Galectin-3 predicts cardiovascular events in patients with type-2 diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lorenzo-Almoros ◽  
A Pello ◽  
A Acena ◽  
J Martinez-Milla ◽  
N Tarin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Galectin 3 ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Introduction Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with early and severe atherosclerosis. However, few biomarkers can predict cardiovascular events in this population. Methods We followed 964 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), assessing at baseline galectin-3, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels. Secondary outcomes were acute ischemia and heart failure or death. Primary outcome was the combination of the secondary outcomes. Results Male patients were 75.0% in T2DM and 76.6% in the non-T2DM subgroup (p=0.609). Age was 61.0 (54–72) and 60.0 (51–71) years, respectively (p=0.092). 232 patients had T2DM. Patients with T2DM showed higher MCP-1 [144 (113–195) vs. 133 (105–173) pg/ml, p=0.006] and galectin-3 [8.3 (6.5–10.5) vs. 7.8 (5.9–9.8) ng/ml, p=0.049] levels. Median follow-up was 5.39 years (2.81- 6.92). Galectin-3 levels were associated with increased risk of the primary outcome in T2DM patients [HR 1.57 (1.07–2.30); p=0.022], along with a history of cerebrovascular events. Treatment with clopidogrel was associated with lower risk. In contrast, NT-proBNP and MCP-1, but not galectin-3, were related to increased risk of the event in non-diabetic patients [HR 1.21 (1.04–1.42); p=0.017 and HR 1.23 (1.05–1.44); p=0.012, respectively], along with male sex and age. Galectin-3 was also the only biomarker that predicted the development of acute ischemic events and heart failure or death in T2DM patients, while in non-diabetics MCP-1 and NT-proBNP, respectively, predicted these events. Conclusion In CAD patients, cardiovascular events are predicted by galectin-3 plasma levels in patients with T2DM, and by MCP-1 and NT-proBNP in those without T2DM. Effect of Gal-3 on the primary endpoint Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Insituto de Salud Carlos III

scholarly journals Galectin-3 is Associated with Cardiovascular Events in Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Type-2 Diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Lorenzo-Almorós ◽  
Ana Pello ◽  
Álvaro Aceña ◽  
Juan Martínez-Milla ◽  
Óscar González-Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Galectin 3 ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Introduction: Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with early and severe atherosclerosis. However, few biomarkers can predict cardiovascular events in this population. Methods: We followed 964 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), assessing plasma levels of galectin-3, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at baseline. The secondary outcomes were acute ischemia and heart failure or death. The primary outcome was the combination of the secondary outcomes. Results. Two hundred thirty-two patients had T2DM. Patients with T2DM showed higher MCP-1 (144 (113–195) vs. 133 (105–173) pg/mL, p = 0.006) and galectin-3 (8.3 (6.5–10.5) vs. 7.8 (5.9–9.8) ng/mL, p = 0.049) levels as compared to patients without diabetes. Median follow-up was 5.39 years (2.81–6.92). Galectin-3 levels were associated with increased risk of the primary outcome in T2DM patients (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.57 (1.07–2.30); p = 0.022), along with a history of cerebrovascular events. Treatment with clopidogrel was associated with lower risk. In contrast, NT-proBNP and MCP-1, but not galectin-3, were related to increased risk of the event in nondiabetic patients (HR 1.21 (1.04–1.42); p = 0.017 and HR 1.23 (1.05–1.44); p = 0.012, respectively), along with male sex and age. Galectin-3 was also the only biomarker associated with the development of acute ischemic events and heart failure or death in T2DM patients, while, in nondiabetics, MCP-1 and NT-proBNP, respectively, were related to these events. Conclusion: In CAD patients, galectin-3 plasma levels are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM, and MCP-1 and NT-proBNP in those without T2DM.

