scholarly journals The Complication Rates of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Deep Venous Thrombosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-90
Author(s):  
Ionela Silivastru Cozlea ◽  
Arthur-Atilla Keresztesi ◽  
Gabriela Asofie Keresztesi ◽  
Daniel Cozlea ◽  
Daniela Ecaterina Dobru
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events

AbstractThe objective of the current study is to evaluate the complication rates (embolic and hemorrhagic events) in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients on different types of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC): direct oral anticoagulant therapy and vitamin K antagonist therapy.Methods: A number of 62 DVT patients were included and divided in two groups, depending on the type of oral anticoagulation therapy administered. The first group was composed of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant treatment (Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban) and the second group was composed of patients treated with vitamin K antagonist (Acenocumarol). General data, including BMI and comorbidities were noted. Embolic and hemorrhagic events were noticed.Results: in the first group of patients (DOAC therapy), a number of 34 patients were included (14 of them with BMI higher than 25 kg/m2 and 14 with concomitant atrial fibrillation), while the second group comprised of 28 patients treated with VKA (21 of them with a high BMI and only 3 of them with atrial fibrillation). After a mean period of 36 months of anticoagulant therapy, complications were present in 17 patients, hematuria (8 episodes) and pulmonary embolism (4 cases) were the most frequent, with no difference regarding the treatment applied.Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was encountered regarding embolic and hemorrhagic event rates in our deep vein thrombosis patients.

scholarly journals A nomogram to predict unfavourable outcome in patients receiving oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation after stroke

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-393
Author(s):  
Manuel Cappellari ◽  
David J Seiffge ◽  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
Maurizio Paciaroni ◽  
Stefano Forlivesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Unfavourable Outcome ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Operating Characteristic Curve

Introduction It is unknown whether the type of treatment (direct oral anticoagulant versus vitamin K antagonist) and the time of treatment introduction (early versus late) may affect the functional outcome in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model including direct oral anticoagulant/vitamin K antagonist and early/late oral anticoagulant introduction for predicting the probability of unfavourable outcome after stroke in atrial fibrillation-patients. Patients and Methods We conducted an individual patient data analysis of four prospective studies. Unfavourable functional outcome was defined as three-month modified Rankin Scale score 3 -6. To generate the nomogram, five independent predictors including age (<65 years, reference; 65--79; or 80), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0--5 points, reference; 6--15; 16--25; or >25), acute revascularisation treatments (yes, reference, or no), direct oral anticoagulant (reference) or vitamin K antagonist, and early (7 days, reference) or late (8--30) anticoagulant introduction entered into a final logistic regression model. The discriminative performance of the model was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results A total of 2102 patients with complete data for generating the nomogram was randomly dichotomised into training ( n = 1553) and test ( n = 549) sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.822 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.800--0.844) in the training set and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.764--0.842) in the test set. The model was adequately calibrated (9.852; p = 0.276 for the Hosmer--Lemeshow test). Discussion and Conclusion Our nomogram is the first model including type of oral anticoagulant and time of treatment introduction to predict the probability of three-month unfavourable outcome in a large multicentre cohort of stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.

Factors associated with silent cerebral events during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the era of uninterrupted oral anticoagulation therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Harada ◽  
Y Nomura ◽  
A Nishimura ◽  
Y Motoike ◽  
M Koshikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Factors Associated

Abstract Background A silent cerebral event (SCE), detected by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is defined as an acute new brain lesion without clinically apparent neurological deficit, and is frequently observed after catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Although the small number of SCEs does not cause neurocognitive dysfunction, the greater volume and/or larger number of SCE lesions are reportedly related to neuropsychological decline; SCE incidence may be a surrogate marker for the potential thromboembolic risk. Thus, strategies to reduce SCEs would be beneficial. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation strategy for peri-procedural period reportedly reduced the risk of SCEs, but the incidence hovers at 10% to 30%. We sought factors associated with SCEs during catheter ablation for AF in patients with peri-procedural uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy. Methods AF patients undergoing catheter ablation were eligible (n=255). All patients took non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for peri-procedural OAC (&gt;4 weeks) without interruption during the procedure. Brain MRI was performed within 2 days after the procedure to detect SCEs. Clinical characteristics and procedure-related parameters were compared between patients with and without SCEs. Results SCEs were detected in 59 patients (23%, SCE[+]) but not in 196 patients (77%, SCE[-]). Average age was higher in SCE[+] than SCE[-] (66±10 years vs. 62±12 years, p&lt;0.05). Persistent AF prevalence, CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and serum NT-ProBNP levels increased in SCE[+] vs. SCE[-]. In transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography, left-atrial dimension (LAD) was larger and AF rhythm/spontaneous echo contrast were more frequently observed in SCE[+] than SCE[-]. SCE[+] had lower initial activated clotting time (ACT) before unfractionated heparin (UFH) injection and longer time to reach optimal ACT (&gt;300 sec) before trans-septal puncture than SCE [-]. In multivariate analysis, LAD, initial ACT before UFH injection, and time to reach optimal ACT were predictors for SCEs. Conclusions LAD and intra-procedural ACT kinetics affect SCEs during the procedure in patients with uninterrupted OAC for AF ablation. Shortening time to achieve optimal ACT during the procedure may reduce the risk of SCEs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. 527-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominick J. Angiolillo ◽  
Shaun G. Goodman ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
John W. Eikelboom ◽  
Matthew J. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Antithrombotic Management

