scholarly journals Developing injury indicators for First Nations and Inuit children and youth in Canada: a modified Delphi approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Pike ◽  
RJ McDonald ◽  
S Piedt ◽  
AK Macpherson
Keyword(s):  
First Nations ◽  
Injury Prevention ◽  
Indigenous Communities ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Children And Youth ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Prompt Action

Introduction The purpose of this research was to take the initial step in developing valid indicators that reflect the injury issues facing First Nations and Inuit children and youth in Canada. Methods Using a modified-Delphi process, relevant expert and community stakeholders rated each indicator on its perceived usefulness and ability to prompt action to reduce injury among children and youth in indigenous communities. The Delphi process included 5 phases and resulted in a refined set of 27 indicators. Results Indicators related to motorized vehicle collisions, mortality and hospitalization rates were rated the most useful and most likely to prompt action. These were followed by indicators for community injury prevention training and response systems, violent and inflicted injury, burns and falls, and suicide. Conclusion The results suggest that a broad-based modified-Delphi process is a practical and appropriate method, within the OCAP™ (Ownership, Control, Access and Possession) principles, for developing a proposed set of indicators for injury prevention activity focused on First Nations and Inuit children and youth. Following additional work to validate and populate the indicators, it is anticipated that communities will utilize them to monitor injury and prompt decisions and action to reduce injuries among children and youth.

What initiatives do healthcare leaders agree are needed for healthcare system improvement? Results of a modified-Delphi study

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1002-1012
Author(s):  
Stuart Barson ◽  
Robin Gauld ◽  
Jonathon Gray ◽  
Goran Henriks ◽  
Christina Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
System Leaders ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify five quality improvement initiatives for healthcare system leaders, produced by such leaders themselves, and to provide some guidance on how these could be implemented. Design/methodology/approach A multi-stage modified-Delphi process was used, blending the Delphi approach of iterative information collection, analysis and feedback, with the option for participants to revise their judgments. Findings The process reached consensus on five initiatives: change information privacy laws; overhaul professional training and work in the workplace; use co-design methods; contract for value and outcomes across health and social care; and use data from across the public and private sectors to improve equity for vulnerable populations and the sickest people. Research limitations/implications Information could not be gathered from all participants at each stage of the modified-Delphi process, and the participants did not include patients and families, potentially limiting the scope and nature of input. Practical implications The practical implications are a set of findings based on what leaders would bring to a decision-making table in an ideal world if given broad scope and capacity to make policy and organisational changes to improve healthcare systems. Originality/value This study adds to the literature a suite of recommendations for healthcare quality improvement, produced by a group of experienced healthcare system leaders from a range of contexts.

Developing injury indicators for Canadian children and youth: a modified-Delphi approach

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Pike ◽  
S. Piedt ◽  
L. Warda ◽  
N. Yanchar ◽  
C. Macarthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Youth ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach

scholarly journals Respiratory, birth and health economic measures for use with Indigenous Australian infants in a research trial: A modified Delphi with an Indigenous panel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Jane Perkes ◽  
Billie Bonevski ◽  
Joerg Mattes ◽  
Kerry Hall ◽  
Gillian Gould
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Respiratory Health ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Health Care Utilisation ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Indigenous Women ◽  
Indigenous Australian ◽  
Modified Delphi

Abstract Background: There is significant disparity between the respiratory health of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian infants. There is no culturally accepted measure to collect respiratory health outcomes in Indigenous infants. The aim of this study was to gain end user and expert consensus on the most relevant and acceptable respiratory and birth measures for Indigenous infants at birth, between birth and 6 months, and at 6 months of age follow-up for use in a research trial. Methods: A three round modified Delphi process was conducted from February 2018 to April 2019. Eight Indigenous panel members, and 18 Indigenous women participated. Items reached consensus if 7/8 (≥80 %) panel members indicated the item was ‘very essential’. Qualitative responses by Indigenous women and the panel were used to modify the 6 months of age surveys. Results: In total, 15 items for birth, 48 items from 1 to 6 months, and five potential questionnaires for use at 6 months of age were considered. Of those, 15 measures for birth were accepted, i.e., gestational age, birth weight, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admissions, length, head circumference, sex, Apgar score, substance use, cord blood gas values, labour, birth type, health of the mother, number people living in the home, education of mother and place of residence. Seventeen measures from 1-to 6 months of age were accepted, i.e., acute respiratory symptoms (7), general health items (2), health care utilisation (6), exposure to tobacco smoke (1) and breastfeeding status (1). Three questionnaires for use at 6 months of age were accepted, i.e., a shortened 33-item respiratory questionnaire, a clinical history survey and a developmental questionnaire. Conclusions: In a modified Delphi process with an Indigenous panel, measures and items were proposed for use to assess respiratory, birth and health economic outcomes in Indigenous Australian infants between birth and 6 months of age. This initial step can be used to develop a set of relevant and acceptable measures to report respiratory illness and birth outcomes in community based Indigenous infants.

