Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Total Laparoscopic Radical Resection and Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Abstract Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with rectal cancer has not yet been established in Japan. We conducted a non-randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative CRT with S-1, a fixed-dose combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium. Methods: We conducted a prospective, interventional, single-center study. Radiotherapy was administered at a total dose of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy in 25 fractions) for five weeks. S-1 was administered orally for a total of nine weeks (five weeks during and four weeks after radiotherapy) at a dose of 80 mg/m2/day. The endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The required sample size was calculated to be 30 individuals. The characteristics of the 28 patients included were as follows: cStage (II:12/ III:16), median age of 66 years (range 40–77 years), male/female (20/8), and lesion site (Ra-Rb:3/Rb:23/Rb-P:2). Results: Preoperative treatment was completed in 27 patients (96%). Treatment abandon was because of diarrhea. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in only two patients (7%). Clinical downstaging was performed in eight patients (29%). Radical resection was achieved in 27 patients (96%), including 19 (68%) who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. The pCR rate was 11% (three patients). The three-year disease-free survival rate was 79%, and the overall survival was 89%. No local recurrence occurred three years after surgery. Conclusions: Preoperative CRT with S-1 has an acceptable safety profile, and can potentially contribute to preserving anal function in patients with rectal cancer.Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000013598. Registered 1 April 2014, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000015887

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.718001594.793478386 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Sabine Tejpar ◽

Loredana Vecchione

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled

Download Full-text

The risk factors of local recurrence and distant metastasis on pT1/T2N0 mid-low rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-021-02223-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

I-Li Lai ◽

Jeng-Fu You ◽

Yih-Jong Chern ◽

Wen-Sy Tsai ◽

Jy-Ming Chiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Rectal Cancer ◽

Local Recurrence ◽

Distant Metastasis ◽

Resection Margin ◽

Radical Resection ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Low Rectal Cancer ◽

Distal Resection Margin ◽

Lymph Node Yield

Abstract Background Radical resection is associated with good prognosis among patients with cT1/T2Nx rectal cancer. However, still some of the patients experienced cancer recurrence following radical resection. This study tried to identify the postoperative risk factors of local recurrence and distant metastasis separately. Methods This retrospective, single-center study comprised of 279 consecutive patients from Linkou branch of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in 2005–2016 with rectal adenocarcinoma, pT1/T2N0M0 at distance from anal verge ≤ 8cm, who received curative radical resection. Results The study included 279 patients with pT1/pT2N0 mid-low rectal cancer with median follow-up of 73.5 months. Nineteen (6.8%) patients had disease recurrence in total. Nine (3.2%) of them had local recurrence, and fourteen (5.0%) of them had distant metastasis. Distal resection margin < 0.9 (cm) (hazard ratio = 4.9, p = 0.050) was the risk factor of local recurrence. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≥ 5 ng/mL (hazard ratio = 9.3, p = 0.0003), lymph node yield (LNY) < 14 (hazard ratio = 5.0, p = 0.006), and distal resection margin < 1.4cm (hazard ratio = 4.0, p = 0.035) were the risk factors of distant metastasis. Conclusion For patients with pT1/pT2N0 mid-low rectal cancer, current multidisciplinary treatment brings acceptable survival outcome. Insufficient distal resection margin attracted the awareness of risk factors for local recurrence and distant metastasis as a foundation for future research.

Download Full-text

Multimodal Treatment of cT3 Rectal Cancer in a Prospective Multi-Center Observational Study: Can Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Be Omitted in Patients with an MRI-Assessed, Negative Circumferential Resection Margin?

