The role of gene polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Biologia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Slabá ◽  
Pavol Joppa ◽  
Ján Šalagovič ◽  
Ružena Tkáčová

AbstractChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Irreversible airflow limitation, both progressive and associated with an inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases, is a hallmark of the disease. Cigarette smoking is the most important environmental risk factor for COPD, nevertheless, only approximately 20–30% of smokers develop symptomatic disease. Epidemiological studies, case-control studies in relatives of patients with COPD, and twin studies suggest that COPD is a genetically complex disease with environmental factors and many involved genes interacting together. Two major strategies have been employed to identify the genes and the polymorphisms that likely contribute to the development of complex diseases: association studies and linkage analyses. Biologically plausible pathogenetic mechanisms are prerequisites to focus the search for genes of known function in association studies. Protease-antiprotease imbalance, generation of oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation are recognized as the principal mechanisms leading to irreversible airflow obstruction and parenchymal destruction in the lung. Therefore, genes which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of COPD are involved in antiproteolysis, antioxidant barrier and metabolism of xenobiotic substances, inflammatory response to cigarette smoke, airway hyperresponsiveness, and pulmonary vascular remodelling. Significant associations with COPD-related phenotypes have been reported for polymorphisms in genes coding for matrix metalloproteinases, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, glutathione-S-transferases, heme oxygenase, tumor necrosis factor, interleukines 1, 8, and 13, vitamin D-binding protein and β-2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2), whereas adequately powered replication studies failed to confirm most of the previously observed associations. Genome-wide linkage analyses provide us with a novel tool to identify the general locations of COPD susceptibility genes, and should be followed by association analyses of positional candidate genes from COPD pathophysiology, positional candidate genes selected from gene expression studies, or dense single nucleotide polymorphism panels across regions of linkage. Haplotype analyses of genes with multiple polymorphic sites in linkage disequilibrium, such as the ADRB2 gene, provide another promising field that has yet to be explored in patients with COPD. In the present article we review the current knowledge about gene polymorphisms that have been recently linked to the risk of developing COPD and/or may account for variations in the disease course.

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Gupta ◽  
Antonia Banyard ◽  
Aoibheann Mullan ◽  
Srividya Sriskantharajah ◽  
Thomas Southworth ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (06) ◽  
pp. 817-829
Author(s):  
Ernesto Crisafulli ◽  
Alessandra Manco ◽  
Miquel Ferrer ◽  
Arturo Huerta ◽  
Claudio Micheletto ◽  
...  

AbstractPatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer acute exacerbations (AECOPD) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), named nonpneumonic and pneumonic exacerbations of COPD, respectively. Abnormal host defense mechanisms may play a role in the specificity of the systemic inflammatory response. Given the association of this aspect to some biomarkers at admission (e.g., C-reactive protein), it can be used to help to discriminate AECOPD and CAP, especially in cases with doubtful infiltrates and advanced lung impairment. Fever, sputum purulence, chills, and pleuritic pain are typical clinical features of CAP in a patient with COPD, whereas isolated dyspnea at admission has been reported to predict AECOPD. Although CAP may have a worse outcome in terms of mortality (in hospital and short term), length of hospitalization, and early readmission rates, this has only been confirmed in a few prospective studies. There is a lack of methodologically sound research confirming the impact of severe AECOPD and COPD + CAP. Here, we review studies reporting head-to-head comparisons between AECOPD and CAP + COPD in hospitalized patients. We focus on the epidemiology, risk factors, systemic inflammatory response, clinical and microbiological characteristics, outcomes, and treatment approaches. Finally, we briefly discuss some proposals on how we should orient research in the future.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1141-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Liu ◽  
Wei-Bo Liang ◽  
Lin-Bo Gao ◽  
Xin-Min Pan ◽  
Tian-Yi Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document