scholarly journals Dulaglutide is cardioprotective with or without background metformin in patients with diabetes and established or high risk for coronary vascular disease. A subgroup analysis of the REWIND Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Ferrannini ◽  
H.C Gerstein ◽  
H.M Colhoun ◽  
G.R Dagenais ◽  
R Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background The 2019 ESC/EASD European Guidelines for Diabetes, Prediabetes and Coronary Artery Disease introduced a paradigm shift in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for or already established cardiovascular (CV) disease by recommending a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) as initial glucose lowering therapy in patients without any previous antihyperglycaemic treatment. This recommendation has been questioned since outcome trials of GLP-1-RA were usually conducted with metformin as background therapy. Purpose The aim of this report is to determine whether the effect of dulaglutide on cardiovascular events varies according to baseline metformin therapy. It was tested by a subgroup analysis of the Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial. Methods REWIND, a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, comprised 9901 participants (women: 46.3%; mean age: 66.2 years) with T2D and either a previous CV event (31%) or a high CV risk (69%). They were randomised (1:1) to either sc. dulaglutide (1.5 mg/week) or placebo in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome was the first of a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke or CV death. Secondary outcomes were a microvascular composite endpoint, all-cause death and heart failure. The effect of dulaglutide study outcomes in patients with and without baseline metformin was evaluated by means of a Cox regression hazard model with baseline metformin, dulaglutide assignment and the interaction between dulaglutide and metformin as independent variables. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a Cox regression model with additional adjustments for factors that differed at baseline between people on vs. those not on baseline metformin selected by a backward regression model. A p<0.05 was considered significant (see Figure 1). Results Patients without metformin at baseline (n=1864; 19%) were older, leaner, more likely to be women and had a higher proportion of prior CV events, heart failure and renal disease than patients with metformin (n=8037; 81%). During a median follow-up of 5.4 years (IQR 5.1–5.9), the primary outcome occurred in 976 (12%) participants with baseline metformin and in 281 (15%) without metformin. There was no significant difference in the effect of dulaglutide on the primary outcome in the groups with vs. without metformin at baseline (HR 0.93 [CI 0.82–1.06] vs. 0.78 [CI 0.61–0.99]; p for interaction=0.16). The effect of dulaglutide on the secondary outcomes was also not modified by concomitant metformin use (all interaction p>0.1). Conclusion This exploratory analysis suggests that the cardioprotective effect of dulaglutide does not depend on baseline metformin therapy. This supports the recommendation of using agents with proven cardioprotective efficacy without metformin in patients with diabetes and additional cardiac risk factors. Figure 1. Forest plot Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Eli Lilly and Company

scholarly journals Night heart rate variability identifies cardiovascular risk in community dwelling people with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Hadad ◽  
B.S Larsen ◽  
A.S Fenger ◽  
D Stavnem ◽  
N Mattsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction Low Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects cardiac autonomic neuropathy, associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. Measuring HRV is challenged by environmental noise, mental stress and physical activity during the day-time. Thus, measuring night-time HRV during sleep may be a better tool to predict cardiovascular (CV) events in low risk T2DM patients without previous cardiovascular disease. Methods Copenhagen Holter Study included 678 community dwelling subjects aged 55–75 years free of previous cardiovascular disease. Day- and night-time HRV were available for 653. The population included 133 well-controlled T2DM patients (mean HbA1c 7.2%). Median follow- up was 14.4 years. HRV is defined as standard deviation for the mean value of normal-to-normal complexes (SDNN). Night-time HRV measurements were pre-defined from 2:00 to 2:15 AM. CV events were defined as CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization. Results The rate of CV events was 17 and 31 per 1000 patient-year in patients without and with T2DM, respectively (p=0.015). Night-time SDNN was inversely associated with CV events in T2DM patients with a HR of 0.74 (0.61–0.89), P=0.001, for each 10 ms increment in SDNN, after adjustment for sex, age, LDL, smoking, systolic BP, glucose, CRP and NT pro-BNP (table 1). Twenty-four-hours HRV was not associated with cardiovascular events (table 1). Conventional risk factors had an AUC of 0.704 (95% CI 0.602–0.806) to predict CV events in T2DM. Prediction was improved by the addition of night-time SDNN; AUC 0.765 (95% CI 0.669–0.862), P=0.037, but not by CRP or NT-proBNP (Figure 1). In subjects with well-controlled T2DM and night-time SDNN ≤30 ms, the 10-year risk of CV death and CV even-rate were 12% and 45%, respectively. This allocates these T2DM patients in a “very high-risk” group, and more aggressive targets for blood-pressure and lipids according to the current guidelines. Conclusion Reduced night-time HRV associates with increased risk of CV events in persons with well-controlled T2DM. We observed improved risk prediction of cardiovascular events in T2DM by night-time HRV, which may have therapeutic consequences. Figure 1. ROC Curve Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Danish Heart Foundation

