A Policy Network Analysis on the Policy-Making Process of the After-Schools

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-118
Author(s):  
Min kyoung Kim ◽  
Yeong mo Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Policy Network ◽  
Policy Making Process

Network analysis of Korean health insurance policy-making process

1992 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Myongsei Sohn ◽  
Seung Hum Yu ◽  
Yong Hak Kim
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Insurance Policy ◽  
Policy Making Process

scholarly journals Identifying Clusters of Complex Urban–Rural Issues as Part of Policy Making Process Using a Network Analysis Approach: A Case Study in Bahía de Los Ángeles, Mexico

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Sandoval ◽  
Manuel Castañón-Puga ◽  
Carelia Gaxiola-Pacheco ◽  
Eugenio Suarez
Keyword(s):  
Network Analysis ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Urban Rural

6. Policy Networks

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Peterson
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
European Integration ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Policy Networks ◽  
Policy Network ◽  
Policy Options ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Network Approach ◽  
Shed Light

This chapter examines the policy network approach to the analysis of European governance. The European Union has three primary features that lend itself to policy network analysis: the formidable power of the European Parliament (EP), EU’s status as an extraordinarily ‘differentiated polity’, and the fact that EU policy-making is underpinned by a complex labyrinth of committees that shape policy options before policies are ‘set’ by overtly political decisionmakers such as the EP. The chapter first traces the origins of policy network analysis before explaining the importance of policy networks for European integration. It then considers a host of criticisms levelled against policy network analysis and the application of the approach to Eurojust and the European Judicial Network. It also shows how policy network analysis might help us to shed light on the EU after its radical enlargement and concludes by reflecting on the future of policy network analysis.

Positive Reintegration as a Way of Small and Medium-Sized Business Development

2012 ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
A. Zolotov ◽  
M. Mukhanov
Keyword(s):  
Policy Implementation ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Economic Reforms ◽  
Alternative Possibility ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Compensation Mechanisms ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Monitoring And Enforcement ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Modernization Process

А new approach to policy-making in the field of economic reforms in modernizing countries (on the sample of SME promotion) is the subject of this article. Based on summarizing the ten-year experience of de-bureaucratization policy implementation to reduce the administrative pressure on SME, the conclusion of its insufficient efficiency and sustainability is made. The alternative possibility is the positive reintegration approach, which provides multiparty policy-making process, special compensation mechanisms for the losing sides, monitoring and enforcement operations. In conclusion matching between positive reintegration principles and socio-cultural factors inherent in modernization process is provided.

A Study on the Policy-making Process of the Three Kindergarten Bills: Focusing on Fast Track Systems and the Devil Shift

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-171
Author(s):  
Jeong Ho Yoo ◽  
Yunju Yang ◽  
Ji Hye Choi ◽  
Seung Taek Lee ◽  
Rosa Minhyo Cho
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
The Devil

The Dual Executive

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Belco ◽  
Brandon Rottinghaus
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Political System ◽  
Government Support ◽  
The Political ◽  
Government Function ◽  
Dual Roles ◽  
System P ◽  
Policy Making Process

The president serves dual roles in the political system: one who “commands” by pursuing his or her agenda using unilateral orders and one who “administers” and who works to continue proper government function, often with the support of Congress. In a reassessment of the literature on unilateral power, this book considers the president’s dual roles during the stages of the policy-making process. Although presidents may appear to act “first and alone,” the reality is often much different. Presidents act in response to their own concerns, as well as assisting Congress on priorities and the need to maintain harmonic government function. The authors find support for both the model of an aggressive president who uses unilateral orders to push his or her agenda, head off unfavorable congressional legislation, and selectively implement legislation, and they find support for a unifying president who is willing to share management of government, support Congressional legislative efforts, and faithfully implement legislation. At the same time, presidents self-check their actions based on the ability of Congress to act to overturn their orders, through a shared sense of responsibility to keep government moving and out of respect for the constitutional balance. The shared nature of unilateral orders does not preclude an active president, as presidents remain strong, central actors in the political system.

Government and Urban Poverty: Inside the Policy-Making Process

1984 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 487
Author(s):  
E. M. McLeay ◽  
Joan Higgins ◽  
Nicholas Deakin ◽  
John Edwards ◽  
Malcolm Wicks
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Urban Poverty ◽  
Policy Making Process
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document