Association Of Stringed Response and Immunoparesis Normalization After Bortezomib-Based Therapy Is Related To Better Outcomes In Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5354-5354
Author(s):  
Marcio M Andrade Sr. ◽  
Ilda Murillo-Florez ◽  
Anel Montes-Limon ◽  
Beatriz de Rueda ◽  
Jose-Maria Grasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Female Ratio

Abstract Background Proteasoma inhibitors have proven to be one of the major advances on multiple myeloma (MM) therapy. Their principal effect in growth inhibition of MM cells is achieved not only through the inhibition of proteasomes but also by preventing the adhesion of myeloma cells to stromal cells, induction of cytokines by the microenvironment, decrease angiogenic activity and a direct apoptotic effect on MM cells. Actually it is part of the first-line standard of care therapy for patients with MM. On the other hand, multiple strategies have been developed for trying to predict response or improve the assessment of response and follow-up of MM patients. Currently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria of response include immunophenotype and immunoparesis analysis. The HevyLiteTM and FreeLiteTM assays (The Binding Site Ltd. Birminghan. UK) permit a separate quantification of the amount of kappa- and lambda-bound to a given immunoglobulin (HLC) and the free light chains kappa or lambda amount quantification (FLC), both being excellent tools for immunoparesis assessment. Aims To analyze the usefulness of immunoparesis analysis by HevyLiteTM and FreeliteTM in patients who receive bortezomib-based therapy in our institution. Patients and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed including the patients diagnosed with secretor IgA or IgG MM who received therapy with bortezomib either at relapse or as first-line therapy. General clinical characteristics, therapy schedules, number of cycles, response to therapy according IMWG criteria and relapse were recorded. For the analysis, only patients with at least 4 cycles of bortezomib based regimen and HLC and/or FLC analysis performed between 4-12 weeks after complete therapy were included. Period of study: June 2004 to April 2013. Results At the end of study a total of 67 MM patients had received bortezomib-based therapy, 63 of them completed 4 or more cycles and were included in the analysis. Male/Female ratio: 31/32, mean age: 66.9 years old (46-81), therapeutic schedules were: bortezomib-prednisone: 3 (4.7%), bortezomib-dexametasone: 33 (51.6%), bortezomib-melfalan-prednisone: 18 (28.1%), bortezomib-dexametasone-lenalidomide: 8 (12.5%) and bortezomib-talidomide-dexametasone: 1 (1.6%). 55% of patients received at least 6 cycles of therapy. Immunoglobulin Myeloma subtype: IgAL: 13 (20.4%) patients, IgAK: 10 (15.6%) patients, IgGK: 32 (50.8%) patients and IgGL: 8 (14.1%) patients. A total of 46 (73%) patients showed an abnormal HLC ratio at diagnosis and 48 (76,2%) had immunoparesis before therapy; a total of 47 (74.6%) registered an abnormal FLC ratio at diagnosis. The response to therapy was: 15 (23.8%) of cases achieved a stringent complete response (SR), 3 (4.8%) a very good partial response (VGPR), 36 (57.1%) obtained a partial response (PR) and 9 (14.3%) patients had not-response/progressive-disease. At the time of post-therapy evaluation, 26 (37%) of patients had normalized FLC-ratio, 15 (23.8%) maintain the SR, 1 (1,6%) patient in VGPR and 5 (11.1%) in PR and 1 (1.6%) of non-responder patients. Normalization of HLC-ratio was only observed in patients with SR and VGPR: 13 (20.6%). Regarding the immunoparesis analysis, only 15 (23.8%) of patients with immunoparesis recovered the immune restitution (IR) at the end of therapy, of which 8 (11.7%) were SR patients, 2 VGPR and 5 PR patients. At the end of the study 47(71.4%) patients relapsed, 5 (11.11%) are on maintenance therapy and 11(17.4%) after a median follow-up of 29 months (9-94) without therapy not-relapsed; the association of SR with IR was related to a less tendency to relapse and need of therapy, 7/8 patients who achieved this status are not-relapsed. Conclusion In our cohort, patients who achieved a SR with a normalization of immunoparesis shows a clear tendency to less incidence of relapse; probably reflecting a better response with not only an undetectable monoclonal protein but also the recovery of the immune function. Even in small cohorts, the immunoparesis recovery analysis through HLC quantifications seems to be an useful tool to determine a new level of response. More investigations on this field are warranted. This work has been partially supported by a grant from Fundación para el Estudio de la Hematología y hemoterapia en Aragón (FEHHA) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Would Be Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (CTD) a Possible Treatment For Multiple Myeloma Where Is Not Possible New Drugs?

