PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKABAHASA INDONESIA SISWA SMA

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Bastian Manurung
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Achievement Motivation ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Physics Learning

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar fisika, pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar tehadap hasil belajar fisika. Metode quasi eksperimen dan desain faktorial 2x3 pada taraf signifikansi α=5%. Sebelum uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe dilakukan uji normalitas Lilifors serta uji homogenitas menggunakan uji F dan uji Barlett. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Ada pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar auditorial memperoleh hasil belajar fisika lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar fisika siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Serta terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, motivasi berprestasi, bahasa indonasia. Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of STAD type cooperative learning strategy and cooperative learning strategy of TPS type to physics learning result, influence of learning style to physics learning result, and interaction between learning strategy and learning style to physics learning result. Method of quasi experiment and 2x3 factorial design at significance level α = 5%. Before the advanced test with Scheffe test is done Lilifors normality test and homogeneity test using F test and Barlett test. The findings of this study indicate that there is an influence of learning strategies on physics learning outcomes. The result of student physics learning taught by STAD type cooperative learning strategy is higher than the students' physics learning result which is taught by cooperative learning strategy of TPS type. There is an influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics. Students who have a tendency of auditorial learning style to obtain the results of physics learning is higher than the results of physics learning students who have a tendency of visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style. And there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles to student physics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategy, achievement motivation, indonasia language.

PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Abdul Halim
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Significance Level

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar fisika, pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar tehadap hasil belajar fisika. Metode quasi eksperimen dan desain faktorial 2x3 pada taraf signifikansi α=5%. Sebelum uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe dilakukan uji normalitas Lilifors serta uji homogenitas menggunakan uji F dan uji Barlett. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Ada pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar auditorial memperoleh hasil belajar fisika lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar fisika siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Serta terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar fisika Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of STAD type cooperative learning strategies and cooperative learning strategies of TPS type to the results of physics learning, the influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles tehadap the results of physics learning. Method of quasi experiment and 2x3 factorial design at significance level α = 5%. Before the advanced test with Scheffe test is done Lilifors normality test and homogeneity test using F test and Barlett test. The findings of this study indicate that there is an influence of learning strategies on physics learning outcomes. The result of student physics learning taught by STAD type cooperative learning strategy is higher than the students' physics learning result which is taught by cooperative learning strategy of TPS type. There is an influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics. Students who have a tendency of auditorial learning style to obtain the results of physics learning is higher than the results of physics learning students who have a tendency of visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style. And there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles to student physics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, physics learning outcomes

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MENGGAMBAR TEKNIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novidawaty Tambunan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Map Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Drawing Technique

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, menggambar teknik Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students taught with Mind Map learning strategies and expository learning strategies, (2) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students who have visual learning styles with kinestetik, (3) interaction between learning strategy and learning style to learning result Drawing technique 1. Method research using quasi experimental method with 2 x factorial research designs 2. Data analysis technique using two-way ANOVA at significance level α = 0,05. The results showed that: (1) learning result Drawing technique 1 students taught by Mind Map learning strategy, higher than expository learning strategy; (2) learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 students who have a higher learning style Kinesthetic than Visual learning style; (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Drawing technique 1. Keywords: learning strategy, learning style, drawing technique

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GAMBAR TEKNIK MESIN SISWA SMK DI MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mursid
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mechanical Engineering ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X Program keahlian teknik mesin SMK Negeri 2 dan SMK Negeri 5 Medan. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran mind map dan ekspositori, gaya belajar, gambar teknik mesin Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who are taught by learning strategies Mind Map and expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who have a visual learning style with kinesthetic, (3 ) interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. The population of this research is all class X students of mechanical engineering expertise program SMK Negeri 2 and SMK Negeri 5 Medan. The research method using quasi-experimental research design 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA Analysis using two lanes at significance level α = 0.05. The findings show that: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who are taught by learning strategy Mind Map, higher than in the expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who have learning style Kinesthetic higher than learning styles Visual, (3) there is no interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. Further test calculations with Scheffe test showed learning outcomes Figure engineering students who have a kinesthetic learning style higher when taught by Mind Map instructional strategies, while learning outcomes Picture mechanical engineering students who have a visual learning style higher when taught by expository strategy. Keywords: learning strategies mind map and expository, learning styles, mechanical engineering drawings

scholarly journals Blended Learning Strategies of Telegram-Assisted Learning Towards Student Mathematics Learning Results Reviewed from Learning Style

