A Study on the Plans for Case Management Practice in Mental Health

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Keun-Hong Lee
1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
John C. Rife

Case management is an important social work practice method in mental health settings. However, there have been very few systematic statewide studies of case management roles and functions. As a result, educators have not had research-based models of what case managers do for use in social work classes. This article presents a curriculum model for teaching empirically-defined mental health case management to undergraduate students using an exemplary National Institute of Mental Health funded statewide study of mental health case management. The model presents strategies for using this content in both BSW research methods courses and practice courses. Suggested primary sources for additional reading about case management are also provided.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592110089
Author(s):  
Jee Young Joo ◽  
Megan F. Liu

This scoping review aimed to examine telehealth-assisted case management for chronic illnesses and assess its overall impact on health care delivery. Guided by the PRISMA statement, this review included 36 empirical studies published between 2011 and 2020. This study identified three weaknesses and four strengths of telehealth-assisted case management. While the weaknesses were negative feelings about telehealth, challenges faced by patients in learning and using telehealth devices, and increased workload for case managers, the strengths included efficient and timely care, increased access to health care services, support for patients’ satisfaction, and cost savings. Future research can be designed and conducted for overcoming the weaknesses of telehealth-assisted case management. Additionally, the strengths identified by this review need to be translated from research into case management practice for chronic illness care. This review not only describes the value of such care strategy, but also provides implications for future nursing practice and research.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
P. Mateus ◽  
J.M. Caldas de Almeida ◽  
A. Carvalho ◽  
M. Xavier

2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Ziguras ◽  
G. W. Stuart ◽  
A. C. Jackson

BackgroundEvidence on the impact of case management is contradictory.AimsTo discuss two different systematic reviews (one conducted by the authors and one conducted through the Cochrane collaboration) that came to contradictory conclusions about the impact of case management in mental health services.MethodWe summarised the findings of the two reviews with respect to case management effectiveness, examined key methodological differences between the two approaches and discuss the impact of these on the validity of the results.ResultsThe differences in conclusions between the two reviews result from the differences in inclusion criteria, namely non-randomised trials, data from unpublished scales and data from variables with skewed distributions. The theoretical and empirical effects of these are discussed.ConclusionsSystematic reviewers may face a trade-off between the application of strict criteria for the inclusion of studies and the amount of data available for analysis and hence statistical power. The available research suggests that case management is generally effective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document