ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion range of motion. Although some evidence for interrater reliability of dorsiflexion was found, little evidence for interrater reliability of plantarflexion range of motion was uncovered. On the basis of the current literature, the responsiveness of ankle joint range-of-motion measurements is uncertain and requires further studies using patient populations. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(6): 564–572, 2005)

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Abdominal and Gluteus Medius Training in Lumbo-Pelvic Stability and Adductor Strength in Female Soccer Players. A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1528
Author(s):  
Héctor Guerrero-Tapia ◽  
Rodrigo Martín-Baeza ◽  
Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Extrinsic Factors ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Limb Injuries ◽  
Experimental Group

Background. Abdominal and lumbo-pelvic stability alterations may be the origin of lower limb injuries, such as adductor pathology in soccer players. Imbalance can be caused by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial over 8 weeks, 25 female footballers were randomly allocated to an experimental group (isometric abdominal training and gluteus medius-specific training) or a control group (isometric abdominal training). Evaluations were performed at baseline, at the end of the intervention and after a 4-week follow-up period. The exercise protocol in common for both groups included three exercises: Plank, Lateral plank and Bird dog. Specific exercises for the gluteus medius were: Pelvic drop and Stabilization of the gluteus medius in knee valgus. Outcome measures were lumbar-pelvic stability and adductor strength. Results: After the intervention, there was an increase in lumbo-pelvic stability in both groups, being greater in the control group than in the experimental group (mean differences [MD]: 4.84 vs. MD: 9.58; p < 0.01) with differences in the analysis of repeated measures (p < 0.001), but not in group interaction (p = 0.26). Changes were found in adductor strength in the experimental group (MD: −2.48; p < 0.001 in the left adductor; MD: −1.48; p < 0.01 in right adductor) and control group (MD: −1.68; p < 0.001 in the left adductor; MD: −2.05; p < 0.001 in the right adductor) after the intervention, with differences in the analysis of repeated measures in left (p < 0.001) and right (p < 0.001) adductor strength. Conclusions: An abdominal and gluteal training protocol shows no advantage over a protocol of abdominal training alone for lumbo-pelvic stability and adductor strength, while improvements in both variables are maintained at four weeks follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document