scholarly journals Seeing into your Teams: An Instructor Interface to Support Team Learning

Author(s):  
Patricia Kristine Sheridan ◽  
Aidan Malone ◽  
Doug Reeve ◽  
Greg Evans

This paper outlines the design of a new instructor interface that has been added to the on-line Team-effectiveness Learning System (TELS) at the University of Toronto. TELS is a tool that supports team-based project courses by facilitating the development of individual team-effectiveness competencies in students within their teams. Instructors saw the system as beneficial for student growth, but they also saw opportunities for them to get a better understanding of the state of their student teams. As a result, TELS has now developed an instructor interface to let instructors “see” into their teams. The instructor interface has been adopted by four courses since its development

Author(s):  
Patricia K. Sheridan ◽  
Navid Korhani ◽  
Doug Reeve ◽  
Greg Evans

This paper presents the design and initial adoption of a new class-level interface that has been added to the on-line Team-effectiveness Learning System (TELS) at the University of Toronto. TELS is an on-line self- and peer-assessment system that allows students to provide intra-team feedback within their project teams. This class-level interface responds to instructor interest in having a better way of assessing and supporting their class’ performance in teamwork as a whole. The interface allows an instructor to assess whether the class has demonstrated sufficient proficiency at teamwork, and/or which areas the class needs to improve to demonstrate proficiency.Launched in September 2015, the class-level interface is currently being used in 5 courses. Preliminary findings indicate the feature to be a useful tool in supporting instructors to tailor their teamwork instruction and activities to the needs of the class.


Author(s):  
Jim Wallace ◽  
Harpreet Dhariwal

MIE 515, Alternative Energy Systems, an engineering technical elective course open to senior undergraduates and graduate students, was delivered as an on line course for Fall 2011. This is the first time an undergraduate engineering course at the University of Toronto has been offered online. The course is also one of five pilot online courses across the University. The move online is being accomplished in two steps. For Fall 2011, a small lecture section of 25 students was used as a setting for video capture and the remaining 110 students accessed the course lectures online asynchronously. A live tutorial was offered once a week. All students were physically present for the midterm examination and the final examination. For Fall 2012, the course will be delivered entirely online, with the exception of student physical presence for the two examinations. Pedagogical and technical lessons learned during this transition year will be presented. The benefits and drawbacks of online delivery will be discussed from the perspective gained this year and compared with our expectations. Student feedback will also be presented and discussed.


Author(s):  
Lisa Romkey ◽  
Nikita Dawe ◽  
Rubaina Khan

The Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto offers a complex, multidisciplinary undergraduate program, commonly known as "EngSci”. We are in the first of a multi-year project titled ROLE (Realigning Outcomes with Learning Experiences), designed to proactively realign curriculum, pedagogy, students, and brand with our program goals. The first step in this process is to understand the state of Engineering Science as an academic discipline more broadly, and to better understand its role in the broader engineering and science landscape.  To better understand the discipline, we have used the academic plan model to compare eight engineering science programs from around the globe. The academic plan model supports the identification of internal and external factors that shape academic programs and frames the academic plan itself as seven related components that make up curriculum. Utilizing public-facing documentation such as websites and grey literature, we compared the IESC (International Engineering Science Consortium) programs and found differences in fundamental curriculum content, sub-disciplinary foci, organizational structure, and sources of external influence.  Concurrently, we conducted a workshop with members from the IESC to facilitate dialogue on the state of the discipline. This workshop resulted in a number of interesting artifacts, documenting the perspective of the participants. Some key themes that emerged included a strong focus on fundamentals and first principles; a focus on non-traditional and rapidly developing sub-disciplines, using the notion that Engineering Science can act as an “incubator” for new disciplines; and a diversity of views on the relationship between science and engineering within Engineering Science programs.  Finally, the paper paves a way forward for the next phase of the work, which involves interviewing program faculty and alumni to further understand perceptions of the discipline and the positioning of the discipline in the broader science and engineering landscape. 


