Síndrome da Anca de Ressalto

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Bernardo Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Snapping Hip ◽  
Predominant Symptom ◽  
Snapping Hip Syndrome

Snapping hip syndrome is a condition in which the predominant symptom is the snapping feelingaround the hip joint caused by a dynamic impingement between muscles or tendons and boneprominences. The etiology of the snapping hip types and consequently the therapeutic targets havebeen subjects of discussion and controversy along the years. A careful clinical history and physicalexamination is frequently enough for this disease diagnosis. Treatment is typically conservative,however when it is not successful surgical treatment is indicated, consisting on the snapping muscleor tendons lengthening. The authors review in this paper the current scientific literature about functionalanatomy, physiopathology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of snapping hip.

The Snapping Hip

1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pećina ◽  
I. Bojanić ◽  
M. Hašpl
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Loose Bodies ◽  
Iliotibial Tract ◽  
Snapping Hip ◽  
Symptom Complex ◽  
Snapping Hip Syndrome

The snapping hip syndrome is a symptom complex characterized by an audible snapping sensation usually, but not necessarily, associated with hip pain during certain movements of the hip joint. A number of different aetiologies, both intraarticular and extraarticular have been described. Intraarticular causes for the snapping hip include loose bodies, osteocartilaginous exostosis, osteochondromatosis and subluxation of the hip. Extraarticular causes for the snapping hip are described in this paper (Tab. I). Due to localization of the causes, three different syndromes are described: the medial (internal), the lateral (external), and the posterior snapping hip syndrome. The authors describe diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment of these syndromes. Successful results in the treatment of lateral snapping hip syndrome with the iliotibial tract fenestration method are also reported.

scholarly journals Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical incisions: retrospective study on 33 cases and review of the literature

2009 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 270-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Karam Corrêa Leite ◽  
Luis Fernando Pina de Carvalho ◽  
Henri Korkes ◽  
Thiago Falbo Guazzelli ◽  
Grecy Kenj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Safety Margin ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Histopathological Analysis ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Uncommon Disease ◽  
Postoperative Diagnosis

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The incidence of scar endometrioma ranges from 0.03 to 3.5%. Certain factors relating to knowledge of the clinical history of the disease make correct diagnosis and treatment difficult. The aim here was to identify the clinical pattern of the disease and show surgical results. The literature on this topic was reviewed. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective descriptive study at Hospital Municipal Maternidade - Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva. METHODS: Data from the medical records of patients with preoperative diagnoses of scar endometrioma who underwent operations between 2001 and 2007 were surveyed and reviewed. The postoperative diagnosis came from histopathological analysis. The main information surveyed was age, obstetric antecedents, symptoms, tumor location, size and palpation, duration of complaint, diagnosis and treatment. All patients underwent tumor excision with a safety margin. RESULTS: There were 33 patients, of mean age 30.1 ± 5.0 years (range: 18-41 years). The total incidence was 0.11%: 0.29% in cesarean sections and 0.01% in vaginal deliveries. Twenty-nine tumors (87.9%) were located in cesarean scars, two (6.0%) in episiotomy scars and two (6.0%) in the umbilical region. The main symptom was localized cyclical pain (66.7%), of mean duration 30.5 months (± 23). Surgical treatment was successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: This is an uncommon disease. The most important diagnostic characteristic is coincidence of painful symptoms with menstruation. Patients undergoing cesarean section are at greatest risk: relative risk of 27.37 (P < 0.01). The surgical treatment of choice is excision of the endometrioma with a safety margin.

