An evaluation of factors influencing response to epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy in the PEPITES trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Fleischer ◽  
Sharon Chinthrajah ◽  
Amy M. Scurlock ◽  
Dianne E. Campbell ◽  
Todd D. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Response ◽  
Peanut Allergy ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Specific Ige ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Patch Application ◽  
Epicutaneous Immunotherapy ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Background: Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy is a potential novel immunotherapy that utilizes the unique cutaneous immunologic properties to induce desensitization. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial (PEPITES) in peanut-allergic children 4‐11 years demonstrated an epicutaneous patch (DBV712) with 250 µg peanut protein was statistically superior to placebo in inducing desensitization following 12 months of daily treatment. Objective: To investigate what baseline and in-study factors influenced response to DBV712 250 µg, with a focus on patch adhesion, by posthoc analysis of PEPITES data. Methods: A posthoc multivariate model built with log-transformed Month 12 eliciting dose (ED) as the dependent variable was used to assess the influence of baseline characteristics and patch adhesion. Baseline characteristics and treatment response were also evaluated by stratifying subjects into decile subgroups by patch detachment rates over the 12-month study. Results: Multivariate analysis identified higher baseline ED and lower baseline peanut-specific IgE as the variables most predictive of higher Month 12 ED, followed by mean daily patch application duration, baseline SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score, and age. By decile stratification, no association between patch detachment and treatment response was identified for 80% of DBV712-treated subjects. All DBV712-treated subjects, including those with the highest patch detachment rates, demonstrated treatment benefit measured by fold-changes in geometric mean ED. Conclusion: We identified subject baseline characteristics of higher baseline ED and lower baseline peanut-specific IgE as most predictive of higher Month 12 ED. For the majority of treated subjects, patch detachment did not impact treatment response. A minority of subjects, highly sensitive to peanut at baseline, had lower prespecified responder rates and higher patch detachment rates, yet still benefited from treatment based upon fold-changes in ED.

P300 EVALUATION OF DAILY PATCH APPLICATION DURATION FOR EPICUTANEOUS IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR PEANUT ALLERGY

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
J. Spergel ◽  
D. Fleischer ◽  
E. Kim ◽  
D. Campbell ◽  
T. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peanut Allergy ◽  
Patch Application ◽  
Epicutaneous Immunotherapy

Evaluation of daily patch application duration for epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-284
Author(s):  
David M. Fleischer ◽  
Jonathan M. Spergel ◽  
Edwin H. Kim ◽  
Dianne E. Campbell ◽  
Todd D. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Peanut Allergy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Peanut Protein ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Application Time ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trial ◽  
Patch Application ◽  
Epicutaneous Immunotherapy ◽  
Post Hoc

Background: Epicutaneous immunotherapy is a potential novel immunotherapy that utilizes unique cutaneous immunologic properties. In a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial, an epicutaneous patch (DBV712) with 250 µg of peanut protein applied once daily for 12-months was statistically superior to placebo in desensitizing children with peanut allergy (ages 4‐11 years) (N = 356). Objective: To assess the relationship between the hours of daily application time and the efficacy of DBV712 250 µg. Methods: DBV712 250 µg was applied to 30 nonallergic volunteers for various durations from 2 to 24 hours and then assayed for residual peanut protein. Patch application data from the phase III clinical trial were analyzed post hoc according to prespecified responder rates and changes in the eliciting dose (ED), as measured by the geometric mean (GM) ED ratio (12 months/baseline). Results: Following application, there was a marked decrease in peanut protein on the patches from 2 to 12 hours. After 12 hours, the median peanut protein recovered was below quantification limits. The median daily patch application duration in subjects from the phase III clinical trial was 21.1 hours (DBV712 250 µg) and 22.4 hours (placebo). Ninety-five percent of the treated population achieved >10 hours per day mean application. Response rates and GM ED ratios were similar among subjects across a range of application durations; e.g., in those with a mean duration of >10 hours, the response rate was 36.6% and the GM ED ratio was 3.8, comparable with 42.6% and 4.0, respectively, in those with a mean duration of >20 hours. In DBV712 250 µg subjects with >16 hours mean application duration (84.5% of the treated population), the response rate was 38.8% versus 13.4% for placebo (difference, 24.4% [95% confidence interval, 15.5‐34.0%]; p < 0.001). Conclusion: An evaluation of residual peanut protein on patches following application and post hoc analysis of phase III data strongly suggest that allergen delivery is attained with 12‐16 hours of daily patch application time, sufficient to drive clinically meaningful desensitization to peanut after 12 months.

