scholarly journals Analisis Kesalahan dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kombinatorika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Yunis Sulistyorini ◽  
Dian Fitri Argarini ◽  
Nok Izatul Yazidah

Error analysis is integral part of mathematics learning. This qualitative research aims to describe the types and causes of student errors in solving combinatorics problem based on cognitive style. Subjects are high school students with field independent (FI) and field dependent (FD) cognitive style. Error analysis refers to Newman's error analysis. FI and FD students have same errors that are comprehension error at stage of understanding problem; processing skills error and encoding error at the stage of carrying out the plan. The causes of the errors are viewed from the cognitive factors, namely understanding students' concepts in solving problems. FI students have a deeper understanding and make careless error while the FD students have a lack of understanding of the concept which cause more error. The cause of errors in both students is also due to the accumulation of errors at stage of understanding problem. 

1979 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominick Pellegreno ◽  
Fred Stickle

56 high school students were administered the Group Embedded Figures Test and the Pictures of Facial Affect. A low Pearson product-moment correlation of .02 was obtained between the measures. Data indicated that field-dependent and field-independent individuals were not significantly different in their skills of labeling pictures of facial affect.


Author(s):  
Refa Lina Tiawati ◽  
Suryanti Suryanti

This study aims to describe the analysis of language errors of Baubau 3 High School students in class discussion activities. The research design is descriptive qualitative. Research data analyzes language errors in class discussion activities in the form of use of intonation / tone, diction (choice of words), and sentence structure.The results showed that the form of language error analysis in class X of SMA Negeri 3 Baubau in class discussion activities was the use of intonation consisting of: high intonation, moderate intonation and low intonation. The use of diction (word choice) which consists of: the use of synonymous words, the use of denotation and connotation words, the use of foreign words or terms, the use of popular words and study words, and the use of words of conversation and slang. The use of  sentence structure consists of: the use of compulsory sentence structures and the use of sentence structures are not mandatory (where they like). Based on the data obtained regarding the analysis of language errors in class X students in class discussion activities, it can be said that in the use of intonation there are errors in the form of high intonation of 11, intonation is not there and intonation is low as many as 16 errors. In the use of diction there are errors in the use of 40 synonymous words, use of denotations and connotations of 41, use of foreign words or terms as many as 14, use of popular words and study words as many as 3, and the use of 120 words of conversation and slang. Furthermore, the use of sentence structures has errors in the form of mandatory sentence structures that do not exist, and in the sentence structure is not mandatory as many as 156 errors. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 505
Author(s):  
Nur Alifah ◽  
Usman Aripin

This study aims to describe the thinking process of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems reviewed based on cognitive style field dependent and field independent. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative research method, while the method of data retrieval is test and interview. The study conducted on the VII grade students of SMPN 2 Marga Asih.The subjects of the study were 2 students from junior high school consisting of 1 students with cognitive field dependent and 1 student style with an independent cognitive field. The results showed that there were significant differences between the two subjects in processing information, that was the subject of FI understand the problem better when compared with the subject of FD. Because if processing information was not stored properly, it will be very influential in the next step.


MATHEdunesa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-193
Author(s):  
Rohmatus Tsaniyah

Statistical thinking is a mental activity that occurs from the process of identifying statistical information to the process of making decisions or drawing conclusions that are interconnected. One that can effect individual statistical thinking profiles is cognitive style. The purpose of this research is to describe the statistical thinking profile of Field Independent and Field Dependent high school student in solving problems. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The instruments of this research are the researcher as the main instrument and cognitive style test, mathematics ability test, and interview guidelines as the supporting instruments. Research subjects are one of FI student and one of FD student with an equivalent level of high mathematical ability. The results of this study indicate differences in the profile of FI student an FD student statistical thinking. In evaluating the effectiveness of the data display, FI student can provide analytical argument about the presentation of data display that more effectively used and FD student provide answers for the presentation of effective data displays based on what is seen from the question. In describing the results of the available problems and making conclusions from the results that have been obtained, FI student describes the solutions in more detail accompanied by the arguments also provide conclusions related to the existing problems and FD student briefly describes the solutions and provide general conclusions and have not been linked to the existing problems. Because of the statistical ability of two subjects is defferent, teacher should pay attention to the statistical concepts and train students on solving statistical problems by any solutions. Keywords : Statistical thinking profile, problem solving, Field Independent, Field Dependent


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Yang Luo ◽  
Yuewu Lin

Illustration is always used as an example to make the written text or the utterance more clear in general. In Winarski’s opinion (1997), one picture equals thousands of words. That is to say, illustrations are capable to express the meaning of unfamiliar language or a great deal of information in the reading material by vivid pictures, tables, drawings, paintings and so on. As a result, illustrations are applied to many different fields including English language teaching. Based upon Song’s 3 types of illustration classification (2005), decorational illustrations, explainable illustrations and promotive illustrations, this paper tries to investigate the effects of illustrations on the reading performance of senior high school students with different cognitive styles (field-dependence, field-mix and field-independence) in the process of English reading. The result shows that: 1). There is a significant correlation between illustration types and reading performance in terms of field-dependent students. The coefficient of explainable illustration to reading peformance is the highest, while the lowest coefficient is decorational illustration. 2). As for field-mixed participants, their reading performance is also closely associated with illustrations. However, the coefficients are lower than that of field-dependent participants. Decorational illustration has no obviously relation to reading performance. Explainable illustration also reaches the highest coefficient, and it can better improve student’ reading score than promotive illustration. 3). Speaking of field-independent students, no correlation has been found between decorational, promotive illustration and reading performance. However, there exists a significant correlation between explainable illustration and reading performance for field-independent participants.


AL-TA LIM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-280
Author(s):  
Nok Izatul Yazidah ◽  
Dian Fitri Argarini ◽  
Yunis Sulistyorini

The purpose of this study is to describe students’ relational understanding in solving problems for FI students. The subjects of this research are Senior High School students having field independent cognitive style in Malang and chosen randomly. The subjects consist of two students. Sheet of GEFT test, sheet of Combinatorial questions, and interview sheet were used in this study. The finding of the study showed that medium-academic achievement student had an ability on relational understanding as the same as the high-academic achievement student. Meanwhile, the process in solving problem made by the high-academic achievement student was likely similar to the accurate process in solving problems.


1986 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Swinnen ◽  
Joost Vandenberghe ◽  
Erik Van Assche

This study sought to determine the relationships between the cognitive styles field dependence-independence and reflection-impulsivity and the acquisition of a gross motor skill in an unstructured learning environment. In reference to the first cognitive style construct, it was hypothesized that field-independent subjects perform better than field-dependent subjects because they provide organization when the material to be learned lacks structure, leading them to rely on their analyzing and restructuring ability. The second construct refers to cognitive inhibition required for response uncertainty tasks as well as motor impulse inhibition. Subjects (57 boys, 65 girls) were 13-year-old junior high school students. Several visual perceptual tests were administered and gymnastic performance scores were measured at pretest, during the learning session, and posttest. The hypothesis that field-independent subjects are more successful in an unstructured learning environment than field-dependent subjects was confirmed for boys only. The correlations between the reflection-impulsivity variables and gymnastic performance were generally low, and no support could be found for the hypothesis that reflective subjects are more successful in learning the skill than impulsive subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document