AUTONOMY OF FAMILY RELATIONS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-293
Author(s):  
P.A. YAKUSHEV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Family Relations ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Family Courts ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
Separate System ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

The article examines the ontology of the autonomy of family relations and its impact on the independence of family law as a branch of law. It is proved that the independence of family law as a branch of law, due by the nature of family relations and their autonomy, determines the need to regulate family relations by an independent codified normative legal act containing material norms of law. Thus, it is concluded that the branch autonomy does not determine the existence of a separate system of courts for the settlement of disputes connected with application of norms of law and an independent justice. Since all family disputes can be considered by courts of General jurisdiction within the existing types of legal proceedings (claim proceedings, special proceedings, writ proceedings), the creation of specialized family courts in the Russian Federation is impractical. However, for the proper consideration and resolution of family disputes, based on the specifics of their subject composition, the subject of dispute, the nature of relationships, degree of procedural activity of the court, it is necessary to supplement Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation separate chapters containing the rules governing the procedural peculiarities of consideration of some categories of family disputes.

scholarly journals Examination and subsequent evaluation of criminal case materials by the prosecuting attorney as the basis for effective organization of the judicial inquiry

2020 ◽  
pp. 249-261
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Anatol'evna Zayceva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Effective Organization ◽  
Fundamental Consideration

The subject of this article is the activity of the prosecuting attorney in the maintenance of public prosecution. The research methodology includes dialectical, logical, formal-legal, and hermeneutical methods. The legal framework for this research is comprised of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, criminal procedure legislation, as well as local normative acts regulating the questions of participation of prosecutors in the judicial stages of criminal proceedings. Emphasis is made on the questions of theoretical and applied nature, related to consideration of criminal case materials by the prosecutor. The article explores the positions of scholars regarding prosecutor’s preparation for the legal proceedings, specificity of prosecutor's work at the stage of preparing for maintenance of state prosecution in court. The conclusion is formulated that the effectiveness of maintenance of prosecuting attorney depends on the level of his preparation to the legal proceedings, which includes examination of criminal case materials. The author highlights two key stages of preparation of the prosecutor to maintenance of public prosecution: examination and subsequent evaluation of criminal case materials; participation in the preliminary hearing and fundamental consideration of criminal case .The author believes that activity of the prosecutor is aimed at formation of inner conviction and maintenance of prosecution in court.

Problems of Creation and Functioning of Constitutional (Charter) Courts of the Subjects of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 51-57
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
Justices Of The Peace ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

Constitutional (statutory) courts are among the most effective bodies to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens. As a result of constitutional (statutory) legal proceedings, not only the person who filed the complaint receives judicial protection, but also other citizens whose rights were violated or could be violated, since recognizing a normative legal act as inadequate to the constitution, such a court cancels it. In his work, the author attempts to objectively assess the level and state of constitutional justice in the regions of the Russian Federation. In view of the fact that, with the exception of justices of the peace, the constitutional (statutory) courts are the only courts of the subjects of the Russian Federation, their absence in most entities violates the principle of separation of powers that is necessary in any democratic state. In addition, constitutional (statutory) courts play an important part in protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens, including allowing them to challenge the constitutionality of a particular law of the subject, as well as, for example, the regulatory legal act of the local government. The author concludes that there is a necessity to organize such courts, analyzes the problems in the already established courts of this category, and also formulates proposals for improving constitutional justice in the subjects of the Russian Federation.

On the issue of understanding administrative proceedings

2020 ◽  
pp. 135-140
Author(s):  
Valentin Nazarov ◽  
Tat’yana Akimova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Judicial Procedure ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

We point out some trends observed in the development of Russian justice. We note the features of the historical development of the state that have influenced the legislative consolidation of administrative legal proceedings. Exploring the main approaches to the definition of administrative legal proceedings, we conditionally combine them into three large groups and characterize each of them. The various positions of legal scholars on the legal nature of administrative legal proceedings are illustrated. It is indicated that with the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure, there was a separation of administrative proceedings from other types, the result of which is the creation of administrative and legal means to ensure and protect public interests as well as the practical implementation of constitutional legal norms on administrative legal proceedings. We specify that the independent nature of administrative legal proceedings is determined by the specifics of this process. The features characteristic for this type of legal proceedings are analyzed. We express an opinion on the need for a more clear and unambiguous formulation of the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation and its normative consolidation. Despite the fact that more than four years have passed since the adoption of the Code, the controversy surrounding the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation continues to this day. In addition, we reveal the most important results of the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure.

scholarly journals Class Proceedings and Loss of the Right to a Separate Claim in an Arbitration Procedure