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Kadek Suryati ◽  
I Gede Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Online Application

The research aims to describe the influence of telegram-assisted blended learning strategies on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of learning styles. This research is a quasi-experimental research using 2x3 factorial design. The respondents taken is the second semester students majoring in informatics engineering at the STMIK STIKOM Indonesia campus. The sampling procedure in this study was a random sampling technique that was started by carrying out the equivalency test of 4 classes taken using the one-way ANOVA test. After that randomly selected, two classes as an experimental class and two classes as a control class. To get instruments that have validity before use, questionnaires and tests are first tested and validated by experts who are experts in their fields. Normality and homogeneity tests are needed as a prerequisite before analyzing the data. The method used to analyze data is two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) student mathematics learning outcomes taught with telegram-assisted blended learning strategies were better than conventional mathematics learning outcomes of students taught, (2) the effect of telegraph-assisted blended learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes in learning styles. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it is recommended that further researchers or educators be able to develop a blended learning strategy as a way to convey learning material so that they can pay more attention to the learning styles of each student and can develop telegrams with more attractive features so that the telegram becomes one of online application for learning media.

scholarly journals WEB-BASED COOPERATIVE LEARNING, LEARNING STYLES, AND STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bambang Hariadi
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Web Based ◽  
The Web

Abstract: This study was aimed to examine the effect of the instructional learning strategy (webbased STAD-type cooperative and text-based STAD-type cooperative learning strategies) and learning styles towards student learning achievement. This quasi-experimental study used a non-equivalent control group version of the factorial design. The subjects were the first-semester undergraduate students of Information Systems at STIKOM Surabaya. Sixty-nine (69) students were involved, 34 of whom were the subjects of the experimental group and 35 were the subjects of the control group. The collected data were statistically analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance technique (ANOVA) with the significance level of 0.05. The findings of this research indicate that there was a significant difference in learning achievement, for the General Management course, between groups of students taught with the web-based STAD-type cooperative learning strategies and those taught with the text-based STAD-type cooperative learning strategies. Based on the findings, the researcher suggests lecturers to implement the STAD-type cooperative learning strategies, and use the web-based and text-based strategies simultaneously (complementarily) in the form of blended learning. Keywords: learning strategy, STAD type cooperative, web based learning, learning styles, learning outcomes PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF BERBASIS WEB, GAYA BELAJAR, DAN HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh strategi pembelajaran (kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis web vs kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis teks) dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa. Penelitian kuasi eksperimen ini menggunakan desain faktorial versi nonequivalen control group design. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa program studi Sistem Informasi semester I di STIKOM Surabaya yang berjumlah 69 mahasiswa, terdiri dari 34 mahasiswa untuk kelas eksperimen dan 35 mahasiswa untuk kelas kontrol. Data yang terkumpul diolah secara statistik dengan menggunakan teknik analisis varian dua jalur dengan menggunakan taraf signifikansi 0,05. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar mata kuliah Manajemen Umum yang signifikan antara kelompok mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis web dan strategi kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis teks. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian ini disarankan untuk menerapkan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan menggunakannya secara bersamaan (saling melengkapi) antara yang berbasis web dengan yang berbasis teks dalam bentuk blended learning. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, kooperatif tipe STAD, web base learning, gaya belajar, hasil belajar

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
. Zulhamdi ◽  
Abdul Muin Sibuea ◽  
. Syarifuddin
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Generative Learning ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
High Intelligence ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Biology Learning