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5385-5385
Author(s):  
Marcelo Bellesso ◽  
Marcela Cavalcante de Andrade Silva ◽  
Rodrigo Dolphini Velasques ◽  
Helena Visnadi ◽  
Roberta Shcolnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
In The Beginning

Abstract Background Nowadays, the best evidence for symptomatic patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) is initial induction therapy with more than two drugs that contains bortezomib. If patients are eligible it is established the use of high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We do not have to prescribe in Brazilian public health service, due to economic reasons, new drugs such as: bortezomib and lenalidomide. On the other hand, it is known that Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) regimen is an effective primary therapy for MM and it is widely used in some countries such as United Kingdom. We have been prescribing for first line therapy CTD regimen in our clinical practice for approximately 4 years. Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with MM treated with CTD regimen in the Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Here we present response rate, reduction dose rate, toxicity rate and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and Method We studied 71 patients that were submitted as first line treatment CTD, during 2006-2012. This regimen consists: Cyclophosphamide 500mg orally on days 1, 8, 15; Thalidomide 100mg orally on days 1 to 28 and Dexamethasone 40mg orally on days 1 to 5 and 14 to 18, every 30 days. To sensitive and eligible patients, we have submitted them for  ASCT. PFS and OS were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS was calculated from the start of treatment until progression or death or last follow-up and OS until death or last follow-up. GraphPad Prism (v5.0) software was used for statistical calculations, and P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results In the 71 patients, 54.2% were male patients, the median age was 57.81 years old (± 7.96). Out of the 71 patients (78.7%), were classified by Durie Salmon staging as IIIA or IIIB and 30% presented stage III for the International Staging System (ISS). Fifty seven (80.2%) were considered eligible for ASCT in the beginning of treatment. Moreover, the evidences of end-organ damage felt related to the plasma cell disorder were: lytic lesions 78.6%; anemia 51.4%, renal failure 20% and hypercalcemia 11.4%. The median of CTD cycles prescribed was 6.44 (± 2.62) and 47.1% were treated in the beginning without adjustment doses. It was evidenced 5.63% deaths related to the treatment. It was observed adjustment doses after 1st cycle in 35.7% of patients due to: peripheral neuropathy 36%, tremor 16%, thrombosis 12%, bradycardia 12% and others 24%. It was observed in 71 patients: 6 (8.45%) stable disease (SD); 4 (5.63%) progressive disease (PD); 26 (36.66%) partial response (PR); 15 (21.1%) very good partial response (VGPR) and 16 (22.53%) complete response (CR), it was not possible to analyze 4 (5.63%) patients due to death. Of total eligible patients to ASCT, 57.62% were submitted for ASCT and in this moment 6.7% have been preparing for ASCT. The median of PFS was 29.2 months (CI 95% 0,22-0,66) and  median of OS was not achieved. It was observed difference in OS between patients with stage III for the ISS: 28,92 months versus (vs) patients with stage I and II median not reached, p = 0.0105. PFS study demonstrated curves that patients responding to CTD at least VGPR (VGPR+CR) presented better median PFS 37.48 months than others patients (PR+PD+SD) 17.93 months, p=0.0018.  Only patients that presented PD and SD response to CTD had a significantly shorter OS median 19.21 months than patients responses at least PR (PR+VGPR+RC) median was not reached, p < 0.0001. Conclusion We conclude that CTD is a feasible regimen where is not possible to prescribe new drugs, with acceptable toxicity. Moreover, patients that presented at least VGPR and at least PR to CTD demonstrated better PFS and OS, respectively. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Daratumumab (DARA) in combination with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MMY1001): An open-label, phase 1b study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8000-8000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej J. Jakubowiak ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Brendan M. Weiss ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

