scholarly journals Conditioned pain modulation assessment using contact heat as conditioning stimulus and two different test stimuli

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Knezevic ◽  
Milena Kovacevic ◽  
Ljiljana Klicov ◽  
Magdalena Pantic ◽  
Jana Vasin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Contact Heat ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold

Introduction. The objective of the study was to determine the potentials and reliability of conditioned pain modulation effect in healthy population by application of a conditioning contact heat stimulus, and heat and pressure applied to the low back region as a test stimulus. Material and Methods. The study included 33 healthy subjects (average age 25.73 ? 5.35 years). Pressure and heat pain thresholds were examined on the paravertebral musculature of the lower back as test stimuli. Contact heat was used on the contralateral forearm as a conditioning stimulus. Conditioned pain modulation was calculated as the difference between pain thresholds after and before conditioning stimulus application. To assess the reliability, identical testing was performed 14 ? 2 days later. Results. The pressure and heat pain thresholds, after the conditioning stimulus, were significantly higher compared to pain thresholds obtained before the conditioning stimulus (101,63 N/cm2 ? 45,21N/cm2 vs 82,15 N/cm2 ? 36,15 N/cm2, t = -7,528, p < 0,001 and 47,08?C ? 2,19o C vs 45,00 ? 3,05?C, t = -6,644, p < 0,001, respectively). The reli?ability of the same protocol, measured 14 ? 2 days after the previous testing, showed good reliability of the pressure pain threshold (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0,636, 95% confidence interval 0,240 - 0,825), and fair of the heat pain threshold (intraclass cor?relation coefficient = 0,435, 95% confidence interval - 0,070 - 0,713). Conclusion. Conditioned pain modulation was successfully induced by contact heat applied via a thermode, a conditioning stimulus. The reliability of this method of testing proved to be fair when it comes to the heat pain threshold and good when it comes to the pressure pain threshold.

Visuo–tactile stimulation, but not type of movement, modulates pain during the vision of a moving virtual limb

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 449-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calum Gordon ◽  
Alba Barbullushi ◽  
Stefano Tombolini ◽  
Federica Margiotta ◽  
Alessia Ciacci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Immersive Virtual Reality ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Healthy Participants

Aim: Evidence has revealed a relationship between pain and the observation of limb movement, but it is unknown whether different types of movements have diverse modulating effects. In this immersive virtual reality study, we explored the effect of the vision of different virtual arm movements (arm vs wrist) on heat pain threshold of healthy participants. Patients & methods: 40 healthy participants underwent four conditions in virtual reality, while heat pain thresholds were measured. Visuo–tactile stimulation was used to attempt to modulate the feeling of virtual limb ownership while the participants kept their arms still. Results: Effects on pain threshold were present for type of stimulation but not type of movement. Conclusion: The type of observed movement does not appear to influence pain modulation, at least not during acute pain states.

Local hyperalgesia, normal endogenous modulation with pain report beyond its origin: a pilot study prompting further exploration into plantar fasciopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-385
Author(s):  
Henrik Riel ◽  
Melanie L. Plinsinga ◽  
Rebecca Mellor ◽  
Shellie A. Boudreau ◽  
Viana Vuvan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Pain Processing ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Plantar Fasciopathy

AbstractBackground and aimsPersistent tendinopathies were previously considered solely as peripheral conditions affecting the local tendinous tissue until quantitative sensory testing identified involvement of altered pain processing. In similar fashion, pain in patients with persistent plantar fasciopathy may also involve more than local tissue. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate potential differences in conditioned pain modulation and pressure and thermal pain thresholds, between individuals with PF and healthy pain-free controls, as a precursor to a larger-scale study.MethodsWe assessed 16 individuals with plantar fasciopathy and 11 pain-free controls. Plantar fasciopathy diagnosis was: palpation pain of the medial calcaneal tubercle or the proximal plantar fascia, duration ≥3 months, pain intensity ≥2/10, and ultrasound-measured plantar fascia thickness ≥4 mm. Quantitative sensory tests were performed locally at the plantar heel and remotely on the ipsilateral elbow. Assessments included pain thresholds for pressure, heat and cold, and conditioned pain modulation measured as change in local resting pressure pain threshold with cold water hand immersion. Participants rated pain intensity at pain threshold. Additionally, the area and distribution of plantar fasciopathy pain was drawn on a digital body chart of the lower limbs. Descriptive analyses were performed and between-group differences/effects expressed as standardised mean differences (d).ResultsThere was no conditioned pain modulation difference between participants with plantar fasciopathy and controls (d = 0.1). Largest effects were on local pressure pain threshold and reported pain intensity on pressure pain threshold (d > 1.8) followed by pain intensity for heat and cold pain thresholds (d = 0.3–1.5). According to the digital body chart, pain area extended beyond the plantar heel.ConclusionsThe unlikelihood of a difference in conditioned pain modulation yet a pain area extending beyond the plantar heel provide a basis for exploring altered pain processing in a larger-scale study.ImplicationsThis was the first study to investigate the presence of altered pain processing in individuals with plantar fasciopathy using a conditioned pain modulation paradigm and thermal pain thresholds. We found no indication of an altered pain processing based on these measures, however, patients rated pain higher on thresholds compared to controls which may be important to clinical practice and warrants further exploration in the future.

