The comparative study of mental health and non-mental health case management practice − focusing on mental health enhancement centers and community welfare centers

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
So Young Min ◽  
Hyo Sun Choi
Demography ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Maskileyson ◽  
Daniel Seddig ◽  
Eldad Davidov

Abstract The comparative study of perceived physical and mental health in general—and the comparative study of health between the native-born and immigrants, in particular—requires that the groups understand survey questions inquiring about their health in the same way and display similar response patterns. After all, observed differences in perceived health may not reflect true differences but rather cultural bias in the health measures. Research on cross-country measurement equivalence between immigrants and natives on self-reported health measures has received very limited attention to date, resulting in a growing demand for the validation of existing perceived health measures using samples of natives and immigrants and establishing measurement equivalence of health-related assessment tools. This study, therefore, aims to examine measurement equivalence of self-reported physical and mental health indicators between immigrants and natives in the United States. Using pooled data from the 2015–2017 IPUMS Health Surveys, we examine the cross-group measurement equivalence properties of five concepts that are measured by multiple indicators: (1) perceived limitations in activities of daily life; (2) self-reported disability; (3) perceived functional limitations; (4) perceived financial stress; and (5) nonspecific psychological distress. Furthermore, we examine the comparability of these data among respondents of different ethnoracial origins and from different regions of birth, who report few versus many years since migration, their age, gender, and the language used to respond to the interview (e.g., English vs. Spanish). We test for measurement equivalence using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The results reveal that health scales are comparable across the examined groups. This finding allows drawing meaningful conclusions about similarities and differences among natives and immigrants on measures of perceived health in these data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Auksė Endriulaitienė ◽  
Kristina Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė ◽  
Aistė Pranckevičienė ◽  
Rasa Markšaitytė ◽  
Douglas R. Tillman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mrs. Shikha Koundal

The present study seeks to examine the comparative study between truant and non truant students on mental health. The study was conducted on the students of tenth standard of government and private schools. From the analysis of the result, it was found that the truant and non-truant of 10th class of government and private schools of rural and urban area, both group has same mental health. Both groups were average in their mental health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-26
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman Ahmed Alsuwaidi ◽  
Arieff Salleh Rosman

The case management system is an innovative system in the national legislations, it was created because of the slow judiciary procedures and the accumulated cases in the courts. It is also an attempt to settle the juristic dispute before resorting to the jurisdiction. This study aims to identify the alternative methods of disputes settlement in the Islamic sharia; reconciliation, mediation, adjudication. It also sheds a light on the case management system in modern judicial systems and its practical implementations through the comparative study, the demonstration of its goals and its date of inception, the evaluation of the system through the illustration of the advantages and disadvantages, the identification of the main obstacles it encounters, and the Comparison between the case management system in the law and the alternative systems to settle disputes in the Islamic sharia in order to reach conclusions and recommendations by following the scientific methodology of the study using a descriptive, analytical, historical and comparative method. The most important recommendations of the study; first, the need to implement the rules of Islam in the jurisdiction. Second, the need to expand the power of those involved in the a case management system by enabling them to settle disputes in a final manner. Third, the need to pass a special and independent law that organizes the offices of the a case management and clarifies the duties and powers of those who are responsible. يعتبر نظام إدارة الدعوى القضائية نظاما مستحدث ا في التشريعات الوطنية، أوجدته الحاجة بسبب بطء إجراءات التقاضي وتكدس الدعاوى القضائية في المحاكم، ومحاولةً لحل النزاع القانوني قبل اللجوء إلى القضاء، كما وتهدف هذه الدراسة للتعرف على الطرق البديلة لحل النزاعات في الشريعة الإسلامية وهي الصلح والوساطة والتحكيم، وتسليط الضوء على نظام إدارة الدعوى في الأنظمة القضائية الحديةة، والتطبيقات العملية له من خلال الدراسة المقارنة، وبيان أهدافه، وتاريخ نشأته، وتقييم النظام من خلال بيان المزايا والعيوب، وتحديد أهم المعوقات الي تواجهه، ومقارنة نظام إدارة الدعوى في القانون، بالأنظمة البديلة لحل النزاعات في الشريعة الإسلامية، وذلك بهدف الوصول إلى النتائج والتوصيات، من خلال إتباع منهجية علمية باستخدام المنهج الوصيي التحليلي، والتاريخي، والمقارن. ومن أهم التوصيات الي خلصت إليها الدراسة أولاً: ضرورة إعمال أحكام الإسلام في القضاء. ثانيا:ً العمل على توسيع صلاحيات القائمين على نظام إدارة الدعوى، وذلك من خلال تمكينهم من اليصل في المنازعات بشكل نهائي. ثالةاً: ضرورة تنظيم قانون خاص ومستقل ينظم عمل مكاتب إدارة الدعوى، ويوضح فيه مهام وصلاحيات القائمين عليه


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
John C. Rife

Case management is an important social work practice method in mental health settings. However, there have been very few systematic statewide studies of case management roles and functions. As a result, educators have not had research-based models of what case managers do for use in social work classes. This article presents a curriculum model for teaching empirically-defined mental health case management to undergraduate students using an exemplary National Institute of Mental Health funded statewide study of mental health case management. The model presents strategies for using this content in both BSW research methods courses and practice courses. Suggested primary sources for additional reading about case management are also provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document