scholarly journals Descriptive Evidence from Audit Practice on SAS No. 99 Brainstorming Activities

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. A1-A11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi L. Bellovary ◽  
Karla M. Johnstone
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Group Interactions ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

SUMMARY: This paper describes how auditors conduct brainstorming sessions to comply with the requirements of SAS No. 99. We gather evidence by interviewing 22 auditors at all personnel levels across seven audit firms (including all of the Big 4 firms) and by observing actual brainstorming sessions. The results reveal how auditors prepare for brainstorming sessions and allow us to describe a typical four-step brainstorming session process. We describe brainstorming group interactions and provide evidence on brainstorming session outcomes in terms of fraud risk assessments, audit plan modifications, and budget modifications. Finally, we report how audit firms encourage professional skepticism during brainstorming.

scholarly journals Assessing Management Integrity: Insights from Big 4 Auditors in Egypt

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. A29-A39
Author(s):  
Rasha Kassem
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
External Auditors ◽  
Corporate Scandals ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments ◽  
Audit Standards

SUMMARY Recent corporate scandals have raised concerns about the quality and value of the audit profession and have generated demands for improving auditors' evaluation of management integrity. The literature lacks evidence regarding methods of assessing management integrity, while audit standards provide little if any guidance on this matter. This raises questions about how external auditors can comply with the audit standards in this area and what best practices and deficiencies exist in the assessment of management integrity. This study examines methods of assessing management integrity by providing insights from the Big 4 auditors in Egypt. The findings of this study will benefit audit firms in their professional audit training programs, as well as auditors conducting fraud risk assessments.

Fraud Brainstorming Group Composition in Auditing: The Persuasive Power of a Skeptical Minority

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle McAllister ◽  
Allen D. Blay ◽  
Kathryn Kadous
Keyword(s):  
Group Composition ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
Mediation Analyses ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Persuasive Power ◽  
High Trait ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

We experimentally examine the effects of trait professional skepticism on fraud brainstorming performance. We find that groups with a minority, but not a majority, of high trait skeptics develop more fraud ideas than control groups with no high trait skeptics. Mediation analyses indicate that minority high trait skeptic groups also assess higher fraud risk, in part because they consider more fraud ideas. Low trait skeptics who brainstorm in groups with a minority of high trait skeptics tend to view the minority high trait skeptic as the best member of the group because of that member's unique insights. Their individual, post-brainstorming fraud risk assessments remain high, indicating conversion to the minority (skeptical) viewpoint. Our study contributes to the brainstorming literature by highlighting the importance of group composition. It suggests that firms can promote skeptical team judgments by leveraging individuals' high trait skepticism in thoughtfully composed interacting groups.

The Effect of Fraud Risk Assessment Frequency and Fraud Inquiry Timing on Auditors' Skeptical Judgments and Actions

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey R. Brasel ◽  
Richard C. Hatfield ◽  
Erin Burrell Nickell ◽  
Linda M. Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Fraud Detection ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Operational Level ◽  
Assessment Frequency ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

SYNOPSIS Identifying ways to improve and maintain professional skepticism, particularly for the purpose of reducing the risk of material misstatement due to fraud, continues to be a top priority for the auditing profession. This study examines two strategies for improving skeptical behavior in a fraud-related task: (1) practicing inward-directed skepticism through repeated risk assessments and (2) performing timely fraud inquiries of operational-level employees. Results indicate auditors made more skeptical judgments when revisiting and reassessing fraud risk assessments. Further, when auditors performed operational-level fraud inquiries prior to substantive testing, participants exhibited significantly greater increases in skeptical judgment than those who performed inquiries subsequently or not at all. We also observed a greater tendency toward skeptical action, but only on the part of participants who were highly skeptical by nature. These findings support the effectiveness of two strategies for improving skepticism throughout an audit engagement that can improve fraud detection.

Professional Skepticism: The Effects of a Partner's Influence and the Level of Fraud Indicators on Auditors' Fraud Judgments and Actions

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina D. Carpenter ◽  
Jane L. Reimers
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
The Public ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Public Company ◽  
Academic Researchers ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments ◽  
Selection Of

ABSTRACT: The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), in its recent auditor inspections, cited a lack of professional skepticism and selection of appropriate audit procedures as serious problems for auditors, and suggested that the tone set by audit partners is critical for auditors' fraud investigations. We investigate selected components of Nelson's (2009) model of professional skepticism: the effects of the partner's emphasis on professional skepticism and the effect of the level of fraud indicators on auditors' identification of fraud risk factors, auditors' fraud risk assessments, and their selection of audit procedures. Thus, we provide an initial test of predictions of the links established in his model, and our results suggest a possible extension to his model. This study provides evidence that a partner's emphasis on professional skepticism is critical for both effective and efficient identification of relevant fraud risk factors and choice of relevant audit procedures. These results should be informative to both standard setters and academic researchers because they highlight the costs and benefits of an audit partner's attitude toward professional skepticism on the evaluation of fraud.

