scholarly journals Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in Clinical Center of Banja Luka

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 460-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonija Verhaz ◽  
Ranko Skrbic ◽  
Mirjana Rakic-Music ◽  
Ana Sabo
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Clinical Center ◽  
Banja Luka ◽  
Tract Infections

Introduction Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are the most common nosocomial infections of the urinary tract, and among the most common nosocomial infections in general. The major problems of these infections include antibiotic resistance and enormous direct and indirect cost of treatment. Material and methods A retrospective study on major causes of infections and antibiotic resistance was conducted at four clinics of the Clinical Center of Banja Luka. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to nursing staff dealing with urinary catheters in order to get an overview of their clinical performance. Results The results showed that in 89% of cases (out of 198 patients with developed catheter-associated urinary tract infection) infections were caused by gram-negative bacteria, in 7% by gram-positive bacteria and in 4% by Candida. The most common bacteria were: Escherichia coli (33.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.1%), Proteus mirabilis (13.3%), and Enterobacter (10.5%). Majority of bacteria presented with extremely high resistance (72-100%) to ampicillin, gentamycin and cotrimoxazole, and in some cases a significant resistance to ciprofloxacine, nalidixic acid, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime. The questionnaire showed that nursing staff did not follow guidelines for medical care of patients with urinary catheters. Conclusion It can be concluded that poor hygienic and epidemiological conditions, as well as irrational use of antibiotics contribute to uncontrolled development of urinary tract infections in catheterized patients.

scholarly journals Resistance of catheter-associated urinary tract infections to antibacterials

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonija Verhaz ◽  
Ranko Skrbic ◽  
Mirjana Rakita-Music
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Treatment Principles ◽  
Clinical Center ◽  
Conventional Antibiotics ◽  
Banja Luka ◽  
Tract Infections

Introduction. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are the most common nosocomial infections. The worldwide data show the increasing resistance to conventional antibiotics among urinary tract pathogens. Aim. To evaluate the adequacy of initial antimicrobial therapy in relation to the antimicrobial resistance of pathogens responsible for CAUTI in Clinical Center of Banja Luka. Methods. A retrospective study on major causes of CAUTI, antibiotic resistance and treatment principles was conducted at four departments of the Clinical Center of Banja Luka from January 1st, 2000 to April 1st, 2003. Results. The results showed that 265 patients had developed CAUTI. The seven most commonly isolated microorganisms were, in descending order: E. coli (31.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.8%), Proteus mirabilis (12.9%), Gr. Klebsiella-Enterobacter (12.3%), Enterococcus spp. (5.2%), Pseudomonas spp. (4.3%), Serratia spp. (4.0%). The most common pathogens were highly resistant to ampicillin (64?100%), gentamycin (63?100%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (68?100%), while some bacterias, like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia spp. showed rates of ciprofloxacin resistance as high as 42.8% and 72.7%, respectively. In 55.5% of the cases, the initial antibiotic therapy was inadequate, and was corrected latter on. There were no standard therapeutic protocols for this type of nosocomial infections. Conclusion. The results of this study emphasized an urgency of the prevention and introduction of clinical protocols for better management of CAUTI. Treatment principles should better correspond to the antibiotic sensitivity of uropathogens.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Female External Urinary Catheter Reduces Indwelling Urinary Catheter Use and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s482-s483
Author(s):  
Paul Gentile ◽  
Jesse Jacob ◽  
Shanza Ashraf
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Using alternatives to indwelling urinary catheters plays a vital role in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). We assessed the impact of introducing female external catheters on urinary catheter utilization and CAUTIs. Methods: In a 500-bed academic medical center, female external catheters were implemented on October 1, 2017, with use encouraged for eligible females with urinary incontinence but not meeting other standard indications for urinary catheters. Nurses were educated and trained on female external catheter application and maintenance, and infection prevention staff performed surveillance case reviews with nursing and medical staff. We determined the number of catheter days for both devices based on nursing documentation of device insertion or application, maintenance, and removal. We used the CAUTI and DUR (device utilization ratio) definitions from the CDC NHSN. Our primary outcomes were changes in DUR for both devices 21 months before and 24 months after the intervention in both intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards. We used a generalized least-squares model to account for temporal autocorrelation and compare the trends before and after the intervention. Our secondary outcome was a reduction in CAUTIs, comparing females to males. Results: In total, there were 346,213 patient days in 35 months. The mean rate of patient days per month increased from 7,436.4 to 7,601.9 after the implementation of female external catheters, with higher catheter days for both urinary catheters (18,040 vs 19,625) and female external catheters (22 vs 12,675). After the intervention, the DUR for female external catheters increased (0 vs 0.07; P < .001) and for urinary catheters the DUR decreased (0.12 vs 0.10; P < .001) (Fig. 1). A reduction in urinary catheter DUR was observed in ICUs (0.29 vs 0.27; P < .001) but not wards (0.08 vs 0.08; P = NS) (Fig. 2). Of the 39 CAUTIs, there was no significant overall change in the rate per 1,000 catheter days (1.22 vs 0.87; P = .27). In females (n = 20 CAUTI), there was a 61% reduction in the CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter days (0.78 vs 0.31; P = .02), but no significant change in the rate in males (0.44 vs 0.56; P = .64). The CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter days among females decreased in the ICUs (1.14 vs 0.31; P = .04) but not in wards (0.6 vs 0.33; P = .96). Conclusions: In a setting with a baseline low UC DUR, successful implementation of female external catheters further modestly reduced UC DUR and was associated with a 61% decrease in CAUTI among females in the ICU but not in wards. Further interventions to better identify appropriate patients for female external catheters may improve patient safety and prevent patient harm.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