The Effect of Conditioned Pain Modulation on Tonic Heat Pain Assessed Using Participant-Controlled Temperature

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2839-2849
Author(s):  
Laura Sirucek ◽  
Catherine Ruth Jutzeler ◽  
Jan Rosner ◽  
Petra Schweinhardt ◽  
Armin Curt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Stimulus ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Withdrawal Reflex ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds

Abstract Objective Descending pain modulation can be experimentally assessed by way of testing conditioned pain modulation. The application of tonic heat as a test stimulus in such paradigms offers the possibility of observing dynamic pain responses, such as adaptation and temporal summation of pain. Here we investigated conditioned pain modulation effects on tonic heat employing participant-controlled temperature, an alternative tonic heat pain assessment. Changes in pain perception are thereby represented by temperature adjustments performed by the participant, uncoupling this approach from direct pain ratings. Participant-controlled temperature has emerged as a reliable and sex-independent measure of tonic heat. Methods Thirty healthy subjects underwent a sequential conditioned pain modulation paradigm, in which a cold water bath was applied as the conditioning stimulus and tonic heat as a test stimulus. Subjects were instructed to change the temperature of the thermode in response to variations in perception to tonic heat in order to maintain their initial rating over a two-minute period. Two additional test stimuli (i.e., lower limb noxious withdrawal reflex and pressure pain threshold) were included as positive controls for conditioned pain modulation effects. Results Participant-controlled temperature revealed conditioned pain modulation effects on temporal summation of pain (P = 0.01). Increased noxious withdrawal reflex thresholds (P = 0.004) and pressure pain thresholds (P &lt; 0.001) in response to conditioning also confirmed inhibitory conditioned pain modulation effects. Conclusions The measured interaction between conditioned pain modulation and temporal summation of pain supports the participant-controlled temperature approach as a promising method to explore dynamic inhibitory and facilitatory pain processes previously undetected by rating-based approaches.

Development of a novel brief quantitative sensory testing protocol that integrates static and dynamic pain assessments: Test-retest performance in healthy adults

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J De Vita ◽  
Katherine Buckheit ◽  
Christina E Gilmour ◽  
Dezarie Moskal ◽  
Stephen A Maisto
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Dynamic Responses ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Contact Heat ◽  
Intraclass Correlations

Abstract Objective Quantitative sensory testing is an expanding pain research domain with numerous clinical and research applications. There is a recognized need for brief reliable quantitative sensory testing protocols that enhance assessment feasibility. This study aimed to integrate static (pain threshold, tolerance, suprathreshold) and dynamic (conditioned pain modulation, offset analgesia, temporal summation) pain reactivity measures into a brief 20-minute protocol that uses a single portable device. The test-retest performance of this optimized protocol was evaluated. Design Using a test-retest design, the brief quantitative sensory testing assessment was administered to participants on two occasions separated by exactly 7 days. Setting A clinical psychology research laboratory at Syracuse University. Subjects Participants were 33 healthy adults recruited from Syracuse University’s online research participation pool. Methods A portable computerized quantitative sensory testing device delivered contact-heat pain to assess static and dynamic pain measures in participants. Dynamic responses were continuously recorded using a computerized visual analog scale. Results Pain threshold, tolerance, and suprathreshold exhibited excellent reliability (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.80 to 0.83). Conditioned pain modulation, offset analgesia, temporal summation yielded reliability in the good to excellent range (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.66 to 0.71). Conclusions Findings suggested that this brief integrated QST protocol may reliably monitor human pain reactivity over brief periods. This protocol may enhance quantitative sensory testing feasibility in clinical and research settings.