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuti: (1) apakah hasil belajar biologi antara siswa yang diajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran diskoveri lebih tinggi dibandingkan strategi pembelajaran generatif, (2) apakah hasil belajar biologi siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan tinggi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan yang memiliki kecerdasan rendah, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kecerdasan terhadap hasil belajar biologi. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Sei Suka dan SMA Negeri 1 Air Putih, sebanyak 6 kelas  dengan jumlah siswa sebanyak 214 siswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan   = 0,05 dimana terlebih dahulu dilakukan uji persyaratan analisis data yaitu uji normalitas dengan uji Liliefors dan uji homogenitas varians dengan uji F. Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar biologi siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan tinggi yang diajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran diskoveri lebih tinggi dari strategi pembelajaran generatif dengan Fhitung = 16,02 > Ftabel 3,96 (2) hasil belajar biologi siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan rendah yang diajarkan dengan strategi generatif lebih tinggi dari strategi pembelajaran diskoveri dengan Fhitung = 7,88 > Ftabel 3,96 (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kecerdasan terhadap hasil belajar biologi dengan Fhitung = 8,33 > Ftabel 3,96. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar fisikaAbstract: This study aims to find out: (1) whether the results of biology learning between students who are taught with a diskover learning strategy is higher than generative learning strategies, (2) whether the results of biology learning students who have high intelligence are higher than those who have low intelligence , (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and intelligence on learning outcomes of biology. The study population was all students of class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Sei Suka and SMA Negeri 1 Air Putih, as many as 6 classes with a total of 214 students. The research method uses an experimental method with a 2x2 factorial research design. The data were analyzed using two-way ANAVA at a significant level = 0.05, where the requirements for data analysis were first tested, namely the normality test with the Liliefors test and the homogeneity test of variance by F test. The results of the study found that: have high intelligence taught by the learning strategy is higher than generative learning strategies with Fcount = 16.02> Ftable 3.96 (2) the results of biology learning students who have low intelligence are taught with a generative strategy higher than the learning strategy covered with Fitung = 7.88> Ftable 3.96 (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and intelligence on biology learning outcomes with Fcount = 8.33> Ftable 3.96. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, physics learning outcomes

scholarly journals The Effect of Brain Based Learning Strategies and Project Based Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Students of the Kinesthetic Learning Style Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6S3) ◽  
pp. 373-377
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Brain Based Learning

Brain-based learning is a concept of strategy to create learning-oriented efforts to empower students' brain potential. Project-Based Learning is a learning strategy that utilizes projects or activities as a center of learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of brain-based learning and project-based learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes, especially kinesthetic learning style groups. The quasi-experimental research method is post-test only design, retrieval of learning outcomes data with tests and learning styles using questionnaires and data analysis using ANOVA with t-Dunnet advanced tests. This study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using the Project-Based Learning strategy were higher than those taught by the Brain-Based Learning (BBL) learning strategy especially for students in kinesthetic learning styles. The suitability of investigative activities creates products in project-based learning with the characterization of students' kinesthetic learning styles which are characterized by always touching certain information objects can strengthen the memory of meaningful information and knowledge so as to improve the quality of learning outcomes.

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN MIND MAP DAN EKSPOSITORI DENGAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR TEKNOLOGI PERKANTORAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Darmauli .
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Map Learning ◽  
Technology Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Technology Students

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X, berjumlah 145 orang yang berasal dari 4 kelas. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran . Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci:strategi pembelajaran, mind map, ekspositori, teknologi perkantoran Abstract: The research objectives are: differences in office technology learning outcomes between students taught with mind map learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught with expository learning strategies, differences in office technology learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles with which has a kinesthetic learning style, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on the learning outcomes of office technology. The population of this study was all students of class X, totaling 145 people from 4 classes. The sampling technique is done by cluster random sampling. The research method that uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANOVA at a significance level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: the learning outcomes of office technology students taught with mind map learning strategies are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies, learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles rather than student learning outcomes that have a visual learning style, there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes of office technology. The calculation of further tests with the scheffe test shows the learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles when taught with mind map learning strategies, whereas office technology learning outcomes of students who have higher visual learning styles when taught with expository learning strategies. Keywords: learning strategies, mind maps, expository, office technology

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document