Can Japan Craft an International Nuclear Disarmament Policy?

The article is devoted to the study of such an important aspect of the activities of the World Russian People's Council (until 1995 it was called the World Russian Council) in the 90-s of the 20-th century as a discussion of national security issues and nuclear disarmament. At that time, a number of political and public figures actively called for the nuclear disarmament of Russia. Founded in 1993, the World Russian Council called for the Russian Federation to maintain a reasonable balance between reducing the arms race and fighting for the resumption of detente in international relations, on the one hand, and maintaining a powerful nuclear component of the armed forces of the country, on the other. The resolutions of the World Russian Council and the World Russian People's Council on the problems of the new concepts formation of foreign policy and national security of Russia in the context of NATO's eastward movement are analyzed in the article. It also shows the relationship between the provisions of the WRNS on security and nuclear weapons issues with Chapter VIII of the «Fundamentals of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church».

Download Full-text

Contemporary International Tribunals

10.1093/oso/9780190848194.003.0011 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Antonio Augusto Cançado Trindade Trindade

Keyword(s):

Ad Hoc ◽

International Criminal ◽

Case Law ◽

Nuclear Disarmament ◽

International Human Rights ◽

International Criminal Tribunals ◽

The Icj ◽

The Common ◽

International Human ◽

International Tribunals

In the course of 2016, international human rights tribunals (ECtHR, IACtHR and ACtHPR) kept on making cross-references to each other’s case-law, as well as to that of other international tribunals. The same has taken place on the part of international criminal tribunals (ICC and ICTFY), at a time of special attention to the preservation of the legacy of the ad hoc tribunals (ICTFY and ICTR). One could have expected the same from the ICJ, as to the case-law of other international tribunals, in its recent decisions in the cases concerning the Obligation of Nuclear Disarmament (2016), keeping in mind the common mission (of realization of justice) of contemporary international tribunals from an essentially humanist outlook.

Download Full-text

Strategic Scripts and Nuclear Disarmament

10.1093/oso/9780190851163.003.0017 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Matthew Harries ◽

Benedict Wilkinson

Keyword(s):

Nuclear Weapons ◽

Analytical Tool ◽

The Other ◽

Nuclear Disarmament ◽

Stable Reduction ◽

The Way

This chapter spans Freedman’s earliest focus on nuclear weapons and his development of strategic scripts as an analytical tool over three decades later. It discusses the way in which opposing logics of disarmament and armament co-existed in relation to nuclear weapons. It deploys the notion of strategic scripts to explain the contradictions inherent in approaches to nuclear disarmament, developing the concept of strategic scripts as it does so. The notion of scripts can be used to explore and even to promote nuclear disarmament. Two scripts, one of ‘stable reduction’, the other of ‘disarmament’, each serve to frame thinking. These scripts and the interactions they generate facilitate understanding of the way in which opposite instinctive reactions and, stemming from these, scripts about nuclear weapons co-exist, but are fragile as either an analytical or a strategic tool.

Download Full-text

Reflections on Institutional Cosmopolitanism

10.1093/oso/9780190905651.003.0003 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Richard Beardsworth

Keyword(s):

The State ◽

Nuclear Disarmament ◽

Global Policy ◽

Mitigation And Adaptation ◽

Political Purpose ◽

Role Of The State ◽

Agents Of Change ◽

The Individual ◽

Change Mitigation

With its moral commitment to the individual, cosmopolitanism has often downplayed the role of the state in cosmopolitan commitments and their practices. There is, however, emerging concern to put the state back into cosmopolitan concerns. This chapter argues that two outstanding reasons for this intellectual move are of an institutional and political nature. First, despite the recent pluralization of global actors, states remain the major agents of change within a (post-Western) system of states; both the moral and political purpose of the state should therefore be aligned with global imperatives. Second, a clearly formulated “marriage” between the global and the national is required to line up institutional motivation for enlightened global policy. This chapter argues, accordingly, for cosmopolitan state responsibilities toward the provision of global public goods (examples include nuclear disarmament, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and sustainable development).

Download Full-text