scholarly journals PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI TAHUN 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Della Ayu Rizki ◽  
Eni Wuryani

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of implementing good corporate governance on financial performance in banking companies. Proxies for good corporate governance are the board of directors, the independent board of commissioners, the audit committee, external audit quality, and institutional ownership. Measurement of banking financial performance uses Return on Assets (ROA). The sample used is 26 samples of banking sector companies listed on the IDX during 2014-2018. The analysis technique uses multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the board of directors and institutional ownership have an influence on financial performance, while the independent board of commissioners, audit committee, and external audit quality have no influence on financial performance. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance;Financial Performance;Banking Sector.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodhiyani Cahya Ningsih ◽  
Dian Retnaningdiah

this study was to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Financial Performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA) in financial companies listed on the IDX in the period of 2014-2018. This study used a Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The independent variable of the research used GCG as proxied by the Board of Directors, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, and the Audit Committee, while CSR is measured using indicators based on the 2016 Global Reporting Inititive (GRI) Standard. Financial performance as measured by Return on Assets (ROA). Sampling data using purposive sampling, and there are 11 companies that meet predetermined criteria. This study showed that the Managerial Ownership has an effect on Financial Performance (ROA). This is shown as hypothesized. The Board of Directors, the Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Institutional Ownership, the Audit Committee do not affect the Financial Performance (ROA), this is not as hypothesized. CSR has no effect on Financial Performance (ROA), this is not what was hypothesized. The Board of Directors, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Audit Committee and CSR simultaneously affect Financial Performance (ROA). These results meet the hypotheses of the study.   Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nurkholis Muhammad ◽  
Damayanti Damayanti

This study is conducted to examine the effect of good corporate governance on financial performance. The variables used in this study are the board of commissioners, the board of directors, institutional ownership and the audit committee as independent variables, while the dependent variable is financial performance proxies with ROA. This study uses 14 consistent samples of LQ45 companies that met the sample criteria during 2014 to 2018. The sampling technique in this research is purposive sampling in order to obtain 70 observations. Because the classical assumption test gets problems in the autocorrelation test, the data are transformed using the cochrane orcutt method, so that the total observations become 69 observations. The data analysis technique utilizes multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that the board of commissioners has a positive and significant effect on financial performance, while the board of directors has a significant negative effect on financial performance, and institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on financial performance, while the audit committee has a significant negative effect on financial performance. Based on the determination testing of variable of the board of commissioners, board of directors, institutional ownership and audit committee in the regression model, this study is able to explain the dependent variable of financial performance by 32.9%, while 67.1% is explained by other variables not examined in this study


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadya Ayu Saputri ◽  
Rochmi Widayanti ◽  
Ratna Damayanti

The purpose of the study was to analyze the effect of the application of good corporate governance, which was governed by the board of commissioners, board of directors, audit committee and institutional ownership of financial performance which was interpreted by the return on asset ratio in banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2017. The total population is 43 companies, using purpose sampling techniques obtained by a sample of 25 companies. While the analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. The results show that only the audit committee that has no significant effect, the board of commissioners has a significant negative effect on the board of directors and institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on financial performance. Other results show that simultaneous application of good corporate governance has a significant influence on financial performance. Keyword: good corporate governance, financial performance.


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
Desi Pipian Pujakusum

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance mechanism on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2012-2016 period. The corporate governance mechanism is proxied by the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee size, the board of director's education, and the board of commissioner’s education. The company's financial performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). Samples were taken by using purposive sampling. The total number of samples used in this study amounted to 180 research samples. This study was tested with SPSS 20 program. Data analysis technique used in this research is simple regression analysis.  The results showed that the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, and audit comitee size have a significant effect on return on assets. These three factors have a significant effect on return on assets, while the board of commissioners education and the board of director's education have no significant effect on return on assets.


2021 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Jova Yolanda ◽  
Dian Efriyenti

Earnings management practice is the decision to choose a particular accounting method that can achieve the goal of increasing reported profits or reducing investment losses. Misappropriation of financial statements by management can affect the amount of reported income. This study aims to determine whether ownership structure and good corporate governance have a significant influence on earnings management. The study was conducted on pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in a row for the 2016-2020 period. The sample technique used is purposive sampling, so as many as 7 samples of companies are used. The data testing method uses multiple linear analysis. The results of the data test show that partially institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on earnings management, independent commissioners, the audit committee, and the board of directors has a negative but not significant effect on earnings management. Simultaneously the results state that institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and the board of directors have an effect but not significantly on earnings management.


Akuntabilitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-226
Author(s):  
Eny Suprapti ◽  
Farhan Achmad Fajari ◽  
Achmad Syaiful Hidayat Anwar

Environmental problems become things that have not been considered for the companies. This Study aims to determine the effect good corporate governance to environmental disclosure. Good Corporate Governance is a system to controlling management, where GCG is proxied by the board of directors, board of commissioners, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and audit committee. This reaserch use non financial companies listed on BEI. The research sample 30 companies. Measurement of environmental disclosure uses GRI – G4 index is 34 index.  This study using multiple regression. Based on the results of the study found good corporate governanceis proxieduse board of directors and board commissioners there isn’teffect on environmental disclosure.The results institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and audit committee effect on environemental disclosure


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67
Author(s):  
Muslimah Islamiah

ABSTRACTThis study aims to empirically prove the presence or absence of the influence of corporate governance (Board of directors, Board of Commissioners' Size,and Audit Committee) on financial performance at PT. Matahari department store Tbk. The method of analysis of this study uses multiple linear regression and the classical assumption test. The number of samples used in this study is 10 years in the period 2009 - 2018 taken through purposive sampling. The results of this study indicate that (1) the board of directors not influential significant effect on ROA, (2) the size of the board of commissioners not influential significant effect on ROA, (3) The audit committee is influential and not significant to ROA.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delfalina ◽  
Aminar Sutra Dewi

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on the board of commissioners, boards of directors, and institutional ownership of the financial performance of the company. The sample used is the financial sector company in 20011-2015 amounted to 30 samples. The type of data used is secondary data obtained from www.idx.co.id. The hypothesis in this study was tested using multiple linear regression. The result of hypothesis testing shows that the board of commissioner has positive and not significant influence, the board of directors has positive and not significant impact to the company's financial performance (ROE). institutional ownership has a positive and significant impact on ROE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1451
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Sintya Puspita Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Ramantha

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of the board of directors, independent commissioners, audit committee, and company size on the sustainability report with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The number of samples used was 117, with the sample collection method using purposive sampling method, while the data collection method used in this study was documentation. The data analysis technique used is Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results showed that the board of directors, independent commissioners, and audit committee had a positive effect on the sustainability report, while company size had no effect on the sustainability report. In addition, institutional ownership is able to moderate the influence of the board of directors, independent commissioners, and company size on the sustainability report. Meanwhile, institutional ownership was not able to moderate the effect of the audit committee on the sustainability report. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance; Sustainability Report.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document