scholarly journals Estimation of Evapotranspiration in the Amazon River Basin Using the Atmospheric Water Balance Method

1993 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 695-698
Author(s):  
Hiroshi MATSUYAMA
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Balance Method ◽  
Amazon River ◽  
Atmospheric Water ◽  
Amazon River Basin ◽  
Water Balance Method

scholarly journals Identification of the Impacts of Climate Changes and Human Activities on Runoff in the Jinsha River Basin, China

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowan Liu ◽  
Dingzhi Peng ◽  
Zongxue Xu
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Human Activities ◽  
Climate Changes ◽  
Balance Method ◽  
Variation Method ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Jinsha River ◽  
Water Balance Method ◽  
Double Mass

Quantifying the impacts of climate changes and human activities on runoff has received extensive attention, especially for the regions with significant elevation difference. The contributions of climate changes and human activities to runoff were analyzed using rainfall-runoff relationship, double mass curve, slope variation, and water balance method during 1961–2010 at the Jinsha River basin, China. Results indicate that runoff at upstream and runoff at midstream are both dominated by climate changes, and the contributions of climate changes to runoff are 63%~72% and 53%~68%, respectively. At downstream, climate changes account for only 13%~18%, and runoff is mainly controlled by human activities, contributing 82%~87%. The availability and stability of results were compared and analyzed in the four methods. Results in slope variation, double mass curve, and water balance method except rainfall-runoff relationship method are of good agreement. And the rainfall-runoff relationship, double mass curve, and slope variation method are all of great stability. The four methods and availability evaluation of them could provide a reference to quantification in the contributions of climate changes and human activities to runoff at similar basins in the future.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Evapotranspiration Estimates in the Yellow River Basin against the Water Balance Method

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guojie Wang ◽  
Jian Pan ◽  
Chengcheng Shen ◽  
Shijie Li ◽  
Jiao Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Yellow River ◽  
Yellow River Basin ◽  
Balance Method ◽  
The Yellow River ◽  
Water Balance Method ◽  
Global Land ◽  
The Yellow River Basin

Evapotranspiration (ET), a critical process in global climate change, is very difficult to estimate at regional and basin scales. In this study, we evaluated five ET products: the Global Land Surface Evaporation with the Amsterdam Methodology (GLEAM, the EartH2Observe ensemble (E2O)), the Global Land Data Assimilation System with Noah Land Surface Model-2 (GLDAS), a global ET product at 8 km resolution from Zhang (ZHANG) and a supplemental land surface product of the Modern-ERA Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA_land), using the water balance method in the Yellow River Basin, China, including twelve catchments, during the period of 1982–2000. The results showed that these ET products have obvious different performances, in terms of either their magnitude or temporal variations. From the viewpoint of multiple-year averages, the MERRA_land product shows a fairly similar magnitude to the ETw derived from the water balance method, while the E2O product shows significant underestimations. The GLEAM product shows the highest correlation coefficient. From the viewpoint of interannual variations, the ZHANG product performs best in terms of magnitude, while the E2O still shows significant underestimations. However, the E2O product best describes the interannual variations among the five ET products. Further study has indicated that the discrepancies between the ET products in the Yellow River Basin are mainly due to the quality of precipitation forcing data. In addition, most ET products seem to not be sensitive to the downward shortwave radiation.

scholarly journals A worldwide evaluation of basin-scale evapotranspiration estimates against the water balance method

2016 ◽  
Vol 538 ◽  
pp. 82-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbin Liu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jing Zhou ◽  
Yanzhong Li ◽  
Fubao Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Balance Method ◽  
Water Balance Method ◽  
Basin Scale

scholarly journals The Atmospheric Water Balance over the Semiarid Murray–Darling River Basin

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Draper ◽  
Graham Mills
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Water Balance ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Moisture Flux ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Atmospheric Water ◽  
Flux Divergence ◽  
Murray Darling Basin ◽  
Moisture Flux Divergence

Abstract The atmospheric water balance over the semiarid Murray–Darling River basin in southeast Australia is analyzed based on a consecutive series of 3- to 24-h NWP forecasts from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s Limited Area Prediction System (LAPS). Investigation of the LAPS atmospheric water balance, including comparison of the forecast precipitation to analyzed rain gauge observations, indicates that the LAPS forecasts capture the general qualitative features of the water balance. The key features of the atmospheric water balance over the Murray–Darling Basin are small atmospheric moisture flux divergence (at daily to annual time scales) and extended periods during which the atmospheric water balance terms are largely inactive, with the exception of evaporation, which is consistent and very large in summer. These features present unique challenges for NWP modeling. For example, the small moisture fluxes in the basin can easily be obscured by the systematic errors inherent in all NWP models. For the LAPS model forecasts, there is an unrealistically large evaporation excess over precipitation (associated with a positive bias in evaporation) and unexpected behavior in the moisture flux divergence. Two global reanalysis products (the NCEP Reanalysis I and the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis) also both describe (physically unrealistic) long-term negative surface water budgets over the Murray–Darling Basin, suggesting that the surface water budget cannot be sensibly diagnosed based on output from current NWP models. Despite this shortcoming, numerical models are in general the most appropriate tool for examining the atmospheric water balance over the Murray–Darling Basin, as the atmospheric sounding network in Australia has extremely low coverage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document