scholarly journals Central inhibition of pain is augmented in women with self-injurious behavior

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Lalouni ◽  
Jens Fust ◽  
Johan Bjureberg ◽  
Granit Kastrati ◽  
Robin Fondberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds

Individuals who engage in nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) have demonstrated higher pain thresholds and tolerance compared with individuals without NSSI. The objective of the study was to assess which aspects of the pain regulatory system that account for this augmented pain perception. In a cross-sectional design, 81 women, aged 18-35 (mean [SD] age, 23.4 [3.9]), were included (41 with NSSI and 40 healthy controls). A quantitative sensory testing protocol, including heat pain thresholds, heat pain tolerance, pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation (assessing central down-regulation of pain), and temporal summation (assessing facilitation of pain signals) was used. Thermal pain stimuli were assessed during fMRI scanning and NSSI behaviors and clinical symptoms were self-assessed. NSSI participants demonstrated higher pain thresholds during heat and pressure pain compared to controls. During conditioned pain modulation, NSSI participants showed a more effective central down-regulation of pain for NSSI participants. Temporal summation did not differ between the groups. There were no correlations between pain outcomes and NSSI behaviors or clinical characteristics. The fMRI analyses revealed increased activity in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex in NSSI participants, compared to healthy controls, which are brain regions implicated in sensory aspects of pain processing. The findings suggest segregated inhibitory mechanisms for pain and emotion in NSSI, as pain insensitivity was linked to enhanced inhibitory control of pain in spite of significant impairments in emotion regulation. This may represent an endophenotype associated with a greater risk for developing self-injurious behavior.

Repeatability of cold pain and heat pain thresholds: The application of sensory testing in migraine research

Cephalalgia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 904-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond Sand ◽  
Kristian Bernhard Nilsen ◽  
Knut Hagen ◽  
Lars Jacob Stovner
Keyword(s):  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Cold Pain ◽  
Pain Thresholds ◽  
Thermal Pain ◽  
Normal Limits ◽  
Normal Test ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold ◽  
The Face ◽  
Repeatability Limit

Normal heat pain threshold (HPT) and cold pain threshold (CPT) repeatability should be estimated in order to identify thermal allodynia in longitudinal studies, but such data are scarce in the literature. The aim of our study was to estimate normal HPT and CPT repeatability in the face, forehead, neck and hand. In addition, we reviewed briefly normative studies of thermal pain thresholds relevant for headache research. Thermal pain thresholds were measured on three different days in 31 healthy headache-free subjects. Coefficients of repeatability and normal limits were calculated. HPT and CPT were lowest in the face. Pooled across regions, the lower repeatability limit for the test/retest ratio was 63% for HPT and 55% for CPT. The upper normal CPT limit varied between 24.5°C and 29.7°C. Lower HPT limits ranged between 35.5°C and 40.8°C. Quantitative sensory methods provide useful information about headache and pain pathophysiology, and it is important to estimate the normal test/retest repeatability range in follow-up studies.

The effect of a mental stressor on conditioned pain modulation in healthy subjects

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian B. Nilsen ◽  
Sunniva E. Christiansen ◽  
Line B. Holmen ◽  
Trond Sand
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mental Stress ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Stressful Task ◽  
Medically Unexplained

AbstractBackground and purposeIn animal studies, enhanced sensitivity to painful stimuli succeeding chronic stress has been reported, while acute stress is reported to induce analgesia. Human studies on the effect of mental stress on pain are more equivocal. A disturbed stress-response resulting in an increased sensitivity to painful stimuli has also been discussed as a potential mechanism for e.g., the fibromyalgia syndrome. Endogenous analgesia may be studied in humans by measuring the analgesic effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation. In neurophysiological animal studies this phenomenon was originally denoted “diffuse noxious inhibitory controls” (DNIC), but for human studies it has been suggested to use the term conditioned pain modulation (CPM).The clinical relevance of aberrances in CPM is not clear. Inhibitory CPM is reported as being reduced in several medically unexplained syndromes with musculoskeletal pain aggravated by mental stress. However, whether the reported reduced CPM effects are causally related to clinical pain is unknown.In the present study the effect of a mental stressor on CPM is studied.MethodsWith tourniquet-induced pain as the conditioning stimulus we estimated the CPM effect in twenty healthy subjects. Heat pain threshold (HPT), supra-threshold heat pain level (SHPL) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were used as test stimuli. Measurements were performed at baseline, after a stressful task and after a non-stressful task presented in a blinded cross-over design. We used repeated-measures ANOVAs in the analysis with simple contrasts for post hoc analysis.ResultsWith a ANOVA repeated measures model we found a significant task effect (F = 18.5, p ≤ 0.001), indicating that CPM was successfully induced. In our ANOVA model, we found a significant effect of stress in the contrast analysis (F = 5.2, p = 0.037), indicating that CPM was affected by the stressful task. The effects on PPT could not be analyzed due to a significant carry-over effect (for PPT only).ConclusionsIn the present blinded crossover study, we found a significant small to medium inhibitory effect of mental stress upon the CPM of thermal pain.ImplicationsOur results suggest that previously reported reduced inhibitory CPM in several medically unexplained syndromes with musculoskeletal pain aggravated by mental stress possibly can be related to confounding or clinically relevant stress level differences. However, the result might be modality-specific. Further studies in patients are obviously needed, and the impact of mental stress on CPM should be investigated also with other stressors.