Visceral Medicine ◽

10.1159/000514800 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Henry Ptok ◽

Frank Meyer ◽

Ingo Gastinger ◽

Benjamin Garlipp

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Observational Study ◽

Circumferential Resection Margin ◽

Resection Margin ◽

Anal Verge ◽

Final Analysis ◽

Radical Resection ◽

Distant Recurrence ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽

Recurrence Rates

Background/Aim: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in rectal cancer is associated with significant long-term morbidity. It is unclear whether nCRT in resectable mesorectal fascia circumferential resection margin (mrCRM)-negative rectal cancer treated by adequate total mesorectal excision (TME) is beneficial. The aim was to determine if nCRT can be omitted in patients with MRI-assessed cT3 rectal cancer and a negative mrCRM undergoing good-quality TME. Methods: By means of a prospective nationwide registry (n = 43.147; prospective multi-center observational study), patients with cT3 rectal cancer <12 cm from the anal verge with a negative (>1 mm) MRI-assessed CRM undergoing radical resection from 2006 to 2008 were selected. Overall, 87 patients were available for the final analysis (TME-alone, n = 25; nCRT+TME, n = 62). Groups were balanced for age, sex, and ASA score, with a nonsignificant predominance of males in the nCRT+TME group. As main outcome measures, local and distant recurrence rates were compared between patients undergoing primary surgery (TME-alone) vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation + surgery (nCRT+TME). Results: In the TME-alone group, tumors were located closer to the anal verge (p = 0.018) and demonstrated a smaller minimal circumferential distance from the resection margin (p = 0.036). TME quality was comparable, as was median follow-up (48.9 vs. 44.9 months; p = 0.268). Local recurrences occurred at a similar rate in the TME-alone (n = 1; 5.3%) and nCRT+TME groups (n = 3; 5.5%) (p = 0.994) and were diagnosed at 10 months (TME-alone) and at 8, 13, and 18 months (nCRT+TME). Distant recurrences occurred in 28.9 and 17.4% of the cases, respectively (p = 0.626). The analysis was limited to cT3 cancers with a negative mrCRM. In addition, caution is required when appraising these results because of the limited number of evaluable subjects (especially in the TME-alone group), which adds some uncertainty to the statistical analysis. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with rectal cancer located <12 cm from the anal verge and a negative mrCRM undergoing adequate TME, omission of nCRT had no impact onto the local recurrence rate.

Download Full-text

Coexistence of Perineural Invasion and Lymph Node Metastases Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Radical Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Medical Principles and Practice ◽

10.1159/000363604 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 23 (5) ◽

pp. 465-470 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Chun-Ming Huang ◽

Ching-Wen Huang ◽

Ming-Yii Huang ◽

Chih-Hung Lin ◽

Chin-Fan Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

Perineural Invasion ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Radical Resection ◽

Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Poor Prognostic Factor ◽

Node Metastases

Download Full-text

Clinical Reality and Treatment for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina57030286 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 57 (3) ◽

pp. 286

Author(s):

Michał Jankowski ◽

Manuela Las-Jankowska ◽

Andrzej Rutkowski ◽

Dariusz Bała ◽

Dorian Wiśniewski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Local Recurrence ◽

Rectal Cancer Patient ◽

Radical Resection ◽

Single Center ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Immediate Surgery ◽

Histopathological Results ◽

Isolated Local Recurrence ◽

Recurrence Of Rectal Cancer

Background and Objectives: Despite advances in treatment, local recurrence remains a great concern in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of local recurrence of rectal cancer in our single center over a 7-year-period. Materials and Methods: Patients with stage I-III rectal cancer were treated with curative intent. The necessity for radiotherapy and chemotherapy was determined before surgery and/or postoperative histopathological results. Results: Of 365 rectal cancer patients, 76 (20.8%) developed recurrent disease. In total, 27 (7.4%) patients presented with a local tumor recurrence (isolated in 40.7% of cases). Radiotherapy was performed in 296 (81.1%) patients. The most often used schema was 5 × 5 Gy followed by immediate surgery (n = 214, 58.6%). Local recurrence occurred less frequently in patients treated with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by surgery (n = 9, 4%). Surgical procedures of relapses were performed in 12 patients, six of whom were operated with radical intent. Only two (7.4%) patients lived more than 5 years after local recurrence treatment. The incidence of local recurrence was associated with primary tumor distal location and worse prognosis. The median overall survival of patients after local recurrence treatment was 19 months. Conclusions: Individualized rectal cancer patient selection and systematic treatment algorithms should be used clinical practice to minimize likelihood of relapse. 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by immediate surgery allows good local control in resectable cT2N+/cT3N0 patients. Radical resection of isolated local recurrence offers the best chances of cure.

Download Full-text