592 Prevention of CAUTIs in a Burn ICU

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S138-S138
Author(s):  
Vina Vargas ◽  
Emiko Rivera ◽  
Teresa Sidhu ◽  
Lea Lyn Zaballero ◽  
Yvonne L Karanas
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Research To Practice ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Open Forum ◽  
Excellent Care ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Introduction Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common hospital-associated infection (HAI). Urinary catheter use is associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) that can lead to complications such as cystitis, pyelonephritis, bacteremia, septic shock, and death. CAUTIs are associated with an excess length of stay of 2–4 days, increase costs of $0.4–0.5 billion per year nationally, and lead to unnecessary antimicrobial use. Through numerous implementations, a Burn ICU was able to drastically decrease their incidence of CAUTIs. Methods A Burn ICU implemented several interventions to reduce CAUTI rates. These interventions included: Results When this project was initiated in September of 2017, there were 9 CAUTIs identified in a Burn ICU, per the hospital’s Infection Prevention Department. By the end of 2017, there were 11, which equated to a rate of 14.67 per 1000 urinary catheter days. In 2018, the Burn ICU had 1 CAUTI, with a rate of 1.92 per 1000 urinary catheter days. In 2019 (through quarter 2), the Burn ICU has not had a CAUTI per the Infection Prevention Department. We believe the interventions made have drastically decreased the incidence of CAUTIs. Conclusions A Burn ICU implemented many new practices in 2017 when the CAUTI rate and SIR were above the hospital’s overall SIR. The Burn ICU staff now practice proper care and maintenance of urinary catheters and continue to provide excellent care. Although we have decreased our incidence of CAUTIs for 2018 and 2019, it is equally important we sustain this improvement. Therefore, we will continue to provide an open forum for discussion with staff so we can all do our part in keeping patients safe. Applicability of Research to Practice A Burn ICU decreased the incidence of CAUTIs by educating staff on proper care and maintenance of urinary catheters, removing catheters as soon as possible, and testing for UTIs upon admission to determine the patient’s baseline. By doing so, CAUTI rates went from 14.67 to 0 per 1000 urinary catheter days.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document