8000 Background: DARA in combination with established standard of care regimens prolongs PFS, deepens responses, and demonstrates a favorable safety profile in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The tolerability and efficacy of DARA-KRd in newly diagnosed MM pts was examined. Methods: Newly diagnosed pts regardless of transplantation eligibility were enrolled. Pts received DARA 16 mg/kg QW for Cycles 1-2, Q2W for Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter. All pts received the 1st dose of DARA split over 2 days. Carfilzomib (K) was administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m2 on C1D1, 36 or 70 mg/m2 subsequently based on tolerability of first dose) for ≤13 cycles or elective discontinuation for ASCT. Lenalidomide 25 mg was given on Days 1-21 and dexamethasone 20-40 mg per week. The primary endpoint was tolerability. Results: Twenty-two pts (median [range] age, 60 [34-74] y) were enrolled and received a median of 8 (1-10) treatment cycles. Nineteen pts escalated K dose to 70 mg/m2 by C1D15. Median (range) duration of follow-up was 7.4 (4.0-9.3) months. Six (27%) pts discontinued treatment (1 AE [pulmonary embolism]; 1 PD; 4 other [ASCT]). Serious AEs occurred in 46% of pts, and 14% were possibly related to DARA; 18 (82%) experienced a grade 3/4 TEAE. The most common grade 3/4 TEAEs (>10%) were lymphopenia (50%) and neutropenia (23%); 1 (5%) cardiac grade 3 TEAE was observed (congestive heart failure) which resolved; pt quickly resumed study treatment with reduced K dose. No grade 5 TEAE was reported. All DARA-associated infusion reactions (27% of pts) were grade ≤2. Treatment with DARA-KRd yielded an ORR (≥partial response) of 100% (5% complete response, 86% ≥very good partial response) in 21 response-evaluable pts. The 6-month PFS rate was 100%. Conclusions: The addition of DARA to KRd was well tolerated; the overall safety profile was consistent with that previously reported for KRd, with no additional toxicity observed with the addition of DARA. Deep and durable responses were observed. These data support further investigation of DARA-KRd as a frontline treatment regimen. Updated data will be presented based on longer follow up. Clinical trial information: NCT01998971.

First Asia-Pacific Co-Operative Multicenter Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trial: Preliminary Results of the “dtZ”/“DAZZLE” Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4940-4940
Author(s):  
Gerrard Teoh ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Alok Srivastava ◽  
Vasant Pai ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Osteonecrosis Of The Jaw ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Abstract 4940 Introduction Many physicians have anecdotally reported that Asian patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are frequently unable to tolerate full doses of dexamethasone (Dex) and/or thalidomide (Thal). Unfortunately, co-operative clinical studies from the Asia-Pacific countries are presently lacking and the effective dose of the Dex/Thal combination in Asians is unknown. Since higher doses of zoledronic acid (Zol) have been shown to exert an anti-MM effect in pre-clinical models of MM, we investigated whether higher frequency dosing of Zol combined with lower doses of Dex/Thal could be an effective and better tolerated regimen in Asian patients. Moreover, since attainment of very good partial response (VGPR), near complete response (nCR) or complete response (CR) prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) correlates with good outcome in MM, we wanted to determine if this lower-dose Dex/Thal with higher-frequency dosing Zol regimen could be a good preparative regimen in transplant-eligible patients. Patients and Methods In this international co-operative multicenter phase II non-randomized single arm study in previously untreated patients with MM (n=44), all patients received up to 6 cycles of three-weekly Dex/Thal/Zol (or “dtZ”). Doses of Dex ranged from 20 mg weekly to 20 mg four times a week; and doses of Thal ranged from 50 mg weekly to 100 mg every night. Zol 4 mg was given three-weekly. Response was graded using Blade's criteria. Results The study population included 67.3% Oriental (Korean and Chinese), 30.8% Indian and 1.9% Malay patients. 15.4% of patients were ISS stage I, 61.5% stage II and 23.1% stage III prior to treatment. 39 (88.6%) patients demonstrated at least a partial response (PR); and 23 (52.3%) of patients achieved VGPR (18.2%), near nCR (15.9%) or CR (18.2%). The fastest time to VGPR/nCR/CR was 1 cycle. Most patients tolerated treatment very well and were managed in the outpatient clinic. Sepsis was the most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 toxicity – 8 (18.2%) patients developed bronchopneumonia, and 3 (6.8%) gastrointestinal or urinary tract infections. 