scholarly journals Respiratory, birth and health economic measures for use with Indigenous Australian infants in a research trial: A modified Delphi with an Indigenous panel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Jane Perkes ◽  
Billie Bonevski ◽  
Joerg Mattes ◽  
Kerry Hall ◽  
Gillian Gould
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Respiratory Health ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Health Care Utilisation ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Indigenous Women ◽  
Indigenous Australian ◽  
Modified Delphi

Abstract Background: There is significant disparity between the respiratory health of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian infants. There is no culturally accepted measure to collect respiratory health outcomes in Indigenous infants. The aim of this study was to gain end user and expert consensus on the most relevant and acceptable respiratory and birth measures for Indigenous infants at birth, between birth and 6 months, and at 6 months of age follow-up for use in a research trial. Methods: A three round modified Delphi process was conducted from February 2018 to April 2019. Eight Indigenous panel members, and 18 Indigenous women participated. Items reached consensus if 7/8 (≥80 %) panel members indicated the item was ‘very essential’. Qualitative responses by Indigenous women and the panel were used to modify the 6 months of age surveys. Results: In total, 15 items for birth, 48 items from 1 to 6 months, and five potential questionnaires for use at 6 months of age were considered. Of those, 15 measures for birth were accepted, i.e., gestational age, birth weight, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admissions, length, head circumference, sex, Apgar score, substance use, cord blood gas values, labour, birth type, health of the mother, number people living in the home, education of mother and place of residence. Seventeen measures from 1-to 6 months of age were accepted, i.e., acute respiratory symptoms (7), general health items (2), health care utilisation (6), exposure to tobacco smoke (1) and breastfeeding status (1). Three questionnaires for use at 6 months of age were accepted, i.e., a shortened 33-item respiratory questionnaire, a clinical history survey and a developmental questionnaire. Conclusions: In a modified Delphi process with an Indigenous panel, measures and items were proposed for use to assess respiratory, birth and health economic outcomes in Indigenous Australian infants between birth and 6 months of age. This initial step can be used to develop a set of relevant and acceptable measures to report respiratory illness and birth outcomes in community based Indigenous infants.

scholarly journals Respiratory, birth and health economic measures for use with Indigenous Australian infants in a research trial: A modified Delphi with an Indigenous panel

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Jane Perkes ◽  
Billie Bonevski ◽  
Joerg Mattes ◽  
Kerry Hall ◽  
Gillian Gould
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Respiratory Health ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Health Care Utilisation ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Indigenous Women ◽  
Indigenous Australian ◽  
Modified Delphi

Abstract Background: There is significant disparity between the respiratory health of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian infants. There is no culturally accepted measure to collect respiratory health outcomes in Indigenous infants. The aim of this study was to gain end user and expert consensus on the most relevant and acceptable respiratory and birth measures for Indigenous infants at birth, between birth and 6 months, and at 6 months of age follow-up for use in a research trial. Methods: A three round modified Delphi process was conducted from February 2018 to April 2019. Eight Indigenous panel members, and 18 Indigenous women participated. Items reached consensus if 7/8 (≥80 %) panel members indicated the item was ‘very essential’. Qualitative responses by Indigenous women and the panel were used to modify the 6 months of age surveys. Results: In total, 15 items for birth, 48 items from 1 to 6 months, and five potential questionnaires for use at 6 months of age were considered. Of those, 15 measures for birth were accepted, i.e., gestational age, birth weight, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admissions, length, head circumference, sex, Apgar score, substance use, cord blood gas values, labour, birth type, health of the mother, number people living in the home, education of mother and place of residence. Seventeen measures from 1-to 6 months of age were accepted, i.e., acute respiratory symptoms (7), general health items (2), health care utilisation (6), exposure to tobacco smoke (1), and breastfeeding status (1). Three questionnaires for use at 6 months of age were accepted, i.e., a shortened 33-item respiratory questionnaire, a clinical history survey and a developmental questionnaire. Conclusions: In a modified Delphi process with an Indigenous panel, measures and items were proposed for use to assess respiratory, birth and health economic outcomes in Indigenous Australian infants between birth and 6 months of age. This initial step can be used to develop a set of relevant and acceptable measures to report respiratory illness and birth outcomes in community based Indigenous infants.

