scholarly journals Posterior epidural migration of a lumbar disc herniation

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Meryem Himmiche ◽  
Khalid Chakour ◽  
Mohammed El Faiz Chaoui ◽  
Mohammed Benzagmout

Background: Posterior epidural migration of a lumbar disc fragment (PEMLDF) refers to the dorsal migration of disc material around the thecal sac that can lead to radiculopathy and/or cause a cauda equina syndrome. It is rare and the diagnosis is often just established intraoperatively. Case Description: A 50-year-old male with a chronic history of low back pain and psychosis presented with PEMLDF originating at the L4–L5 level. Conclusion: Lumbar disc herniations rarely present as PEMLDF resulting in symptoms varying from radiculopathy to cauda equina syndrome. These should be included among the differential diagnostic considerations for dorsolateral epidural lesions.

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Pretell-Mazzini ◽  
Kudakwashe R. Chikwava ◽  
John Paul Dormans

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xinbo Wu ◽  
Guoxin Fan ◽  
Shisheng He ◽  
Xin Gu ◽  
Yunfeng Yang

Objective. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of two-level percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and foraminoplasty PELD in treating highly migrated lumbar disc herniations. Methods. Patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniations were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2016. Low back pain and leg pain were evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The satisfaction rate of clinical outcomes was assessed according to the modified MacNab criteria. In addition, the intraoperative duration and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results. Forty patients, 14 cases in two-level PELD group and 26 cases in foraminoplasty PELD group, were included. The VAS scores of low back pain (P=0.67) and leg pain (P=0.86), as well as the ODI scores (P=0.87), were comparative between two-level PELD and foraminoplasty PELD groups. The satisfaction rate of clinical outcomes based on the modified MacNab criteria in the two-level PELD group was equivalent to that in foraminoplasty PELD group (92.9% versus 92.3%, P=0.92). In addition, the intraoperative duration of two-level PELD group was longer than that of foraminoplasty PELD group (80.2 ± 6.6 min versus 64.1 ± 7.3 min, P<0.01). The postoperative complications in the two-level PELD group (postoperative dysesthesia: N = 1) were relatively fewer as compared to those in the foraminoplasty PELD group (postoperative dysesthesia: N = 1; recurrence: N = 1; nucleus pulposus residues: N = 1). Conclusions. Both two-level PELD and foraminoplasty PELD are safe and effective surgical procedures for the patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniations. Moreover, the two-level PELD technique has merits in reducing the incidence of postoperative nucleus pulposus residue.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Abdullah Alshammari ◽  
Abdullah Alshammari ◽  
Michael Weber ◽  
Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez ◽  
Susan Ge

Background: Posteriorly migrated epidural disc fragments (PMEDF) presenting with cauda equina syndrome are relatively common. These cases are sometimes inaccurately identified on MRI as; epidural tumors, abscesses, hematomas and or facet cysts. Proper description and identification are key to be able to provide effective and safe management. Currently we are presenting the case of a patient with cauda equina syndrome secondary to a posterior mass compression intraoperatively identified as a PMEDF. Case Description: 45-years-old male presenting with insidious low back pain that progressed to urinary retention and bilateral foot drop. An MRI of the lumbar spine showed a posteriorly located epidural lesion. That appeared to be dependent on a left facet cyst. The patient was treated with a decompressive laminectomy and multiple disc fragments were identified under the ligamentum flavum and over the posterior epidural space. Conclusion: Posterior epidural migration of a lumbar disc fragments (PEMLDF) are not a common presentation of intervertebral disc herniations and their differential diagnosis and treatment might require a different surgical approach; fusion vs decompression. PEMLDFs should be suspected on those patients presenting with sudden cauda equina syndrome and posteriorly located epidural lesions on MRI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 832-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Hoeritzauer ◽  
Matthew Wood ◽  
Phillip C. Copley ◽  
Andreas K. Demetriades ◽  
Julie Woodfield

