1418-P: Increased Risk of Incident Heart Failure and All-Cause Mortality in Insulin-Resistant People with Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1418-P
Author(s):  
MALGORZATA WAMIL ◽  
RUTH L. COLEMAN ◽  
AMANDA ADLER ◽  
JOHN J. MCMURRAY ◽  
RURY R. HOLMAN
Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc210429
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Wamil ◽  
Ruth L. Coleman ◽  
Amanda I. Adler ◽  
John J.V. McMurray ◽  
Rury R. Holman

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. e1916447
Author(s):  
Claire A. Lawson ◽  
Francesco Zaccardi ◽  
Gerry P. McCann ◽  
Melanie J. Davies ◽  
Umesh T. Kadam ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Glud Heiredal ◽  
M Schou ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
J B Johansen ◽  
B T Philpert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is debated whether insulin use is associated with a pro-arrhythmic effect. There is paucity of studies investigating this aspect in patients with heart failure (HF), where use of insulin is associated with an increased mortality risk. Purpose We aimed to investigate whether patients receiving insulin had higher risk of device-treated ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) in a population of HF patients with medically treated diabetes and primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). Methods Information on ICD/CRT-D implantation and therapy, comorbidities, diabetes, diabetes-related complications and medication were obtained through Danish nationwide registers. From 2007 through 2016 we identified all primary prevention ICD/CRT-D implantations in HF patients with diabetes, defined as treatment with antidiabetic medication within one year prior to implantation. Patients were divided into two groups; Insulin treated vs. non-insulin treated patients. Endpoints of interest were VTA, defined as appropriate ICD therapy, and all-cause mortality. Cumulative incidence curves and adjusted Cox proportional Hazards regression analyses were used to assess risk of outcomes. Adjustment variables included age, gender, ischemic heart disease (IHD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ICD vs. CRT-D, diuretic use (as a proxy for severity of HF), prior VTA and diabetes-related complications, identified from diagnosis codes for diabetic nephro-, retino-, and neuropathy, multiple diabetic complications and unspecified diabetic complications. Results We identified 1240 patients with HF and diabetes with a primary prevention ICD/CRT-D. The majority of patients had type 2 diabetes (94%). Of these 479 patients (39%) were treated with insulin and 761 (61%) were not. Patients were primarily male (85%) with mean age of 66.9±8.3 years, mean LVEF of 25.6±7.5%, 42% had CRT-D and 58% ICD, without differences between the groups. The insulin-treated group had a higher occurrence of diabetes-related complications (81% vs. 42%, p<0.01) and IHD (95% vs. 90%, p<0.01). During a mean follow-up of 3.1±2.1 years, 74 insulin treated patients (16%) and 86 non-insulin treated patients (11%) experienced VTA (p=0.034), with higher 5-year cumulative incidence of VTA in the insulin group. Insulin treatment was associated with significantly increased risk of VTA (HR = 1.45; 95% CI [1.04–2.03], p=0.031) and all-cause mortality (HR=1.27; 95% CI [1.03–1.58], p=0.027), as compared with non-insulin treated patients. Figure 1 Conclusion In HF patients with diabetes implanted with a primary prevention ICD/CRT-D, treatment with insulin was associated with a significant 45% increased risk of device-treated ventricular tachyarrhythmias and 27% increased risk of all-cause mortality. These findings support further clinical trials to evaluate the safety of insulin in patients with HF and type 2 diabetes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Zareini ◽  
P.B Blanche ◽  
A.H Holt ◽  
M.M Malik ◽  
