D. P. Gorskij. Priménénié dialéktičéskoj logiki k izučéniú procéssov myšléniá (Application of dialectical logic to the study of thought processes). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 5–41. - B. M. Kédrov. Opérirovanié naučnymi ponátiámi v dialéktičéskoj i formal'noj logiké (Operating with scientific concepts in dialectical and formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 42–141. - I. G. Gérasimov. Analiz i sintéz v formal'noj logiké i dialéktiké (Analysis and synthesis in formal logic and dialectic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 142–171. - E. V. Il'enkov. Ponimanié abstraktnogo i konkrétnogo v dialéktiké i formal'noj logiké (Understanding abstract and concrete in dialectic and formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 172–210. - L. P. Gokiéli. O dialéktičéskom haraktéré “korénnyh vyvodov” v logiké (On the dialectical character of “fundamental deductions” in logic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 211–222. - A. A. Zinov'év. Probléma stroéniá nauki v logiké i dialiktiké (The problem of the structure of science in logic and dialectic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 223–270. - B. M. Kédrov. Formal'nyé i dialéktičéskié principy klassifikacii nauk i obščaá struktura naučnogo znaniá (The formal and dialectical principles of classification of the sciences and the general structure of scientific knowledge). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 271–310.

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-373
Author(s):  
David Dinsmore Comey
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
General Structure ◽  
Nauk Sssr ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
Thought Processes ◽  
Scientific Concepts ◽  
Akademii Nauk Sssr ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis

P. V. Tavanéc. O vidah suždéniá (On types of judgment). Izvéstiá Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Sériá istorii i filosofii, vol. 7 (1950), pp. 69–84. - P. V. Tavanéc. Kritika istolkovaniá prirody suždénij logikoj otnošénij (A critique of the interpretation of the nature of judgments in the logic of relations). Izvéstiá Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Sériá istorii i filosofii, vol. 7 (1950), pp. 360–372. - K. S. Bakradzé. K voprosu o sootnošénii logiki i dialéktiki (On the question of the relationship of logic to dialectic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1950), pp. 198–209. - V. I. Čérkésov. O logiké i marksistskoj dialéktiké (On logic and Marxist dialectic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1950), pp. 209–222. - M. S. Strogovič. O prédmété formal'noj logiki (On the subject matter of formal logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1950), pp. 309–317. - I. I. Os'makov. O logiké myšéniá i o nauké logiké (On the logic of thought and the science of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1950), pp. 317–330. - P. S. Popov. Prédméi formal'noj logiki i dialéktika (Dialectic and the subject matter of formal logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 1 (1951), pp. 210–218. - N. V. Zavadskaá. K diskussii po voprosam logiki (On the discussion of questions of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 1 (1951), pp. 218–222. - A. O. Makovél'skij. Čém, dolžna byt' logika kak nauka? (What should logic be as a science?) Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 179–181. - Dobrin Spasov. Dialéktičéskuú logiku nado né otricat', a razrabatyvat' (Dialectical logic should not be rejected but elaborated). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 182–184. - M. N. Alékséév. Obsuždénié voprosov logiki v Moskovskom Gosudarstvénnom Univérsdtété (Discussion of questions of logic at the State University of Moscow). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 184–192. - A. D. Aléksandrov. O logiké (On logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1951), pp. 152–163. - F. Á. Ostrouh. Protiv iskažéniá marksizma v voprosah logiki (Versus distortion of Marxism in questions of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1951), pp. 164–173.

1952 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-128
Author(s):  
George L. Kline
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Nauk Sssr ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
State University ◽  
Akademii Nauk Sssr ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Science Of Logic ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

P. V. Kopnin and P. V. Tavaneć. Dialéktika i logika (Dialectic and logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 7–62. - B. M. Kédrov. Prédmét marksistskoj dialéktičéshoj logiki i égo otličié ot prédméta formal'noj logiki (The subject matter of Marxist dialectical logic and its difference from the subject matter of formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 63–137. - B. M. Kédrov. Zakony marksistskoj dialéktičéskoj logiki i ih otnošénié k zakonam formal'noj logiki (The laws of Marxist dialectical logic and their relation to the laws of formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 138–218. - V. A. Léktorskij and N. V. Karabanov. Ponátié toždéstva v formal'noj i dialéktičéshoj logiké (The concept of identity in formal and dialectical logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 219–266. - J. Eléz. Dialéktičéská i formal'naá logika ob obéktivnyh i subéktivnyh protivoréčiáh i kritérii ih različéniá (Dialectical and formal logic on objective and subjective contradictions and the criteria by which they are distinguished). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 267–307. - B. M. Kédrov. Nésvodimost' marksistskoj dialéktičéshoj traktovki protivorčéij k formal'nologičéskim shémam (The irreducibility of the Marxist dialectical treatment of contradictions to the schemata of formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 308–334.

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-372
Author(s):  
David Dinsmore Comey
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Nauk Sssr ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
Akademii Nauk Sssr ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
The Subject

scholarly journals Features of the Criminal Identity in Acts of Extremism

Legal Concept ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
Olga Yakovleva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Methodological Framework ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Practice Methods ◽  
Criminological Analysis

Introduction: the problem of studying the identity of a criminal has always been the focus of criminology, criminal law, criminal procedure, criminalistics and other legal sciences. The criminal identity has individual distinctive features and qualities. The aim of the work is to identify, analyze and evaluate the characteristics of individuals in extremist crimes, and fix them for further use in the law enforcement practice. Methods: the methodological framework for the research is a set of methods of scientific knowledge, among which, first of all, we should mention the methods of system analysis and synthesis. Results: the paper presents a criminological analysis of the criminal identity in acts of extremism. The classification of persons who commit crimes of this group of crimes is determined. The necessity of a comprehensive approach in the development of the state policy in the field of prevention of extremist crime is emphasized. Conclusions: persons who commit crimes of extremism can be divided into several categories: 1) gang delinquents and violent protesters; 2) individuals with religious ideas who are perpetrators of crimes of extremism; 3) persons who provide assistance (including organizational and sponsorship) to the extremist communities and groups, as well as attract extremist criminals for their power purposes.

Actual issues of systematization of scientific knowledge on the conditions of shot in the forensic ballistics

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-169
Author(s):  
Igor' Latyshov ◽  
Fedor Samuylenko
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
Production Method ◽  
Natural Phenomenon ◽  
Projectile Energy ◽  
Energy Characteristics ◽  
Shot Classification ◽  
Forensic Ballistics

In this research, there was considered a challenge of constructing a system of scientific knowledge of the shot conditions in judicial ballistics. It was observed that there are underlying factors that are intended to ensureits [scientific knowledge] consistency: identification of the list of shot conditions, which require consideration when solving expert-level research tasks on weapons, cartridges and traces of their action; determination of the communication systems in the course of objects’ interaction, which present the result of exposure to the conditions of the shot; classification of the shot conditions based on the grounds significant for solving scientific and practical problems. The article contains the characteristics of a constructive, functional factor (condition) of weapons and cartridges influence, environmental and fire factors, the structure of the target and its physical properties, situational and spatial factors, and projectile energy characteristics. Highlighted are the forms of connections formed in the course of objects’ interaction, proposed are the author’s classifications of forensically significant shooting conditions with them being divided on the basis of the following criteria: production from the object of interaction, production from a natural phenomenon, production method, results weapon operation and utilization, duration of exposure, type of structural connections between interaction objects, number of conditions that apply when firing and the forming traces.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document