scholarly journals Management of multiple myeloma in a patient with haemophilia with concurrent emicizumab – case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-140
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Davies ◽  
Luke Carter-Brzezinski ◽  
Margarita Traintafillou ◽  
Rachel Brown ◽  
Charles R M Hay

Abstract With the increased life expectancies of people with severe haemophilia A, diagnoses of disorders associated with increased age are likely to become more common. Multiple myeloma is a commonly diagnosed plasma cell dyscrasia, with incidence strongly related to age. Both the disease itself and specific myeloma therapies are associated with a significant increase in rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Management of VTE prophylaxis can be challenging, especially in patients with a bleeding disorder. In this case report, we describe the management of a patient with concurrent diagnosis of multiple myeloma and severe haemophilia A, undergoing first line myeloma chemotherapy. The patient was successfully managed on standard of care myeloma treatment, with use of emicizumab and venous thromboprophylaxis. This case demonstrates the successful management of a haematological malignancy and a bleeding disorder using integrated and multidisciplinary patient-focused care.

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Trzaska ◽  
Marek Karwacki ◽  
Paweł Łaguna ◽  
Michał Matysiak

Eradication of factor VIII inhibitors using Immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment is the standard of care for severe haemophilia A patients presenting with factor VIII inhibitors, but is not always effective. A description of the potential immunological tolerance effect of the IgG Fc domain of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), as well as published experience with rFVIIIFc for ITI in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors. Review of published literature describing cases of ITI with rFVIIIFc in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors between November 2015 and June 2018. Four publications has been found. Of 56 patients with haemophilia A who presented with FVIII inhibitors, 28 achieved a negative Bethesda titre (< 0.6) after ITI treatment using rFVIIIFc. Additional patients continued on rFVIIIFc ITI at the time of publication, while a few were reported to have switched to bypass therapy alone or other factors . For those still undergoing ITI, longer follow-up is needed to determine final outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Based on literature review, preliminary evidence of FVIIIFc use in high risk, first-time ITI suggests rapid time to tolerization. For rescue ITI, rFVIIIFc showed therapeutic benefit in some patients who previously failed ITI. These findings give hope but highlight the need for further evaluation in ongoing clinical trials.


Haemophilia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. e39-e42
Author(s):  
L. M. Vos ◽  
R. E. G. Schutgens ◽  
H. W. de Valk ◽  
W. Spiering ◽  
R. H. H. Bemelmans

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1593
Author(s):  
Jose Florencio F. Lapeña ◽  
Olivia Agnes D. Mejia