Similar cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and established or high risk for coronary vascular disease treated with dulaglutide with and without baseline metformin

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Ferrannini ◽  
Hertzel Gerstein ◽  
Helen Martina Colhoun ◽  
Gilles R Dagenais ◽  
Rafael Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Metformin Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Objective  Recent European Guidelines for Diabetes, Prediabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases introduced a shift in managing patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for or established cardiovascular (CV) disease by recommending GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors as initial glucose-lowering therapy. This is questioned since outcome trials of these drug classes had metformin as background therapy. In this post hoc analysis, the effect of dulaglutide on CV events was investigated according to the baseline metformin therapy by means of a subgroup analysis of the Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial. Research design and methods  Patients in REWIND (n = 9901; women: 46.3%; mean age: 66.2 years) had type 2 diabetes and either a previous CV event (31%) or high CV risk (69%). They were randomized (1:1) to sc. dulaglutide (1.5 mg/weekly) or placebo in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome was the first of a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and death from cardiovascular or unknown causes. Key secondary outcomes included a microvascular composite endpoint, all-cause death, and heart failure. The effect of dulaglutide in patients with and without baseline metformin was evaluated by a Cox regression hazard model with baseline metformin, dulaglutide assignment, and their interaction as independent variables. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by a Cox regression model with adjustments for factors differing at baseline between people with vs. without metformin, identified using the backward selection. Results  Compared to patients with metformin at baseline (n = 8037; 81%), those without metformin (n = 1864; 19%) were older and slightly less obese and had higher proportions of women, prior CV events, heart failure, and renal disease. The primary outcome occurred in 976 (12%) participants with baseline metformin and in 281 (15%) without. There was no significant difference in the effect of dulaglutide on the primary outcome in patients with vs. without metformin at baseline [HR 0.92 (CI 0.81–1.05) vs. 0.78 (CI 0.61–0.99); interaction P = 0.18]. Findings for key secondary outcomes were similar in patients with and without baseline metformin. Conclusion  This analysis suggests that the cardioprotective effect of dulaglutide is unaffected by the baseline use of metformin therapy.

scholarly journals MCP-1 Predicts Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Persistent Inflammation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1137
Author(s):  
Luis M. Blanco-Colio ◽  
Nerea Méndez-Barbero ◽  
Ana María Pello Lázaro ◽  
Álvaro Aceña ◽  
Nieves Tarín ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Persistent Inflammation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Galectin 3

Clinical data indicate that patients with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels higher than 2 mg per liter suffer from persistent inflammation, which is associated with high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We determined whether a panel of biomarkers associated with CVD could predict recurrent events in patients with low or persistent inflammation and coronary artery disease (CAD). We followed 917 patients with CAD (median 4.59 ± 2.39 years), assessing CRP, galectin-3, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin-I plasma levels. The primary outcome was the combination of cardiovascular events (acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic event, heart failure or death). Patients with persistent inflammation (n = 343) showed higher NT-proBNP and MCP-1 plasma levels compared to patients with CRP < 2 mg/L. Neither MCP-1 nor NT-proBNP was associated with primary outcome in patients with CRP < 2 mg/L. However, NT-proBNP and MCP-1 plasma levels were associated with increased risk of the primary outcome in patients with persistent inflammation. When patients were divided by type of event, MCP-1 was associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic events. A significant interaction between MCP-1 and persistent inflammation was found (synergy index: 6.17 (4.39–7.95)). In conclusion, MCP-1 plasma concentration is associated with recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with persistent inflammation.