OBJECTIVECauda equina syndrome (CES) is a surgical emergency requiring timely operative intervention to prevent symptom progression. Accurately establishing the incidence of CES is required to inform healthcare service design and delivery, including out-of-hours imaging arrangements.METHODSA systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus was undertaken to identify original studies stating the incidence of CES, and the estimates were combined in a meta-analysis as described in the protocol registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42017065865) and reported using the PRISMA guidelines.RESULTSA total of 1281 studies were identified, and 26 studies were included in the review. Data about CES incidence were available from 3 different populations: asymptomatic community populations, patients with nontraumatic low-back pain, and patients presenting as an emergency with suspected CES. The incidence of CES was 0.3–0.5 per 100,000 per year in 2 asymptomatic community populations, 0.6 per 100,000 per year in an asymptomatic adult population, and 7 per 100,000 per year in an asymptomatic working-age population. CES occurred in 0.08% of those with low-back pain presenting to primary care in 1 study, and a combined estimate of 0.27% was calculated for 4 studies of those with low-back pain presenting to secondary care. Across 18 studies of adults with suspected CES, 19% had radiological and clinical CES. Difficulties in comparison between studies resulted from the heterogeneous definitions of CES and lack of separation of more advanced CES with retention, which is unlikely to be reversible. In the studies of patients with suspected CES, the small sample size, the high number of single-center studies (18/18), the high number of studies from the United Kingdom (17/18), the retrospective nature of the studies, and the high number of abstracts rather than full texts (9/18) reduced the quality of the data.CONCLUSIONSFrom current studies, it appears that CES occurs infrequently in asymptomatic community populations and in only 19% of those presenting with symptoms. Determining accurate incidence figures and designing a bespoke service for investigation of patients with suspected CES would require a consensus clinical and radiological definition of CES and international multisite studies of patient pathways of investigation and management.


2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Welch ◽  
Peter C. Gerszten

In recent years the general trend in spinal surgery has been one of reductionism and minimalization. A number of techniques have recently been developed that are applicable in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and discogenic pain due to degenerative disc disease. The purpose of this manuscript is to examine two newer percutaneous disc treatment techniques, intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) anuloplasty and nucleoplasty. The authors review the appropriate clinical treatment criteria, techniques, and lessons learned after performing these procedures in more than 100 patients. The IDET involves the percutaneous insertion of a specially designed thermal resistance probe followed by controlled heating of the intervertebral disc. This may result in disc shrinkage and reduction in pain. The nucleoplasty procedure involves the percutaneous removal of disc material by using a low-temperature resister probe to disintegrate and evacuate disc material, followed by thermal treatment of adjacent residual disc material. To date, no study has been published in which investigators examine the outcomes of this procedure for the treatment of radicular leg pain and low-back pain. Both IDET and nucleoplasty appear to be safe procedures. The IDET procedure may be an alternative to lumbar interbody fusion. Although its long-term role is being defined, this technique appears to provide intermediate-term relief of pain in a population of patients with discogenic low-back pain. Nucleoplasty may provide a percutaneous alternative to microdiscectomy in selected cases.


Author(s):  
Godson E. Anyanwu ◽  
Remigius T. Ekwunife ◽  
Emmanuel C. Iyidobi ◽  
Cajetan U. Nwadinigwe ◽  
Henry C. Ekwedigwe ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation is used to describe a spectrum of anatomical abnormalities involving disc extension beyond the interspace. It follows a tear in the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. It is one of the most common causes of low back pain among adults. The study aims to assess the epidemiological pattern of lumbar disc herniations among adults with low back pain in Enugu urban.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study was a prospective study at National Orthopedic Hospital Enugu and Annunciation Specialist Hospital Enugu. Following ethical approval and written informed consent, patients who met the inclusion criteria were consecutively recruited. The MRI scans of the participants were viewed using DICOM® (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) software on laptop computer. The data included the patients’ demographics, functional disability index for back pain, weight, height, the anatomical level(s) and site(s) of the herniated disc among other parameters.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 81 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were included and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. The mean age of the subjects is 52.99±13.13 years. The most common affected age group is 51-60 years (27.2%). Majority of the subjects (68; 84%) had multiple level herniations which usually includes L4 level(74; 91.4%).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> That multilevel lumbar disc herniation is far more common than single level herniation with a prevalence of 84% among adults with low back pain in Enugu urban. That, there is statistically significant association of lumbar disc herniation and increasing age.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
pp. 559-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Greenhalgh ◽  
Carole Truman ◽  
Valerie Webster ◽  
James Selfe

