scholarly journals Trends in Glucose Lowering Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults with Diabetes in Hong Kong 2002-2016

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimin Yang ◽  
Hongjiang Wu ◽  
Eric S.H. Lau ◽  
Ronald C.W. Ma ◽  
Alice P.S. Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Lowering Drug ◽  
Design And Methods

<b>OBJECTIVE</b> There has been a shift towards new classes of glucose lowering drugs (GLDs) in the past decade but no improvements in glycemic control or hospitalization rates due to severe hypoglycemia (SH) in previous surveys. We examined trends in GLDs utilization, glycemic control and SH rate among patients with diabetes in Hong Kong which introduced a territory-wide, team-based diabetes care model since 2000. <p><b>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</b> Using population-based data from the Hong Kong Diabetes Surveillance Database, we estimated age- and sex-standardized proportion of GLDs classes, mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and SH rates in 763,809 diabetes patients aged≥20 years between 2002-2016. </p> <p><a><b>RESULTS </b>Between 2002-2016, use declined for sulfonylureas (62.9% to 35.3%) but increased for metformin (48.4% to 61.4%) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) (0.01% in 2007 to 8.3%). The proportion of patients with HbA1c of 6.0-7.0% (42-to-53 mmol/mol) increased from 28.6% to 43.4% while SH rate declined from 4.2 per 100-person-years to 1.3 per 100-person-years. The main improvement in HbA1c occurred between 2007 and 2014, decreasing from mean (SD) 7.6 (1.6)% (59.5 [19.0] mmol/mol) to 7.2 (1.7)% (54.8 [18.9] mmol/mol) (p<0.001). The 20-44 age group had the highest proportion of HbA1c≥9% (75 mmol/mol) and rising proportions not on GLDs (from 2.0% to 7.7%).</a></p> <p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b> In this 15-year survey, the modest but important improvement in HbA1c since 2007 coincided with diabetes service reforms, increase in metformin, decrease in sulfonylurea and modest rise in DPP-4i use. Persistently poor glycemic control and under-utilization of GLDs in the youngest group calls for targeted action.</p>

scholarly journals Trends in Glucose Lowering Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults with Diabetes in Hong Kong 2002-2016

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimin Yang ◽  
Hongjiang Wu ◽  
Eric S.H. Lau ◽  
Ronald C.W. Ma ◽  
Alice P.S. Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Lowering Drug ◽  
Design And Methods

<b>OBJECTIVE</b> There has been a shift towards new classes of glucose lowering drugs (GLDs) in the past decade but no improvements in glycemic control or hospitalization rates due to severe hypoglycemia (SH) in previous surveys. We examined trends in GLDs utilization, glycemic control and SH rate among patients with diabetes in Hong Kong which introduced a territory-wide, team-based diabetes care model since 2000. <p><b>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</b> Using population-based data from the Hong Kong Diabetes Surveillance Database, we estimated age- and sex-standardized proportion of GLDs classes, mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and SH rates in 763,809 diabetes patients aged≥20 years between 2002-2016. </p> <p><a><b>RESULTS </b>Between 2002-2016, use declined for sulfonylureas (62.9% to 35.3%) but increased for metformin (48.4% to 61.4%) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) (0.01% in 2007 to 8.3%). The proportion of patients with HbA1c of 6.0-7.0% (42-to-53 mmol/mol) increased from 28.6% to 43.4% while SH rate declined from 4.2 per 100-person-years to 1.3 per 100-person-years. The main improvement in HbA1c occurred between 2007 and 2014, decreasing from mean (SD) 7.6 (1.6)% (59.5 [19.0] mmol/mol) to 7.2 (1.7)% (54.8 [18.9] mmol/mol) (p<0.001). The 20-44 age group had the highest proportion of HbA1c≥9% (75 mmol/mol) and rising proportions not on GLDs (from 2.0% to 7.7%).</a></p> <p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b> In this 15-year survey, the modest but important improvement in HbA1c since 2007 coincided with diabetes service reforms, increase in metformin, decrease in sulfonylurea and modest rise in DPP-4i use. Persistently poor glycemic control and under-utilization of GLDs in the youngest group calls for targeted action.</p>