scholarly journals A cross-sectional analysis of persistent low back pain, using correlations between lumbar stiffness, pressure pain threshold, and heat pain threshold

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Casper Glissmann Nim ◽  
Søren O’Neill ◽  
Anne Gellert Geltoft ◽  
Line Korsholm Jensen ◽  
Berit Schiøttz-Christensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Spinal Stiffness ◽  
Pressure Pain Thresholds ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Introduction Little is known about the underlying biomechanical cause of low back pain (LBP). Recently, technological advances have made it possible to quantify biomechanical and neurophysiological measurements, potentially relevant factors in understanding LBP etiology. However, few studies have explored the relation between these factors. This study aims to quantify the correlation between biomechanical and neurophysiological outcomes in non-specific LBP and examine whether these correlations differ when considered regionally vs. segmentally. Methods This is a secondary cross-sectional analysis of 132 participants with persistent non-specific LBP. Biomechanical data included spinal stiffness (global stiffness) measured by a rolling indenter. Neurophysiological data included pain sensitivity (pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold) measured by a pressure algometer and a thermode. Correlations were tested using Pearson’s product-moment correlation or Spearman’s rank correlation as appropriate. The association between these outcomes and the segmental level was tested using ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey corrected comparisons. Results A moderate positive correlation was found between spinal stiffness and pressure pain threshold, i.e., high degrees of stiffness were associated with high pressure pain thresholds. The correlation between spinal stiffness and heat pain threshold was poor and not statistically significant. Aside from a statistically significant minor association between the lower and the upper lumbar segments and stiffness, no other segmental relation was shown. Conclusions The moderate correlation between spinal stiffness and mechanical pain sensitivity was the opposite of expected, meaning higher degrees of stiffness was associated with higher pressure pain thresholds. No clinically relevant segmental association existed.

scholarly journals An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Age and Sex/Gender on Pain Sensitivity in Healthy Human Participants

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan El-Tumi ◽  
Mark I. Johnson ◽  
Osama A. Tashani
Keyword(s):  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Cold Pressor ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Detection Thresholds ◽  
Pressure Pain ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold ◽  
Cold Pressor Pain

Background: Ageing is associated with alterations of the structure and function of somatosensory tissue that can impact on pain perception. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between age and pain sensitivity responses to noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli in healthy adults. Methods: 56 unpaid volunteers (28 women) aged between 20 and 55 years were categorised according to age into one of seven possible groups. The following measurements were taken: thermal detection thresholds, heat pain threshold and tolerance using a TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer; pressure pain threshold using a handheld electronic pressure algometer; and cold pressor pain threshold, tolerance, intensity and unpleasantness. Results: There was a positive correlation between heat pain tolerance and age (r = 0.228, P = 0.046), but no statistically significant differences between age groups for cold or warm detection thresholds, or heat pain threshold or tolerance. Forward regression found increasing age to be a predictor of increased pressure pain threshold (B = 0.378, P = 0.002), and sex/gender to be a predictor of cold pressor pain tolerance, with women having lower tolerance than men (B = -0.332, P = 0.006). Conclusion: The findings of this experimental study provide further evidence that pressure pain threshold increases with age and that women have lower thresholds and tolerances to innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli. Significance: The findings demonstrate that variations in pain sensitivity response to experimental stimuli in adults vary according to stimulus modality, age and sex and gender.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document