Snapping Hip Syndrome: Systematic Review of Surgical Treatment

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Potalivo ◽  
Walter Bugiantella
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
General Population ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Peak Performance ◽  
Snapping Hip ◽  
Snapping Hip Syndrome ◽  
Flexion And Extension

The snapping hip (SH) syndrome is characterised by an audible snapping, often accompanied by pain, which usually occurs with the flexion and extension of the hip during exercise or ordinary daily activities. The causes of SH can be classified as external, internal and intraarticular. The prevalence of asymptomatic SH in the population is unknown and the incidence of symptomatic cases is not well-defined. The painless snapping in the hip is common in the general population; the symptomatic SH with debilitating pain and weakness is often seen in those who take part in activities such as ballet and running hurdles. The clinician's goal is to determine the cause and treat patients who have symptomatic SH so that they may return to their activities or to athletic peak performance. Most patients with SH can be treated conservatively. However, surgery may be indicated if the condition becomes chronically symptomatic. Arthroscopy may prove useful in the treatment of intraarticular lesions that are causing discomfort. Various techniques have been described with different grades of success. The aim is to achieve the least invasive procedure with the lowest potential complications that corrects the painful snapping, according to the patient's characteristics. The purpose of this systematic review is to clarify the results of the surgical treatment of SH, after the failure of the conservative treatment.

Imaging of Impingement Syndromes around the Hip Joint

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia E. Vassalou ◽  
Aristeidis H. Zibis ◽  
Michail E. Klontzas ◽  
Apostolos H. Karantanas
Keyword(s):  
Physical Examination ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Snapping Hip ◽  
Hip Impingement ◽  
Snapping Hip Syndrome ◽  
Work Up ◽  
Ischiofemoral Impingement

Impingement syndromes are increasingly recognised as significant causes of hip pain and dysfunction. A broad spectrum of intraarticular and extraarticular conditions has been implicated in their pathophysiology. Physical examination is often inconclusive as clinical findings may be unclear or misleading, often simulating other disorders. With current improvements in imaging techniques and better understanding of hip impingement related pathomechanisms, these entities can be accurately diagnosed. In addition, preoperative imaging has allowed for targeted treatment planning. This article provides an overview of the various types of hip impingement, including femoroacetabular impingement, ischiofemoral impingement, snapping hip syndrome, greater trochanteric-pelvic and subspine impingement. Current literature data regarding their pathogenesis, clinical manifestation and imaging work-up are discussed.

VIDEO: Dynamic Ultrasound for Snapping Hip Syndrome

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Levine ◽  
Steven Kwong ◽  
Kambiz Motamedi
Keyword(s):  
Snapping Hip ◽  
Dynamic Ultrasound ◽  
Snapping Hip Syndrome

scholarly journals Availability and Use of Mobile Health Technology for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Support by Health Workers in the Ashanti Region of Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1233
Author(s):  
Ernest Osei ◽  
Kwasi Agyei ◽  
Boikhutso Tlou ◽  
Tivani P. Mashamba-Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Text Messages ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Mobile Wireless ◽  
Ashanti Region ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Treatment Support

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have been identified as promising strategies for improving access to healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. However, the extent of availability and use of mHealth among healthcare professionals in Ghana is not known. The study’s main objective was to examine the availability and use of mHealth for disease diagnosis and treatment support by healthcare professionals in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 285 healthcare professionals across 100 primary healthcare clinics in the Ashanti Region with an adopted survey tool. We obtained data on the participants’ background, available health infrastructure, healthcare workforce competency, ownership of a mobile wireless device, usefulness of mHealth, ease of use of mHealth, user satisfaction, and behavioural intention to use mHealth. Descriptive statistics were conducted to characterise healthcare professionals’ demographics and clinical features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the influence of the demographic factors on the availability and use of mHealth for disease diagnosis and treatment support. STATA version 15 was used to complete all the statistical analyses. Out of the 285 healthcare professionals, 64.91% indicated that mHealth is available to them, while 35.08% have no access to mHealth. Of the 185 healthcare professionals who have access to mHealth, 98.4% are currently using mHealth to support healthcare delivery. Logistic regression model analysis significantly (p < 0.05) identified that factors such as the availability of mobile wireless devices, phone calls, text messages, and mobile apps are associated with HIV, TB, medication adherence, clinic appointments, and others. There is a significant association between the availability of mobile wireless devices, text messages, phone calls, mobile apps, and their use for disease diagnosis and treatment compliance from the chi-square test analysis. The findings demonstrate a low level of mHealth use for disease diagnosis and treatment support by healthcare professionals at rural clinics. We encourage policymakers to promote the implementation of mHealth in rural clinics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document