Epicutaneous Immunotherapy (EPIT) Is Effective and Safe to Treat Peanut Allergy: A Multi-National Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase IIb Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. AB390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh A. Sampson ◽  
Wence Agbotounou ◽  
Claude Thébault ◽  
Ruban Charles ◽  
Laurent Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peanut Allergy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Epicutaneous Immunotherapy

scholarly journals White paper on peanut allergy: treatment pathway

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludger Klimek ◽  
Lars Lange ◽  
Lea Alexandra Blum ◽  
Felix Klimek ◽  
Katja Nemat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peanut Allergy ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Skin Prick Testing ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Specific Ige ◽  
White Paper ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
History Of

Summary Background Peanuts are a member of the legume family (botanical family Leguminosae) and peanut allergies are the most common cause of food anaphylaxis in many countries. The prevalence of peanut allergy is increasing. Methods Experts from Germany and Austria performed a standardized literature search and published their consensus recommendations in a White Paper on Peanut Allergy, which this care pathway is based upon, thus, providing a comprehensive diagnosis and treatment algorithm. Results The most important diagnostic key elements include a detailed clinical medical history, evidence of peanut-specific sensitization by means of skin prick testing and/or in vitro determination of the peanut (extract)-specific IgE and/or the molecular component diagnostics (most important Ara h 2-specific IgE, sometimes also Ara h1-, 3-, 6-, 8- and 9-specific IgE) as well as the gold standard, the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. The diagnostic algorithms were created for the following constellations: Suspected primary peanut allergy with a clear history of systemic immediate-type reaction, suspected primary peanut allergy with questionable symptoms, suspected secondary (possibly pollen-associated) peanut allergy with a history of solely oropharyngeal symptoms and incidental finding of sensitization and no peanut ingestion so far. Conclusions After established diagnosis the standard of care is counseling to avoid peanut contact and prescription of emergency medications (oral antihistamines, oral steroids, inhaled β2-agonists, injectable intramuscular epinephrine) as needed. Instruction on the use of these emergency medications should be provided. A preparation for oral immunotherapy (OIT) for 4 to 17 years old peanut allergic children/ adolescents has been recently approved by the regulatory authorities. OIT for peanut allergy shows high efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, improves quality of life, and health economic aspects. Thus it offers a therapeutic option for peanut allergic children and adolescents.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of a 3-Antigen (Pre-S1/Pre-S2/S) Hepatitis B Vaccine: Results of a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena V Esaulenko ◽  
Aleksey A Yakovlev ◽  
Genady A Volkov ◽  
Anastasia A Sukhoruk ◽  
Kirill G Surkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Antigen Vaccine ◽  
Single Antigen ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Concentration

Abstract Background This study compares the immunogenicity and safety of a 3-antigen (S/pre-S1/pre-S2) hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine (3AV), to a single antigen vaccine (1AV) in adults to support the registration of 3AV in Russia. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, comparative study of 3-dose regimens of 3AV (10 μg) and 1AV (20 µg) in adults aged 18–45 years. We evaluated immunogenicity based on hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibody titers at days 1, 28, 90, 180, and 210, adverse and serious adverse events (SAEs) to study day 210. The primary outcome was based on the difference in rates of seroconversion at day 210 (lower bound 95% confidence interval [CI]: &gt; − 4%). Secondary outcomes were seroprotection rates (SPR), defined as anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-HBs geometric mean concentration (GMC). Results Rate of seroconversion in 3AV (100%) was noninferior to 1AV (97.9%) at study day 210 (difference: 2.1%, 95% CI: −2.0, 6.3%]) but significantly higher at study day 28. SPR at study day 210 was &gt;97% in both arms. Anti-HBs titers were significantly higher at study days 90 (P = .001) and 180 (P = .0001) with 3AV. Sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) had no impact on anti-HBs titers. The rates of local reactions related to vaccination were similar between vaccine arms (3AV vs 1AV) after the first (30% vs 18.8%, P = .15), second (20.0% vs 14.6%, P = .33), and third vaccination (14.9% vs 23.4%, P = .22). No SAEs were reported. Conclusions 3AV was noninferior to 1AV. 3AV induced high SPR, and there were no safety concerns. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04209400.

