scholarly journals The Effect of Brain Based Learning Strategies and Project Based Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Students of the Kinesthetic Learning Style Group

Brain-based learning is a concept of strategy to create learning-oriented efforts to empower students' brain potential. Project-Based Learning is a learning strategy that utilizes projects or activities as a center of learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of brain-based learning and project-based learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes, especially kinesthetic learning style groups. The quasi-experimental research method is post-test only design, retrieval of learning outcomes data with tests and learning styles using questionnaires and data analysis using ANOVA with t-Dunnet advanced tests. This study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using the Project-Based Learning strategy were higher than those taught by the Brain-Based Learning (BBL) learning strategy especially for students in kinesthetic learning styles. The suitability of investigative activities creates products in project-based learning with the characterization of students' kinesthetic learning styles which are characterized by always touching certain information objects can strengthen the memory of meaningful information and knowledge so as to improve the quality of learning outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Meifi Sufanti ◽  
Cecep Anwar Hadi Firdos Santosa

This study aims to determine the effect of STAD learning strategies assisted by teaching aids and multimedia assisted PowerPoint with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes. Sampling was chosen randomly (random class). This type of research used quasi-experimental with a 2x2 factorial research design. The instruments use a test of learning outcomes in the form of multiple-choice questions and a questionnaire for student learning styles. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests. Based on the data analysis, it is concluded that: (1) there are differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students in classes who receive STAD learning assisted by teaching aids between STAD learning assisted by multimedia PowerPoint (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles students with audio learning styles, student mathematics learning outcomes are not higher when taught with STAD learning assisted by PowerPoint multimedia compared to STAD learning assisted by teaching aids (4) For students with kinesthetic learning styles student mathematics learning outcomes are higher when taught with STAD learning assisted by teaching aid, compared to PowerPoint multimedia-assisted STAD learning and (5) there is an interaction between STAD learning strategies and auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. Therefore, it is concluded that with there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles, student learning outcomes are not only influenced by learning strategies. In this case, the STAD learning strategy assisted with teaching aids and STAD assisted with multimedia PowerPoint is not the only factor in making students understand mathematical concepts but must be based on learning styles. For auditory student learning styles, the appropriate learning strategy is to use STAD assisted by Power Point multimedia, while for students who have a kinesthetic learning style using STAD assisted by teaching aids.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Kadek Suryati ◽  
I Gede Adnyana

The research aims to describe the influence of telegram-assisted blended learning strategies on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of learning styles. This research is a quasi-experimental research using 2x3 factorial design. The respondents taken is the second semester students majoring in informatics engineering at the STMIK STIKOM Indonesia campus. The sampling procedure in this study was a random sampling technique that was started by carrying out the equivalency test of 4 classes taken using the one-way ANOVA test. After that randomly selected, two classes as an experimental class and two classes as a control class. To get instruments that have validity before use, questionnaires and tests are first tested and validated by experts who are experts in their fields. Normality and homogeneity tests are needed as a prerequisite before analyzing the data. The method used to analyze data is two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) student mathematics learning outcomes taught with telegram-assisted blended learning strategies were better than conventional mathematics learning outcomes of students taught, (2) the effect of telegraph-assisted blended learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes in learning styles. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it is recommended that further researchers or educators be able to develop a blended learning strategy as a way to convey learning material so that they can pay more attention to the learning styles of each student and can develop telegrams with more attractive features so that the telegram becomes one of online application for learning media.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novidawaty Tambunan

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, menggambar teknik Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students taught with Mind Map learning strategies and expository learning strategies, (2) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students who have visual learning styles with kinestetik, (3) interaction between learning strategy and learning style to learning result Drawing technique 1. Method research using quasi experimental method with 2 x factorial research designs 2. Data analysis technique using two-way ANOVA at significance level α = 0,05. The results showed that: (1) learning result Drawing technique 1 students taught by Mind Map learning strategy, higher than expository learning strategy; (2) learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 students who have a higher learning style Kinesthetic than Visual learning style; (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Drawing technique 1. Keywords: learning strategy, learning style, drawing technique