The optimal antithrombotic treatment regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation represents a challenge in clinical practice. In 2016, an updated opinion of selected experts from the United States and Canada on the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention was reported. After the 2016 North American consensus statement on the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, results of pivotal clinical trials assessing the type of oral anticoagulant agent and the duration of antiplatelet treatment have been published. On the basis of these results, this focused update on the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention recommends that a non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant be preferred over a vitamin K antagonist as the oral anticoagulant of choice. Moreover, a double-therapy regimen (oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y 12 inhibitor) by the time of hospital discharge should be considered for most patients, whereas extending the use of aspirin beyond hospital discharge (ie, triple therapy) should be considered only for selected patients at high ischemic/thrombotic and low bleeding risks and for a limited period of time. The present document provides a focused updated on the rationale for the new expert consensus–derived recommendations on the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

scholarly journals Oral anticoagulation therapy use in patients with atrial fibrillation after the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: findings from the French healthcare databases, 2011–2016

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e026645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Géric Maura ◽  
Cécile Billionnet ◽  
Jérôme Drouin ◽  
Alain Weill ◽  
Anke Neumann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Patterns Of Use

ObjectivesTo describe (i) the trend in oral anticoagulant (OAC) use following the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and (ii) the current patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF in France.Design(i) Repeated cross-sectional study and (ii) population-based cohort study.SettingFrench national healthcare databases (50 million beneficiaries).Participants(i) Patients with identified AF in 2011, 2013 and 2016 and (ii) patients with AF initiating OAC therapy in 2015–2016.Primary and secondary outcome measures(i) Trend in OAC therapy use in patients with AF and (ii) patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF.ResultsBetween 2011 and 2016, use of OAC therapy moderately increased (+16%), while use of antiplatelet therapy decreased (−22%) among all patients with identified AF. In 2016, among the 1.1 million AF patients, 66% used OAC therapy and were more likely to be treated by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) than NOAC therapy, including patients at higher risk of stroke (63.5%), while 33% used antiplatelet therapy. Among 192 851 new users of OAC therapy in 2015–2016 with identified AF, NOAC therapy (66.3%) was initiated more frequently than VKA therapy, including in patients at higher risk of stroke (57.8%). Reduced doses were prescribed in 40% of NOAC new users. Several situations of inappropriate use at NOAC initiation were identified, including concomitant use of drugs increasing the risk of bleeding (one in three new users) and potential NOAC underdosing.ConclusionsOAC therapy use in patients with AF remains suboptimal 4 years after the introduction of NOACs for stroke prevention in France and improvement in appropriate prescribing regarding NOAC initiation is needed. However, NOAC therapy is now the preferred drug class for initiation of OAC therapy in patients with AF, including in patients at higher risk of stroke.

Depression and Uptake of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Medical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Fenger-Grøn ◽  
Claus H. Vestergaard ◽  
Lars Frost ◽  
Dimitry S. Davydow ◽  
Erik T. Parner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

Consideration of non-valvular atrial fibrillation with left atrial appendage thrombus formation despite under appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Shiraki ◽  
H Tanaka ◽  
K Yamashita ◽  
Y Tanaka ◽  
K Sumimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently sustained cardiac arrhythmia, with a prevalence of about 2–3% in the general population. In accordance with CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score, appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy such as warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) significantly reduced the risk of thromboembolic events. However, left atrial (LA) thrombus can be detected in the LA appendage (LAA) in AF patients despite appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy. Purpose Our purpose was to investigate the associated factors of LAA thrombus formation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients despite under appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive 286 NVAF patients for scheduled catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion for AF in our institution between February 2017 and September 2019. Mean age was 67.1±9.4 years, 79 patients (29.5%) were female, and 140 (52.2%) were paroxysmal AF. All patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography before catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion. All patients received appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy including warfarin or DOAC for at least 3 weeks prior to transesophageal echocardiography based on the current guidelines. LAA thrombus was defined as an echodense intracavitary mass distinct from the underlying endocardium and not caused by pectinate muscles by at least three senior echocardiologists. Results Of 286 NVAF patients with under appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy, LAA thrombus was observed in 9 patients (3.3%). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, paroxysmal AF, CHADS2 score ≥3, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), LA volume index (LAVI), mitral inflow E and mitral e' annular velocities ratio (E/e'), and LAA flow were associated with LAA thrombus formation. It was noteworthy that multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LAA flow was independent predictor of LAA thrombus (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59–0.89, p&lt;0.005) as well as LVEF. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the optimal cutoff value of LAA flow for predicting LAA thrombus as ≤15cm/s, with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 93%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95. Conclusions LAA flow was strongly associated with LAA thrombus formation even in NVAF patients with appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy. According to our findings, further strengthen of oral anticoagulation therapy or percutaneous transcatheter closure of the LAA may be considered in NVAF patients with appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy but low LAA flow, especially &lt;15cm/s. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document