39-OR: Secular Trends in Glucose-Lowering Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults with Diabetes between 2002 and 2016 in Hong Kong

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-OR
Author(s):  
AIMIN YANG ◽  
HONGJIANG WU ◽  
ERIC S. LAU ◽  
RONALD C. MA ◽  
ALICE P. KONG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Drug Utilization ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Secular Trends ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Drug

scholarly journals Trends in Glucose-Lowering Drug Use, Glycemic Control, and Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults With Diabetes in Hong Kong, 2002–2016

Diabetes Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2967-2974
Author(s):  
Aimin Yang ◽  
Hongjiang Wu ◽  
Eric S.H. Lau ◽  
Ronald C.W. Ma ◽  
Alice P.S. Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Drug

scholarly journals Glucose-Lowering Medications and Post-Dementia Survival in Patients with Diabetes and Dementia

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Juraj Secnik ◽  
Hong Xu ◽  
Emilia Schwertner ◽  
Niklas Hammar ◽  
Michael Alvarsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Models ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Dementia Patients ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ◽  
Using Data

Background: The effectiveness of glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) is unknown among patients with dementia. Objective: To analyze all-cause mortality among users of six GLDs in dementia and dementia-free subjects, respectively. Methods: This was a longitudinal open-cohort registry-based study using data from the Swedish Dementia Registry, Total Population Register, and four supplemental registers providing data on dementia status, drug usage, confounders, and mortality. The cohort comprised 132,402 subjects with diabetes at baseline, of which 11,401 (8.6%) had dementia and 121,001 (91.4%) were dementia-free. Subsequently, comparable dementia – dementia-free pairs were sampled. Then, as-treated and intention-to-treat exposures to metformin, insulin, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1a), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) were analyzed in the parallel dementia and dementia-free cohorts. Confounding was addressed using inverse-probability weighting and propensity-score matching, and flexible parametric survival models were used to produce hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the association between GLDs and all-cause mortality. Results: In the as-treated models, increased mortality was observed among insulin users with dementia (HR 1.34 [95%CI 1.24–1.45]) as well as in dementia-free subjects (1.54 [1.10–1.55]). Conversely, sulfonylurea was associated with higher mortality only in dementia subjects (1.19 [1.01–1.42]). GLP-1a (0.44 [0.25–0.78]) and SGLT-2i users with dementia (0.43 [0.23–0.80]) experienced lower mortality compared to non-users. Conclusion: Insulin and sulfonylurea carried higher mortality risk among dementia patients, while GLP-1a and SGLT-2i were associated with lower risk. GLD-associated mortality varied between dementia and comparable dementia-free subjects. Further studies are needed to optimize GLD use in dementia patients.

scholarly journals Trends in diabetes medication use in Canada, England, Scotland and Australia: a repeated cross-sectional analysis (2012-2017)

2020 ◽  
pp. bjgp20X714089
Author(s):  
Michelle Greiver ◽  
Alys Havard ◽  
Juliana Bowles ◽  
Sumeet Kalia ◽  
Chen Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Drugs ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Lowering Drug ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Background: Several new classes of glucose lowering medications have been introduced in the past two decades. Some, such as Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2s), have evidence of improved cardiovascular outcomes, while others, such as Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4s), do not. It is therefore important to identify their uptake, in order to find ways to support the use of more effective medications. Aims: We studied the uptake of these new classes amongst patients with type 2 diabetes. Design and setting: Retrospective repeated cross-sectional analysis. We compared rates of medication uptake in Australia, Canada, England and Scotland. Method: We used primary care Electronic Medical Data on prescriptions (Canada, UK) and dispensing data (Australia) from 2012 to 2017. We included persons aged 40 years or over on at least one glucose-lowering drug class in each year of interest, excluding those on insulin only. We determined proportions of patients in each nation, for each year, on each class of medication, and on combinations of classes. Results: By 2017, data from 238,609 patients were included. The proportion of patients on sulfonylureas (SUs) decreased in three out of four nations, while metformin decreased in Canada. Use of combinations of metformin and new drug classes increased in all nations, replacing combinations involving SUs. In 2017 more patients were on DPP4s (between 19.1% and 27.6%) than on SGLT2s (between 10.1% and 15.3%). Conclusions: New drugs are displacing SUs. However, despite evidence of better outcomes, the adoption of SGLT2s lagged behind DPP4s.