1 (2.3%) patient was suspected of having pulmonary embolism. There were 4 (9.1%) deaths – 3 from severe sepsis and 1 from an unknown cause. Importantly, there were no reports of peripheral neuropathy, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) or end stage renal failure. In fact, there was an overall 2.4% improvement in the median creatinine clearance time (CCT). Finally, the percentage of CD34 stem cells was not adversely affected by treatment with dtZ. Conclusions The dtZ regimen appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment regimen for Asian patients with newly-diagnosed MM. The high rate of VGPR/nCR/CR will greatly facilitate AHSCT in transplant-eligible patients. Judicious use of low-dose Thal has abrogated the numerous side-effects associated with Thal and greatly improved patient tolerance. Even though Zol is administered at a higher frequency, it is not associated with worsening of renal function or ONJ. Infections are the most frequent and worrisome complications of treatment. These are likely to be related to the dose of Dex. Accordingly, it is probably wise to further lower the dose of Dex in future studies. (This study is registered with NIH PRS # 00263484.) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prevalence of Oligoclonal Bands in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Achieved Better Results Than Very Good Partial Response after Treatment with Standard or High Doses Chemotherapy-Final Analysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4210-4210
Author(s):  
Luiza soares Vieira ◽  
Edvan de queiroz Crusoe ◽  
Manuella de S. Sampaio Almeida ◽  
Lais Sousa ◽  
ana Lucia Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Oligoclonal Bands ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Good Partial Response

Abstract Introduction - Oligoclonal bands (OB) are monoclonal proteins distinct from those originally identified in the multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosis. Some authors consider that appearance of these bands confers a better prognosis and may be linked to immune reconstitution. There is no data of the exact prevalence of OB emergence in patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better after different treatment schedules. Objectives - To determine the prevalence of OB in MM patients treated with or without high-dose chemotherapy that obtained at least VGPR and its prognostic value. Methods- This is a retrospective and prospective cohort study. Data were collected from records of patients that achieved at least VGPR to identify the OB emergence. Subsequently, new sample collections from the positive patients were made in order to monitor the progress and duration of the maintenance of these bands. Results-Median follow-up was 42m and 101 patients were included. Median age was 58y (29-87) and 55% were male. IgG was the most frequent component (60%). Durie-Salmon IIIA/B was identified in 92% of the population; ISS was 33% in stage I, 30% in stage II, and 31% in stage III. The prevalence of OB identified by SPE and IF was 50.5% (51 cases), with a higher prevalence in those who underwent transplantation and those who achieved complete response (p=0.00139 and p=0.0368, respectively). Progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the OB group (45.4m x 34.7m p = 0.0075). Conclusion - The OB prevalence in this population was 50.5% and oligoclonality resulted in a longer PFS. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase 2 Trial of Concurrent Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside in the Prophylactic Treatment of Bortezomib-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5399-5399
Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Zhongjun Xia ◽  
Xiaoqin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Subcutaneous Injection ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

Abstract Backgrounds Bortezomib is an important drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), and peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. No effective prophylaxis has been defined for PN. Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM), a nerve-protecting drug, is often used to promote growth of nerve and function restoration of damaged nerve. The role of GM in the prophylaxis of bortezomib-induced PN in MM patients has never been investigated. Methods A phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in newly diagnosed MM patients to evaluate the value of GM in the prophylaxis of bortezomib-induced PN. All eligible patients were treated with VD (bortezomib 1.3mg/㎡,subcutaneous injection, d1 ,8,15,22, and dexamethasone 40mg, po,d1 ,8,15,22, 4 weeks a cycle) or CyBorD (cyclophosphamide 300mg/㎡,po,d1 ,8,15, bortezomib 1.3mg/㎡,subcutaneous injection, d1 ,8,1 5,22, and dexamethasone 40mg, po,d1 ,8,15,22, 4 weeks a cycle) for at least 4 cycles. GM was used at a dosage of 100mg/day intravenously at d1 -2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23. No other nerve-protective drugs or thalidomide-containing regimens were allowed. The primary endpoint was overall incidence rate of PN (the grade of PN was recorded according to CTCAE v3.0). The secondary endpoints included duration of PN, complete response rate after 4 cycles of treatment, 1-year PFS and OS rate. (This trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02093910). Results From February 2014 to February 2015, 25 patients of newly diagnosed MM were enrolled. The median age was 55 years old (37-75), and male to female ratio was 19:6. 