Epistaxis may be profuse in individuals with normal bleeding parameters, but in an individual with haemophilia, it may be life-threatening. It is even more dangerous when epistaxis is caused by an undetected concomitant juvenile angiofibroma, and only one such case has been reported in the English literature. We report another case, of an 18-year-old Filipino adolescent with severe haemophilia A who was referred for repeated massive epistaxis. The epistaxis had been attributed to his haemophilia and managed with nasal packing, multiple blood transfusions and Factor VIII administration. After two years of unsuccessful management, nasal endoscopy was performed for the first time, revealing an intranasal mass. Imaging showed a right intranasal vascular tumour supplied mainly by the right sphenopalatine artery. He subsequently underwent preoperative embolization and endoscopic excision of the tumour with Factor VIII transfused pre-, intra-, and post-operatively, and recombinant Factor VII added post-operatively. Final histopathology was consistent with juvenile angiofibroma. There has been no nasal obstruction or recurrence of epistaxis seven years since the surgery. Clinicians should be more meticulous in assessing epistaxis in any patient with a bleeding disorder and investigate more subtle symptoms such as nasal obstruction. Verification of the source by direct visualization and ancillary diagnostic techniques (such as imaging) when indicated should be the standard of care for all patients presenting with epistaxis, whether or not a concomitant bleeding disorder exists. A high index of suspicion for juvenile angiofibroma should be maintained in adolescent males with epistaxis and nasal obstruction.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5354-5354
Author(s):  
Marcio M Andrade Sr. ◽  
Ilda Murillo-Florez ◽  
Anel Montes-Limon ◽  
Beatriz de Rueda ◽  
Jose-Maria Grasa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proteasoma inhibitors have proven to be one of the major advances on multiple myeloma (MM) therapy. Their principal effect in growth inhibition of MM cells is achieved not only through the inhibition of proteasomes but also by preventing the adhesion of myeloma cells to stromal cells, induction of cytokines by the microenvironment, decrease angiogenic activity and a direct apoptotic effect on MM cells. Actually it is part of the first-line standard of care therapy for patients with MM. On the other hand, multiple strategies have been developed for trying to predict response or improve the assessment of response and follow-up of MM patients. Currently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria of response include immunophenotype and immunoparesis analysis. The HevyLiteTM and FreeLiteTM assays (The Binding Site Ltd. Birminghan. UK) permit a separate quantification of the amount of kappa- and lambda-bound to a given immunoglobulin (HLC) and the free light chains kappa or lambda amount quantification (FLC), both being excellent tools for immunoparesis assessment. Aims To analyze the usefulness of immunoparesis analysis by HevyLiteTM and FreeliteTM in patients who receive bortezomib-based therapy in our institution. Patients and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed including the patients diagnosed with secretor IgA or IgG MM who received therapy with bortezomib either at relapse or as first-line therapy. General clinical characteristics, therapy schedules, number of cycles, response to therapy according IMWG criteria and relapse were recorded. For the analysis, only patients with at least 4 cycles of bortezomib based regimen and HLC and/or FLC analysis performed between 4-12 weeks after complete therapy were included. Period of study: June 2004 to April 2013. Results At the end of study a total of 67 MM patients had received bortezomib-based therapy, 63 of them completed 4 or more cycles and were included in the analysis. Male/Female ratio: 31/32, mean age: 66.9 years old (46-81), therapeutic schedules were: bortezomib-prednisone: 3 (4.7%), bortezomib-dexametasone: 33 (51.6%), bortezomib-melfalan-prednisone: 18 (28.1%), bortezomib-dexametasone-lenalidomide: 8 (12.5%) and bortezomib-talidomide-dexametasone: 1 (1.6%). 55% of patients received at least 6 cycles of therapy. Immunoglobulin Myeloma subtype: IgAL: 13 (20.4%) patients, IgAK: 10 (15.6%) patients, IgGK: 32 (50.8%) patients and IgGL: 8 (14.1%) patients. A total of 46 (73%) patients showed an abnormal HLC ratio at diagnosis and 48 (76,2%) had immunoparesis before therapy; a total of 47 (74.6%) registered an abnormal FLC ratio at diagnosis. The response to therapy was: 15 (23.8%) of cases achieved a stringent complete response (SR), 3 (4.8%) a very good partial response (VGPR), 36 (57.1%) obtained a partial response (PR) and 9 (14.3%) patients had not-response/progressive-disease. At the time of post-therapy evaluation, 26 (37%) of patients had normalized FLC-ratio, 15 (23.8%) maintain the SR, 1 (1,6%) patient in VGPR and 5 (11.1%) in PR and 1 (1.6%) of non-responder patients. Normalization of HLC-ratio was only observed in patients with SR and VGPR: 13 (20.6%). Regarding the immunoparesis analysis, only 15 (23.8%) of patients with immunoparesis recovered the immune restitution (IR) at the end of therapy, of which 8 (11.7%) were SR patients, 2 VGPR and 5 PR patients. At the end of the study 47(71.4%) patients relapsed, 5 (11.11%) are on maintenance therapy and 11(17.4%) after a median follow-up of 29 months (9-94) without therapy not-relapsed; the association of SR with IR was related to a less tendency to relapse and need of therapy, 7/8 patients who achieved this status are not-relapsed. Conclusion In our cohort, patients who achieved a SR with a normalization of immunoparesis shows a clear tendency to less incidence of relapse; probably reflecting a better response with not only an undetectable monoclonal protein but also the recovery of the immune function. Even in small cohorts, the immunoparesis recovery analysis through HLC quantifications seems to be an useful tool to determine a new level of response. More investigations on this field are warranted. This work has been partially supported by a grant from Fundación para el Estudio de la Hematología y hemoterapia en Aragón (FEHHA) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (04) ◽  
pp. 302-308
Author(s):  
Hiral Shah ◽  
Tapas Kumar Kundu ◽  
Afroz Farooque Shaikh

AbstractHaemophilia is an X-linked inherited immunogenetic bleeding disorder resulting from deficiency of clotting Factor VIII (haemophilia A) or Factor IX (haemophilia B). Haemophilia patients suffer from complication of developing autoantibodies/inhibitor against clotting factors used for the treatment; most commonly patients are treated with Factor VIII replacement therapy. In modern medicine, haemophiliacs with inhibitor positive status are treated with bypassing agents such as Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing agent and immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) because such patients do not respond to traditional factor replacement therapy during an event of active bleeding. Treatment with ITI is very expensive and it requires medical expertise. Moreover, high cost of such treatment is one part of the problem, while its availability is another problem especially in developing countries. The inhibitor status among haemophilia patients is identified by conducting a blood test which measures the Bethesda units (BU) levels in the blood. In this case report, the homoeopathic management of a patient with haemophilia A severe type (Factor VIII <1%), inhibitor positive (4 BU/mL), is presented. The patient underwent treatment for a span of 4 years. After closely assessing the patient's condition and applying the principles of homeopathy medicine selection, his frequent bleeding episodes were treated with homoeopathic medicines such as Hamamelis Virginica Q, Phosphorus, Arnica montana, Rhus toxicodendron, Calendula officinalis, and Pulsatilla nigricans. Intercurrent medicine—Tuberculinum bovinum—was given when the most indicated medicine failed to relieve the symptoms of the case and was given during non-bleeding phase. The medicines not only helped in reducing haemophilia-related bleeding episodes but also improved complaints of pain, relieved skin complaints, and showed improvement in overall psychological status of patient. It can be concluded that homeopathy medicines were able to successfully reduce the frequency of bleeding and intensity of pain in this patient. Owing to reduced bleeding, he required relatively a smaller number of factor replacement treatment compared with earlier when he was not taking homeopathy. Homoeopathy proved to be effective in managing severe haemophilia patient as a supportive therapy and was able to contribute toward reduced inhibitor levels in severe haemophilia patient.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilushi Wijayaratne ◽  
Priyanga Ranasinghe ◽  
Shanaka P Mohotti ◽  
Shani Dilrukshi ◽  
Prasad Katulanda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document