An Insider’s Perspective on the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. C20-C26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan L. Beller
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
The U.S

Advisory Committee to the U.S. Department of State on Historical Documentation Annual Report, 1978

1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 330-333 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Foreign Relations ◽  
The United States ◽  
Historical Record ◽  
Public Affairs ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Fiscal Constraint ◽  
American Foreign Relations ◽  
The Government ◽  
The U.S

The 22nd annual meeting of the Advisory Committee on Historical Documentation met in Washington on November 3, 1978, with the officers and staff of the Historical Office of the U.S. Department of State, and with other officials in the Bureau of Public Affairs, the Department and the government who are concerned with the release and publication of historical documentation on American foreign relations. The Committee, formerly called the Advisory Committee onForeign Relations of the United States, continues to be concerned chiefly with theForeign Relationsseries as the major form of the Department's historical documentation.The leitmotiv of the meeting—continuing from last year—was the problem of the appropriate adaptation of the series to fiscal constraint. The problem is the more acute because theForeign Relationsseries is now dealing with the 1950s, where it confronts a veritable explosion of documentation involving other agencies of government as well as the Department of State. This expansion of the relevant historical record comes at a time when increases in the budget have barely been able to keep up with the pace of inflation, thus holding practically constant the real resources available for publication.

scholarly journals Strengthening the U.S. Vaccine and Immunization Enterprise: The Role of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee

2011 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela K. Shen ◽  
Jovonni R. Spinner ◽  
Daniel A. Salmon ◽  
Bruce G. Gellin
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
The U.S

Audit Quality Indicators: A Status Update on Possible Public Disclosures and Insights from Audit Practice

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. C12-C19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean C. Bedard ◽  
Karla M. Johnstone ◽  
Edward F. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Public Reporting ◽  
Global Network ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Public Disclosures ◽  
The U.S

SUMMARY: This paper addresses the current status of the recommendation by the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP) that auditing firms provide periodic reporting on audit quality indicators. We first consider several reasons why public reporting of audit quality indicators in the U.S. is highly controversial. We then report some information on how global network auditing firms are internally measuring audit quality in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document