Endoscopic and histologic findings in patients referred for endoscopy by general practitioners in 2008-2013

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Budrewicz

Introduction. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who did not improve with proton pomp inhibitors are at risk of serious diseases and should undergo endoscopy. Aim. The aim of the study was to present endoscopic and histopathologic findings in the esophagus in patients referred by a general practitioners to the Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University in years 2008-2013 with initial diagnosis of GERD, in which the family doctor did not achieve the expected results of the empirical treatment with proton pump inhibitors. Material and methods. The clinical material included 122 patients (51 women and 71 men) aged 55.8 ± 14.1 referred for endoscopy by their general practitioners because of a lack of improvement after empirical treatment. Retrospective analysis of the endoscopic and histologic finding was performed. Results. The most prevalent diagnosis was hernia hiatus oesophagi (n = 41; 33.6%) and the least Barrett’s esophagus (n = 6; 4.9%). In men the most prevalent diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (n = 22; 31.0%) and in women hiatal hernia (n = 24; 47.1%). Near 60% patients were found to have histopathologic abnormalities. The most common finding was oesophageal cancer (n = 22; 18.0%) and the least dysplasia (n = 7; 5.7%). In men the most prevalent diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (n = 21; 29.6%) and in women esophagitis (n = 8; 11.3%) and Barrett’s esophagus (n = 8; 11.3%). Conclusions. 1. Near one quarter of patients with ineffective GERD symptoms treatment, who were referred for endoscopy by family practitioners, has serious endoscopic and histologic diagnosis. 2. Male gender and age above 52 years are risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma. 3. GERD complications are more common in men and benign complications prevail among women.

Author(s):  
Sima Rafiei ◽  
Rafat Mohebbifar ◽  
Mohammad Ranjbar ◽  
Fatemeh Akbarirad

Background: One of the most important methods for improving the fair access of people to health services is the family physician program, which is facing many challenges. One of these challenges is the lack of policymakers' understanding of physicians' preferences regarding the provisions of the family physician contract. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate general practitioners' preferences regarding the type of family doctor contract in one of the underprivileged regions of Iran. Methods: An analytical-cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 general practitioners (GPs) who registered in Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) family physician plan and were working in the health network of deprived regions in Iran. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire was developed by the researchers and then distributed to GPs. Results were analyzed using Ordered Logistic Regression. Data were collected using a questionnaire designed by orthogonal method in SPSS 20. Data analysis was performed using logistic regression model in Stata 13 software. Results: Findings revealed that “type of employer” had the most significant effect on GPs’ preferences (OR = 2.5), followed by “allocating quota for admission to medical specialty courses after 5 years” (OR = 2.25), being allowed to give medical services to population without geographical restriction (OR = 2.8), being allowed to provide services out of the defined service packet (OR =   1.4), and “decreased length of contract” (OR  =  0.93). Conclusion: The amendment of the provisions of the family physician contract in accordance with physicians' preferences increases the probability of their participation in and compliance with the family physician program. However, the compliance of the provisions of this contract with relevant international standards and upstream laws of the country should be maintained as much as possible.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
G. Foreva ◽  
R. Asenova ◽  
M. Semerdjieva

In Bulgaria, the patient is entitled to palliative care in case of incurable disease with an unfavourable prognosis. Palliative care is provided by the family doctor/GP and institutions. Literature on palliative care providing is scarce. The objective of the study was to investigate the opinion of general practitioners, medical students, and other medical specialists working in institutions on palliative care. Method. We have developed a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics have been calculated for all items. Differences between groups have been compared using u-criterion. Level of significance was P<0.05. Data has been analyzed using SPSS v. 16. Results. A total of 518 respondents completed the survey. Lack of appropriate organisation and financing has been pointed out by all participants. The GP’s role in palliative care providing has been described as a contradictory one. The criteria on the basis of which the patients are eligible for palliative care have been arranged in the same way by all respondents, but GPs chose the longest temporal indicator. Quality assessment has not been applied. 2/3 of respondents demanded palliative care training. Conclusion. On the whole, the investigated groups differed to some extent in their opinion on palliative care both on conceptual and practical levels.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 330-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Weimann ◽  
Mathias Zimmermann ◽  
Monica Gross ◽  
Hortense Slevogt ◽  
Anja Rieger ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-217-S-218
Author(s):  
Sachin B. Wani ◽  
Julian A. Abrams ◽  
Steven A. Edmundowicz ◽  
Neil Gupta ◽  
Christine E. Hovis ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 457 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Weimann ◽  
Anja Rieger ◽  
Mathias Zimmermann ◽  
Monica Gross ◽  
Peter Hoffmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document