AimTo develop a simple cauda equina syndrome (CES) toolkit to facilitate the subjective examination of low back pain patients potentially at risk of CES. To undertake preliminary validation of the content of the toolkit.BackgroundCES is a rare condition which can be very challenging to identify in a generalist medical setting.MethodA three phase iterative design with two stake holder groups; extended scope practitioners experienced in managing CES patients and CES sufferers.Toolkit developmentSynthesis of existing CES literature with CES patient data generated from in depth interviews.Toolkit validationContent validation of the draft toolkit with CES patients.Toolkit validationContent validation of the draft toolkit with extended scope physiotherapists.FindingsA three arm toolkit has been developed for use with patients considered by the clinician as at risk of developing CES (eg, worsening low back pain with symptoms/signs of progressive sensory-motor deficit in the lower limbs); patient expertise, clinical expertise, research and pathways. Uniquely, the toolkit drew upon the lived experiences of patients suffering from CES to inform the content.


1993 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Michael Mayer ◽  
Mario Brock

✓ Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy is a new technique for removing “contained” lumbar disc herniations (those in which the outer border of the anulus fibrosus is intact) and small “noncontained” lumbar disc herniations (those at the level of the disc space and occupying less than one-third of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal) through a posterolateral approach with the aid of specially developed instruments. The technique combines rigid straight, angled, and flexible forceps with automated high-power suction shaver and cutter systems. Access can thus be gained to the dorsal parts of the intervertebral space where the disc herniation is located. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy is monitored using an endoscope angled to 70° coupled with a television and video unit and is performed with the patient under local anesthesia and an anesthesiologist available if needed. Its indication is restricted to discogenic root compression with a minor neurological deficit. Two groups of patients with contained or small noncontained disc herniations were treated by either percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (20 cases) or microdiscectomy (20 cases). Both groups were investigated in a prospective randomized study in order to compare the efficacy of the two methods. The disc herniations were located at L2–3 (one patient), L3–4 (two patients), or L4–5 (37 patients). There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning age and sex distribution, preoperative evolution of complaints, prior conservative therapy, patient's occupation, preoperative disability, and clinical symptomatology. Two years after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy, sciatica had disappeared in 80% (16 of 20 patients), low-back pain in 47% (nine of 19 patients), sensory deficits in 92.3% (12 of 13 patients), and motor deficits in the one patient affected. Two years after microdiscectomy, sciatica had disappeared in 65% (13 of 20 patients), low-back pain in 25% (five of 20 patients), sensory deficits in 68.8% (11 of 16 patients), and motor deficits in all patients so affected. Only 72.2% of the patients in the microdiscectomy group had returned to their previous occupation versus 95% in the percutaneous endoscopic discectomy group. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy appears to offer an alternative to microdiscectomy for patients with “contained” and small subligamentous lumbar disc herniations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 508-510
Author(s):  
Michelle Angus ◽  
Daniel Horner

A shortcut review of the literature was carried out to examine the association of sexual dysfunction in the context of new-onset low back pain, with cauda equina syndrome (CES). Five papers were identified as suitable for inclusion using the reported search strategy. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the best papers are tabulated. It is concluded that clinicians appear to be poor at recording this feature during assessment, but between 12% and 96%, patients with confirmed CES will report the presence of new-onset sexual dysfunction at presentation when asked. It appears that this can also be a single isolated red flag feature in the context of low back pain and as such should be a mandatory part of any clinical assessment that seeks to evaluate the risk of impending CES.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document