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 55-57
Author(s):  
Vladislav Yu. Silchenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article provides an assessment of the reform of group production in the civil process of Russia. The author criticizes the norms of the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, by virtue of which a member of a group who refused to participate in a group proceeding, as well as a third party who claims independent claims regarding the subject of a dispute in a group proceeding, lose the opportunity to go to court with an independent claim at the request with which they could enter into group proceeding.

scholarly journals Limits of application of the principle of immediacy in civil procedure

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Konstantin Sergeevich Ryzhkov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Vast Number ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Assessment Of Evidence

The subject of this research is the principle of immediacy as one of the fundamental principles of civil procedure, defining the content of proving cases heard in the order established by the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The goal of this article consists in a thorough analysis of the application of principle of immediacy within the framework of proving, which is regulated by the norms of the civil procedural legislation. The relevance of this topic is substantiated by vast number of exceptions in application of the aforementioned procedural legal principle, including those set by the current legislation. This research employs such methods as analysis, systemic-structural, hermeneutic, and formal-legal. Based on the acquired results, the author determines a list instances in which the current legislation allows for the possibility of limiting the implementation of the principle of immediacy within the process of examination and assessment of evidence by the court. Analysis is also conducted into the limits of application of the principle of immediacy with regards to each individual case.

scholarly journals On Imperfection of Family Laws of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 10-16
Author(s):  
Irina S. Merzlyakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Family Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Marriage And Family ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Family ◽  
Family Practices ◽  
Life Itself ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the substantiation of the need to improve the family legislation of the Russian Federation due to the lack of legal norms that clearly regulate modern forms and problems of marriage and family practices, as well as due to the contradictions existing in Russian family law. Life dynamics, a variety of life realities, value transformations are not “covered” by the current legal field: many conflict and controversial situations of modern marriage and family relations remain outside the legal regulation. This fact indicates the lag of law from life itself.

scholarly journals Administrative Delicts and Administrative Delict Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-556
Author(s):  
P. E. Spiridonov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Term ◽  
Tort System ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of study in this paper are administrative-delict legal relations and the terms associated with this kind of relations. The purpose of the study is to analyze the nature of offences and administrative delicts. It is stated that the use of the term “delictum” it's been a certain evolution from private legal term in the sense of “delicta private” to the term, which can be used both in the sense of “delicta private” and value of “delicta publica”. The conclusion is that the term “delict” may be used in public relations and administrative legal use of the term “administrative delict”. Expanding the range of investigated administrative and delict relations, entails a change and the essential characteristics of administrative offenses, and also creates preconditions for formation of administrative-tort system of prevention of offenses, including not only administrative offences but also other offences that are not related to crimes and civil offenses. In this case, the responsibility should be named administrative and delict, which, in essence, will include a modern administrative and administrative-disciplinary liability. Depending on the nature of the administrative delict may be subdivided into administrative offense and administrative misdemeanor. The essential characteristics of an administrative offense should be upheld, and administrative misdemeanor must be attributed those acts which are now administrative and disciplinary misconduct. With this division of administrative delicts it is possible to realize a codification of administrative and delict legislation, i.e. the creation of Administrative-delict code of the Russian Federation. The work also made the assumption that procedural violations are treated as administrative delict. An attempt is made to distinguish between material legal relations in administrative law and administrative procedural legal relations. Concluded that you cannot mix administrative-tort legal relations, as a kind of material with tort and procedural legal relations. In turn, tort and procedural legal relations are an integral part of administrative and legal proceedings, and administrative delict production is an integral part of the administrative process. The methodological basis of the article is dialectical, formal logical methods, formal-legal method and method of interpretation of law.

The Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies in the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Virtual Currency ◽  
Content Analysis Method ◽  
Crypto Currency ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Definition Of

The paper focuses on the definition of the legal status of the cryptocurrency in the framework of the current Russian legislation. The subject of the research is the principal scientific and practical approaches to determining the object of civil rights and the object of acquisitive crimes in terms of their adaptability to cryptocurrencies. The purposes of the work were the search for a universal algorithm for resolving civil disputes related to the turnover of the crypto currency, and the qualification of the virtual currency theft (fraud). By using historical, comparative legal and dialectical methods as well as the content analysis method parallels between cryptocurrencies and individual objects of civil rights (a thing, property rights, other property) were drawn, and a number of options for qualifying the actions related to the non-repayable withdrawal of the cryptocurrency were proposed. Finally, the paper analyzes the draft laws prepared by the RF Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and presents the author’s vision of the prospects for legalizing the cryptocurrency as an object of civil rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document