scholarly journals Using the Delphi Approach to Identify Priority Areas for Health Visiting Practice in an Area of Deprivation

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosamund Bryar ◽  
Sandra Anto-Awuakye ◽  
Janice Christie ◽  
Claire Davis ◽  
Karen Plumb
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Process ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Consultation Process ◽  
Social Challenges ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Health Visitors ◽  
The Uk ◽  
High Level

Families with children living in areas of high deprivation face multiple health and social challenges, and this high level of need has impacts on the work of health practitioners working in such areas. All families in the UK with children under five years have access to health visiting services, and health visitors have a key role in mitigating the effects of deprivation by addressing health needs through evidence based practice. This paper reports the first stage of a project in Tower Hamlets, London, an area of significant deprivation, which aims to develop an evidence-based toolkit to support health visitors in their practice with families. The first stage used a modified Delphi process to identify the priority health needs of families in the area between June and July 2012. The three-stage Delphi process involved 25 people: four health visitors, four other members of the health visiting service, and 17 representatives of other services working with families. A focus group event was followed by a second event where individuals completed a questionnaire ranking the 27 priorities identified in the first event. The consultation process concluded with participants completing a second questionnaire, by email, confirming or changing their prioritisation of the topics.

Nutrition in Primary Health Care: Using a Delphi Process To Design New Interdisciplinary Services

2006 ◽  
Vol 67 (S1) ◽  
pp. S14-S29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Brauer ◽  
Linda Dietrich ◽  
Bridget Davidson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Administrative Support ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Nutrition Services ◽  
Key Features

Purpose: A modified Delphi process was used to identify key features of interdisciplinary nutrition services, including provider roles and responsibilities for Ontario Family Health Networks (FHNs), a family physician-based type of primary care. Methods: Twenty-three representatives from interested professional organizations, including three FHN demonstration sites, completed a modified Delphi process. Participants reviewed evidence from a systematic literature review, a patient survey, a costing analysis, and key informant interview results before undertaking the Delphi process. Statements describing various options for services were developed at an in-person meeting, which was followed by two rounds of e-mail questionnaires. Teleconference discussions were held between rounds. Results: An interdisciplinary model with differing and complementary roles for health care providers emerged from the process. Additional key features addressing screening for nutrition problems, health promotion and disease prevention, team collaboration, planning and evaluation, administrative support, access to care, and medical directives/delegated acts were identified. Under the proposed model, the registered dietitian is the team member responsible for managing all aspects of nutrition services, from needs assessment to program delivery, as well as for supporting all providers’ nutrition services. Conclusions: The proposed interdisciplinary nutrition services model merits evaluation of cost, effectiveness, applicability, and sustainability in team-based primary care service settings.

scholarly journals Drinking Water Consumption Patterns: An Exploration of Risk Perception and Governance in Two First Nations Communities

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 6851
Author(s):  
Neal Spicer ◽  
Brenda Parlee ◽  
Molly Chisaakay ◽  
Doug Lamalice
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Risk Perception ◽  
First Nations ◽  
Water Consumption ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Indigenous Communities ◽  
Bottled Water ◽  
Consumption Patterns ◽  
First Nation ◽  
Individual Risk

Many Indigenous communities across Canada suffer from the lack of access to clean drinking water; ensuring individuals and communities have safe water to drink either from their home or from their local environment requires the consideration of multiple factors including individual risk perception. In collaboration with local leaders, semi-structured interviews (n = 99) were conducted over a two-year period in the Dene Tha’ First Nation and Kátł’odeeche First Nation to unpack the issue of risk perception and its meaning to local community members. These local metrics of risk perception including smell, taste, safety, health fears and level of concern were then used to explore patterns in other data on drinking water consumption patterns and bottled water use. The results are consistent with previous research related to water insecurity and indicate that both communities consume more bottled water than the average Canadian. Results also varied by jurisdiction; those in Alberta indicated much higher levels of concern and a greater degree of bottled water consumption.

Identifying the capabilities most important for veterinary employability using a modified Delphi process

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda A. Bell ◽  
Martin A. Cake ◽  
Laura T. King ◽  
Caroline F. Mansfield
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Process ◽  
Modified Delphi
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document