506 Samelisant: Baseline Characteristics from a Phase 2 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Narcolepsy

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A199-A199
Author(s):  
Ramakrishna Nirogi ◽  
Jyothsna Ravula ◽  
Pradeep Jayarajan ◽  
Satish Jetta ◽  
Gopinadh Bhyrapuneni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Fixed Ratio ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Healthy Humans ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonists/ inverse agonists increase histaminergic neurotransmission and offer a therapeutic option for the treatment of narcolepsy. Samelisant (SUVN-G3031) is a potent and selective H3R inverse agonist exhibited selectivity over 70 other targets. Samelisant showed wake-promoting and anticataplectic effects in orexin knockout mice suggesting its potential therapeutic utility in the treatment of EDS and cataplexy associated with narcolepsy. Safety and tolerability studies in animals and healthy humans suggested a favorable risk/benefit profile. Methods The current study is a 2 week treatment, multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group study in patients with Narcolepsy with or without Cataplexy. Eligibility criteria include age between 18 to 50 years old, an ESS score of ≥ 12; and mean MWT time of &lt; 12 minutes and a confirm diagnosis of narcolepsy as per ICSD-3. Further, the randomization will be stratified according to type of narcolepsy (Type-1 or Type-2). Each subject will receive either placebo or study drug once daily for 2 weeks in a fixed ratio of 1:1:1. The primary efficacy endpoint is change in maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) score from baseline to week 2. Key secondary endpoints include change from baseline to week 2 in ESS and an improvement in CGI-S scores. Safety will be monitored by medical monitor and by an independent data safety monitoring committee. Baseline clinical and demographic data for the currently enrolled study is summarized descriptively. Since the study is blinded, a breakdown of baseline characteristics by treatment group will not be available until after completion. Results As of data cutoff date of Dec 20, 2020, a total of 54 subjects were completed in the study. The median age of subjects was 30 years (range: 18 - 50 years) with mean BMI of 28.6 (range: 18.3 - 43.1 kg/m2). Overall, 74% of subjects were female and 83% were Caucasian. Mean (SD) baseline values of MWT and ESS are 5.65 (3.5) and 16.7 (2.5), respectively. Conclusion Baseline characteristics are consistent with the general narcolepsy population. The study is currently enrolling the subjects with Narcolepsy with or without Cataplexy, and the Data readout is expected in the second half of 2021. Support (if any):

scholarly journals THU0378 DO COMORBIDITIES DECREASE THE FIRST TNF-INHIBITOR RETENTION AND TREATMENT RESPONSE IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS? DATA FROM TURKBIO

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 422-423
Author(s):  
Y. Erez ◽  
A. Karakas ◽  
S. B. Kocaer ◽  
T. Yüce İnel ◽  
S. Gulle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Cerebrovascular Event ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Survival ◽  
Drug Retention ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
The Impact

Background:The frequency of comorbidities has increased in spondyloarthritis patients compared to the general population. The effect of comorbidities on tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) drug retention and treatment response has not been well evaluated.Objectives:The purpose of this study to assess the impact of comorbidities on the first TNFi drug survival and treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) registered in theTURKBIOdatabase.Methods:In this study, the frequency of comorbidities, disease activity scores at baseline and month 6 and drug retention were recorded in AxSpA patients iniating first TNFi treatment between 2011 and 2019. Kaplan Meier plot and log rank tests were used for drug survival analysis. Cox regression analysis with HR was performed to evaluate the correlation between comorbidities and drug survival.Results:There were 2428 patients with AxSpA (39.3% female) who used their first TNFi during the study period. Among them, a total of 770 (31%) had at least one comorbid disease. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (9.7%), followed by the affective disorders (8%) and chronic lung disease (5.8%). The baseline characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.The presence of any comorbidity did not impact the first TNFi retention (Figure 1). When comorbidities were analysed seperately, we found that only history of cerebrovascular event was negatively associated with drug retention rate (HR: 6.9, p:0.008). There was no statistically significant difference in Bath AS Disease Activity Index 50% (BASDAI50) response between patients with and without comorbidity at 6 months. Less axSpA patients with comorbidity achieved a ASDAS score ≤ 2.1 compared to patients without comorbidity at 6 months.Table 1.Baseline Characteristics of PatientsRadiographic Spondyloarthritis, n (%)2318 (95.5)Female, n(%)954 (39.3)Age, year42.2±11.8Age at diagnosis, years32.5± 11.3Age at initial TNFi, years39.4 ± 11.1Symptom duration, years9.7± 7.5Time to initial TNFi, years7±6.8HLA-B27- positivity, n (%)1144 (47.1)Smokers, n (%)1068 (44)Baseline BASDAI35.5±22.2Baseline ASDAS-CRP2.8±1.1Baseline CRP (mg/L)15.7±24.4VAS global patient46.6±28.7-Quantitative variables are presented as mean ± SD, and qualitative variables are presented as frequency and percentage-ASDAS-CRP, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein VAS, visual analogue scaleConclusion:The results of this study demonstrated that the presence of previous cerebrovascular event decreased the first TNFi survival in patients with axSpA. It also suggested that comorbidities might decrease TNFi treatment response.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document