Abstract P444: Changes in Glucose-Lowering Medication Prescriptions After an Incident Cardiovascular Event Across eGFR Levels in an Integrated Health System

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Im Shin ◽  
Elizabeth Selvin ◽  
Lesley Inker ◽  
Jodie Reider ◽  
Alex R CHANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Health System ◽  
Cardiovascular Event ◽  
Diabetes Duration ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction ◽  
Antihypertensive Medications ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is a major complication among patients with diabetes, and may merit changes in both antihypertensive medications (e.g., to beta blockers and ACE inhibitors) and glucose-lowering medications (e.g., to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT2i] and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists [GLP1 RA], medication classes with evidence of cardiovascular outcome benefit). The objective of this study was to assess how glucose-lowering medication prescriptions changed after a cardiovascular event among persons with diabetes. Hypothesis: There are changes in glucose-lowering medication prescription following a cardiovascular event. Methods: We identified adult patients with diabetes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥15mL/min/1.73 m 2 who experienced a cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure) from 2005-2018 in the Geisinger Health System (cases). We selected control patients with diabetes but without a cardiovascular event by 1:1 matching on demographics, diabetes duration, HbA1c, eGFR, and calendar year. Results: In 15,918 matched case and control patients with diabetes (mean age 65 years, 52% female, mean HbA1c 7.55%, median diabetes duration 5.6 years, and 28% eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), insulin prescriptions increased and metformin prescriptions decreased after a cardiovascular event among cases compared with controls in all eGFR categories ( Table ). There were no differences between cases and controls with respect to changes in SGLT2i, GLP1 RA, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i). Conclusions: In a real-world setting, insulin prescriptions increased and metformin prescriptions decreased, after a cardiovascular event regardless of eGFR level. Prescriptions for SGLT2i and GLP1 RA did not change following a cardiovascular event in all eGFR categories. More efforts are needed to provide optimal therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

scholarly journals Impact of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors on Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Safety with Adherence: An Overview

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 90-99
Author(s):  
Keerthanaa Bhavadasan ◽  
Ann Merry Davis ◽  
Bharathi Kolanthavel
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Lifestyle Modification ◽  
Glucagon Secretion ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Cardiovascular Safety ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors

Diabetes is a ubiquitous chronic disease worldwide. The prevalence is expected to increase further to 9.9% by the year 2045. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, also called as gliptins, act as incretin enhancers. They inhibit glucagon secretion and arouse postprandial insulin secretion, both in a glucose-dependent mode. In 2006, sitagliptin was approved as a first DPP-4 inhibitor in the treatment of diabetes concurrently with lifestyle modification. Sitagliptin has a high bioavailability, while linagliptin has a safety and tolerability profile similar to that of placebo, with a very low risk for hypoglycemia. DPP-4 inhibitors have a weight neutrality effect. One major benefit of gliptins is their excellent tolerability/safety profile compared with other glucose-lowering medications, including other new glucose-lowering agents such as sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Compared with sulfonylureas, they have a smaller decline in HbA1c. The three gliptins showed excellent effect on glycemic control as an add-on therapy in treating type 2 diabetes. The major adverse cardiovascular events, malignancy and pancreatitis, were not associated with the treatment with sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor. The objective of establishing cardiovascular safety trials such as SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, TECOS, CAROLINA, and CARMELINA. DPP-4 inhibitors have higher rates of adherence and persistence compared with sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones.

scholarly journals Diabetes and Frail Older Patients: Glycemic Control and Prescription Profile in Real Life

Pharmacy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Mangé ◽  
Arnaud Pagès ◽  
Sandrine Sourdet ◽  
Philippe Cestac ◽  
Cécile McCambridge
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Frailty Status ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Hba1c Target