scholarly journals Fibrosis biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes depending on the degree of albuminuria

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
D. A. Lebedev ◽  
M. Yu. Laevskaya ◽  
A. Yu. Babenko
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Urinary Albumin Excretion ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Albumin Creatinine Ratio ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Galectin 3 ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

Background. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a risk of developing chronic heart failure (CHF). The degree of albuminuria is a marker of DN and is associated with an increased risk of chronic heart failure (CHF).Aim. To evaluate fibrosis biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters in patients with T2DM without CHF, depending on urinary albumin excretion.Materials and methods. The study included 42 patients with T2DM without verified CHF. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) a group with normoalbuminuria and 2) a group with a moderate increase in albuminuria (albumin / creatinine ratio of 30–300 mg / g). Echocardiography was performed and galectin-3, ST-2, PIСP, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 concentrations were measured.Results. The groups did not differ by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Galectin-3 concentrations were significantly higher in the group with a moderate increase in albuminuria than in the group of patients without albuminuria – 13.6 (11.2; 15.1) ng / ml and 7.4 (6.7; 7.9) ng / ml, respectively, p = 0.002. The groups also did not differ in the values of biomarkers, such as P1CP, TIMP-1, and MMP-9. Besides, the group with normoalbuminuria had lower E/e’ values than the group with a moderate increase in albuminuria – 8 (7; 9) and 10 (9; 12.5), p = 0.02.Conclusion. The patients with type 2 diabetes and a moderate increase in albuminuria have higher values of galectin-3 and a more pronounced diastolic dysfunction. The identified changes may reflect a higher risk of chronic heart failure in this group of patients.

New-onset type 2 diabetes in heart failure: impact of heart failure and death versus ischemic events – a Danish nationwide cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Zareini ◽  
P.B Blanche ◽  
A.H Holt ◽  
M.M Malik ◽  
D.P Rajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Ischemic Event ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Ischemic Events ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is common in patients with heart failure (HF), but knowledge of future cardiovascular events is lacking. Purpose We compared risk of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death versus ischemic events in real-life HF patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D. Methods Using the Danish nationwide registers, we identified all patients with HF between 1998–2016. The patients were separated in two different HF cohorts based on the status of T2D. One cohort consisted of HF patients with either prevalent or absent T2D at the time of HF diagnosis. The other cohort consisted of HF patients, who developed new-onset T2D, included at time of diagnosis. The two HF cohorts were analyzed separately. Outcomes for both cohorts were analyzed as time-to-first event as either an ischemic event (i.e. composite outcome of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral artery disease), HFH, or event-free death (not related to HFH or the ischemic event). For each cohort, we estimated the five-year absolute risk of ischemic event, HFH and event-free death, along with five-year risk ratio of HFH or event-free death versus ischemic events. Effects among subgroups were investigated by stratifying both cohorts based on age, gender and comorbidities present at inclusion. Results A total of 139,264 HF patients were included between 1998 and 2016, of which 29,078 (21%) patients had prevalent T2D at baseline. A total of 11,819 (8%) developed new-onset T2D and were included in the second cohort. The median duration of time between HF diagnosis and new-onset T2D diagnosis was: 4.1 years (IQR:1.5; 5.8). The absolute five-year risk of an ischemic event in patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D was: 17.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17.2; 18.6), 26.1% (95% CI: 25.6; 26.7), and 18.8% (95% CI:18.6; 19.0). Corresponding estimates for HFH were: 31.5% (95% CI: 30.6; 32.3), 33.6% (95% CI: 33.0; 34.2), and 30,7% (95% CI: 30.5; 31.0). The absolute five-year risk of event-free death among patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D was: 20.9% (95% CI: 20.2; 21.7), 18.9% (95% CI:18.4; 19.3), and 18.6% (95% CI: 18.4; 18.8) (see Figure). The five-year risk ratio of experiencing HFH or event-free death versus an ischemic event was: 2.9 (95% CI: 2.8; 3.1), 2.0 (95% CI:2.0; 2.1), and 2.6 (95% CI: 2.6; 2.7) for patients with new-onset T2D, prevalent T2D and no T2D, respectively. Similar results of absolute and relative risk were present across all subgroups. Conclusion In our population of HF patients, 8% developed new-onset diabetes. Development of T2D in patients with HF increases the risk of HFH and mortality three-fold. The increased risk of new-onset T2D is higher than the importance of prevalent T2D in patients with HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Impact of timing of randomization after an acute coronary syndrome and subsequent events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the EXAMINE trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Elharram ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
W White ◽  
G Bakris ◽  
P Rossignol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The timing of enrolment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potentially treatment effect in clinical trials. Using a large contemporary trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) post-ACS, we examined the impact of timing of enrolment on subsequent CV outcomes. Methods EXAMINE was a randomized trial of alogliptin versus placebo in 5380 patients with T2DM and a recent ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], or non-fatal stroke. The median follow-up was 18 months. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the occurrence of subsequent CV events by timing of enrollment divided by tertiles of time from ACS to randomization: 8–34, 35–56, and 57–141 days. Results Patients randomized early (compared to the latest times) had less comorbidities at baseline including a history of heart failure (HF; 24.7% vs. 33.0%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (9.6% vs. 15.9%), or atrial fibrillation (5.9% vs. 9.4%). Despite the reduced comorbidity burden, the risk of the primary outcome was highest in patients randomized early compared to the latest time (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.47; 95% CI 1.21–1.74) (Figure 1). Similarly, patients randomized early had an increased risk of recurrent MI (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.17–1.96) and HF hospitalization (1.49; 95% CI 1.05–2.10). Conclusion In a contemporary cohort of T2DM with a recent ACS, early randomization following the ACS increases the risk of CV events including recurrent MI and HF hospitalization. This should be taken into account when designing future clinical trials. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Takeda Pharmaceutical

