scholarly journals KANDUNGAN NUTRISI SILASE JERAMI JAGUNG MELALUI FERMENTASI POLLARD DAN MOLASES

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Trisnadewi A. A. A. S. ◽  
I G. L. O. Cakra ◽  
I W. Suarna

Kendala utama penggunaan jerami jagung sebagai pakan adalah kandungan protein yang rendah dan tinggi seratkasar sehingga perlu diberi perlakuan untuk meningkatkan nilai nutrisinya. Tujuan penelitian adalah menentukanformulasi silase jerami jagung terbaik dengan menggunakan pollard dan molases terhadap kandungan nutrisisilase. Percobaan menggunakan rancangan acak lengkap (RAL) dengan enam perlakuan dan masing-masingperlakuan diulang empat kali, sehingga terdapat 24 unit percobaan. Keempat perlakuan tersebut adalah A = 100%jerami jagung + 20% pollard + 0% molases; B = 100% jerami jagung + 10% pollard + 10% molases; C = 100%jerami jagung + 0% pollard + 20% molases; D = 100% jerami jagung + 10% pollard + 0% molases; E = 100%jerami jagung + 5% pollard + 5% molases; dan F = 100% jerami jagung + 10% pollard + 0% molases. Peubah yangdiamati dalam penelitian ini adalah kandungan bahan kering (BK), bahan organik (BO), energi, serat kasar (SK),protein kasar (PK), abu, bahan ektrak tanpa nitrogen (BETN), dan total digestible nutrient (TDN) Hasil penelitianmenunjukkan bahwa silase jerami jagung pada perlakuan A yaitu silase jerami jagung dengan suplementasi 20%pollard menunjukkan kualitas nutrisi yang paling baik dibandingkan perlakuan lainnya. Kata kunci: jerami jagung, silase, kandungan nutrisi

1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. L. Anderson ◽  
Lorna Jost ◽  
C. A. Dinkel ◽  
M. A. Brown

1962 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-214
Author(s):  
J. Kielanowski ◽  
Aleksandra Ziolecka ◽  
Zofia Osińska

In order to facilitate reciprocal conversions of Starch Equivalents (SE) and Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) values of feeds, multiple regression equations were computed for three different groups of feeds (concentrates, green roughages and silages, and dry roughages. These equations are: for concentrates, green roughages and silages, and dry roughages, respectively.[Formula: see text]Where Y = percentage TDN, X1 = percentage SE, and X2 = percentage crude fiber and[Formula: see text]Where Y = percentage SE; X1 = percentage TDN, and X2 = percentage crude fiber.The addition of the crude fiber content as the second independent variable in each equation resulted in a slight but marked gain in accuracy, especially for green and dry roughages, when compared with simple regressions of TDN on SE or vice versa.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1899-1906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jercyane Maria da Silva Braga ◽  
Rilene Ferreira Diniz Valadares ◽  
Samantha Gusmão Pellizzoni ◽  
Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho ◽  
Luciana Louzada Prates ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nakano ◽  
Ikuo Hattori ◽  
Kenzi Sato ◽  
Satoshi Morita

1962 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Dodsworth ◽  
C. Ball

Results are given from two digestibility trials in which the following three diets were fed to sheep: (i) grass only, (ii) grass+5 oz. cotton cake daily, (iii) grass+10 oz. cotton cake daily.In the first trial the average dry-matter content of the grass was low (approx. 14%), intake was low and the supplements were eaten in addition to the grass. In the second trial where the dry-matter content (approx. 20%) of the grass and the intake were higher, the cake supplements reduced herbage consumption.The feeding of cake did not have any significant effect on the dry-matter percentage in the faeces but depressed the digestibility of the dry matter, crude protein, crude fibre and nitrogen-free extract in the diets including cake and reduced their starch equivalent and total digestible nutrient values.No evidence was found to support the recommendation that undecorti-cated cotton cake should be fed to grazing animals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document