(1) Background: The latest recommendations for diabetes management adapt the objectives of glycemic control to the frailty profile in older patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proportion of older patients with diabetes whose treatment deviates from the recommendations. (2) Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in older adults with known diabetes who underwent an outpatient frailty assessment in 2016. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target is between 6% and 7% for nonfrail patients and between 7% and 8% for frail patients. Frailty was evaluated using the Fried criteria. Prescriptions of glucose-lowering drugs were analyzed based on explicit and implicit criteria. (3) Results: Of 110 people with diabetes with an average age of 81.7 years, 67.3% were frail. They had a mean HbA1c of 7.11%. Of these patients, 60.9% had at least one drug therapy problem in their diabetes management and 40.9% were potentially overtreated. The HbA1c distribution in relation to the targets varied depending on frailty status (p < 0.002), with overly strict control in frail patients (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Glycemic control does not seem to be routinely adjusted to the health of frail patients. Several factors can lead to overtreatment of these patients.

scholarly journals Lack of association between either outpatient or inpatient glycemic control and COVID-19 illness severity or mortality in patients with diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002203
Author(s):  
Paras B Mehta ◽  
Michael A Kohn ◽  
Suneil K Koliwad ◽  
Robert J Rushakoff
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Treatment ◽  
Insulin Level ◽  
Illness Severity ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Insulin Use ◽  
Average Glucose ◽  
Ventilator Requirement

IntroductionTo evaluate whether outpatient insulin treatment, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), glucose on admission, or glycemic control during hospitalization is associated with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) illness severity or mortality in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a geographical region with low COVID-19 prevalence.Research design and methodsA single-center retrospective study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from January 1 through August 31, 2020 to evaluate whether outpatient insulin use, HbA1c, glucose on admission, or average glucose during admission was associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation (ventilator) requirement, or mortality.ResultsAmong 111 patients with DM, 48 (43.2%) were on outpatient insulin and the average HbA1c was 8.1% (65 mmol/mol). The average glucose on admission was 187.0±102.94 mg/dL and the average glucose during hospitalization was 173.4±39.8 mg/dL. Use of outpatient insulin, level of HbA1c, glucose on admission, or average glucose during hospitalization was not associated with ICU admission, ventilator requirement, or mortality among patients with COVID-19 and DM.ConclusionsOur findings in a region with relatively low COVID-19 prevalence suggest that neither outpatient glycemic control, glucose on admission, or inpatient glycemic control is predictive of illness severity or mortality in patients with DM hospitalized with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Factors determining the clinical significance of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in the treatment of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-67
Author(s):  
I. V. Glinkina ◽  
A. V. Balashova ◽  
A. S. Shyman ◽  
A. V. Oderij ◽  
S. A. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Severe Hypoglycemia ◽  
Cognitive State ◽  
Cardiovascular Risks ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors

Elderly patients with diabetes type 2 represent complex and heterogeneous group with different diabetes complications and comorbidity, polypharmacy, functional and cognitive state. Each of those factors should be taken into account to choose the best glycemic targets as well as the most tailored treatment so that it is necessary for endocrinologist to perform geriatric assessment. The most favorable antidiabetic drugs for elderly are safe in terms of hypoglycemia and cardiovascular risks, can be used irrespective of kidney function, do not affect weight or bone mineral density, and are available in fixed combinations with other drugs. Dipeptidyl pepti-dase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors meet all these requirements with low adverse events rate. Interdisciplinary approach, close interaction with patient and his relatives and considerations for both intensification and deprescribing are keys to successful treatment in this patient subgroup. Cardiovascular events are the most common cause of death and hypoglycemia is highly unfavorable in elderly because it can lead to falls, life-threatening arrhythmias, and cognitive impairment. So deprescribing in elderly with diabetes should be primarily aimed at minimizing of cardiovascular events and severe hypoglycemia risks. For this purpose, it is considered to the reject use of sulfonylureas, glinides, insulins in favor of safer ones (metformin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document