D.P Rajan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is common in patients with heart failure (HF), but knowledge of future cardiovascular events is lacking. Purpose We compared risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death versus ischemic events in real-life HF patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D. Methods Using the Danish nationwide registers, we identified all patients with HF between 1998–2016. The patients were separated in two different HF cohorts based on the status of T2D. One cohort consisted of HF patients with either prevalent or absent T2D at the time of HF diagnosis. The other cohort consisted of HF patients, who developed new-onset T2D, included at time of diagnosis. The two HF cohorts were analyzed separately. Outcomes for both cohorts were analyzed as time-to-first event as either an ischemic event (i.e. composite outcome of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral artery disease), HFH, or event-free death (not related to HFH or the ischemic event). For each cohort, we estimated the five-year absolute risk of ischemic event, HFH and event-free death, along with five-year risk ratio of HFH or event-free death versus ischemic events. Effects among subgroups were investigated by stratifying both cohorts based on age, gender and comorbidities present at inclusion. Results A total of 139,264 HF patients were included between 1998 and 2016, of which 29,078 (21%) patients had prevalent T2D at baseline. A total of 11,819 (8%) developed new-onset T2D and were included in the second cohort. The median duration of time between HF diagnosis and new-onset T2D diagnosis was: 4.1 years (IQR:1.5; 5.8). The absolute five-year risk of an ischemic event in patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D was: 17.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17.2; 18.6), 26.1% (95% CI: 25.6; 26.7), and 18.8% (95% CI:18.6; 19.0). Corresponding estimates for HFH were: 31.5% (95% CI: 30.6; 32.3), 33.6% (95% CI: 33.0; 34.2), and 30,7% (95% CI: 30.5; 31.0). The absolute five-year risk of event-free death among patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D was: 20.9% (95% CI: 20.2; 21.7), 18.9% (95% CI:18.4; 19.3), and 18.6% (95% CI: 18.4; 18.8) (see Figure). The five-year risk ratio of experiencing HFH or event-free death versus an ischemic event was: 2.9 (95% CI: 2.8; 3.1), 2.0 (95% CI:2.0; 2.1), and 2.6 (95% CI: 2.6; 2.7) for patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D, respectively. Similar results of absolute and relative risk were present across all subgroups. Conclusion In our population of HF patients, 8% developed new-onset diabetes. Development of T2D in patients with HF increases the risk of HFH and mortality three-fold. The increased risk of new-onset T2D is higher than the importance of prevalent T2D in patients with HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lorenzo-Almoros ◽  
A Pello ◽  
A Acena ◽  
J Martinez-Milla ◽  
N Tarin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with early and severe atherosclerosis. However, few biomarkers can predict cardiovascular events in this population. Methods We followed 964 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), assessing at baseline galectin-3, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels. Secondary outcomes were acute ischemia and heart failure or death. Primary outcome was the combination of the secondary outcomes. Results Male patients were 75.0% in T2DM and 76.6% in the non-T2DM subgroup (p=0.609). Age was 61.0 (54–72) and 60.0 (51–71) years, respectively (p=0.092). 232 patients had T2DM. Patients with T2DM showed higher MCP-1 [144 (113–195) vs. 133 (105–173) pg/ml, p=0.006] and galectin-3 [8.3 (6.5–10.5) vs. 7.8 (5.9–9.8) ng/ml, p=0.049] levels. Median follow-up was 5.39 years (2.81- 6.92). Galectin-3 levels were associated with increased risk of the primary outcome in T2DM patients [HR 1.57 (1.07–2.30); p=0.022], along with a history of cerebrovascular events. Treatment with clopidogrel was associated with lower risk. In contrast, NT-proBNP and MCP-1, but not galectin-3, were related to increased risk of the event in non-diabetic patients [HR 1.21 (1.04–1.42); p=0.017 and HR 1.23 (1.05–1.44); p=0.012, respectively], along with male sex and age. Galectin-3 was also the only biomarker that predicted the development of acute ischemic events and heart failure or death in T2DM patients, while in non-diabetics MCP-1 and NT-proBNP, respectively, predicted these events. Conclusion In CAD patients, cardiovascular events are predicted by galectin-3 plasma levels in patients with T2DM, and by MCP-1 and NT-proBNP in those without T2DM. Effect of Gal-3 on the primary endpoint Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Insituto de Salud Carlos III


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document