5 patients had ISS stage I disease, 6 patients with stage II, and the remaining 14 patients with stage III. All patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 2-9) of Bortezomibcontaining regimens. At the time of data analysis, 84% of patients had at least partial response, 48% had at least very good partial response, and 24% had complete response. 7 patients experienced PN after a median of 2 cycles (range 1-4) of treatment, resulting in the overall PN rate of 28%. Among these 7 patients, only 1 patient (4%) had grade 2 PN, leading to dose reduction of bortezomib, and all other patients had grade 1 PN. During treatment, 1 patient (4%) had grade 2 diarrhea, and another 1 patient (4%) had herpes zoster infection. The concurrent use of GM did not introduce new side effects and seemed not compromise the efficacy of bortezomib. At a median follow up time of 8 months, 1-year PFS rate and OS rate were speculated to be 69.8% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions The early-term analysis of this phase 2 trial found it feasible to concurrently use GM and bortezomib-containing regimens, and GM had the potential role of reducing bortezomib-induced PN rate and severity without compromising efficacy. This needs to be validated in future phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

First-line CyborD treatment for graft ineligible multiple myeloma patients: Real-life efficacy and tolerability.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20516-e20516
Author(s):  
Dominic Duquette ◽  
Marie-Michelle Germain
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Renal Toxicity ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

e20516 Background: CyborD is a regimen that was widely adopted in Canada around 2010 despite very little data supporting it’s use. The aim of the study is to describe the efficacy and tolerability of First line CyborD regimen for graft ineligible myeloma patients. Methods: This is a retrospective study at two centres in the CHU de Québec for patients with graft ineligible multiple myeloma patients treated with first line CyborD regimen between 2013 and 2018. The objectives are to describe the efficacy and tolerability of CyborD and to document PFS and OS. Results: 51 patients were included in this study with a median follow-up of 31 months. Partial response or better (≥ PR) was obtain in 84% of patients and 63% of patients achieved a very good response or better (≥ VGPR). A high rate of 26% of complete response (CR) was also obtained. A median PFS of 30 months was obtained while 75% of patients were still alive at that time. Estimated survival at 48 months was 63%. Severe toxicities (grade 3 or 4) were seen as anemia (20%), neutropenia (10%), bacterial infection (16%), diarrhea (12%) and renal toxicity (4%). Side effects related to dexamethasone in this fragile patient population reached 69% of patients but only 28% needed a dose reduction. Conclusions: First-line CyborD treatment was highly effective for graft ineligible multiple myeloma patients and this is a very well tolerated regimen. It compares favorably to RD regimen making it still an excellent first-line treatment for this elderly population. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Standard-of-Care Treatments in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4075-4075
Author(s):  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Marie-Christiane Vekemans ◽  
Sébastien Anguille ◽  
Julien Depaus ◽  
Nathalie Meuleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens

Abstract Background: With the advent of immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and, more recently, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved considerably. Unfortunately, even with these 3 major MM drug classes, most patients ultimately relapse and require further therapy. There remains an incomplete understanding of how patients who have received extensive therapy and with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are treated in routine clinical practice, as no standard-of-care exists for these patients, and what the outcomes are in this real-world setting. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients with triple-class (IMiD, PI and anti-CD38 mAb) and triple-line exposed RRMM using real-world data from patients in Belgium. Methods: A multicenter, observational study, involving 7 non-academic and academic Belgian centers, was conducted based on a retrospective chart review of adult RRMM patients who started subsequent treatment from March 2017 through May 2021 after having received ≥3 lines of therapy including at least an IMiD, a PI, and anti-CD38-directed therapy (tri-exposed). Data were captured in an electronic case report form (Castor EDC). Patients with an ECOG performance status of ≥2, who received prior CAR-T treatment or prior BCMA-targeted therapy, or with a known active or prior history of CNS involvement (or with clinical signs thereof), were excluded. All treatment lines initiated after becoming eligible were used in the analysis. Specifically, all treatment lines for patients meeting the eligibility criteria more than once in their entire follow-up were included as separate observations, with date of treatment initiation as specific baseline for each treatment line. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to explore the prognostic value with Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS), and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT). Results: A total of 112 patients with 237 eligible treatment lines were included in the analysis; median follow-up was 16.6 months. In 45% of the initiated treatment lines, patients were refractory to 4 or 5 therapies, 62% had received ≥5 prior lines, 22% had extramedullary disease and in 48% of observations the time to progression in prior line was shorter than 4 months. After patients became tri-exposed, more than 50 unique treatment regimens were initiated, with the following being the most common: carfilzomib + dexamethasone (14%), pomalidomide + dexamethasone + chemotherapy (8%), and ixazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (6%). Additionally, 4% of included observations were exposed to anti-BCMA agents. Overall, the following treatment classes were the most frequently started: PI only (19%), PI + IMiD combinations (17%), and regimens including anti-CD38 antibodies (15%). Median OS was 9.79 months [95% CI: 7.79; 12.22], median PFS was 3.42 months [95% CI: 2.79; 4.27], median TTNT was 3.61 months [95% CI: 3.09; 4.57]. Higher refractory status (p&lt;0.001), being male (p=0.001), older age (p&lt;0.001), shorter duration of prior lines (p&lt;0.001), shorter time to progression in prior line (p=0.025), and higher LDH levels (p&lt;0.002) were prognostic for worse outcomes for both OS (Figure 1) and PFS. Conclusions: This retrospective chart review of patients with tri-exposed RRMM in Belgium shows that real-world outcomes in terms of OS, PFS and TTNT are poor for these patients, with a median OS of &lt;10 months. A wide variety of treatment regimens used in clinical practice confirm the absence of a clear standard-of-care in this patient population. The literature also confirms that these poor outcomes observed in Belgium, for this subset of MM patients, are similar in other countries. These real-world data highlight the high unmet medical need in this patient population and critical need for new and effective treatment options. MD and MCV contributed equally to this work. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Delforge: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vekemans: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS-Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Depaus: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Meuleman: iTeos Therapeutics: Consultancy. Strens: Realidad bvba: Consultancy. Van Hoorenbeeck: Janssen: Current Employment. Moorkens: Janssen-Cilag: Current Employment. Diels: Janssen: Current Employment. Ghilotti: Janssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy: Current Employment. Dalhuisen: Janssen: Current Employment. Vandervennet: Janssen: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Survival Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients in Czech Republic

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4894-4894
Author(s):  
Tereza Popkova ◽  
Ludek Pour ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Alexandra Jungova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Czech Republic ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Although highly effective agents and novel therapeutic strategies are being developed, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) has not been overcome in the first-line treatment for fit patients (pts) with multiple myeloma. The objective of this work is to retrospectively analyze the use of this procedure in newly diagnosed Czech patients. Methods: Data were derived using the Czech Myeloma Group Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies. By February 2 nd 2021, a total of 2154 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who underwent HDT/ASCT were identified. Results: At the time of multiple myeloma diagnosis, the median age was 59 years; 24%/56%/14%/5%/1% pts were ECOG 0/1/2/3/4; 44%/32%/24% pts were ISS stage I/II/III; 14.5%/17.5%/68% and 84%/16% pts were Durie-Salmon stage I/II/III and subclassification A/B, respectively. The combinations of agents used in the induction regimen were proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and glucocorticoid (GC) in 28.5% (613/2154) pts; PI, GC and chemotherapy (CHT) in 24.8% (534/2154) pts; GC and CHT in 22,5% and IMiD, GC and CHT in 16.1% (346/2154). Other combination of drugs was used in 8.2% (177/2154) pts. It was registered that 3.7% (79/2154) induction regimens were switched to a different combination because of toxicity, patient's choice, poor peripheral venous access or other reasons. Single HDT/ASCT was performed in 77.3% (1665/2154) cases whereas tandem HDT/ASCT was given to 11.8% (254/2154) patients. In 10% (215/2154) cases, the transplantation technique was not specified. Nine percent (193/2154) patients were treated within a clinical study. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and the median overall survival (mOS) of the whole cohort was 28.9 and 92.1 months, respectively. Information about response to treatment before and after the high-dose therapy were available for 75.7% (1627/2154) and 92.2% (1987/2154) patients, respectively. Disease status at the time of HDT/ASCT was defined as stringent complete response (sCR) at 2.2% (36/1627), complete response (CR) at 11.9% (194/1627), very good partial response (VGPR) at 38.2% (621/1627), partial response (PR) at 40.9% (666/1627), minimal response (MR) at 3.6%, (58/1627), stable disease (SD) at 2.2% (36/1627), progressive disease (PD) at 1% (16/1627) patients. The overall response rate (ORR) on day 100 was 92.8% (sCR: 10.5% [209/1987], CR: 22.4% [446/1987], VGPR: 35% [696/1987], PR: 24.8% [493/1987], MR: 2.7% [54/1987], SD: 1.4% [27/1987], PD: 3.1% [62/1987]). We also performed a survival analysis of patients progressing up to 18 months after HDT/ASCT (n=1219) versus patients progressing in more than 18 months (n=935). The median OS was 41.5 versus 124.9 months, respectively. An analysis of the role of tandem HDT/ASCT in this real-world cohort will be presented at the conference. Conclusion: Globally as well as in the Czech Republic, HDT/ASCT is an important therapeutic approach in the first-line treatment of multiple myeloma. Our analysis of 2154 newly diagnosed transplant-eligible patients confirms high effectiveness - ORR of 92.8%, mPFS of 28.9 months, and long-term survival reaching mOS of 92.1 months. Disclosures Minarik: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Immunophenotypic Response After Allografting In Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3371-3371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Giaccone ◽  
Lucia Brunello ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Moreno Festuccia ◽  
Milena Gilestro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Minimal residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow-cytometry recently showed a promising role in predicting outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. However, data on immunophenotypic response (IR) after allografting are lacking. Aim To evaluate the impact of IR and compare it to conventional complete remission (CR) following allografting in myeloma patients. Methods Sixty-six consecutive patients, median age 54 years (35-66), who underwent an allograft between January 2000 and December 2011 with a follow-up of at least 3 months were included. Disease response was evaluated by serum and urine electrophoresis, and bone marrow aspirate at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after transplant and yearly thereafter. Skeletal survey or MRI were performed yearly or as clinically indicated (overt relapse or complaints of bone pain). Bone marrow aspirates had to contain at least 13000 cells/µL for flow-cytometry studies and IR was defined as absence of monoclonal plasma-cells detected by 4 or 6-colour staining with the following antibodies: CD38, CD138, CD56, CD19, CD45, cyKappa, cyLambda. CR was defined according to standard criteria (Durie et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467-73). Results Conditioning regimen was non-myeloablative 2Gy TBI-based in 55 patients, reduced intensity (fludarabine-melphalan-based) in 10 and myeloablative in 1 patient. Post-grafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate. Donors were HLA identical siblings in 58 patients and unrelated in 8. Only 1 patient received bone marrow as source of stem cells. Thirty-five/66 (53%) received the allograft as part of the first line treatment, whereas the remaining 31/66, (47%) were transplanted at relapse. At the time of transplant, 5/66 were both in IR and CR, 16 were only in IR and 4 patients were only in clinical CR. All 21 patients in IR at the time of transplant maintained it, while 26/45 (58%) entered IR after the allograft. Among patients surviving at least 3 months, overall treatment related mortality was 10.6% at 3 years. After a median follow-up of 69 months (range 19-147), the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was 45.6% and 49.3% without significant difference between responsive and non-responsive patients. At follow-up, overall, 24 patients achieved CR and IR (CR/IR group), 21 achieved IR but not CR