Facilitating Brainstorming: Impact of Task Representation on Auditors' Identification of Potential Frauds

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Chen ◽  
Amna Saeed Khalifa ◽  
Ken T. Trotman
Keyword(s):  
Data Availability ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Task Representation ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Group Brainstorming ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

SUMMARY Individual auditor brainstorming is an important input to group brainstorming. In a setting where multiple potential frauds exist, we examine the effect of brainstorming task representation (simultaneous versus sequential unpacking of potential frauds) on individual auditors' identification of potential frauds and fraud risk assessments. Results from an experiment with experienced auditors show that the sequential unpacking of the brainstorming task into risk categories (potential frauds identified for each category individually) leads to a greater quantity and quality of potential frauds identified by auditors compared to the simultaneous unpacking (potential frauds identified for the categories together). Additional analysis suggests that the positive effect of sequential unpacking on the quality of frauds identified persists when auditors subsequently receive frauds identified by other team members. We also find a potential negative effect of sequential unpacking as it reduces auditors' fraud risk assessments thus potentially reducing the level of professional skepticism. Data Availability: Contact the authors.

Can Simple Metaphors Be Used as Decision Aids to Promote Professional Skepticism?

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60
Author(s):  
Mary P. Durkin ◽  
Jacob M. Rose ◽  
Jay C. Thibodeau
Keyword(s):  
Decision Aids ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Efficient Tool ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Audit Evidence

ABSTRACT This study examines the potential for metaphorical priming to promote professional skepticism. Results of an experiment with 99 senior auditors from two Big 4 audit firms indicate that reading metaphors that are entirely unrelated to audit evidence can promote professional skepticism and influence auditors' judgments. Relative to auditor participants who did not read a metaphor, participants who read a metaphor related to concerns about the honesty of the sources of information (client-skeptical metaphor) or concerns about one's own ability to detect problems (self-skeptical metaphor) assessed higher levels of fraud risk. These auditors also perceived that fraud-based explanations were more likely to cause fluctuations in client ratios. Importantly, metaphorical primes improved auditors' fraud-related actions and caused them to focus on issues that were the most likely explanations for the audit evidence. Results suggest that metaphorical priming may represent a powerful and efficient tool for promoting high-quality and professionally skeptical judgments.

Fraud risk assessments and auditors’ professional skepticism

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Payne ◽  
Robert J. Ramsay
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Professional Skepticism ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

scholarly journals How Fraud Risk Decomposition Affects Auditors' Fraud Risk Assessments

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. P26-P32
Author(s):  
Chad A. Simon ◽  
Jason L. Smith ◽  
Mark F. Zimbelman
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Risk Decomposition ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Auditing Standards ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

SUMMARY In this paper, we provide a practitioner summary of our paper “The Influence of Judgment Decomposition on Auditors' Fraud Risk Assessments: Some Trade-Offs” (Simon, Smith, and Zimbelman 2018). In that study, we investigate potential unintended consequences from current auditing guidance on risk assessments. Specifically, auditing standards recommend separate assessments of the likelihood and magnitude of risks (hereafter, LM decomposition) when auditors assess risk. Our study involved several experiments, including one with experienced auditors, where we found evidence that LM decomposition leads auditors to be less concerned about high-risk fraud schemes relative to auditors who make holistic risk assessments. Our other experiments involved non-auditing settings and replicated this finding while exploring potential explanations for it. After providing a summary of our study and its results, we offer concluding remarks on the potential implications of our findings.

On the Use of Checklists in Auditing: A Commentary

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. C1-C25 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Efrim Boritz ◽  
Lev M. Timoshenko
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Cue Combination ◽  
Assessment Task ◽  
Fraud Risk ◽  
Red Flag ◽  
Application Methods ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
Fraud Risk Assessments

SUMMARYExperimental studies concerning fraud (or “red flag”) checklists often are interpreted as providing evidence that checklists are dysfunctional because their use yields results inferior to unaided judgments (Hogan et al. 2008). However, some of the criticisms leveled against checklists are directed at generic checklists applied by individual auditors who combine the cues using their own judgment. Based on a review and synthesis of the literature on the use of checklists in auditing and other fields, we offer a framework for effective use of checklists that incorporates the nature of the audit task, checklist design, checklist application, and contextual factors. Our analysis of checklist research in auditing suggests that improvements to checklist design and to checklist application methods can make checklists more effective. In particular, with regard to fraud risk assessments, customizing checklists to fit both client circumstances and the characteristics of the fraud risk assessment task, along with auditor reliance on formal cue-combination models rather than on judgmental cue combinations, could make fraud checklists more effective than extant research implies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document