scholarly journals Analysis of KRAS and NRAS mutations in Greek patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) on the registry of the Gastro-intestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Gouvas ◽  
Telenia Kalambaliki ◽  
Alexandra Voutsina ◽  
Zenia Saridaki ◽  
Maria Tzardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Exon 4 ◽  
Pathological Parameter

Abstract Introduction Several studies show that mutational profiles could influence treatment decisions in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). KRAS mutational status was the first step in biomarkers development in the era of molecular targeted therapies. Recently, NRAS mutational status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for the response to treatment with anti-EGFR moAbs. The aim of this observational study was to assess the feasibility of the KRAS/NRAS mutational analysis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Greece and to identify any correlations with known clinical characteristics and histopathologic features. Methods From January 2014 until September 2014 all patients registered to the GIC-SG database with newly diagnosed metastatic disease from colon or rectal cancer were included and tumor samples were analyzed for kras/nras mutations in 9 different certified laboratories in Greece. Results Samples from 510 patients were analyzed. Mutations’ distribution was as follows: 173 (33,9%) KRAS exon 2, 10 (2%) KRAS exon 3, 25 (4,9%) KRAS exon 4, 22 (4,3%) NRAS exon 2, 11 (2,2%) NRAS exon 3 and 3 (0,6%) NRAS exon 4. The only factor significantly associated with RAS mutational status was primary tumor location, with right sided tumors exhibiting higher rates of mutations. Discussion The incidence and distribution of KRAS or NRAS exon 2-4 mutations are in accordance with those reported in the literature. The most significant clinical or pathological parameter revealed from the analysis is the location of the primary tumor.

scholarly journals Impact of biomarkers and primary tumor location on the metastatic colorectal cancer first-line treatment landscape in five European countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kafatos ◽  
Victoria Banks ◽  
Peter Burdon ◽  
David Neasham ◽  
Kimberly A Lowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Factors

Background: Advances in therapies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and improved understanding of prognostic and predictive factors have impacted treatment decisions. Materials & methods: This study used a large oncology database to investigate patterns of monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus chemotherapy treatment in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in mCRC patients treated in first line in 2018. Results: Anti-EGFR mAbs were most often administered to patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and those with left-sided tumors, while anti-VEGF mAbs were preferred in RAS mutant and right-sided tumors. Adopted treatment strategies differed between countries, largely due to reimbursement. Conclusion: Biomarker status and primary tumor location steered treatment decisions in first line. Adopted treatment strategies differed between participating countries.

scholarly journals Prognostic impact of primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A 5 year retrospective analysis of our treated population.

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii118-iii119
Author(s):  
Gonçalo Atalaia ◽  
Marta Vaz Baptista ◽  
Tiago Tomás ◽  
Susana Almeida ◽  
Inês Eiriz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumor Location

Understanding the Prognostic Value of Primary Tumor Location and KRAS in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the OPTIMOX3 DREAM Phase III Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-208.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Magdalena Benetkiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Post Hoc

Primary tumor location and efficacy of second-line therapy after initial treatment with FOLFIRI in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer- FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3525-3525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Paul Modest ◽  
Sebastian Stintzing ◽  
Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Alexander Kiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Primary Tumor Location ◽  
Line Therapy

3525 Background: FIRE3 compared 1st-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab (arm A) or bevacizumab (arm B) in 592 patients (pts) with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Second-line therapies appeared more successful in arm A compared to arm B. The impact of primary tumor location on this observation is unclear. Methods: Pts. were stratified for primary tumor site (left- vs. right-sided). Duration of 2nd-line therapy was calculated as time from first to last application. Progression-free survival (PFS2nd) and overall survival (OS2nd) of second-line therapy) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test as well as Cox regression. All analyses were performed in the RAS wild-type population of the trial and reported according to drug sequences. Results: 272 of 400 pts. (68%) received 2nd-line therapy, of those 206 (109 in arm A, 97 in arm B) pts. presented left-sided, whereas 66 (26 in arm A, 40 in arm B) pts. presented right-sided primaries. PFS2nd was markedly longer in pts. with left-sided as compared to right-sided primary tumors (6.0 (95% CI: 5.5-6.7) vs. 3.4 (95% CI: 3.0-5.8) months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47-0.87), P = 0.005). Differences in PFS2nd between study-arms were evident in pts. with left-sided primaries (arm A: 7.3 (95% CI: 6.4-7.7) vs. arm B: 5.3 (95% CI: 4.3-5.9) months, HR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.44-0.84), P = 0.002), but not in pts. with right-sided primaries (arm A: 4.0 (95% CI: 3.0-6.3) vs. arm B: 3.3 (95% CI: 2.6-5.8) months, HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.62-1.90). Consistent observations were also made for treatment duration and OS2nd. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates that treatment duration and efficacy of second-line therapy are associated with primary tumor location. Efficacy of second-line therapy was significantly greater in pts. with left-sided tumors as compared to right sided tumors. This difference was driven by superior activity of second-line regimens of arm A compared to arm B in left-sided tumors. Our observations confirm the strong prognostic value of primary tumor location in mCRC across treatment lines. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927.

Impact of primary tumor sidedness on erlotinib efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab maintenance: Results from the DREAM phase III trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 737-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Benoit Samson ◽  
Marie-Line Garcia-Larnicol ◽  
Jérôme Dauba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Mutational Status

737 Background: Primary tumor sidedness (PTS) could be a predictive maker for treatment efficacy of EGFR inhibitors monoclonal antibodies in patients with wild-type (WT) RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), cetuximab having limited efficacy in patients with WT-RAS right-sided tumors. DREAM study demonstrated that adding erlotinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to bevacizumab during maintenance therapy improved clinical outcomes (RR, PFS, OS) in patients with MCRC, whatever KRAS status. The aim of this post-hoc analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes according to KRAS mutational status and PTS when adding erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Methods: PTS was retrospectively collected in patients from the DREAM phase III trial treated with bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy for MCRC who have been controlled by induction therapy. The limit for the definition of PTS was splenic flexure, and rectal tumors were considered as left-sided tumors. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Among 452 patients who received maintenance therapy, PTS ascertainment was 84.7% (n = 383) with 265 (71.0%) patients having left-sided primary tumor and 108 (28.9%) having right-sided primary tumors (3 patients had both and tumor location was unknown in 7 patients). Median OS and treatment effect are presented in table 1. Conclusions: The greatest OS benefit of adding erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance therapy was observed in patients with WT-KRAS and right-sided MCRC, suggesting a clinical impact of the different mechanism of action between EGFR TKI and monoclonal antibodies. Clinical trial information: NCT00265824. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document