scholarly journals Serum uric acid, influence of sacubitril/valsartan, and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PARAGON-HF

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Selvaraj ◽  
B.L Claggett ◽  
D.V Veldhuisen ◽  
I.S Anand ◽  
B Pieske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Serum Uric Acid ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Serum uric acid (SUA) is a biomarker of several pathobiologies relevant to the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though by itself may also worsen outcomes. In HF with reduced EF, SUA is independently associated with adverse outcomes and sacubitril/valsartan reduces SUA compared to enalapril. These effects in HFpEF have not been delineated. Purpose To determine the prognostic value of SUA, relationship of change in SUA to quality of life and outcomes, and influence of sacubitril/valsartan on SUA in HFpEF. Methods We analyzed 4,795 participants from the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF) trial. We related baseline hyperuricemia to the primary outcome (CV death and total HF hospitalization), its components, myocardial infarction or stroke, and a renal composite outcome. At the 4-month visit, the relationship between SUA change and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) and several biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were also assessed. We simultaneously adjusted for baseline and time-updated SUA to determine whether lowering SUA was associated with clinical benefit. Results Average age was 73±8 years and 52% were women. After multivariable adjustment, hyperuricemia was associated with increased risk for most outcomes (primary outcome HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.37, 1.90, Fig 1A). The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan for the primary outcome was not modified by baseline SUA (interaction p=0.11). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SUA −0.38 mg/dL (95% CI: −0.45, −0.31) compared with valsartan (Fig 1B), with greater effect in those with baseline hyperuricemia (−0.50 mg/dL) (interaction p=0.013). Change in SUA was independently and inversely associated with change in KCCQ-OSS (p=0.019) and eGFR (p&lt;0.001), but not NT-proBNP (p=0.52). Time-updated SUA was a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes over baseline SUA. Conclusions SUA independently predicts adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces SUA compared to valsartan, an effect that was stronger in those with higher baseline SUA, and reducing SUA was associated with improved outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document