scholarly journals AN ENGINEERING DESIGN COURSE TO DEVELOP AND ASSESS CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING

Author(s):  
Ryan P. Mulligan ◽  
Natalie Simper ◽  
Nerissa Mulligan

A challenging new engineering design course is developed as part of the Engineering Design and Practice Sequence in the Civil Engineering program. This course engages students in a cyclical design process where they plan, build, test, and evaluate a model-scale tidal current turbine. They then use their own observations and analysis to iteratively inform, improve and re-test their design.The two objectives of this paper are to provide a description of the development and structure of this design course, and to assess student learning. The Final Design Reports were externally evaluated using the Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education rubrics. Students also completed a standardized test called the Collegiate Learning Assessment as an objective evaluation of longitudinal learning gains. The Civil Engineering students demonstrated significant improvement in critical thinking, problem solving, and written communication skills.

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 422-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas J. Hefty

Applying mathematics during engineering design challenges can help children develop critical thinking, problem solving, and communication skills.


Author(s):  
Zbigniew M. Bzymek ◽  
Eliot Brown

Abstract In today’s fast growing world, the economy — especially the field of technology and production — are developing very rapidly. Engineering design that would predict the results of this rapid development and equip the society with tools to control them, faces a big challenge. Rapidly developing technology brings many benefits to humanity and makes life easier, friendlier and more comfortable. This has been the case for thousands of years as new branches of engineering were born and came to serve society. One might say that engineers have the privilege of creating a bloodless and peaceful revolution resulting in easier and happier lives for people. At the same time, such fast developing technology creates traps and dangers, and may cause harm. The inventions of Alfred Nobel, Samuel Colt and Eliphalet Remington, for example, or nuclear research have all brought significant technological progress to nations and societies but have also brought harms and disasters affecting both societies and individuals. The role of engineering design is to predict these harmful actions and plan to neutralize or eliminate them, or even change them from harmful into friendly. Such actions follow the way recommended by BTIPS (Brief Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) procedures [1], especially those using the Prediction module [2], [3]. When developing Prevention Engineering a system approach should be observed and hierarchy of systems established and defined. All systems should be designed in such a way that prevents harm to humans and the natural world. Recommendations for introducing Prevention Engineering as a branch of engineering practice, and as an educational and research discipline, should be created as soon as possible, and directions for introducing courses in Prevention Engineering design and practice should also be developed [4]. For example, personal protective equipment for individuals and groups as designed by ME and MEM engineering students in their courses might be considered as Prevention Engineering developments [5]. Defining and formulating Prevention Engineering as a new branch of engineering is necessity in our times. In every step of our lives we face the challenge of preventing harms and destruction that can be done by the contemporary surrounding world. The goal of Prevention Engineering [PE] is to make the world safe. Prevention and safety are connected, prevention is an action, while safety is the condition or state that we are trying to achieve. Preventative actions can be based on the recommendations of BTIPS - Brief Theory of Inventing Problem Solving - and may use BTIPS’s approach [4], [5]. The reasons for the development of PE have already been described [6]. Each of these should be pointed out and preventative measures should be found. Adding these preventative measures to the contemporary engineering research, practice and education, and especially reflecting them in the engineering curriculum would be useful now and will also be necessary in the future [7], [8].


Author(s):  
Concepcion Rebollar ◽  
Carolina Varela ◽  
Olatz Eugenio

Computational thinking is an essential skill set for today's students, given the digital age in which we live and work (CT). Without a precise definition, it is generally understood to be a collection of abilities and attitudes required to deal with difficulties in any aspect of life, whether or not a computer is involved. Measurement and evaluation of students' progress in CT abilities are critical, and this can only be done using instruments that have been tested and shown to work before. New students at the Basque Country's University of the Basque Country's Engineering Degrees are tested for critical thinking, algorithmic thinking, problem solving, cooperation and creativity using a previously proven tool.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Uziak ◽  
Ning Fang

Freehand sketching is a fundamental skill in mechanical engineering and many other engineering disciplines. It not only serves as a communication tool among engineers, but plays a critical role in engineering design and problem solving. However, as computer-aided drafting has replaced traditional drawing classes nowadays, the training of students’ freehand sketching skills has been almost completely eliminated in modern engineering curricula. This paper describes the attributes of freehand sketching and its roles in several essential aspects of engineering; in particular, in its roles in problem solving, of which current literature has ignored. Representative examples are provided to show students’ freehand sketching skills in problem solving in a foundational undergraduate mechanical engineering course. Pedagogical suggestions are made on how to teach freehand sketching to engineering students.


1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. P. Lewis

The educational objectives of professional courses at tertiary level are usually stated in terms of (a) imparting knowledge and (b) developing problem-solving skills. In engineering, however, little empirical research has been undertaken into the problem-solving skills of either students or professionals. The paper examines the responses of second and third year engineering students in the University of Melbourne to a number of open-ended exercises which tap problem-solving skills in engineering design. The results show two major features of interest. First, an extremely wide variety of student response was observed, and secondly, there was little correlation between the students' problem-solving skills and their academic record. The educational implications of these findings are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Possin

The Collegiate Learning Assessment Test (CLA) has become popular and highly recommended, praised for its reliability and validity. I argue that while the CLA may be a commendable test for measuring critical-thinking, problem-solving, and logical-reasoning skills, those who are scoring students’ answers to the test’s questions are rendering the CLA invalid.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document