"Comparison of Continuation Rates of Intrauterine Devices"

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 322
Author(s):  
Anthony R. Measham ◽  
Abel Villegas
Contraception ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Woo ◽  
Sara Seifert ◽  
Dacia Hendricks ◽  
Roxanne M. Jamshidi ◽  
Anne E. Burke ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Rakhshani ◽  
M. Mohammadi

Wevaluated contraception continuation rates and discontinuation reasons in Zahedan among 1741 women from 1998-2000. By Kaplan-Meier technique continuation rates were 92% for low dose combined hormonal oral contraceptives [OC], 86% for a levonorgestrel-releasing implant, 82% for intrauterine devices [IUD] and 53% for medroxyprogesterone acetate at the first year. After 3 years, continuation was 78% for levonorgestrel implant, 70% for OC, 60% for IUD and 44% for medroxyprogesterone acetate. The commonest reason for discontinuing OC and medroxyprogesterone acetate was changing method; for IUD and levonorgestrel-releasing implant, the commonest reason was side-effects. By Cox regression model, continuation rate and contraceptive type were significantly related to health centre


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaori Nakada

Abstract Background Maternal employment has been described as a barrier to breastfeeding in many countries. In Japan, many mothers quit breastfeeding after returning to work because they do not know how to continue breastfeeding. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a breastfeeding support program for mothers. The secondary objective was to explore the effectiveness of a pamphlet for mothers returning to work. Methods This was a quasi-experimental design study with a program group (n = 48), pamphlet group (n = 46) and comparison group (n = 47) that took place from February 2017 to August 2018. Participants in the program and pamphlet groups were women who planned to return to work within 4–12 months after giving birth, while the comparison group included women who had been back at work for at least 3 months. The program involved a 90-min breastfeeding class, a pamphlet, a newsletter, and email consultation. The pamphlet group was sent only the pamphlet, while the comparison group received no intervention. The outcome was breastfeeding continuation rate at 3 months after returning to work. Results The breastfeeding continuation rate 3 months after returning to work was significantly higher in the program group than in the comparison group (79.2% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.004). After adjusting for background factors, the program intervention had an effect on breastfeeding rates (adjusted odds ratio = 4.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.57, 13.96; p = 0.006). However, comparing the pamphlet and comparison groups revealed no significant differences in breastfeeding continuation rates at 3 months after returning to work (69.6% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.07). Conclusions Program intervention was associated with a significant increase in breastfeeding continuation rates 3 months after returning to work. Randomized controlled trials are needed to make this program applicable in practice. Pamphlet intervention resulted in no significant difference. Further study is necessary after examining the contents of the pamphlet.


Author(s):  
Qianqian Fan ◽  
Guo Bao ◽  
Dongfeng Ge ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Mingming Sun ◽  
...  

Contraception ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi K. Tepper ◽  
Maria W. Steenland ◽  
Mary E. Gaffield ◽  
Polly A. Marchbanks ◽  
Kathryn M. Curtis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document