because of persistence of urine/serum M-component (noCR/IR group), and 21 did not achieve either CR or IR (noCR/noIR group). Interestingly, none achieved CR without IR. Median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients who achieved IR were 96 and 55 months versus 36 and 7 months in those who did not (p<0.001). Median OS and EFS were not reached and 59 months in the CR/IR group, 77 and 15 months in the noCR/IR, and 30 and 5 months in the noCR/noIR respectively (p<0.001 for both EFS and OS-fig.1). In univariate analysis, being in the CR/IR group was the only significant predictor for prolonged OS and EFS (p<0.001). Of note, cumulative incidence of extra-medullary disease at first relapse after the allograft was 4% in the CR/IR, 32% in the noCR/IR and 15% in the noCR/noIR groups respectively (p<0.001). Receiving the allograft as first line therapy or later during the disease course did not significantly impact on OS and EFS. Conclusion The achievement of IR confers a favorable impact on OS and EFS after allografting. A higher incidence of extra-medullary in the noCR/IR group (some 30% of our patient cohort) may suggest that myeloma cells escape immune control outside the bone marrow. In this group, imaging studies such as positron emission tomography may clinically be indicated during follow-up to detect early relapse. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Original Versus Generic Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Multipl Myeloma: Comprasion of Effectivity and Adverse Events

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5594-5594
Author(s):  
Zahit Bolaman ◽  
Sehmus Ertop ◽  
Atakan Turgutkaya ◽  
Selim Cem ◽  
Ayse Hilal Eroglu Kucukerdiler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Muscle Cramp ◽  
P Value ◽  
Medicine Department ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Number Of Patients

Original versus generic lenalidomide in patients with relapsed multipl myeloma: Comprasion of effectivity and adverse events Ali Zahit Bolaman1, Sehmus Ertop2 Atakan Turgutkaya1, Cem Selim, 1 Ayse Hilal Eroglu Kucukerdiler1, Birsen Sahip2, Irfan Yavasoglu1. 1 Adnan Menderes University, School of Medicine, Department of Hematology AYDIN/TURKEY 2 Bulent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology ZONGULDAK/TURKEY Backround: Lenalidomide is an effective IMID derivative drug in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide is available as original and generic forms in our country. So far, there is no any clinical study comparing generic and original lenalidomine for effectivity and adverse events. We compared generic and original lenalidomide effects and adverse events (AEs) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). Methods: The patients with RMM using original or generic lenalidomide were evaluated as retrospectively. Overall response (OR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), stable disease and progressive disease rates and also for adverse events, development rates of neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anorexia, constipation diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, creatinine increase, transaminase increase, asthenia, fatigue, pyrexia, peripheral edema, upper respiratory system infection, pneumonia, another infection, muscle cramp, back pain, bone pain, muscle weakness, arthralgia, headache, tremor, paresthesia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesaemia, skin dry and skin erythema were investigated in myeloma patients. All data were analyzed using the PASW for Windows version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were described as a number, frequency, and percentage. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for the analysis of categorical data and independence between variables. The results were assessed at 95% confidence interval and p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant. Results: The number of patients using original lenalidomide was 55 and the number of patients using generic lenalidomide was 43. OR rate was 60 % versus 39.5% in patients using original and generic lenalidomide, respectively. CR rate was 14.5%, VGPR was rate 45.4% in original group while CR rate was 20.9 and VGPR 18.6 in patients using generic lenalidomide. AEs were low in original lenalidomide group than generic group. AEs were usually grade 1 or 2. Response and AEs rates are shown in Table 1. Conclusion: Our study showed original and generic forms of lenalidomide are effective for the treatment of RMM. OR rate was higher in original lenalidomide than generic lenalidomide. The AEs of original lenalidomide were lower than generic lenalidomide without statistically significance. Further studies involving a larger number of patients with RMM would be useful for comparing the efficacy and AEs of original or generic lenalidomide. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document