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mursid

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X Program keahlian teknik mesin SMK Negeri 2 dan SMK Negeri 5 Medan. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran mind map dan ekspositori, gaya belajar, gambar teknik mesin Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who are taught by learning strategies Mind Map and expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who have a visual learning style with kinesthetic, (3 ) interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. The population of this research is all class X students of mechanical engineering expertise program SMK Negeri 2 and SMK Negeri 5 Medan. The research method using quasi-experimental research design 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA Analysis using two lanes at significance level α = 0.05. The findings show that: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who are taught by learning strategy Mind Map, higher than in the expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who have learning style Kinesthetic higher than learning styles Visual, (3) there is no interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. Further test calculations with Scheffe test showed learning outcomes Figure engineering students who have a kinesthetic learning style higher when taught by Mind Map instructional strategies, while learning outcomes Picture mechanical engineering students who have a visual learning style higher when taught by expository strategy. Keywords: learning strategies mind map and expository, learning styles, mechanical engineering drawings


Author(s):  
Mul Iadi

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kairul Anwar ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah hasil belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dari siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dari siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam memberikan pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar Hadits. Metode penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan : (1) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan (3) Terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Hadits siswa. Siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual memiliki hasil belajar lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik yang di ajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching. Kata Kunci: metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar hadits Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the learning outcomes of students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style higher than students who have a kinesthetic learning style, and interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in giving effect to the learning outcomes Hadith. The research method using a quasi-experimental design with a 2x2 factorial study. Data were analyzed using ANOVA two lanes on the significant level α = 0.05. The findings show: (1) the learning outcomes Hadith students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, (2) learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style more than in the learning outcomes Hadith students who have kinesthetic learning style, and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes Hadith. Students who have a visual learning style education outcomes are higher when compared with students who have a learning style that kinesthetic learning methods in teaching with hypnoteaching. Keywords: teaching methods and learning styles on learning outcomes hadith


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Darmauli .

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X, berjumlah 145 orang yang berasal dari 4 kelas. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran . Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci:strategi pembelajaran, mind map, ekspositori, teknologi perkantoran Abstract: The research objectives are: differences in office technology learning outcomes between students taught with mind map learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught with expository learning strategies, differences in office technology learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles with which has a kinesthetic learning style, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on the learning outcomes of office technology. The population of this study was all students of class X, totaling 145 people from 4 classes. The sampling technique is done by cluster random sampling. The research method that uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANOVA at a significance level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: the learning outcomes of office technology students taught with mind map learning strategies are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies, learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles rather than student learning outcomes that have a visual learning style, there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes of office technology. The calculation of further tests with the scheffe test shows the learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles when taught with mind map learning strategies, whereas office technology learning outcomes of students who have higher visual learning styles when taught with expository learning strategies. Keywords: learning strategies, mind maps, expository, office technology


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fauzan Akbar ◽  
Arsad Bahri

This research is a quasi-experimental study that aims to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of Project-based Learning (PjBL) in improving students' cognitive learning outcomes with different learning styles namely visual, audio and kinesthetic learning styles. The population of this study was all groups at X grade in Public High School 1 Bulukumba. Sample of the study was choosed by random sampling. Each learning model was represented by two groups as PjBL and Direct Instruction. The research sample used was group XI IPA 1, XI IPA 2, XI IPA 3, and XI IPA 4. The design of this study was pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design factorial pattern 2 x 3. The research instrument consisted of essay tests to measure cognitive learning outcomes and students learning style questionnaire. The research data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with two-way analysis of covariate (ANCOVA). The results showed that PjBL and learning styles had an effect on students 'cognitive learning outcomes, while the interaction between learning models and learning styles did not affect students' cognitive learning outcomes. This shows that PjBL is effective in improving students' cognitive learning outcomes.Keywords: Project-based Learning, learning styles, cognitive learning outcomes, biology learning


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document