2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
David Bevan

C.I.M is on-line. This issue marks the beginning of a new phase of publication for the journal: CIM is now available only on-line. Over its 30 year existence, CIM has been published in several formats and by different agencies. In recent years, CIM was owned and published by CMA as one of its associate journals. In 2004, CSCI purchased CIM and ownership reverted to the society. Since then, CIM has been type-set and formatted in-house and printed and distributed by University of Toronto Press (UTP) and, as in interim measure, the journal was available on the CSCI web-site. This process was threatened by the sale of UTP's off-set Printing Division. Links have now been established between CSCI, CIM and the University of Toronto Library to make use of the U of T Open Journal Access initiative to develop sophisticated on-line distribution. The Library supports journals via the Open Journal System (OJS) management software as well as providing archiving facilities. CIM will remain a subscription journal but, in the spirit of open access, all content will be freely available after a six month publication delay. Access will also be made available to all Canadian Universities via their library websites and authors will have immediate access for submitted articles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-340
Author(s):  
Markian Dobczansky ◽  
Simone Attilio Bellezza

AbstractThis article introduces a special issue on Ukrainian statehood. Based on the conference “A Century of Ukrainian Statehoods: 1917 and Beyond” at the University of Toronto, the special issue examines the relationship between the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1920 and the Soviet Ukrainian state over the long term. The authors survey the history of the Ukrainian SSR and propose two points of emphasis: the need to study the promises of “national” and “social” liberation in tandem and the persistent presence of an “internal other” in Soviet Ukrainian history.


Author(s):  
Erindah Dimisyqiyani ◽  
Sedianingsih Sedianingsih ◽  
Rizky Amalia Sinulingga ◽  
Nurul Azizah

This study analyzes the Bibliometric study about online registration at the hospital. This analysis includes statistical information obtained from the Scopus database of 1,456 research journals taken from 1999 to 2019. Keywords verified from the survey result are used to retrieve relevant articles from the database. The result of the study shows that the journal article occupies the top position is "Gefitinib plus the best supportive care in patients previously treated with difficult to cure non-small lung cancer: Results of a multicentre, multicentre randomized, placebo-controlled study (Evaluation of Iressa Survival in Lung Cancer" written by Thatcher N., Chang A ., Parikh P., JR Pereira, Ciuleanu T., Von Pawel J., Thongprasert S., Tan EH, Pemberton K., Archer V., Carroll K with the number of citation 1,852 in 2005. The best author who wrote a journal article related to online registration is Jaffray, DA which donated nine research article publications related to online registration. The institution that most donated  article publications is the University of Toronto, 54 journal articles. The majority of paper publications was dominated by United State with 326 papers. The number of articles written with this theme have increased from year to year, in other words this theme is still a tranding topic to be researched and developed by researchers.


Author(s):  
Robert Fitzgerald ◽  
John Findlay

This article reports on a new breed of tool that supports both higher-level thinking and, more importantly, human- to-human interaction in the form of team learning (Elliot, Findlay, Fitzgerald, & Forster, 2004; Findlay & Fitzgerald, 2006; Fitzgerald & Findlay, 2004). We argue that developing tools to support team learning is no longer merely desirable, but is now essential if humans are to productively engage with the increasing complexity and uncertainty that arises from accelerating technological and social change. The article begins by developing a case for the development of technological tools that support the collaborative creation of new knowledge. It then overviews the Zing team learning system (TLS) and reports on its development and use over the last 14 years. It concludes by identifying some of the emerging features of collaborative knowledge creation processes.


Author(s):  
P K Sheridan ◽  
P M To ◽  
G J Evans ◽  
D W Reeve

Not available


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorraine Weinrib ◽  
Patricia Paradis

This Special Issue of the Forum is a compilation of articles presented at a Symposium held at the University of Toronto in February 2016 on “The State of Canada’s Constitutional Democracy”. The Symposium was organized by Cheryl Milne (Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights) and Professor Lorraine Weinrib (University of Toronto), and they were later joined by Patricia Paradis (Centre for Constitutional Studies, University of Alberta). Its purpose was to examine the extent to which current Canadian governance is complying with modern constitutional principles.It is the organizers’ hope that the publication of these conference proceedings will broaden and deepen our understanding of the reform projects discussed at the “State of Canada’s Constitutional Democracy” Symposium that lie ahead.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document