Unmaking the Rehabilitative Ideal
This chapter argues that prisoners themselves catalyzed these changes through their resistance to what many felt were the discriminatory, degrading, and coercive features of the rehabilitative regime in California's prisons. It then maps the diverse and unlikely collection of law enforcement professionals, leftist radicals, and law-and-order activists who all joined prisoners in their rejection of the “rehabilitative ideal.” When legislators abolished indeterminate sentencing, they transferred to the legislature the authority to set the prison terms for different crimes. However, moving sentencing policy into the political arena need not inevitably lead to harsher sentencing. Not every crime evokes a populist demand for retribution, and crime increases do not mechanically trigger harsher punishment.